Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19
Ignacio Peinado, Eva de Lera, José Martínez Usero, Colin Clark, Jutta Treviranus
and Gregg Vanderheiden
Raising the Floor – International, 150 Route de Ferney, Geneva, Switzerland
Keywords: Digital Inclusion, Accessibility, ICT Access, Quality of Life, Life-work, COVID-19, Pandemic, Work,
Health, Ageing, Digital Literacy, Skills, Artificial Intelligence, Accessible Workplace.
Abstract: The rapid advances in information and communication technologies and the widespread adoption of
disruptive technologies such as AI and automated systems are changing the work landscape dramatically and
are affecting especially older workers and workers with disabilities. Since 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has
accelerated some of these changes, widening the unemployment gap for people with disabilities. To facilitate
reskilling and upskilling of older workers and people with disabilities we need to create inclusive work
environments that consider their evolving needs and capabilities. The Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure
(GPII) provides workers, employers and organizations with tools and methods to include accessibility into
their practices and policies. The SmartWork project provides a great opportunity to test how Morphic, the
auto-personalization from preference solution provided by the GPII, can help building a more inclusive
workplace.
1 INTRODUCTION
Over a billion people in the world around 15% of
the overall population - and 100 million people in the
EU live with a disability
1
. More than 46% of persons
aged 60 years and over have disabilities and more
than 250 million older people experience moderate to
severe disabilities
2
. When most people without a
disability think about disabilities, they usually picture
major disabilities such as blindness or paraplegia, but
disability encompasses a vast and fluid number of
physical and mental health conditions such as asthma,
depression, or temporary physical problems, which
can come and go throughout a person’s lifetime (even
in a single day). As we age, our physical and mental
capacities change for the better or worse, which
requires us to continuously adapt to our changing
circumstances. These changes can affect us in all
aspects of our life and can be especially challenging
in the field of work, as our capacities need to comply
with the requirements and expectations of our co-
workers, managers, or clients. Theories such us the
lifespan development theories propose that humans
1
https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/
disability-and-rehabilitation/data-and-statistics/facts-on-
disability
face different challenges across their individual
lifespan that require learning and adaptation as well
as decisions about changing resources (Baltes, 1987).
These challenges occur due to the ongoing interplay
of both individuals’ abilities and needs and
environmental requirements and resources (Hertel &
Zacher, 2018). This mismatch is what defines
disability, according to the definition provided by the
social model of disability.
The Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII)
aims to ensure that everyone who faces accessibility
barriers due to disability, literacy, digital literacy, or
aging, regardless of economic resources, can access
and use the Internet and all its information,
communities, and services for education,
employment, daily living, civic participation, health,
and safety. The SmartWork project has provided an
opportunity to test some of the concepts developed
within the GPII in a work environment, as well as the
first time that Morphic, the auto-personalization from
preferences solution part of the GPII, is tested in a real
environment in European soil.
2
https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/disabi
lity-and-ageing.html
460
Peinado, I., de Lera, E., Usero, J., Clark, C., Treviranus, J. and Vanderheiden, G.
Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19.
DOI: 10.5220/0010722900003063
In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence (IJCCI 2021), pages 460-467
ISBN: 978-989-758-534-0; ISSN: 2184-3236
Copyright © 2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Section 2 of this paper presents an overview of the
problematic and discusses some barriers that older
workers and worker with disabilities face in the work
environment, and how the COVID-19 pandemic has
exacerbated some of these issues while also opening
some opportunities. Section 3 discusses relevant
trends regarding the future of work, and how they can
impact older workers and workers with disabilities.
Section 4 discusses some strategies for building
inclusive workspaces, and how the GPII can be used to
improve the performance and motivation of older
workers and workers with disabilities. Finally, section
5 describes how the SmartWork project will test
Morphic, the auto-personalization from preferences
solution provided by the GPII, in a real work
environment, and our expectations from the pilots.
2 WORK, AGEING AND
DISABILITY
2.1 The Right to Work
Having a job in equal terms to their counterparts is
fundamental to social integration and participation in
society of people with disabilities. The population of
people without connectivity, and/or unable to access
or use computers so they can work calls for a need to
inject inclusiveness in all ICT, to ensure that all
people, including people with disabilities, can have
their rightful access to work.
