Real-Time Stand-Up Evaluation Using Low-Cost Hardware
Luis Rodriguez-Cobo
1
, Guillermo Diaz-Sanmartin
2,3
, Jose Francisco Algorri
1,2,4
,
Carlos Fernandez-Viadero
4,5
, Jose-Miguel Lopez-Higuera
1,2,4
and Adolfo Cobo
1,2,4
1
CIBER-BBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
2
Photonics Engineering Group, Universidad de Cantabria, Spain
3
Department Communications Engineering, University of the Basque Country, Spain
4
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Spain
5
Psychiatry Service, Marqu
´
es de Valdecilla University Hospital, Spain
Keywords:
Wireless, Load-Cell, Real-Time Monitoring, Sarcopenia, Frailty.
Abstract:
In this study, we’ve equipped an ordinary chair with budget-friendly electronics capable of tracking the tem-
poral distribution of weight changes. This electronic system is specifically crafted to analyze typical human
motions, such as sitting down and standing up. These everyday movements greatly affect different motor
skills, such as walking patterns, the likelihood of falling, and insights into sarcopenia. However, there’s no
precise way to measure the quality of these actions, lacking an absolute standard. To tackle this issue, the
developed analyzer incorporates variables like Smoothness and Percussion, aiming to enhance information
and establish an objective metric in evaluating stand-up/sit-down actions. This approach not only introduces
a more precise assessment but also provides clinicians with additional insights, making the evaluation more
objective and informed.
1 INTRODUCTION
In the past few decades, Europe has undergone a sig-
nificant demographic transition, presenting unprece-
dented challenges in caring for older individuals. Cur-
rent healthcare systems, structured around the con-
ventional medical approach to single acute illnesses,
are largely unprepared to address the complex med-
ical needs of older individuals dealing with often
chronic multimorbidities, geriatric syndromes, and
polypharmacy (Nishimura et al., 2017).
While extending life remains a crucial public
health goal, the preservation of the capacity to live
independently holds even greater significance. Dis-
abling conditions not only burden individuals but also
strain the sustainability of healthcare systems (Linde-
mann et al., 2003).
In this context, the geriatric syndrome of frailty
and potential interventions targeting this condition
have gained particular relevance (Anabitarte-Garc
´
ıa
et al., 2021). The term ’frailty’ in older individu-
als has garnered increasing interest, with various pro-
posed definitions and assessment tools (Pozai et al.,
2016). Despite the efforts of many researchers, a
universally agreed-upon definition and standardized
evaluation methodology are still elusive.
Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of skeletal muscle
mass and strength due to aging, stands out as a major
phenomenon in the aging process and a widely dis-
cussed topic in geriatric literature (Shum et al., 2009).
Shifting the discussion towards the consequences of
sarcopenia, such as reduced functional reserve linked
to movement capacity, may facilitate the development
of a framework and theoretical organization for the
condition. This shift moves from a purely speculative
response to an answer that can be effectively trans-
lated into clinical practice. Only in this case can we
reach a consensus on what needs evaluation and how
to assess it. Such a process is essential for gaining
the endorsement of regulatory agencies, ensuring that
sarcopenia and physical frailty become clinically rec-
ognized conditions and important targets for interven-
tions (Hughes et al., 1994).
People are becoming more aware of sarcope-
nia as a consequence of aging, and it’s linked to a
higher chance of negative outcomes like falls, frac-
tures, frailty, and mortality. Various methods have
been suggested for evaluating muscle mass, strength,
and physical performance in clinical trials. Although
these tools have shown accuracy and reliability in re-
Rodriguez-Cobo, L., Diaz-Sanmartin, G., Algorri, J., Fernandez-Viadero, C., Lopez-Higuera, J. and Cobo, A.
Real-Time Stand-Up Evaluation Using Low-Cost Hardware.
DOI: 10.5220/0012359800003657
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2024) - Volume 1, pages 117-122
ISBN: 978-989-758-688-0; ISSN: 2184-4305
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
117
search settings, applying many of them to everyday
practice isn’t straightforward.
In the present work, a budget-friendly electron-
ics capable of tracking the temporal distribution of
weight changes has been integrated into a chair to ob-
tain relevant data from a commonly human posture:
sitting and standing up. People perform this action
several times throughout the day, and there is a rele-
vant interaction between the quality of these actions
and other motor capabilities (Nishimura et al., 2017)
such as speed and other gait parameters, fall risk (Lin-
demann et al., 2003), or even information on sarcope-
nia (Pozai et al., 2016).
The quality of sitting or standing actions is not
an absolute value, and there is currently no quali-
tative and objective measurement for this parameter.
