Impact of G20 on High Cost of Funds and Legal Risk in Credit
Rescue
Khalimi
1
and Eri Eka Sukarini
2
1
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Indonesia
2
Universitas Wiralodra Indramayu, Indonesia
Keywords: G20, Cost of Funds, Credit Rescue, Legal Risk.
Abstract: Facing economic and monetary problems cannot be done alone for developing and developed countries, so
that the Group of 20 (G20) Presidency was formed. The G20 forum in building an agreement on economic
and monetary cooperation which held in November 2022 in Bali, will play a major role in realizing
interstate life and creating prosperity. Indonesia prepared various strategies to be aware of potential crises.
The increase in interest rates became a threat in the country. Based on the IMF's World Economic Outlook,
global economic growth is getting weaker. The type of research used is doctrinal/normative legal research.
This research is descriptive-analytic in nature by presenting a complete picture of the impact of the G20 on
the high cost of funds for bank loan interest and how the legal impact on credit rescue is. The type of data
used is secondary data. The data collection technique used is through literature study, for further analysis of
this matter by using non-statistical data analysis techniques with a qualitative approach. In conclusion, the
increase in loan interest rates due to the large cost of funds has an impact on high congestion, so that there is
a legal impact in efforts to save credit.
1 INTRODUCTION
The G20 launched a comprehensive program of
reforms to enhance the global resilience of the
financial system while maintaining its open and
integrated structure. We admit, the results of the
G20 are implemented and continue, but it is felt that
it is not optimal, including financial institutions that
are not yet strong, capital and liquidity standards
have not been measured properly. On the other hand,
the impact of the G20, especially in Indonesia,
shows that higher resilience has been achieved, as
evidenced by the well-running supply of credit to the
real economy. Growth in total credit and bank
lending has returned in all regions, albeit at a
different pace. Monetary policy has been very
accommodative and has contributed. Nonetheless,
financial authorities must remain vigilant to
maintain an open and integrated global financial
system. International bank lending, particularly by
European banks, has declined since the crisis and its
structure has shifted towards more stable regionally
funded loans. Financing through international debt
markets has continued to grow, and there is greater
use of global infrastructure for trading, clearing and
settlement. Nonetheless, the geographic risk of
market fragmentation remains and should be
monitored. Reduction of market liquidity in normal
times and reforms can result in financial stability
problems.
The existence of significant changes in various
financial activities, it turned out to be untenable. The
effect of the high cost of funds has resulted in banks
channeling their loans at high interest rates, which is
not conducive to debtors, especially the business
world. Continued support from G20 leaders is
needed to fully implement the agreements that have
been made. Global regulatory cooperation should be
strengthened by revising the legal framework to
facilitate cooperation, for example information
sharing on resolutions and removing legal barriers to
promote full and consistent application of standards
to support reducing the chances of multiple
regulations. Further support for the G20 presidency,
by issuing a regulation to provide easy access to
credit, reasonable interest charges, as well as
facilitating banks to obtain third party fund owners
with low cost of funds. In this way, banks are not
faced with the problem of bad loans due to high cost
of funds.
Khalimi, . and Sukarini, E.
Impact of G20 on High Cost of Funds and Legal Risk in Credit Rescue.
DOI: 10.5220/0011887500003582
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar and Call for Paper (ISCP) UTA â
˘
A
´
Z45 Jakarta (ISCP UTA’45 Jakarta 2022), pages 57-60
ISBN: 978-989-758-654-5; ISSN: 2828-853X
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
57
Nuryani's research (2022) conveys the results
that the higher the cost of funds and the amount of
credit disbursed, the lower the return on assets. Vice
versa, the lower the cost of funds and the amount of
credit disbursed, the lower the return on assets.
Yuliana's research, Dwi Ari Pertiwi (2020) said that
the loan interest rate variable had a significant
positive effect on the profitability variable. While
the variable number of customers has a significant
negative effect on the profitability variable. In
relation to the G20, the research results of Ratna
Kartika Dewi (2014) stated that in overcoming the
US and European Union financial crises, developed
countries were highly committed to priority agendas,
while developing countries did not show high
compliance like developed countries.
