Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process
Piotr Gudz
1a
, Nadiia Shmygol
1b
, Maryna Gudz
1c
, Olena Cherniavska
2d
and Yulia Cherniavska
3e
1
"Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic" National University, Zukovskogo str.64, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
2
Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design KNUTD Nemyrovycha-Danchenka Street, 2, Kyiv, Ukraine
3
National University of Construction and Architecture KNUCA, 31 Povitroflotskij Ave, Kyiv, Ukraine
Keywords: Digital Economy, Digitalization of Economy, Reproduction, Platform, IT-Business, Network Readiness
Index.
Abstract: The aim of the work is an analytical study of reproducible phenomena and connections, that are manifested
in the development of innovative economics of the digital type. The article reflects the importance of the
digital economy for GDP growth, analyzes and gives an interpretation of the digital economy, identifies the
prerequisites for the formation and development of the digital industry, proves the reproductive nature of
business processes in order to create new value. The article uses such research methods as structural, logical
and analytical methods for better understanding of nature and structure of the digital economy; method of
comparative analysis and method of extrapolation for the formation of the reproduction model in digital
economy; generalization method for making conclusions. The model of reproduction process transformation
under the conditions of digital economy is offered. In addition features of digital economy reproduction are
defined and priorities of digital economy development in Ukraine are substantiated.
1 INTRODUCTION
Formulation of the problem. Even under COVID-19
today's economy characteristic is the growing
influence of a new type of economy, which is based
on network services, as well as digital and electronic
economy or economy of the virtual world. Depending
on the methods of determining the size of the digital
economy, its share ranges from 4.5 to 15.5 percent of
world GDP (Digital economy report, 2019). In 2010,
Boston Consulting Group estimated the amount of
digitization at $ 2.3 trillion for a group of top 20
countries, or about 4.1% of their GDP. And it predicts
that the digital economy will have reached $ 16
trillion by 2035 (World Bank, 2020). Digital business
is also attractive and cost-effective at macro level.
After all, the cumulative effect, the dollar invested
into digital technology over the past three decades,
has added an average of 20 dollars to GDP (Xaustov,
a
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7604-549X
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-6580
c
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-1454-4987
d
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9819-578X
e
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-1576-281X
2019). Meanwhile, despite the rapid development of
information technology and the formation of the
digital economy on their basis it requires theoretical
understanding of new realities, awareness and
justification of the latest theoretical constructs of the
digital economy.
Analysis of recent researches. It should be noted
that in the scientific literature and in practice there is
terminological uncertainty, differences in views on
the essence and content of the new economy, as
researchers often reduce its essence to the Internet or
networks, platform or information technology, new
business management methods or new virtual
technologies. However, in the English-speaking
environment, the theoretical aspects of the digital
economy are considered by Becker L. (Becker, 2018),
Gumerova G. I., Shaimiev E.Sh. (Gumerova &
Shaimiev, 2019), Lapidus L.V. (Lapidus, 2018) in the
context of the transformation of management
decisions.
Gudz, P., Shmygol, N., Gudz, M., Cherniavska, O. and Cherniavska, Y.
Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process.
DOI: 10.5220/0011341600003350
In Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient Intelligence (ISC SAI 2022) - Sustainable Development and Global Climate Change, pages 67-75
ISBN: 978-989-758-600-2
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
67
Thus, the main determinant of the digital economy
is determined by Podolchak N. Yu., Bilyk O. I.,
Levytska Ya. V. computer networks as the field of its
activity: "Digital economy is a kind of economic
market system, where one, several or all stages of
economic processes are carried out through computer
networks. Digital economy is one of the
manifestations of economic freedom, innovation and
the level of economic development" (Podolchak et al,
2019). It is true, but it is not enough to understand the
depth of the processes, that take place in the system of
productive forces and production relations in Industry
4.0.
In domestic and foreign literature the various
prerequisites for the development of the digital
economy are identified. Thus, Nureyev R.M.,
Karapayev O.V. determine the development of the
Internet, network society as prerequisites for the
development of the digital economy is called (Nureev
& Karapaev, 2019). The main reason for the
expansion of the digital segment of the economy is the
growth of the transaction sector, which accounts for
more than 70% of national GDP in the developed
countries. This sector includes: public administration,
consulting and information services, finance,
wholesale and retail trade, as well as the provision of
various utilities, personal and social services (OECD,
2017). However, we must note that the lack of
scientific work on the methodology of digital
economy such as the theory of factors of production,
the value theory, the price theory, the expanded
reproduction theory, the theory of capital movements,
the competition theory and etc. Conflicting views on
the conceptual and categorical apparatus, forecasting
the effects of E-economy and E-government are also
enumerated among them.