Time is the most important variable that can be mea-
sured and compared between different samples, but it
is known that the distribution of energy around body
parts can provide an additional source of information
(Shum et al., 2009).
There are many tests that include a sit-
ting/standing task, mainly in older people or in some
types of rehabilitation, usually in relation to lower
body strength or movement (Chow et al., 2019). One
of the most popular is the Timed Up and Go test (Her-
man et al., 2011), which consists of getting up from
a chair, walking several meters, turning 180 degrees,
returning and sitting down again, and measuring the
time spent. Another similar test consists of repeating
the lifting of a chair, and there is a relationship be-
tween the two (Hughes et al., 1994).
However, the analysis of the stand-up/sit-down ac-
tions in the course of these tests still depends on the
experience of the clinical staff, and new methods for
the systematic evaluation of these actions are needed.
Therefore, based on the designed analyzer, different
variables (Smoothness and Percussion) have been de-
fined to provide more information on the process and
allow these measurements to be objectified.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the search for simplicity of use, we propose to use
a routine action (getting up and sitting on a chair) as
an indirect indicator of frailty. The main idea of this
work is to analyze the temporal evolution of weight
transfer from the chair to the feet of the individual
when standing up. Likewise, during the sitting pro-
cess, the opposite transfer will be studied: from the
individual’s feet to the chair. This section describes
both the basic scheme of the proposed analyzer and
the metrics used to quantify this process.
ADC
Figure 1: General description of the proposed device.
2.1 Instrumented Chair
Starting from a standard chair of height 50 cm without
armrests to minimize the influence of the arms during
analysis, four load cells are incorporated to each chair
leg. Also, an electronic system is designed to interro-
gate these load cells with a high sampling frequency
(1kHz) and send the data wirelessly to a control com-
puter that allows synchronization with other systems.
An scheme of the proposed design is depicted below:
Figure 2: Actual images of the prototype: the four compres-
sion load cells are the only contact points with the floor.
BIODEVICES 2024 - 17th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
118
Four high precision FC23 compression load cells
from TE Connectivity company capable of measur-
ing from 0 to 226.80kg (500lbs) are located under
each chair leg. The amplified Wheatstone bridge
signal provided by each sensor is connected to a
four-channel precision Delta-Sigma ADC (analog-to-
digital converter) (ADS1219) capable of operating at
1kHz. With an effective resolution of 20 bits, it pro-
vides the load value of each of the sensors through
the I2C (Inter-Integrated Circuit) bus. The ADC is in-
terrogated by a generic microcontroller of the ESP32
family from Espressif Systems, which is a low-power
system on a chip (SoC) with Wi-Fi and dual-mode
Bluetooth capabilities. It is a dual core microcon-
troller with a clock rate up to 240 MHz which of-
fers enough computational power and connectivity to
implement signal preprocessing algorithms and send
data over wireless.
In order to minimize noise, each measure given
by the microcontroller is the average of 3 correlatives
measures. All the data collected from each leg and the
summation of them are sent via Wi-Fi to an external
application at an effective frequency of 50 Hz. TCP
(Transmission Control Protocol) protocol has been se-
lected for this communication to guarantee that the
data will arrive at the destination without errors and
in the same order in which it was transmitted.
Once the prototype device is completed, a series
of weights in the range of 10kg to 50kg are used to
calibrate the response of each load cell. The device
thus sends the aggregate weight data supported by the
chair via Wi-Fi at a refresh rate of 50hz.
Time
Time
Weight
Weight
Figure 3: Graphic representation of the Smoothness curves.
Pronounced peaks resulting from difficulties in standing
(top). Smooth line without peaks indicating correct stand-
ing (bottom).
Time
Time
Weight
Weight
Figure 4: Graphic representation of the Percussion curves.
Pronounced peak resulting from difficulties in sitting (top).
Smooth curve without peaks indicating correct sitting (bot-
tom).
2.2 Passive Parameters
As mentioned in the introduction, one of the aims is
to create parameters that are capable of objectively
quantifying the information provided by the Smart
Chair, and since in the chair there are mainly two ac-
tions, sitting and standing, we propose a new param-
eter for each action, the Smoothness and the Percus-
sion, respectively.