Article 27 of the United Nations Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (hereafter
CRPD) enshrines the right to work and employment
as a fundamental right. In all regions, countries are
making efforts to harmonize legislative and policy
frameworks with the CRPD, including by seeking to
domesticate provisions. In the United States, the
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 makes
it unlawful to discriminate in employment against a
qualified individual with a disability. In Europe, the
new 2021-2030 European Disability Strategy
foresees the presentation of a package to improve
labour market outcomes for people with disabilities in
2022, plus outlining the development of new
disability indicators and hence better information
about the situation of people with disabilities in
employment (European Commission, 2021). At a
global level, the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda and
Sustainable Development Goals aims to ensure an
inclusive future of work. More specifically, Goal 8
3
https://askjan.org/topics/costs.cfm
aims to achieve full and productive employment and
decent work for all women and men, including for
young people and persons with disabilities, and equal
pay for work of equal value, by 2030.
Despite all legislative efforts, in the European
Union, only 50.6% of persons with disabilities are
employed, compared to 74.8% of persons with no
reported disabilities. Moreover, it is common that
people with disabilities face higher levels of
unemployment and higher risks of poverty and
discrimination. Segregated work, or sheltered
environments, usually lead to sub-minimal wages
and, as its own name implies, segregation. It is still
not clear how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected
the rates of employment of persons with disabilities
compared to people without disabilities at European
level. Nevertheless, during the pandemic a widening
of the disability employment gap has been observed
both in UK (Holland, 2021) and the USA (Schur,
Ameri, & Kruse, 2020).
2.2 Barriers to Employment for PWD
There are several reasons why business managers and
employers have reservations regarding hiring people
with disabilities: in some cases, they fear their job
performance will be lower; in other cases, they are
worried that workers with disabilities will miss work
more frequently because of health problems, or are
worried about the cost of accommodations (Gaunt &
Lengnick-Hall, 2014) (Gold, Oire, Fabian, &
Wewiorski, 2012). In the former case, previous
research shows that people with disabilities score
higher in several efficiency-related metrics (Aichner,
2021). Regarding accommodations and their cost,
reasonable accommodations used at workplaces vary
from no-tech solutions which cost little or no money
(i.e., writing shorter emails in a simpler language) to
accommodations that are technologically simple or
unsophisticated (i.e., installing assistive technologies
in a computer, replacing a doorknob with an
accessible handle, etc.). A 2020 survey report
prepared by the Job Accommodation Network (JAN)
for the Department of Labor’s Office of Disability
Employment Policy estimated that 56% of workplace
accommodations for employees cost nothing to
execute, while the remaining ones have a median cost
of $500
3
. Moreover, some studies demonstrate that
businesses that integrate persons with disabilities in
their teams along with accessibility practices are more
likely to be innovative and reach broader audiences,
according to the World Wide Web Consortium
4
.
4
https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/
Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19
461
2.3 The Impact of COVID-19 on Work
and Disability
The broad adoption of “remote” processes – tele-
work, tele-medicine, virtual schooling, e-commerce
and more was steadily growing in the last decade.
But with the pandemic situation in 2020, the digital
transformation has accelerated to an unexpected
rhythm. According to Upwork’s, the world’s largest
work marketplace, as stated in its Future Workforce
Report, in 2025, there will be more people working
from home, more virtual social and entertainment
interactions, fewer forays in public than has been the
case in recent years (Ozimek, 2020). The pandemic
has rearranged incentives so that consumers will be
more willing to seek out smart gadgets, apps, and
systems. Digital transformation, i.e., “a process that
aims to improve an entity by triggering significant
changes to its properties through combinations of
information, computing, communication, and
connectivity technologies'' (Vial, 2019), is generally
taking place in all spheres of our life and affecting
everyone from babies to older people. In the digital
life at pre-COVID-19 times we were attending to a
process of steady digital transformation in e-
government services, health and care, business,
education, arts, etc.