Objective setting. The aim of the work is an
analytical study of reproducible phenomena and
connections that are manifested in the development of
innovative economics of the digital type. The work
uses such research methods as structural, logical and
analytical ones in order to understand the nature and
structure of the digital economy; method of
comparative analysis and extrapolation method for the
formation of the reproduction model in digital
economics; generalization method for making
conclusions.
2 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
In our opinion, in terminological discussions, the
position of the Polish scientist Mikhail Holinski, who
believes that the pseudo-definition of the digital
economy should not be born in advance, is the most
real. Moreover, considering the point of view of the
scientific methodology, the interpretation of the
economic category must contain measures of its state
of development. Since these phenomena occur in our
life and it is in the initial phase of development, we
should not worry about finding a holistic definition of
digital economy (Goliński, 2019). Foreign researchers
have different views on the essence of the digital
economy, pointing to the increased degree of
connections and interaction of all authors of the
reproduction process on a single electronic platform,
including manufacturers, intermediaries, suppliers,
consumers: "A form of economic people’s activity,
businesses, devices, data and processes. The basis of
the digital economy is hyper connection. So, the
growing interconnectedness of people, organizations
and machines, formed through the Internet, mobile
technology and the Internet of Things" (Deloitte,
2019).
Despite this pragmatism, we must note that more
expanded vision of the digital economy is provided in
the government document "Ukraine 2030E is the
country with the developed digital economy": digital
economy is a type of economy, where the key factors
and means of production are digital data (binary,
information, etc.) and network transactions, as well as
their use as a resource, which can significantly
increase efficiency, productivity and value for
products and services (Ukrayina, 2020). However, it
is difficult to imagine economies without workers and
digital competencies.
Analysis of legal and regulatory acts showed, that
the world's leading developed countries in the context
of technological and civilization challenges responded
by adopting strategies for the development of
information communities: Poland in 2013
(Długookresowа Strategiа, 2013), Russia in 2017 (O
Strategii, 2017), the European Union in 2015 began to
implement a digital agenda, a kind of road map, but
with strategic guidelines (Europejska agenda, 2017),
Ukraine since 2019 (Ukrayina, 2020). It has happen
since 2015.
The European Commission has launched the
digital single market by promoting e-commerce,
digitizing copyright protection, electronic privacy,
harmonizing the digital rights of market participants
and the state, harmonizing tax rules and cyber security
(Komunikat, 2015).
The digital single market strategy will be based on
three pillars:
better access for consumers and businesses to
online goods and services across Europe. It requires
that the most important differences between the virtual
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
68
and real worlds must be quickly removed in order to
remove barriers to cross-border online activities;
creating the right conditions for the development
of digital networks and services. It requires fast,
secure and reliable content infrastructure and services,
as well as the right legal conditions for innovation and
investment, as well as fair competition and a level
playing field;
maximizing the economic growth generated by the
European digital economy. It requires the investment
into ICT infrastructure and technology, such as cloud
computing and large database sets, as well as research
and innovation that will increase the competitiveness
of industry, will improve utilities and expand the circle
of people, who use digital economy and improve their
skills (Komunikat, 2015).
Funding of the European Structural and
Investment Funds in the amount of more than 21.4
billion Euros is only provided for the development of
EU digital infrastructure and single market services,
as well as for research and innovation startups
(Komunikat, 2015).
Analysis of the development of the digital
economy indicates the preconditions for its formation.
It is believed that a number of factors contribute to the
development of the digital economy. The first is
determined by the abrupt growth of technical
capabilities of information processing and
transmission. According to the UN report on the
development of the digital economy, the evolution of
global Internet traffic from 2002 to 2022 has
increased. It will continue to grow in 10 and 20 years,
respectively, in 230 and 1507 times! In 2002 it will
grow to 100 Gb / s. In 2007 it will grow to 2000 Gb /
s. In 2012 it will grow to 46000 Gb / s, in 2022 it will
grow to 150700 Gb (Digital economy report, 2019).