2.2.1 Smoothness (S)
Smoothness, S, can be defined as a value that pro-
vide information about the body dynamics when it is
standing, and it is related to the number of attempts
a person makes until they can get up. Each attempt
involves an oscillation in the weight curve, and the
magnitude of this oscillation together with the num-
ber of them generates a value of S. Mathematically,
Smoothness can be defined as:
S =
(
1 n = 0
1 K ·C n > 0
(1)
K being a variable that depends on the weight vari-
ations in the period prior to incorporation, with the
form:
K = 1
1
n
·
n
i=1
x
i
w
(2)
where n is the number of minimums registered, x
i
is the value of each one of them, and w is the weight
registered by the scale when the person is sitting at
rest. Finally, C is a value that penalizes the number of
Real-Time Stand-Up Evaluation Using Low-Cost Hardware
119
minimums in the curve, so that if there are many im-
portant fluctuations, the Smoothness is less, and has
the form:
C =
0 n = 1
1 +
n
10
·
1
K 1
1 < n 10
1
K
n > 10
(3)
This means that if the Smoothness is high, stand-
ing is more correct, and if it is low, person has more
difficult to perform it. In addition, if n > 0, S is
highly penalized, and if someone needs more than
ten attempts, Smoothness is zero. On other hand,
the reason a larger minimum is more penalized than
a smaller one is because more energy has been ex-
pended. Therefore, when more energy is expended in
a failed attempt, the penalty is greater.
2.2.2 Percussion (P)
The other theoretical parameter that we propose is
the Percussion, P. In physics percussion refers to the
great force (F
=
inf) exerted on an object at a given
instant (t 0). We use this term to refer to the force
exerted by the human body when the person sits in
the chair in relation to its force while sitting at rest.
In other words, it is a value that relates the relative
weight increase between the weight at rest and the
weight at the time the person sits down, and is de-
scribed by:
P = 1
w
0
w
s
(4)
where w
0
is the weight measures by the chair when
the person is sitting at rest, and w
s
is the weight mea-
sures by the chair at the instant the person is down.
Accordingly, Percussion is strongly related with
the low limbs force. If a healthy person performs
this test, the value of P will be low, since they will
gradually sit in the chair without sudden hits. How-
ever, if the person is not able to maintain his or her
own weight in some point of the action, a peak in the
weight curve will be generate by the hit and the Per-
cussion will be higher. Percussion values values range
from zero to a limit of one. The greater the weight in-
crease with respect to the rest, the greater the value
of the Percussion, whose limit is one for an infinite
increase
2.3 Experimental Setup and Results
The proposed device has been installed into Pho-
tonics Engineering Group facilities at University of
Cantabria. Leaving a free space of several meters in
front of the chair, the chair is placed together with
some marks on the floor in order to perform a refer-
ence test for the analysis of frailty: Timed up and Go
(TUG) (Herman et al., 2011). The TUG consists of
measuring the time it takes a person to get up from
a chair, walk a few meters (3-4m) at his or her usual
pace, turn around, return to the chair and sit down.
In order to establish the usability of the device, a
study was carried out with volunteers without mobil-
ity problems to establish baseline values for the met-
rics developed and compare them with the reference
time of the Timed Up and Go test. In addition, dif-
ferent specific tests have been carried out to test the
detection extremes of the proposed variables.
Figure 5: Simulation of weight change during the stand-up
of a person with reduced mobility. The measured Smooth-
ness for this change is S = 0.11.
2.3.1 Smoothness and Percussion Evaluation
The device has been used to evaluate the get-up
and sit-up of 15 healthy volunteers (13 men and 2
women), within the TUG test whose characteristics
have been summarized in Table 1. As expected, all the
tests performed by the volunteers offer baseline pa-
rameters in accordance with the variable definitions.
BIODEVICES 2024 - 17th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
120
Table 1: Characteristics of 15 volunteers. *Body Mass Index. Percussion and Smoothness are compared to the total time
spent during the Timed Up and Go test.
Age (years) Weight (Kg) Height (m) BMI (Kg/m2) P S TUG time (s)
28 66 1.75 21.55 0.23 1 8.2
31 83 1.82 25.05 0.11 1 9.8
38 74 1.6 28.9 0.25 1 11.8
32 60 1.73 20.04 0.12 1 9.33
44 93 1.78 29.35 0.06 1 9.27
50 64 1.7 22.14 0.31 1 7.03
48 106 1.82 32 0.1 1 9
24 74 1.83 22.09 0.16 1 8.8
25 77 1.78 24.3 0.04 1 9.3
37 95 1.84 28.06 0.09 1 8.03
30 75 1.68 26.57 0.26 1 6.47
34 100 1.84 29.53 0.2 1 7.83
28 72 1.65 26.44 0.13 1 7.73
26 81 1.72 27.37 0.15 1 9.77
69 90 1.69 31.51 0.08 1 10.07
Figure 6: Simulation of weight change during the sit-down
of a person with reduced mobility. The measured Percus-
sion for this change is S = 0.62.