1.1 Cost of Funds and Credit
The definition presented by the Financial Services
Authority (OJK), the cost of funds is a certain
number of costs that must be incurred by banks or
financial institutions, because they have used money
sourced from other parties, such as customers or
banks. The factors that affect the cost of funds are
the interest rate paid, the composition of the
portfolio of sources of funds, provisions regarding
the reserve requirement, service costs to obtain
funds (service cost), interest tax and years of
efficiency.
There are many definitions of the cost of funds,
among them according to Rivai (2007:669) is the
interest paid by the bank on the funds successfully
collected by the bank from various sources. Fees that
must be paid by a financial institution or bank for
the use of money that comes from other parties
(customers and or banks). The cost of funds in a
bank is the basis for determining loan interest rates
after calculating the expected profit including
administrative costs and other costs (cost of funds).
The cost of bank funds is a cost that must be paid by
the bank for each fund that has been successfully
collected from various sources, before being
deducted by the minimum mandatory liquidity
(requrement) that the bank must always maintain. In
contrast to the opinion of Taswan (2010: 188), the
cost of funds is a direct cost incurred to obtain every
rupiah, the funds raised include non-operational
funds (unloanable funds), such as reserve
requirements to meet Bank Indonesia regulations.
The effect of the cost of funds for loans that have an
inverse correlation also becomes parallel because the
higher the cost of funds and the amount of credit
disbursed, the lower the return on assets. Vice versa,
the lower the cost of funds and the amount of credit
disbursed, the lower the return on assets.
The cost of funds became the initial trigger factor
for the movement of credit performance which was
monitored from several aspects, both in terms of
credit quality, list of non-performing loans, as well
as ratios to measure the health of banks. Sources of
bank funds that are lent to the public in the form of
credit are not from the bank's own funds because
bank capital is also limited, but are public funds
stored in banks. Banks try to compete to attract
funds to collect public funds so that they are willing
to save their funds with various lotteries or attractive
facilities. Maintaining customer trust is the bank's
obligation because customer deposits are a source of
profit, customer is a king. The role of the Asset
Liquidity Committee (ALCO) team is very
important in managing and anticipating liquidity
between funds lent in the form of credit and funds
originating from the public (Sutarno 2004:3).
Regarding third party funds, Veitzal Rivai
(2007:413) defines funds as funds obtained from the
community, in the sense of the community as
individuals, companies, governments, households,
cooperatives, foundations and others both in rupiah
and foreign currencies. foreign. According to
Muljono (2006:153), third party funds are funds
collected from the community will be used for
funding the real sector through lending. These third
party funds are collected by the bank through a
variety of fund products offered to the general
public, who put their trust in the bank concerned to
save their money and then withdraw it at maturity in
return for interest and capital gains from the bank.
Loans granted due to expensive sources of funds
affect the amount of interest charged to customers.
For commercial banks, of course, before channeling
public funds, they must have sufficient sources of
funds in their operations so that credit can be given
properly in order to obtain the expected income.
Retnadi (2006:105) states, the ability to channel
credit for the bank is strongly influenced by the
ability of the bank to collect public funds (Third
Party Funds) to the fullest. Funds collected from the
public (Third Party Funds) are the largest and most
reliable source of funds by banks (Dendawijaya,
2005). The bank's activity after collecting funds
from the wider community is to redistribute these
funds to people who need them, in the form of loans
or better known as credit. So that from the
distribution of credit, the bank will get a profit
which is income for the bank. This is also in
accordance with the theory put forward by Kasmir
(2011: 43) which suggests that funds from the public
ISCP UTA’45 Jakarta 2022 - International Seminar and Call for Paper Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
58
collected in banks play a very important role as a
source of funds that can affect the ability of banks to
provide credit to the public. By increasing the ability
to channel credit, the bank's income will also
increase. In relation to credit distribution, bank
income is income derived from interest income,
administration fee income, fees and commission
income and other income as a result of bank
transactions. From the results of this credit loan, the
bank can generate income which is called operating
income. In addition to operating income, the bank
also obtains non-operating income from activities
outside the bank's main business, such as income
from the sale of fixed assets. BI as the monetary
authority stipulates provisions for standardizing the
ability to generate income. A healthy bank is the
ability of a bank to carry out normal banking
operations and be able to fulfill all its obligations
properly in ways that are in accordance with
applicable banking regulations (Kasmir 2008:41).
