Table 6: Post hoc Mann-Whitney test of red betel leaf (Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav.) extract against Salmonella typhi.
Treatment K (+) K (-) P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
K (+) - 0,014* 0,014* 0,021* 0,020* 0,021* 0,021*
K (-) 0,014 - 1,000 0,014* 0,013* 0,014* 0,014*
P1 0,014* 1,000 - 0,014* 0,013* 0,014* 0,014*
P2 0,021* 0,014* 0,014* - 0,772 0,083 0,021*
P3 0,020* 0,013* 0,013* 0,772 - 0,020* 0,020*
P4 0,021* 0,014* 0,014* 0,083 0,020* - 0,043*
P5 0,021* 0,014* 0,014* 0,021* 0,020* 0,043* -
4 DISCUSSIONS
Red betel leaf extract has an inhibitory response
against Salmonella typhi bacteria but does not have
an inhibitory effect against Streptococcus
pneumoniae bacteria. This is caused by differences in
the cell wall structure of the two bacteria.
Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria are gram-positive
bacteria whose cell walls are composed of PG
(peptidoglycan) so that the cell walls formed are quite
thick and stiff. Meanwhile, Salmonella typhi bacteria
are gram-negative bacteria whose cell walls contain
much smaller amounts of PG (Peptidoglycan) than
Streptococcus pneumoniae, but on the outside there is
an outer membrane which is composed of
lipoproteins and phospholipids and contains
lipopilysaccharides. These bacteria have a thick cell
wall in the form of peptidoglycan, which is located
between the inner membrane and the outer
membrane. This difference makes Salmonella typhi
bacteria more susceptible to being destroyed by
antibacterial agents than Streptococcus pneumoniae,
so that in this study the inhibition zone for Salmonella
typhi was larger than for Streptococcus pneumoniae
(Pratiwi I, 2011)
Various factors such as bacterial population,
temperature, incubation period, antimicrobial
concentration, and the environment around the
microbe can influence antimicrobial activity in vitro.
Researchers are trying to control factors that can be
controlled, for example, choosing the age and
condition of the red betel leaves taken, the process of
making extractions of red betel leaves (Piper
crocatum Ruiz and Pav.) using ethanol as a solvent so
that chemicals that have an antibacterial effect on the
leaves Red betel (Piper crocatum Ruiz and Pav.) can
be polluted. Then, the bacterial population was
standardized by comparing the turbidity with 0.5%
Mac Farland solution. The researchers adjusted the
temperature, culture media and incubation time
according to theory (Kurniawan, 2015).
The antibacterial effectiveness test of red betel
leaf (Piper crocatum Ruiz and Pav.) extract showed
the presence of an inhibition zone which acts as an
indicator of the antibacterial effect. It can be
concluded that the compounds resulting from the
extraction of red betel leaves (Piper crocatum Ruiz
and Pav.) which diffuse into the agar from the well
method are able to inhibit the growth of Salmonella
typhi bacteria but not Streptococcus pneumoniae
bacteria. Erythromycin 500 mg was used as a positive
control and showed an inhibitory zone for the growth
of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria and
Ciprofloxacin 500 mg was used as a positive control
for Salmonella typhi also showed an inhibitory zone
for the growth of the bacteria. Meanwhile, the
negative control, namely distilled water, did not show
any inhibition zone on the Mueller Hinton Agar
media.
In Salmonella typhi, the results of the inhibition
zone formed prove that the greater the concentration
of red betel leaf (Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav.)
extract, the greater the antibacterial activity. This is in
line with research by Rahmayanti Y in 2014 which
stated that the higher the concentration of red betel
leaf (Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav.) extract, the more
antibacterial active ingredients it contains so that the
inhibition zone formed will be larger. Increasing the
concentration of antibacterial compounds is expected
to increase the penetration of antibacterial
compounds into microbial cells.
In this study, there were no inhibitory zone results
for red betel leaf (Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav.)
extract against Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria.
This research is not in line with previous research
conducted by Pratiwi I in 2011 which stated that there
had been results in the form of a reduction in the
number of bacterial colonies by 47.1%. The MIC
result of a concentration of 6.25% also indicates that
this concentration is active in inhibiting
Streptococcus pneumoniae. This may be because the
concentration of the extract used must be higher and