The intensive development of the economy
platform is another factor in the development of the
digital economy. The strength of the digital platform
is reflected in the fact that seven of the top- eight
world's companies use business models on the
platform through market capitalization. Five
companies were IT manufacturers, which were the
top- five at market value in 2019. The total value of
platform companies with market capitalization of
more than 100 million US dollars was estimated at
more than 7 trillion dollars in 2017, what is 67%
higher than in 2015 (Digital economy report, 2019).
Digital platforms provide mechanisms for
combining a set of counterparties to interact via the
Internet. A distinction can be made between
transaction platforms and innovation platforms.
Transaction platforms are bilateral or multilateral
markets with a network infrastructure that supports the
exchange between numbers of different agents. They
have become the main business model for large digital
technology corporations, such as Amazon, Alibaba,
Facebook and eBay, as well as for those, who are
developing digitally supported market segments (e.g.
Uber, Didi, Chuxing, Airbnb). Innovative platforms
create an environment for encoding and producing
content by developing applications and software in the
form of operating systems such as Android or Linux.
In our opinion, the beginning of the digital
economy development is the result of more global
processes than technical innovations, the development
of the Internet and so on. In this sense, we agree with
the opinion of Polish scientists that technological
change is not a determinant of the digital economy ...
in contrast to social, economic, cultural factors
(Cyfrowa gospodarka, 2017). Indeed, the
globalization of the economy, accompanied by the
concentration of social communities, leads to the
development of cities and the concentration of the
population of countries around large cities, the share
and importance of which will only increase. Thus,
since 1950, the number of people living in cities has
increased almost six fold, from 751 million to more
than 4 billion people in 2018, which is more than half
of the world's population. Over the next three decades,
the cities are projected to grow another 2.5 billion
people (The comprehensive smart environment,
2016). These processes form the demand for business
and government for an effective system of
management, control infrastructure development,
provision of services and production of innovative
products. So, we believe that this entropy is leading
one in order to understand the development of
infrastructure for metropolises and agglomerations:
from transport and financial hubs, to the development
of information technology, big data management for
urban administration and other technologies,
including the digital economy in response to the new
system of population settlement.
The digital economy is operationally represented
at all stages of the product reproduction cycle. It is
essentially Industry 4.0, which makes the economic
and technological basis of the fourth industrial
revolution. Today digit law is an artificial intelligence,
robotics, web money, industrial biology, processing of
large data arrays Big Data, 3D industrial printing,
unmanned vehicles, drones, block chain and crypto
currencies, 4G communication, e-government and
servicing of state and municipal government and
administrative services ("Action" service), etc. In
business management, modern digital technologies
are mostly used to solve supply chain management
problems to optimize and control the cycle of
Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process
69
procurement of raw materials, production of material
goods and their further distribution, as well as
enterprise resource planning and customer
relationship management (OECD, 2017).
The digital or virtual economy is mostly
represented in the Internet in the form of information
and communication technologies. Network is a system
of centralized management, where network benefits
are endowed with four properties:
1. Complementary, compatibility, standardization.
2. Significant production scale of economy.
3. External network effects. B. Metcalfe's law
indicates that the value of any network for the
consumer is equivalent to the square of the number of
connection nodes.
4. Effects of the trap: customers of network are
caught by the terms of contracts and agreements;
network operating conditions; the effects of loss of
loyalty when the customer loses the preferences that
the consumer had in the network (Osnovy, 2018).
It is must be noted that in scientific research it is
important to distinguish the concept of digital
economy, which in fact remains complementary,
terminologically. In this sense, the position of
American scientists, who distinguish the following
components of the digital economy, is clear:
a) the main digital sector,
b) digital economy,
c) digitalization of the economy (Digital economy
report, 2019).
Another position is held by Head of Ukraine
Innovative Development Association, who identifies
two components of digitalization. They are digital
economy and the IT sector (Ukrayina perexodyt,
2018).
Guided by this approach, we would like to define
the peculiarities of the functioning of the digital
economy from a theoretical point of view.
1. The main means of production as a set of objects
and means of labor, which are used by people in the
production of material goods and service, are divided
into tools and objects of labor.
