6 CONCLUSIONS
This research study uncovers that farmers who utilize
the Uzhavan app generally hold a positive perception
of it. This positive perception stems from the farmers'
belief in the app's user-friendliness and their
expectations regarding its performance, which
significantly influence their intention to use the app.
Moreover, the availability of necessary conditions
plays a crucial role in determining the actual usage of
the app by farmers. However, it is worth noting from
the qualitative analysis that the presence of
facilitating conditions directly impacts farmers' usage
behavior, and it was identified that some farmers do
not possess smartphones; Consequently, access to
smartphones would enable them to fully utilize the
functionalities offered by the Uzhavan app.
Additionally, through qualitative analysis, it was
observed that certain farmers remain unaware of the
Uzhavan app services, lack of access to smartphones,
and lack of knowledge to operate it. To address this
issue, it is recommended to develop concise videos
that can be easily shared through platforms like
WhatsApp and YouTube, thereby reaching a larger
number of farmers to promote awareness. By
understanding the importance of digital access and
the functionalities of the e-Agriextension platform, all
farmers can benefit from the technological
advancements in agriculture.
As a recommendation, extension officials can
strategize awareness initiatives supplemented with
training sessions for farmers. Based on the findings,
it is recommended that to enhance farmers' effort
expectancy, the Uzhavan app should be rendered
more comprehensible, with supplementary audio
attributes for the farmers who are unable to read.
Further investigation can be conducted on the
extent of influence of the digital tools in agriculture,
especially the influence of the use of Uzhavan app on
farmers' economic and profit efficiency.
REFERENCES
Aker, J. C. (2011). Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of
information and communication technologies for
agricultural extension in developing countries.
Agricultural Economics, 42(6), 631–647.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
Arifin, Z., Anggoro, S., Irianto, H., & Purnaweni, H. (2022).
A Systematic Literature Review : UTAUT Model
Research for Green Farmer Adoption. 12(6).
Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M., & Karetsos, S. (2016).
Studying Mobile Apps for Agriculture. IOSR Journal of
Mobile Computing & Application, 3(6), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.9790/0050-03064449
Davis, K., Ngwenya, B., & Chen, L. (n.d.). ICTs and rural
development: Review of the literature, current
interventions and opportunities for action. International
Journal of Communication.
FAO. (2019). Digital Technologies in agriculture and rural
areas.
Fornell, C., & Larcker F., D. (1981). CLAES FORNELL
AND DAVID F. LARCKER* Evaluating Structural
Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and
Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research,
XVIII(February), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM:
Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and
Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full
collinearity assessment approach. International Journal
of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kumar, A., Saini, P., & Prakash, A. (2023). Design and
Development of Smart Agri app. International Research
Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology
and Science, 5(5), 242–244.
https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2019.8246
Labarta, R., Campos, B., Camacho, G., & López, M. (2011).
Mobile phones and rural livelihoods: Adoption, use,
and impact. Development in Practice. 21(6), 802–812.
Lin, D., Fu, B., Xie, K., Zheng, W., Chang, L., & Lin, J.
(2023). Research on the Improvement of Digital
Literacy for Moderately Scaled Tea Farmers under the
Background of Digital Intelligence Empowerment.
Agriculture (Switzerland), 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101859
Michels, M., Bonke, V., & Musshoff, O. (2020).
Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in crop
protection. Precision Agriculture, 21(6), 1209–1226.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09715-5
Michels, M., Bonke, V., & Mußhoff, O. (2020).
Understanding the adoption of crop protection
smartphone apps: An application of the Unified Theory
of Acceptance and Use of Technology.
Omar, Q., Yap, C. S., Ho, P. L., & Keling, W. (2022).
Predictors of behavioral intention to adopt e-
AgriFinance app among the farmers in Sarawak,
Malaysia. British Food Journal, 124(1), 239–254.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0449
PONTEROTTO, J. G. (2007). an Overview of Coefficient
Alpha and a Reliability Matrix for Estimating
Adequacy of Internal Consistency Coefficients With
Psychological Research Measures. Perceptual and
Motor Skills, 105(7), 997.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.7.997-1014
Qiang, C. Z., Kuek, S. C., Dymond, A., & Esselaar, S.
(2011). Mobile Applications for Agriculture and Rural
Development. December.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0
(beta).