Systematic and Ecological-cenotic Analysis of Poisonous Plants of the
Chechen Republic
Z. I. Iriskhanova, M. A.Takaeva and L. G. Molochaeva
Chechen State University, Grozny, Russia
Keywords: Poisonous plants, species, genus, family, florocenoelement, phytocenosis, phytocoenoecology.
Abstract: In this communication, an ecological-cenotic analysis of medicinal plants of the Chechen Republic is given.
This report provides a systematic and ecological-coenotic analysis of poisonous plants in the Chechen
Republic. The list of studied species is given. These studies were carried out on the basis of the processing of
herbarium materials and field observations of the authors. Poisonous plants are found among various
systematic groups: horsetails, club mosses, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms.
1 INTRODUCTION
Poisonous plants are plants that produce and
accumulate poisons in the process of vital activity that
cause poisoning of animals and humans. More than
10 thousand species of poisonous plants are known in
the world flora, mainly in the tropics and subtropics.
There are many of them in countries with temperate
and cold climates, more than 300 species are found in
Russia (Orlov, 1990).
Medicinal poisonous plants have been used for
centuries, and many cultures still rely on native plants
to meet their basic health needs. Poisonous medicinal
plants are used to treat various diseases and may have
antidiabetic, anti-cancer, antibacterial, antifungal and
cytogenetic properties.
2 MAIN PART
This study was conducted in the Chechen Republic in
the period from June 2019 to June 2021The research
is based on the analysis of field studies and
observations of the authors. Route-geobotanical,
route-floristic methods were used. The purpose of this
review is to provide a report on the systematic and
ecological-cenotic analysis of poisonous plants of the
republic.
To confirm the stated information, a study of the
scientific literature was conducted. A total of 58 plant
species belonging to 41 genera and 23 families were
identified as poisonous plants. The systematic
spectrum of this group of plants is shown in Table 1.
Most of the representatives of these plant species
are plants of the Papaveraceae Juss., Euphorbiaceae
Juss. numbering 6 species (10.34%). The second
place is occupied by plants of the family Solanaceae
Juss., Asteraceae (5 species, 8.62%). In third place
are representatives of the families Equisetaceae Rich.
ex DC, Helitropiaceae, Cucurbitaceae Juss. there are
4 species each (6.9%). Then in decreasing number of
species are the families Caprifoliaceae Juss.,
Rhamnaceae Juss., Cucurbitaceae Juss. (3 species
each, 5.17%), Dryopteridaceae China (Aspidiaceae)
(2 species, 3.45%), family Huperziaceae Rothm.,
Takhaseae S. F. Gray, Cupressaceae Rich. ex Bartl.,
Ephedraceae Dumort, Thymelaeaceae Juss.,
Peganaceae Engl.Tiegh., Cannabaceae Endl.,
Cannabaceae Endl., Chenopodiaceae Vent.,
Melanthiaceae Batsch, Rutaceae Juss.,
Convallariaceae Horan. (1 species each, 1.72%).
The largest genus Euphorbia (Tithymalis) has 5
species, the genus E guisetum, Heliotropium - 4
species, the genus Senecio - 3 species. The vast
majority of genera of poisonous plants contain one
species, there are 11 such genera. There are 4 genera
of two species each.
Representatives of poisonous plants of the
Chechen Republic are components of various
phytocenoses. The studied species belong to different
plant groupings, representing natural
florocenoelements. That is, they are ecologically
different, more or less constantly confined to certain
phytocenoses.
Iriskhanova, Z., A.Takaeva, M. and Molochaeva, L.
Systematic and Ecological-cenotic Analysis of Poisonous Plants of the Chechen Republic.
DOI: 10.5220/0011568300003524
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Methods, Models, Technologies for Sustainable Development (MMTGE 2022) - Agroclimatic Projects and Carbon Neutrality, pages
189-192
ISBN: 978-989-758-608-8
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
189
When analyzing poisonous plants according to the
ecological-cenotic parameter, we identified 11
florocenoelements, the spectrum of which is given in
Table 2. The number of florocenoelements in the flora
is always greater than the number of species, which
manifests their ecological plasticity. This position is
confirmed by many researchers of the flora of the
North Caucasus, who analyzed regional flora
(Galushko, 1975; Galushko, 1976; Galushko, 1980;
Ivanov, 1996; Ivanov, 1998; Shkhagapsoev, 2002;
Khrustalev, 1991) (fig. 1-2).
There are 16 types of forest florocenoelements
(22.22%). These are such types as Hupérzia selágo
Table 1: Systematic spectrum of poisonous plants of the Chechen Republic.