Tools are a thing or a set of things that a person
acts over labor objects in order to transform them
according to their needs. Hence, in the digital
economy they are earns of information processing and
operations with it via a computer and its software,
means of connections and communications such as
mobile devices, the Internet as a virtual network of
information space. In contrast to the material
economy, where the main resource of wealth is land,
these functions are performed by the Internet in the
information economy.
Comparative analysis allows us to establish certain
semantic parallels. Land is known to perform three
functions: a place for cultivation (agriculture), a place
for extraction (mining), a place for location (location
of productive forces). The Internet also shows its
purpose as a place for activity. Services are created
and goods are designed there. In this case there is a
process of writing a scientific product. The location
feature exponentially grows as a platform for running
your own business. The quarantine, caused by the
spread of COVID-19, confirms a similar conclusion,
when a number of service organizations are mostly
switched to the platform of Internet representation and
activities. Finally, the parallels with the place of
extraction are obvious. Users of the platforms and the
general public use a huge amount of information to
ensure the activities. They are involved in its
"drawing" on a paid or free basis. The literature
represents quite different opinion: the Internet has the
properties of communication as a source of
communication, media as a source of information and
production as a basis for business (Kudryavceva &
Kolos, 2005; Shmygol, 2021; Pulina, 2021).
2. Labor objects are the objects, which a person
influences in the process of labor. They are the objects,
which are given by nature, or they have undergone
primary processing. They are positioned as raw
materials. In the digital economy, the main object of
labor is the intangible form of the product
information, data, databases and data banks. In the
digital economy, the main object of labor is the
intangible form of the product such as information,
data, databases and data banks.
3. Man as a basic element not only of the economy
but also of society in terms of digital transformation
also acquires specificity. Modern research indicates
the dynamic processes of social reproduction: the
growing tendency of the weight of human capital in
relation to physical capital in the overall structure of
total capital (tabl.1).
Table 1: Structural changes in total capital in Western
countries, % of the total.
Total
capital
1800
year
1860
year
1913
year
1950
year
1973
year
1990
year
2020
year
Physical
capital
78-80 77-79 67-69 52-53 43-44 31-33 19-20
Human
capital
20-22 21-23 31-33 47-48 56-57 67-69 80-81
Compiled by the authors based on (ShchetininV, 2001)
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
70
Data analysis of table 1 represents the
prerequisites for creating a new model of economic
development. Its basis is formed on ethical norms and
environmental standards by directing investments in
renewable natural capital, including per person and
reducing the non-renewable flow of natural resources.
If Adam Smith spoke of the economic man, then
in the economy of numbers the main productive force
is the "digital man". At this stage of scientific
development and technology, a “digital person” is
qualified personnel, who have digital competencies
such as knowledge, skills and abilities to use them in
specific production or management situations to solve
specific problems. The content of professional
competencies of the “digital man" correlates the
factors and product of knowledge in economy.
4. The production process is considered through
the prism of the reproduction process. In this case, it
does not matter about the narrowed, simple or
extended reproduction it will be discussed, because it
is the prerogative of the study of quantitative
parameters and values. Although the scientific and
civic competencies and views of the authors of the
article are close to those researchers, who are
considered questionable and even harmful economic
policies, aimed at ever-increasing rates of social
production. It does not lead humanity and dwellers to
individual quality of life, happiness index and so on.
The digital economy is operationally represented
at all stages of the product reproduction cycle; it is
essentially Industry 4.0, which is the economic and
technological basis of the fourth industrial revolution.
Digital today is artificial intelligence, robotics,
electronic money, industrial biology, processing of
large data arrays Big Data, 3D industrial printing,
unmanned vehicles, drones, block chain and crypto
currencies, 4G communication, e-government and
servicing of state and municipal government and
administrative services ("Action" service), etc. In a
reproductive perspective, the most appropriate is the
interpretation of the digital economy as "activities for
the creation, dissemination and use of digital
technologies and related products and services",
presented by scientists from the Higher School of
Economics in Moscow (Gokhberg, 2019). It is here
that the digital platform, as can be seen from (Fig. 1),
allows reducing the traditional reproduction process
from the model: production – exchange – distribution
consumption (PECD) to the model production:
digital economy – consumption (PDC).