The Percussion variable, associated with the impact
of sitting back in the chair, offers a high granularity
allowing a complementary classification to the total
time spent in the Timed Up and Go test. Smoothness,
on the other hand, offers a warning when the person’s
mobility is quite impaired and needs several attempts
to get up from the chair.
Since Smoothness is a parameter that will always
provide 1 when the monitored persons have a degree
of functional mobility, specific laboratory tests have
been performed simulating scenarios in which a per-
son needs several attempts (3) to finally be able to get
up from the chair. The results of these tests can be
seen in Figure 5.
Laboratory tests have also simulated situations in
which the patient does not correctly control the ac-
tion of sitting back in the chair. A typical situation
for people with mobility problems is that they drop
their body when sitting down, causing a sudden im-
pact against the chair. The Percussion variable reflects
this situation by offering a value higher than the refer-
ence values obtained in the initial tests. This situation
is exhibited in figure 6.
3 SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSIONS
This work presents a new non-invasive device and
method that helps in the determination of the degree
of physical functionality of patients. By using low-
cost electronics, it is possible to obtain reliable and
repetitive information of a widely repeated process
in the daily routine of people: sitting down and get-
ting up from a chair. The proposed device is based
on instrumenting each of the four legs of a common
Real-Time Stand-Up Evaluation Using Low-Cost Hardware
121
chair without armrests with load cells. Using a 32-bit
microcontroller with WiFi communication capability,
the different load cells are interrogated by means of
an analog-to-digital converter and the data is sent to
a control computer. This platform allows us to ob-
tain in real time the weight supported by the chair,
being able to obtain different weight transfer profiles
from the chair to the feet or vice versa. Using this
tool as a basis, two new variables have been defined,
Smoothness and Percussion, which try to provide ob-
jective values complementary to those currently used
in the clinic. Both the device and the defined vari-
ables have been tested in laboratory conditions to ob-
tain reference values for healthy individuals without
mobility problems. Also, trying to find representative
values for each of the variables, specific tests have
been performed simulating that the patient does not
offer a good motor function. Based on all these tests,
it is concluded that both the device and the defined
variables offer greater granularity in the quantification
of standard tests used in clinical settings such as the
Timed-Up-and-Go timing test. In summary, this work
encompasses the design and testing of a easily deploy-
able device in clinical environments. Both the device
and the addressed variables are easy to understand,
allowing for easy integration into the clinical mon-
itoring of patients with various pathologies, even in
tests currently employed such as the Timed-Up-and-
Go. Such potential clinical integration will enhance
the objective information available for assessments of
complex processes, such as motor function, enabling
better monitoring and early detection of critical situa-
tions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by FEDER funds of
European Comission. Also, J.F.A. received funding
from MCIN of Spain under Juan de la Cierva grants.
REFERENCES
Anabitarte-Garc
´
ıa, F., Reyes-Gonz
´
alez, L., Rodr
´
ıguez-
Cobo, L., Fern
´
andez-Viadero, C., Somonte-Segares,
S., del Valle, S. D., Mandaluniz, E., Garc
´
ıa-Garc
´
ıa,
R., and L
´
opez-Higuera, J. M. (2021). Early diag-
nosis of frailty: Technological and non-intrusive de-
vices for clinical detection. Ageing Research Reviews,
70:101399.
Chow, R. B., Lee, A., Kane, B. G., Jacoby, J. L., and Bar-
raco, R. D. (2019). Effectiveness of the “timed up
and go” (tug) and the chair test as screening tools for
geriatric fall risk assessment in the ed. The American
Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Herman, T., Giladi, N., and Hausdorff, J. M. (2011). Prop-
erties of the ‘timed up and go’ test: More than meets
the eye. Gerontology, 57(3):203–210.
Hughes, M. A., Weiner, D. K., and Schenkman, M. L.
(1994). Chair rise strategies in the elderly. Clinical
Biomechanics.
Lindemann, U., Claus, H., and Stuber, M. (2003). Measur-
ing power during the sit-to-stand transfer. European
Journal of Applied Physiology.
Nishimura, T., Arima, K., Okabe, T., Mizukami, S., and
Tomita, Y. (2017). Usefulness of chair stand time
as a surrogate of gait speed in diagnosing sarcopenia.
Geriatr Gerontol Int.
Pozai, T., Lindemann, U., Grebe, A.-K., and Stork, W.
(2016). Sit-to-stand transition reveals acute fall risk
in activities of daily living. IEEE Journal of Transla-
tional Engineering in Health and Medicine.
Shum, G. L., Crosbie, J., and Lee, R. Y. (2009). Energy
transfer across the lumbosacral and lower-extremity
joints in patients with low back pain during sit-to-
stand. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabili-
tation.
BIODEVICES 2024 - 17th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
122