Only under extremely rare circumstances and in
accordance with the Essential Commodities
(Amendment) Ordinance of 2020 may the central
government control the supply of specific food goods
(such as war and famine). Only in the event of a sharp
price increase may agriculture produce stock
limitations be implemented.
1.4 Contract Farming Business Models
Informal model - The promoter and the farmer both
run the risk of defaulting under this arrangement,
which is the most speculative and transient of all
contract farming schemes (van Gent, n.d., p.5). The
interdependence of contract parties or established,
reliable relationships, however, may lessen the
danger of opportunistic behaviour. The CF model's
unique characteristics include:
Small holders and small farms enter into
straightforward, informal seasonal production
contracts.
The effectiveness frequently relies on the
accessibility and calibre of external extension
services.
When embedded services are offered, they are
typically confined to the delivery of basic inputs on
credit and normally only involve grading and quality
control.
Typical products: minimally processed/packaged,
vertically coordinated; for example, fresh produce for
local markets, occasionally also staple crops.
• Intermediary model - In this arrangement,
the buyer subcontracts a middleman
(collector, aggregator, or farmer
organisation) who formally or unofficially
hires farmers (combination of the
centralized/informal methods). Special
features of this CF model include:
o The intermediary buys the crop and
delivers embedded services (often by
passing through services provided by
purchasers against service fees).
o If this model is well-designed, incentive
structures are sufficient, and there are
control mechanisms in place, it can
operate.
o There may be drawbacks to this
paradigm in terms of vertical
coordination and farmer incentives
(buyers may lose control of production
processes, quality assurance and
regularity of supplies; farmers may not
benefit from technology transfer; there is
also a risk of price distortion and reduced
incomes for farmers).
• Multipartite model - This model may have
originated from the centralised or nucleus
estate models, such as after the privatisation
of para-statals. It involves a number of
organisations, including governmental
statutory entities, commercial businesses,
and occasionally financial institutions.
Special attributes:
o Joint ventures between parastatals,
community businesses, and domestic or
foreign investors may be part of this
approach.
o The vertical coordination is at the firm's
choice. The potential for political
influence must get the necessary
consideration.
o In addition, this model might include a
farm-firm structure that is reinforced by
contracts with outside service providers
(e.g. extension, training, credits, inputs,
logistics).
o Farmer organisation and embedded
services (such as credits, extension,
marketing, and occasionally also
processing) may be carried out by
independent organisations (such as
cooperatives).
o This model may involve equity share
schemes for producers.
• Centralized model - In this paradigm, the
customers' engagement might range from
modest input provision (such as the selection
of certain types) to complete control over all
elements of production (e. g. from land
preparation to harvesting). The most typical
CF model, which may be summed up as
follows:
o A vast number of small, medium, or large
farmers are served by the buyer's
sourcing of their products and provision
of services.
o Farmer-contractor relations and
coordination are strictly vertically
organised.
o At the start of the season, the quota,
quality requirements, and delivery
conditions are established.
o The production and harvesting
procedures and standards are strictly