Figure 2: Pros and cons of introducing a carbon tax. 
Taxes  allow  industries  to  find  the  most  cost-
effective ways to reduce carbon emissions. This is a 
better  alternative  to  a  market  economy  than 
government  regulation.  The  carbon  tax  also 
contributes  to  economic  growth.  For  example,  the 
carbon tax in Sweden has reduced emissions by 26% 
over  the  past  27  years.  During  the  same  period,  its 
economy grew by 78% (Kanunnikova, 2021). 
However,  the  disadvantages  of  introducing  a 
carbon tax should also be disclosed. As noted above, 
the carbon tax is  regressive, and when gasoline and 
gas prices rise, these high percentages will become a 
heavy burden for the population who will not be able 
to switch to "Green Technologies", that is, everyday 
things  will  become  inaccessible  to  them.  Based  on 
this, it is necessary to introduce a carbon tax gradually 
so that people get used to the fact that prices will only 
rise and look for alternative options. 
The  European  Union  also  announced  the 
"European  Green  Course",  which  aims  to  create  a 
climate–neutral EU economy by 2050. As one of the 
measures, it is planned to introduce a carbon tax on 
imports to EU countries. If everything is implemented 
according  to  the  plan,  importers  will  have  to  buy 
carbon certificates corresponding to the carbon price 
that  would  be  paid  in  the  EU  if  the  goods  were 
produced locally. The EU has proposed to introduce 
a tax on  imported  carbon-intensive products, which 
will  determine  the  role  of  trade  in  the  fight  against 
climate  change  (The  EU  introduces  a  carbon  tax. 
What is its essence and how it works: Ecology News. 
https://finance.rambler.ru/).  These  measures  are 
causing  controversy  among  EU  trading  partners, 
some of whom consider it "green protectionism". At 
best,  the  proposed  carbon  tax  should  promote  a 
common  understanding  of  carbon-based  trade 
policies,  maximizing  both  environmental  and 
economic benefits (Kamilova). 
Reducing carbon emissions into the atmosphere is 
a global trend, not just a whim of the European Union. 
For example, China, Japan and South Korea declare 
carbon neutrality as a national goal (Burko, 2013). As 
emission  control  practices  are  implemented  in 
different countries, the establishment of cross-border 
regulations will become more likely. 
In order for exporting countries to survive in the 
"green"  market,  it  will  be  necessary  to  create  their 
own  state  system  of  accounting  and  evaluation  of 
carbon  gas,  develop  tariffs,  as  well  as  a  system  of 
incentives for enterprises that have abandoned the use 
of  carbon  gas,  thereby  minimizing  possible  climate 
damage  (Kanunnikova,  2021).    Only  in  this  case, 
when the state responds promptly to rapidly growing 
changes  in  all  areas  of  the  world  market,  it  will  be 
possible  to  maintain  the  competitiveness  of  the 
country, as well as ensure sustainable development. 
4  CONCLUSIONS 
The essence and importance of the "Green" economy 
lies in the fact that it contributes to a more sustainable 
and  low-carbon economy. In  order  to  stimulate this 
area,  it  is  necessary  to  constantly  look  for 
mechanisms and tools, one of which is the carbon tax. 
The  introduction  of  a  carbon  tax  has  both 
advantages and disadvantages. 
The  Russian  economy  is  not  ready  for  such 
structural shifts as the introduction of a carbon tax, as 
it will have to revise all directions, starting with the 
regulatory and legislative framework. 
However,  it  cannot  fail  to  react  to  the  changes 
taking place around the world, since the cross-border 
tax  introduced  in  the  EU  countries  will  primarily 
negatively  affect  the  Russian  economy  and  its 
competitiveness. 
REFERENCES 
Sleptsova, E.V., Glubokaya, Ya. Ya., 2021. Analysis of the 
experience of using financial  instruments  to  stimulate 
"green" technologies. Economics and Business: theory 
and practice. 4-2.  
Kanunnikova, K. I., 2021. Formation of a "green" economy 
in Russia. Skif. 5 (57).  
Positive:
•Added value reduces 
emissions, 
motivating 
consumers to seek 
cleaner energy;
•Accelerates 
economic growth 
due to a significant 
increase in 
government 
revenues;
•Funds of agencies 
managing the effects 
of climate change 
are increasing.
Negative:
•The carbon tax is 
regressive;
•Its sudden increase 
shocks the economy;
•Punishes those who 
cannot switch to 
alternative forms of 
energy. Often these 
are city-forming 
enterprises.