This will speed up adoption of new education and
learning platforms, rearrange work patterns and
workplaces, change family life, and upend living
arrangements and community structures. The crisis is
enhancing digital interconnectedness that engenders
empathy, better awareness of the ills facing humanity
and positive public action.
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately
affected many who historically faced significant
barriers to employment, including people with
disabilities. Because of a variety of factors, older
persons and persons with disabilities have been more
likely to be infected by COVID-19, develop serious
illness or die, or find themselves isolated,
impoverished and facing increased hardship in the
future.
3 THE FUTURE OF WORK AND
ACCESSIBILITY
A joint publication by Fundación ONCE and the ILO
Global Business and Disability Network, developed
within the framework of Disability Hub Europe,
identified the following megatrends of the Fourth
Industrial Revolution that will shape the future of
work: (1) the technological revolution; (2) the new
skills that will be required; (3) the cultural changes;
(4) demographic shifts, and (5) climate change. The
technological revolution is mainly driven by rapid
advances in information and communication
networks, data analysis and manipulation, and the
widespread adoption of disruptive technologies such
as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automated systems.
Moreover, the COVID-19 has accelerated trends such
as the adoption of remote work and procedures.
Regarding demographic shifts, ageing societies need
to make disability inclusion a priority to be able to
address the current and future requirements of a large
percentage of their members, included the workforce.
The following subsections will discuss some of the
challenges related to the technological revolution
(specifically, Artificial Intelligence and automated
systems (section 3.1) and remote work (section 3.2)),
and the new skills that will be required (section 3.3).
3.1 Artificial Intelligence, Automated
Systems, and Accessibility
AI and automated systems are already having a
profound impact throughout the overall employment
life cycle, informing decisions about hiring,
management, performance evaluation, and beyond.
As an example, many companies are outsourcing
their human resources processes to specialized
companies that use machine learning and AI for
applications such as candidate screening, resume
parsing, and employee attrition and turnover
prediction. AI-driven tools are used for performance
evaluation, talent management, and employee
recognition using raw data and insights driven by
algorithms.
On the one side, AI has the potential to make the
workplace more inclusive by making workplace
accommodations faster and more convenient. For
instance, real-time AI-based captioning or
translations for teleconferencing applications can
help people with deafness, intellectual disabilities or
who don’t speak the language participate in a remote
call, or object recognition can support individuals
unable to view and image or see move through “live
spaces” (Inclusive Design Research Centre, 2021). AI
and automated systems are also being introduced as
replacements for human workers who help provide
disabled people access, and the use of AI-enabled
worker management platforms is growing steadily.
(Whittaker, et al., 2019)
Despite its apparent advantages, considerations
regarding fairness in AI for people with disabilities
has received little attention thus far. The fairness of
SmartWork 2021 - 2nd International Workshop on Smart, Personalized and Age-Friendly Working Environments
462
AI methods needs to be examined since human bias
can be amplified rather than mitigated by machine
learning. Sources of bias can arise from biased
training sets, lack of representation in data sets or
because of the use of proxy data (Trewin, 2018).
When AI is part of the decision-making, it is
important that the decisions made by AI are
explainable. Some of the authors are currently
working on the We Count project
5
, a community-
driven project that aims to address the inherent bias
against small minorities and outliers in AI and data
analytics.
3.2 Remote Work
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic
working from home has become the norm for millions
of workers in the EU and worldwide. Early estimates
from Eurofound (Eurofound, 2021) suggest that close
to 40% of those currently working in the EU began to
telework fulltime because of the pandemic. A recent
JRC study provides a rough estimation of around 25%
of employment in teleworkable sectors in the EU
(Fana, Tolan, Torrejon, Brancati, & Fernandez-
Macias, 2020). Teleworking is traditionally more
common in high-skilled, white-collar occupations. As
companies revisit their work practices and embrace
telework, the potential it offers for change could
prove a useful angle in making society in general and
work specifically disability inclusive. On the one
hand, employees with disabilities would greatly
benefit from working in a familiar environment and
reducing commute time, as well as from avoiding
stressful environments. On the other hand, the types
of jobs currently held by workers with disabilities
may greatly constrain their ability to benefit from this
increased availability of remote work (Schur, Ameri,
& Kruse, 2020). To ensure that older employees and
employees with disabilities are included in all aspects
of remote work during this crisis and always,
employers should consider new technologies that
may assist older and disabled employees with remote
work, as well as to make sure that accommodations
follow the employee home.