No. Family Number of
species
%
1 Pa
p
averaceae Juss. 6 10.34
2 Eu
p
horbiaceae Juss. 6 10,34
3 Solanaceae Juss. 5 8,62
4
A
steraceae 58,62
5 Equisetaceae Rich. ex DC 4 6,9
6 Helitropiaceae 46,9
7
Ap
iaceae Lindl. 4 6,9
8 Ca
p
ri
f
oliaceae Juss. 3 5,17
9
R
hamnaceae Juss. 3 5,17
10 Cucurbitaceae Juss. 3 5,17
11 Dryopteridaceae China (
A
spidiaceae) 2 3,45
12 Fabaceae Lindl. 2 3,45
13 Hu
p
erziaceae Rothm. 1 1,72
14 Тахасеае S. F. Gra
1 1,72
15 Cupressaceae Rich. ex Bartl. 1 1,72
16 Ephedraceae Dumort 1 1,72
17 Thymelaeaceae Juss. 1 1,72
18 Pe
g
anaceae En
g
l.Tie
g
h. 11,72
19 Cannabaceae Endl. 1 1,72
20 Cheno
p
odiaceae Vent. 1 1,72
21
M
elanthiaceae Batsch 1 1,72
22
R
utaceae Juss. 1 1,72
23 Convallariaceae Horan. 1 1,72
Total 58 100
Figure 1: Structure of poisonous plants in the flora of the Chechen Republic.
6
6
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Papaveraceae Euphorbiaceae
Solanaceae Asteraceae
Equisetaceae Helitropiaceae
Apiaceae Caprifoliaceae
Rhamnaceae Cucurbitaceae
Dryopteridaceae Fabaceae
Huperziaceae
Тахасеае
Cupressaceae Ephedraceae
Thymelaeaceae Peganaceae
Cannabaceae Chenopodiaceae
Melanthiaceae Rutaceae
Convallariaceae
MMTGE 2022 - I International Conference "Methods, models, technologies for sustainable development: agroclimatic projects and carbon
neutrality", Kadyrov Chechen State University Chechen Republic, Grozny, st. Sher
190
(L.) Bernh. ex Schrank et C. Mart., Еguisetum
fluviatile L., Dryopteris filix–mas (L.) Schott.,
Dryopteris assimilis S.Walker, Taxus baccata L.,
Melilotus albus Mediс., Peganum harmala L.,
Heliotropium suaveolens Bieb., Heliotropium
ellipticum Ledeb., Conium maculatum L., Aethusa
cynapium L., Frangula alnus Mill., Ricinus
communis L.s.l., Tithymalis helioscopius (L.) Scop.,
Atropa caucasica Kreyer (A. bella-donna L.),
Convallaria transcaucasica Utkin ex Grossh. (C.
majalis L.) (Umarov, 2011).
There are 6 types of lowland florocenoelements
(8.33%). These are such types Еguisetum palustre L.,
Sambucus nigra L., Cannabis ruderalis Janisch.,
Euphorbia humifusa Schlecht., Tanacetum vulgare
L., Pyrethrum coccineum (Willd.) Worosch
(Umarov, 2011).
Subalpine florocenoelements are part of
subalpine meadows, there is only 1 species (1.39%).
This is Heraculum sibiricum L. (Umarov, 2011).
There are 1 species of Alpine
florocenoelements (1.39%). This is Heraculum
sibiricum L. (Umarov, 2011).
There are 3 types of steppe florocenoelements
(4.17%). These are such types as Daphne mezereum
L., Papaver rhoeas L., Papaver bracteatum Lindl.
(Umarov, 2011).
There are 2 types of calcepetrophilic
florocenoelements (2.78%). These are such types as
Juniperus sabina L., Ephedra distachia L. (Umarov,
2011).
There are 1 type of psammophilic elements
(1.39%). This is Ephedra distachia
L. (Umarov,
2011).
Argillophilic florocenoelements living on clay
substrates, only 1 species (1.39%). This is Papaver
arenarium Bieb. (Umarov, 2011).
Hygrophilic florocenoelements live in places
with increased soil moisture. There are 2 such species
(2.78%): E guisetum palustre L., Eguisetum pratense
Ehrh. (Umarov, 2011).
There are 7 types of segetal florocenoelements
(9.72%). This is Еguisetum palustre L., Еguisetum
arvense L., Еguisetum fluviatile L., Chaerophyllum
aromaticum L., Heracleum sibiricum L., Frangula
alnus Mill., Papaver arenarium Bieb. (Umarov,
2011).