In our opinion, the transformation of the
traditional economy into a digital one, based on the
theory of the reproduction process, can be represented
graphically (Fig. 2).
Source:
DLF Attorneys-at-law, 2021
Figure 1: Changing the economic model of reproduction.
In the reproductive phase of the digital economy,
the stage of production is not only the use of
information technology, software products at the
stage of design, construction, but also the
intellectualization of the product, tangible know-how,
design, but also the production process.
Compiled by the authors
Figure 2: Transformation of reproduction process in digital
economy.
It is manifested in technological innovations of
3D, 4D, 5D-technologies of manufacturing materials,
semi-finished products, parts, assemblies, etc. The
formed new values indicate for evolutionary and
favorable for the economy cycle to the producer:
benefits of saving resources; ease of scaling;
reduction of Time2market; expansion of the sales
network. It is believed that during and after the
economic crisis determined by the global COVID-19
pandemic, the transformation of all sectors and
markets, in particular in the form of digitization, can
Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process
71
contribute to the production of higher quality goods
and services at reduced costs.
The exchange and distribution phase is related to
the distribution and logistics relationships and
connections of market agents.
That is, the digital economy is characterized by
the movement of market processes of exchange and
distribution of the product to the network space. That
is, the digital economy is characterized by the
movement of market processes of exchange and
distribution of the product to the network space. This
creates a new configuration of the economic space
and the market as a whole.
Such a pattern of economic relations is not
artificially created, as it may seem at first glance. The
benefits are also obvious for business intermediaries.
They are the following: speed of transactions,
resource savings, improving the efficiency of
logistics operations. The digital economy allows
greater control over the creation of value chains in
different business models on a digital platform.
The components of the operational process of the
digital economy are technological and information
blocks: IoT Monitor Marketer OBL (Omni bulk
messaging). IoT and M2M connections around the
world provide full visibility, event management and
control from the network to end devices, with priority
security. Omni bulk messaging is Omni channel
marketing technology. Omni messaging platform is
for business network. Different operators provide
different mobile communication channels to really
connect and communicate with the target audience, as
well as effectively reach potential customers.
The stage of consumption to a lesser extent, but
associated with the paradigm of the digital economy.
The consumer saves time on the choice and purchase
of goods and services, has a more balanced choice of
consumer solutions, determined by information
support, and so on. In addition, the digital economy is
creating new jobs in digital services, especially for
high-skilled professionals, as well as new forms of
digital activity for smaller skilled workers. In
business management, modern digital technologies
are mostly used to solve supply chain management
problems in order to optimize and control the cycle of
raw material procurement, production of goods and
their further distribution, as well as to plan enterprise
resources and customer relationship management.
5. Property relations. In an industrial economy,
the relationship of ownership (possession,
appropriation and disposal) of means of production is
associated with the object of ownership for a specific
material object: land, real estate, etc. In the digital
economy, there is a theoretical construct that
characterizes the new relationships between right to
property and property. To conduct and control
business means of production in the classical sense in
such a system of relations are superfluous. Instead,
ownership of a brand, trade mark, business creates
and sells conditions for other businesses. The sale or
use of which by a business or individual is a profitable
part of a digital business. For example, Uber
corporation does not have its own cars to provide
passenger and freight services. Didi does not have its
own retail space to sell goods and services to
customers. Chuxing does not have self-service in
automotive technology, based on artificial
intelligence. Airbnb does not have its own hotel fund
to provide accommodation services.
The digitalization of the economy is characterized
by the impact of information and communication
technologies on other sectors of the economy in
comparison with the digital economy, which directly
creates added value in production, logical,
distribution and sales chains. In this case, digitalism
plays the role of locomotive for accelerating
economic growth (Table 2).
Table 2: Average annual values of additional contribution
of growth factors to the value added of sectors of the
economy as a result of digitalization for the period from
2019 to 2030.