3.3 Skills and Disabilities
71% of employees in the EU need basic or moderate
level digital skills to perform their jobs. (European
Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
5
https://wecount.inclusivedesign.ca/
6
https://disabilityin.org/resources2/covid-19-response-
accessible-tools-and-content/
(Cedefop), 2015). Digital skills range from basic
usage skills that enable individuals to take part in the
digital society and consume digital goods and
services, to advanced skills that empower the
workforce to develop new digital goods and services.
In 2019, the percentage of people from 17 to 64 years
old having at least basic digital skills reached 58% (up
from 55% in 2015). These skill indicators are strongly
influenced by socioeconomic factors: regarding age,
only 38% of those aged 55-74 and 32% of the retired
and the inactive claimed to possess basic software
skills. It is expected that nearly 14% of the global
workforce will possibly need to change occupational
categories by 2030 due to technological advances
(Manyika, et al., 2017).
In the next decade, technological change will
likely bring a decline in physical tasks, and an
increase in cognitive and social tasks, digital tools,
and autonomy and teamwork (European Centre for
the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop),
2015). Skills such as critical thinking, analytical
capacity, emotional intelligence, and cognitive
flexibility may become essential in this new
landslide. This new paradigm can be specially
challenging for older workers and especially for
workers with disabilities, who have statistically lower
levels of education and training, as well as difficulties
to access information and communication
technologies (Fundacion ONCE (Organisation) ILO
Global Business and Disability Network
(Organisation), 2021). Therefore, companies and
policy makers need to create the tools and
environment to facilitate reskilling and upskilling for
older workers and people with disabilities, especially
those whose jobs will likely disappear.
4 BUILDING AN ACCESSIBLE
WORKPLACE POST COVID-19
Creating an inclusive workplace is a complex process
that involves all departments in the organization.
Drawing on the collective expertise of their partners,
the site Disability:IN proposed a list of action items
aimed to help organizations ensure that employees
with disabilities are included in all aspects of remote
work during and after the pandemic
6
. In their
Accessibility Blog, Microsoft shared some thoughts
regarding what the disability community can teach us
about working remotely
7
. In both cases, their
7
https://blogs.microsoft.com/accessibility/inclusive-
remote-working/
Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19
463
recommendations align with the detailed
recommendations provided by the World Wide Web
Consortium’s Web Accessibility Initiative (W3C
WAI) for planning, implementing, and sustaining an
organizational ICT accessibility program
8
or the
recommendations provided by the Employer
Assistance and Resource Network on Disability
Inclusion (EARN) for creating an accessible and
welcoming workplace
9
, and that can be summarized
in the following points:
1. Learn from people with disabilities and, if
possible, involve them in the design and
decisions processes in your company.
2. Incorporate accessibility in the corporate
culture of your organization, creating an
accessibility policy, supporting accessibility
champions and, importantly, granting
resources.
3. Leverage assistive technologies.
Furthermore, a joint document developed by
Fundación ONCE and the ILO Global Business and
Disability Network within the framework of
Disability Hub Europe (Fundacion ONCE
(Organisation) ILO Global Business and Disability
Network (Organisation), 2021) identifies the
following main levers for an inclusive labour market:
New forms of employment and employment
relations integrate disability inclusion.
1. Skills development and life-long learning
made inclusive of persons with disabilities.
2. Universal Design embedded in development
of all new infrastructure, products, and
services.
3. Make assistive technologies, existing and
newly developed, affordable, and available.
4. Measures to include persons with disabilities
in growing and developing areas of the
economy.