This is also related to the efficiency and ability of
banks to carry out operational activities, with cost
efficiency, the income obtained by the bank will be
even greater (Dendawijaya, 2005: 120).
The imposition of large interest will also have an
impact on the ability of the debtor to repay his
credit. For banks as creditors, credit interest will be
the main source of income from their invested
productive assets, other than in the form of interbank
assets, but for debtors, high interest payments, even
though as a consequence of the credit agreement, are
worthless expenses if they are not accompanied by
principal payments. The end of the problem, the
debtor's principal balance does not decrease, the
bank's income from interest factors contributes to
generating profits, but the health of the bank on
credit quality becomes unhealthy. If this happens,
the bank will try to save credit in various ways,
either through rescheduling, reconditioning or
restructuring. Efforts to save credit in the midst of
deteriorating global economic conditions are
meaningless as the result of the Russo-Ukrainian
war also has a negative impact, especially on
Indonesian banks. Geopolitical tensions have
resulted in increased prices for energy, food, and
fertilizers. As a result, inflation in a number of
countries has soared. To anticipate this, several
banks have tightened credit by increasing interest
rates due to the difficulty of obtaining third party
funds. On the other hand, this can also slow down
economic growth. In fact, some countries are in
danger of falling into a recession.
The global economic situation is becoming more
challenging and it is no exaggeration to say that the
world is in danger. Legal risks in credit rescue
include repeated credit rescues so that credit quality
performance looks good and even credit
capitalization in the sense of pooling arrears of
interest with loan principal into new loan principal.
This strategy was carried out because of the
openness of tolerance as a result of over-machting to
face a critical economic crisis, as happened in the
case of the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance
(BLBI) in 1998. Taking advantage of the crisis
momentum with procedures or processes that
violated the provisions of the Financial Services
Authority in carrying out rescue operations. credit, is
a banking crime.
2 CONCLUSION
Based on the results of research and discussion, it
can be stated conclusion as follows:
1. Third party funds have a positive influence on
lending, but have the potential for problems if
the cost of funds is high so that loan interest is
also high;
2. Credit rescue carried out by banks is not in
accordance with procedures and taking
advantage of crisis situations for credit quality
performance to be healthy, is not a reason not
to be categorized as a banking crime.
3 SUGGESTIONS
1. Even though the bank is in a state of lack of
liquidity for credit expansion, the cost of
funds must be calculated carefully because it
has an impact on the amount of interest
charged to debtors.
2. Credit rescue in any situation must be in
accordance with procedures so as not to
appear as the use of crisis time as an excuse
that results in bank losses (moral hazard)
leading to banking crimes.
REFERENCES
Dendawijaya, L. 2005. Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta :
Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
Kasmir. 2010. Manajemen Perbankan, Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Kasmir. 2011. Dasar-dasar Perbankan.Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Impact of G20 on High Cost of Funds and Legal Risk in Credit Rescue
59
Retnadi, D. 2006. Perilaku Penyaluran Kredit Bank. Jurnal
Kajian Ekonomi 2006.
Sutarno. 2004. Aspek-aspek Hukum Perkreditan pada
Bank, Alfabeta CV, Bandung,
Taswan. 2006. Manajemen Perbankan. Upps tim Ykpn
Yogyakarta : Yogyakarta.
Veithzal Rivai. 2006. Credit Manajemen Hand Book. PT
Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 tahun
1992
tentang Perbankan.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun
1998 tentang Perbankan.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun
2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
http://repository.ekuitas.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789
/412/BAB%202.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
https://kamus.tokopedia.com/b/biaya-dana/
Implementation and Effects of the G20 Financial
Regulatory Reforms 3 July 2017 3rd Annual Report
https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P030717-2.pdf
ISCP UTA’45 Jakarta 2022 - International Seminar and Call for Paper Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
60