Sector of the
economy
Аnnual
average
cost of
fixed asset
s
(OPF) %
Capital
contrib
ution,
%
Labor
contribut
ion,%
Total,
%
Financial
sector
0,92 1,20 0,93 3,04
Transport 1,29 1,20 0,55 3,03
Construction 0,98 1,02 0,88 2,88
Education 1,00 1,20 0,57 2,77
Chemical
industr
y
1,64 1,40 –0,43 2,61
En
g
ineerin
g
1,52 1,48
0,46 2,54
Other
services
0,93 0,79 0,24 1,95
Heath care 0,81 0,58 0,25 1,65
Li
g
ht industr
y
1,02 0,96
0,65 1,32
Power
Industry
0,32 0,83 0,04 1,19
Trade 0,60 0,36 0,04 1,00
Agricultural
Complex
0,78 0,69 –0,56 0,91
Publc
Administratio
n
0,58 0,24 –0,40 0,41
Timber
industry
com
p
lex
0,31 0,14 –0,53 –0,08
Metallur
0,25 0,10
0,55
0,21
Mining
industr
y
0,08 0,04 –0,46 –0,35
Compiled by the authors based on (L. M. Gokhberg, 2019)
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
72
Data analysis on the average annual values of the
contribution of growth factors to the added value of
sectors of the economy as a result of digitalization for
the period from 2019 to 2030 (Tab. 2), performed by
Russian scientists at the Higher School of Economics,
confirms the trend of the global economy about the
accelerated growth of digitalization in science and
education, the financial and banking sector, transport
and construction, as well as in the service sector. In
the forecast period, digitalization will provide from
3.04 to 2.77% growth in value added in these sectors.
Thus, the digitalization of the economy becomes a
structural factor in economic growth.
It should be fairly added that the digital economy
is not a panacea for solving social problems. At the
Thieß Petersen and Falk Steiner, the effects of
progressive digitization in the labor market are
contradictory, as digital technological progress has
both the destruction of jobs and job creation.
However, in the short run in 10-15 years significant
net job losses are unlikely happen to be in contrast to
the long run in 2040/50, when the effects of job cuts
may outweigh the pace of job creation (Thieß
Petersen, 2019). At the same time, 375 million
workers, what covers about 14% of the global
workforce, will be forced to change their profession
from 2019 to 2030 (McKinsey, 2017). The digital
economy provides more opportunities to test the
economic security of counterparties for corporate
manufacturers and agents in general.
The analysis of the roadmap adopted by the
Government of Ukraine for the implementation of the
strategy for the development of the digital economy,
despite its pioneering and positive content, indicates
the lack of tools to achieve specific goals for the
development of digital economics. According to
domestic experts, the share of the digital economy in
Ukraine fluctuates within 3-4% of GDP, and by 2025
may double. Weak nature of the development of the
components of the digital economy is confirmed by
the results of foreign studies. Thus, according to the
Networked Readiness Index, it is an indicator that
characterizes the level of development of information
and communication technologies in 139 countries,
Ukraine ranked 64th in 2016. So we are not enlisted
to the world map of the digital economy.
A number of scientists, based on the research of
foreign research centers and scientists, state the state
of factor support for the development of the digital
economy in Ukraine as weak, at the initial stage.
Thus, the weaknesses of the development of domestic
digital economics are: low protection of intellectual
property rights, underdeveloped banking and
financial services, high investment risks, small
number of mobile broadband subscribers, inefficient
cyber security, advanced software piracy, insufficient
funding for technological development, low digital
consumer competences. Instead, the pros are: positive
dynamics of investment in telecommunications,
revitalization in the IT business sector, the speed of
Internet connections, e-democracy, the use of big data
and the quality of education (Xaustov, 2019).
According to these indicators, Ukraine is on the
sixtieth position among 139 countries studied, which
refers it to marginal digital countries.
Indeed, Ukraine still has an underdeveloped
infrastructure of information markets, the Internet,
network communication channels, low technological
education of consumers and a general syndrome of
"outdated technologies". But the situation of low
adaptability to information change is not unique to the
domestic economy: according to a study by ESG
commissioned by Dell EMC, 95% of large companies
do not meet the requirements of the new digital
business. However, 96% of those companies, which
have transformed into digital standards, have almost
doubled their revenue earnings next year (ESG,
2017). It’s a clear illustration of the effectiveness of
change management at the corporate level.