Raising the Floor is working to ensure that the
widespread adoption and rapid advances in
information and communication technologies do not
leave anyone behind, regardless of their physical and
mental abilities, their age, or their socioeconomic
status. As part of that vision, we have coordinated the
development of the Global Public Inclusive
Infrastructure (GPII), an infrastructure for making the
8
https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning-and-managing/
9
https://askearn.org/topics/creating-an-accessible-and-
welcoming-workplace/
development, identification, delivery and use of pre-
existing access technologies and services easier, less
expensive, and more effective. The GPII takes a
comprehensive approach to ICT access, addressing 3
key barriers through its 3 main pillars:
1. People do not know what will help them or
even if anything exists that would help them.
The GPII brings together information from 14
different databases about accessibility
software and hardware in its Unified Listing
10
.
2. Solutions do not exist for a person’s type,
degree, or combination of disability. The GPII
DeveloperSpace
11
list components and
resources to conceive, develop and market
novel accessible solutions.
3. Introducing the cloud-based auto-
personalization of digital interfaces based on
user needs and preferences. Morphic
facilitates the discovery of the accessibility
features embedded in the computer, as well as
assistive technologies both present in the
computer or in the cloud. When the user finds
a configuration that works for them, they can
store it securely in the cloud. The
configuration, based on the user’s needs and
preferences, will activate automatically when
the user keys in to Morphic in any other
computer with Morphic installed.
The solutions provided by the GPII will facilitate the
development of a more inclusive workplace. More
specifically, Morphic will provide employers and
employees with:
Easy discovery of accessible features and
solutions for workers (and employers).
Sometimes, users are not aware or not eager to
recognize their own functional limitations (as
an example, during the SmartWork pre-pilots,
asked if they had any disabilities, one of the
interviewees stated that he did not, but he was
color blind). Moreover, our own capacities
may vary over time. even during the same day
or seasonally due to events like accidents or
injuries. Morphic unveils the accessibility
features embedded in the user’s computer and
provides them with easy access to otherwise
difficult to access settings. With Morphic,
users can play around with the computer’s
settings, find the configuration that better suits
10
https://ul.gpii.net/
11
https://ds.gpii.net/
SmartWork 2021 - 2nd International Workshop on Smart, Personalized and Age-Friendly Working Environments
464
their needs and store that configuration for
future use, hence implementing our “one-size-
fits-one” vision.
Enabling Full Digital Equity. Morphic
allows importing your configuration into any
Morphic-enabled computer. Nowadays, many
companies have dedicated computers with
several assistive technologies installed,
usually placed in segregated places within the
organization’s premises. This creates a sense
of “difference” between users who need
assistive technologies and those who do not.
With Morphic and its Install on Demand
functionality, any computer within the
organization can be automatically adapted to
the needs and preferences of the user, and even
the assistive technologies they need will be
automatically installed when the user keys in.
When the user keys out of Morphic, this
software will be automatically removed, and
the computer will be restored to its original
state. With Morphic, a shared computer can be
used in the morning shift by a worker with
disabilities and in the afternoon shift by
another worker with completely different
needs, without going through complicated
installation procedures. With Morphic,
companies can have a pool of “clean”
computers that can be provided to workers that
need to attend a meeting outside the
company’s premises or work remotely, and
that will be automatically configured to meet
the needs and preferences of the user.
Bringing inclusive culture into corporate
culture. As stated in section 2 of this paper,
many employers and business owners
consider that workers with disabilities will
perform worse, or that the cost of the
accommodations required would impact on
the company’s benefits. In the end, the main
problem is the lack of an inclusive working
culture. Morphic can help companies build a
more inclusive working culture by raising
awareness about the whole range of
accessibility needs and solutions, facilitating
pre-built configuration bundles for different
groups of users that will foster empathy and
will allow IT staff to involve users with special
needs more quickly and efficiently.
While the GPII will help workers perform their work
more efficiently, there are other aspects of the overall
12
http://www.smartworkproject.eu/
work cycle that need to be addressed to improve the
inclusiveness of the workplace. As discussed in
previous sections, the fairness of AI solutions used in
the work decision processes needs to be addressed,
and Raising the Floor is working on initiatives such
as the We Count project that aims to ensure that AI
algorithms consider the needs of the tails of the tails.
