Admission and discharge are the areas that bed
management can most influence and thus there is a
large focus on both areas. Destino et al., 2019; Cho
et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2017; Mustafa and Mahgoub,
2016, all cover initiatives to improve early discharge
by focusing on process change and record the effects
of these changes. However, James et al., 2019 and
Rachoin et al., 2020, both suggest that the impact on
Length of Stay (LOS) holds true for surgical patients
but not for medical patients.
Given that a multidisciplinary team is responsi-
ble for discharge, shared information is key to man-
aging and streamlining the process. This was high-
lighted in the studies above, where communication
was a key factor contributing to the initiatives. Paper-
based, mostly manual systems do not lend themselves
to easy communications of status and create an over-
head making the initiatives difficult to sustain.
2.2 Modelling
Bed management can be aided by modelling tech-
niques. Modelling is very dependent on historic data
to train and test the models and paper based systems
do not lend themselves to easy extraction of the data,
as input to models. Thus the capture of electronic data
allows for shared information for management on a
day by day basis. Additionally, these systems allow
gathering of data over a period of time, which can be
used to model and predict patient patterns to improve
patient throughput.
2.3 Partner Hospital
The main computer based record system in the part-
ner hospital is the Hospital Information System (HIS),
primarily an ordering and billing system. The HIS is
used to capture patient details when presenting for ad-
mission and updated sometime after patient discharge
to show the bed available again. Until this happens,
the bed is not available to other patients.
The current bed management system is paper-
based and manual and to a large extent memory-less,
in that each day a new paper model is populated
from the HIS and the previous day’s transactions for-
gotten. This does not lend itself to easy review of
previous transactions to determine how the current
method could be improved or made more efficient.
The memory-less system limits discussion as the in-
formation and lessons learned rests with individuals
and are not easily shared.
The HIS is not used by staff as a first point of call
to get visibility of patients in the hospital relying in-
stead on word of mouth or walking the wards. Re-
quests for beds to be renewed are made directly to the
Housekeeping staff on the ward. This contributes to
the creation of information silos and a lack of real-
time information. This lack of a shared view of the
hospital occupancy, limits the visibility to a per ward
basis, and inhibits administration of bed management
on a whole hospital basis, creating inefficiency.
3 DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM
FOR BED MANAGEMENT
This section describes the development of the appli-
cation. Being based in the hospital allowed access
to clinical, administrative and housekeeping staff to
gain a fundamental understanding of the hospital op-
eration.
3.1 Requirements Gathering
An understanding of what was required was largely
developed from documenting the high-level processes
associated with the normal hospital operation, the pa-
tient pathways and supporting processes. Addition-
ally, commercially available systems were examined.
Most fell short of something that could be easily in-
tegrated into the hospital and the development of a
bespoke system was undertaken.
Requirements gathering was primarily influenced
by discussions with the Hospital Manager and the Bed
Manager. In addition to the Bed Manager, the role
was covered, outside of core hours, by the Assistant
Director of Nursing (ADON) and their input was cap-
tured also. The Clinical Nurse Manager (CNM) for
the Dayward covered bed allocations for that ward
and contributed to the requirements. Interviews with
staff, shadowing some roles and observing the hos-
pital functioning all contributed to understanding the
requirements for data capture. Review of the commer-
cially available systems created a focus on developing
a coherent system to manage the patient along the pa-
tient pathway while highlighting the bed renewal re-
quirement and recording its completion.
Of note is that the bed renewal process involves
both Housekeeping and Healthcare Assistant (HCA)
staff. Bed renewal is complete when both roles com-
plete their respective tasks.
A goal was to minimise any overhead a new sys-
tem would impose, while providing benefit in terms
of visibility. A series of screen mock-ups were cre-
ated as a basis for discussion and feature definition
with the Hospital Manager and Bed Manager. Sub-
sequently a series of Hypertext Markup Language
Bed Management System Development
377