The policy of catching up provides for a planned
increase in the share of Ukraine's digital economy in
total GDP from 3% in 2021 to 65% in 2030
(Ukrayina, 2020). The declarative nature of the
forecasts is evidenced by the fact that the program
document "Ukraine 2030E - a country with a
developed digital economy" does not contain specific
financial, tax, customs, banking instruments to
influence business (supply) or citizens (demand) that
would stimulate development, implementation ,
production of technologies of SMART-economy,
increase of digital competences at citizens and their
capitalization which could and should provide
achievement of ambitious purposes on the way of
digitalization of domestic economy as a competitive
model of development in modern types.
4 CONCLUSIONS
According to the results of the study, it can be
generalized that the digital economy in the
reproductive sense is a constantly recurring activity
for the creation, exchange, distribution and use of
digital technologies and complementary with goods
and services aimed at efficiency and greening of
social production. The peculiarity of the reproduction
process under the conditions of digitalization is its
transformation from the traditional model
Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process
73
"production – exchange – distribution – consumption
(PEDC)" to the production model "digital economy
consumption (DEC)".
In terms of digitalization, Ukraine is among 139
surveyed countries, what makes it marginal. Thus, the
infrastructure of information markets, the Internet,
network communication channels remains
underdeveloped in Ukraine, low technological
education of consumers and the general syndrome of
"outdated technologies" are noted. To intensify the
development of the digital economy, it is necessary to
develop specific financial, tax, customs, banking
instruments to influence business (supply) and
citizens (demand), which would accelerate the
development, implementation, production of
SMART-economy technologies, and increase and
capitalize digital competencies.
REFERENCES
Digital economy report 2019. Value creation and capture:
implications for developing countries. United Nations
conference on trade and development. 2019, United
Nations. 12 р. (in Engl.)
World Bank. 2020. World Development Report 2020:
Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value
Chains. Washington, DC: World Bank. URL:
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3
2437 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. (in Engl.)
Xaustov Volodydymyr. (2019). Cyfrova ekonomika: yak
tobi sluzhytsya? Dzerkalo tyzhnya. Vyp. 39. 18-25
zhovtnya (in Ukr.)
Becker L. (2018). Nachhaltiges Business Development
Management Strategien fur die Transformation.
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. 52 p. (in
Deuch.)
Gumerova G. I., Shaimiev E.Sh. (2019). Management of
the digital economy as a scientific direction (on the
basis of management (4.0). International Research
Journal. 40-45 Issue: № 1 (79) Part 2. (in Engl.)
Lapidus L.V. (2018). Tsifrovaya ekonomika: upravlenie
elektronnym biznesom i elektronnoi kommertsiei :
monografiya. M.: INFRA-M., 2018. 381 s. (in Rus.)
Podolchak N. Yu., Bilyk O. I., Levyczka Ya. V. (2019).
Suchasnyj stan cyfrovizaciyi v Ukrayini. Efektyvna
ekonomika 10. [online] Available
at:<http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/10_2019/6
.pdf> (in Ukr.)
Nureev R.M., Karapaev O.V. (2019). Tri etapa
stanovlennya tsifrovoi ekonomiki. Voprosy
regulirovaniya ekonomiki. Vyh.10, № 2. s.3-27. (in
Rus.)
OECD (2017). Going Digital: Making The Transformation
Work for Grouth and Well-being. Paris. 76 s. (in Engl.)
Michał Goliński.Gospodarka cyfrowa, gospodarka
informacyjna, gospodarka oparta na wiedzy różne
określenia tych samych zjawisk czy podobne pojęcia
określające różne zjawiska? (2019). Roczniki kolegium
analiz ekonomicznych. 49. Szkoła Główna Handlowa
W Warszawie. [online] Available at:<
http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z49_13.
pdf> (in Polish)
Deloitte (2019). What is Digital Economy? [online]
Available
at:<https://www2.deloitte.com/mt/en/pages/technolog
y/articles/mt-what-is-digital-economy.html> (in Engl.)
Ukrayina 2030E krayina z rozvynutoyu cyfrovoyu
ekonomikoyu (2020). [online] Available
at:<https://strategy.uifuture.org/kraina-z-rozvinutoyu-
cifrovoyu-ekonomikoyu.html> (in Ukr.)
Długookresowа Strategiа Rozwoju Kraju „Polska 2030.
Trzecia fala nowoczesności”. (2013). [online]
Available
at:<http://kigeit.org.pl/FTP/PRCIP/Literatura/002_Stra
tegia_DSRK_PL2030_RM.pdf> (in Polish)
O Strategii razvitiia informatsionnogo obshchestva v
Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2017 2030 gody. Ukaz
Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 05.2017 г.№ 203.