There are 32 types of ruderal
florocenoelements (44.44%). This is Melilotus
officinalis (L.) Pall., Heliotropium. europaeum L.,
Heliotropium. lasiocarpum Fisch. et Меу., Sambucus
ebulus L., Sambucus ebulus L., Lonicera steveniana
Fisch.ex Pojark., Chaerophyllum aromaticum L.,
Heracleum sibiricum L., Rhamnus cathartica L.,
Frangula alnus Mill., Frangula alnus Mill., Papaver
arenarium Bieb., Papaver bracteatum Lindl.,
Papaver dubium L., Chelidonium flavum Grantz.,
Anabasis aphylla L., Tithymalis falcatus (L.),
Tithymalis раluster (L.), Tithymalis ibericus (Boiss.)
Prokh., Euphorbia humifusa Schlecht., Tithymalis
helioscopius
( L.), Veratrum lobelianum Bernh.,
Hyoscyamus niger L., Solanum nigrum L., Scopolia
caucasica Kolesn., Senecio rhombifolius (Willd.)
Sch. Bip., Senecio vernalis Waldst.et Kit., Senecio
Fi
g
ure 2: S
p
ectrum of florocenoelements of
p
oisonous
p
lants of the Chechen Re
p
ublic.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Systematic and Ecological-cenotic Analysis of Poisonous Plants of the Chechen Republic
191
vulgaris L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Bryonia alba L.,
Bryonia dioica Jacq., Ecballium elaterium (L.)
A.Rich. (Umarov, 2011).
Table 2: Phytocenoecological spectrum of poisonous plants
of the Chechen Republic.
Florocenoelement qty
florocen
o-
elements
%
of the total
number of species
Forest 16 22.22
Plain 6 8.33
Subalpine 1 1.39
Alpine 1 1.39
Ste
pp
e 3 4.17
Calce
p
etro
p
hilic 2 2.78
Psammo
p
hilic 1 1.39
Ar
g
illo
p
hilic 1 1.39
Hygrophilic 2 2.78
Segetal 7 9.72
Ruderal 32 44.44
TOTAL 72 100
The spectrum of phlorocenoelements of
poisonous plants of the Chechen Republic is given in
Table 2.
3 CONCLUSION
There are 58 species of poisonous plants in the flora
of the Chechen Republic. The largest number of
species are families Papaveraceae Juss.,
Euphorbiaceae Juss. (6 species, 10.34%). Families
Huperziaceae Rothm., Takhaseae S. F. Gray,
Cupressaceae Rich. ex Bartl., Ephedraceae Dumort,
Thymelaeaceae Juss., Peganaceae Engl.Tiegh.,
Cannabaceae Endl., Cannabaceae Endl.,
Chenopodiaceae Vent., Melanthiaceae Batsch,
Rutaceae Juss., Convallariaceae Horan. have the
minimum number of species (one species each).
Ecological and cenotic analysis revealed 72
florocenoelements. In the first place are ruderal, in the
second place are forest florocenoelements. The
smallest are subalpine, alpine, psammophilic and
argilogalophilic florocenoelements.
REFERENCES
Galushko, A. I., 1975. Vegetation cover of Checheno-
Ingushetia. Grozny. pp. 4-103.
Galushko, A. I., 1976. Analysis of the flora of the western
part of the Central Caucasus. Flora of the North
Caucasus and questions of its history. 1. pp. 5-130.
Galushko, A. I., 1980. Flora of the North Caucasus
(determinant). 1. p. 317; 2. p. 350; 3. p. 327.
Ivanov, A. L., 1996. Analysis of the flora of Stavropol.
Bulletin of the Stavropol State University. 6. pp. 47-57.
Ivanov, A. L., 1998. Flora of the Pre-Caucasus and its
genesis. Stavropol: Publishing House of SSU. p. 204.
Orlov, B. N., Gelashvili, D. B., Ibragimov, A. C., 1990.
Poisonous animals and plants of the USSR. Moscow. p.
272.
Umarov, M. U., Taisumov, M. A., 2011. Synopsis of the
flora of the Chechen Republic. Grozny. p. 152.
Khrustalev, F. G., 1991. A wonderful gift of nature. Grozny.
p. 12.
Shkhagapsoev, S. H., Starikova, N. V., 2002. Analysis of
the natural flora of Kabardino-Balkaria. Nalchik. p.
113.
MMTGE 2022 - I International Conference "Methods, models, technologies for sustainable development: agroclimatic projects and carbon
neutrality", Kadyrov Chechen State University Chechen Republic, Grozny, st. Sher
192