(2017). [online] Available at:<
http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102431
687> (in Rus.)
Europejska agenda cyfrowa. (2017). [online] Available at:<
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/europe-
2020-strategy>. (in Polish)
Komunikat komisji do parlamentu europejskiego, rady,
europejskiego komitetu ekonomiczno-społecznego i
komitetu regionów. Strategia jednolitego rynku
cyfrowego dla Europy. (2015). [online] Available
at:<https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/PL/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52015DC0192> (in
Polish)
Cyfrowa gospodarka. Kluczowe trendy rewolucji cyfrowej.
Diagnoza, prognozy, strategie reakcji. pod red.
Dominika Batorskiego. (2012). Warszawa, MGG
Conferences Sp. z o.o. [online] Available
at:<http://www.euroreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_euroreg_
publications_files/1335/cyfrowa_gospodarka_kluczow
e_trendy_rewolucji_cyfrowej.pdf> (in Polish)
The comprehensive smart environment. (2016). [online]
Available at:< https://www.visualcapitalist.com/iot-
building-smarter-cities> (in Engl.)
Osnovy tsifrovoi ekonomiki: uchebnoe posobie (2018). Pod
red. M.I. Stolbova, E.A. Brenedelevoi. M.: Izdat. dom
«Nauchnaya biblioteka». 276 s. (in Rus.)
Ukrayina perexodyt` na cyfrovu ekonomiku: shho ce
oznachaye? (2018). [online] Available
at:<https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/2385945-
ukraina-perehodit-na-cifrovu-ekonomiku-so-ce-
oznacae.html> (in Ukr.)
Kudryavceva S.P., Kolos V.V. (2005). Mizhnarodna
informaciya. Navch. pos. K.: Vydavnychyj Dim
«Slovo», 2005. 400 с. (in Ukr.) Kudryavceva S.P.,
Kolos V.V. (2005). Mizhnarodna informaciya. Navch.
pos. K.: Vydavnychyj Dim «Slovo», 2005. 400 с. (in
Ukr.)
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
74
Shmygol, N., Galtsova, O., Yelisyeyeva, O., & Belozertsev,
V. (2021, November). Priority areas of state regulation
of the industry in the context of sustainable
development. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science (Vol. 915, No. 1, p. 012028).
IOP Publishing.
Pulina, T., Shmygol, N., Narivs' kyi, O., Khmara, N., &
Shmygol, Y. (2021, December). Substantiation of the
project of development of charging stations network for
electric cars. In Conference Proceedings Determinants
Of Regional Development (No. 2, pp. 189-203).
Shmygol, N., Galtsova, O., Shaposhnykov, K., &
Bazarbayeva, S. (2021). Environmental management
policy: an assessment of ecological and energy
indicators and effective regional management (on the
example of Ukraine). Polityka Energetyczna-Energy
Policy Journal, 43-60.
Shchetinin V. (2001). Chelovecheskii kapital i
neodnorodnost ego traktovki. Mezhdunarodnaia
ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 2001. 12.
s.39-46. (in Rus.)
Chto takoe tsifrovaya ekonomika? Trendy, kompetentsii,
izmerenie : dokl. k XX Apr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf.
po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva,
Moskva, 9–12 apr. 2019 g. (2019) ; nauch. red. L. M.
Gokhberg. M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki,
2019. 128 s. (in Rus.)
Thieß Petersen. Falk Steiner. The Bigger Picture. Global
Economic Dynamics. (2019). [online] Available
at:<https://ged-project.de/research/studies/the-bigger-
picture> (in Engl.)
McKinsey (2017). Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: What the Future
of Work Will Mean for Jobs, Skills, and Wages. (Date
accessed: 09/28/2018) (in Engl.)
ESG 2017 IT Transformation Maturity Curve. Офіційний
сайт корпорації Dell EMC. [online] Available
at:<https://www.delltechnologies.com/en-us/it-
transformation/index.htm#overlay=/collateral/analyst-
reports/esg-dellemc-it-transformation-maturity-report>
(in Engl.)
Economy Digitalization in Paradigm of Reproductive Process
75