5 CASE STUDY: MORPHIC AS
INCLUSIVE APPROACH IN
THE WORKPLACE
The European-funded SmartWork project aims to
support active and healthy ageing at work.
SmartWork is developing a suite of smart services,
building a Worker-Centric AI System for work ability
sustainability
12
. One of the SmartWork services is
UbiWork, which is based on Morphic. Within
SmartWork, we are using a TRL-7 version of the
softwarej, that has been already tested in several
operational locations in the United States, such as
public libraries and job centers (Szopa, Jordan,
Folmar, & Vanderheiden, 2019). SmartWork marks
the first time that Morphic will be tested in Europe,
more specifically in two work environments in
Portugal and Denmark.
Morphic was already tested during the
SmartWork pre-pilots and caused an overall good
impression among the workers interviewed. In
Autumn-Qinter 2021 it is being tested with 60 users
in Denmark and Portugal. The SmartWork project
started in January 2019, before the COVID-19
pandemic started, so we had to review our use cases
and switch from a classic office environment to a
mixed presential-remote work environment. The
version of Morphic that will be used in the pilots will
provide workers with the following features: (1)
employers or pilot facilitators will be able to create
custom Morphic implementations, adapted to the
company’s needs and routines, that can be distributed
to the employees; (2) Morphic will automatically
install all SmartWork software along with other
software required by the pilot facilitator or the
worker, and will orchestrate the identity management
of all SmartWork applications so that user needs to
log in to the system one time; (3) workers will be able
to create custom configurations and store them in the
cloud, so that (4) when users switch computers, all
their configuration and software will appear
automatically, and (5) when the worker keys out of
Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19
465
Morphic, the computer will be restored to its original
settings.
One of our objectives in the project is to
demonstrate that Morphic facilitates the inclusion of
people with disabilities in the workplace by achieving
true digital equity. Users with special needs will not
require a dedicated computer with assistive
technologies installed: organizations that deploy
Morphic will ensure that individuals who need
assistive technology software are able to sit down at
any computer, anywhere in their organization, and
have the assistive technologies they need appear on
that computer, configured to their needs and
preferences. Several users can share a computer and,
when a worker finishes its session in Morphic, the
computer will get back to its original state. When a
new worker or intern gets to the organization, they
can use Morphic to import the configuration of their
personal computers into their workstation, facilitating
the onboarding process of people with special needs.
The results of the pilots will be used to build
Morphic Enterprise, that will be made available as a
commercial product.
6 CONCLUSIONS
In Western countries people with disabilities face
higher levels of unemployment and higher risks of
poverty and exclusion. These problems may worsen
as the rapid advances on information and
communication technologies and the widespread
adoption of novel technologies such as AI and
automated systems are dramatically changing the
work landscape, killing some old jobs, and creating
new ones that require new skills, which might lead to
the exclusion of persons with disabilities or older
workers who have more difficulties for reskilling or
upskilling to the new skills. Some preliminary data
show that, in certain territories the COVID-19
pandemic has had a more profound effect in older
workers and people with disabilities. To facilitate the
inclusion of older workers and workers with
disabilities in this new work market, we need to create
inclusive workplaces, and to make sure that
employers and corporations bring inclusivity and
accessibility into their corporate culture and practices.
We believe that the GPII can be a useful tool to create
more inclusive workplaces, by leveraging the use of
assistive technologies and raising awareness about
accessibility tools and practices. The best way to
ensure that no users are left behind is to provide an
‘one-size-fits-one’ approach, providing workers with
the possibility to take control of their experience in an
informed way, involving users in the design and
decision processes so we make sure we do not leave
behind the tails of the tails.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Morphic was created with funding from the European
Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-
2013) grant SmartWork under agreement number
826343 and the Automated Personalization
Computing Project (APCP) grant number
H421A150006 from the U.S. Department of
Education. No endorsement by the funding agencies
should be assumed.
REFERENCES
Aichner, T. (2021). The economic argument for hiring
people with disabilities. Humanities and Social
Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-4.
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span
developmental psychology: On the dynamics between
growth and decline. Developmental psychology, 23(5),
611.
Eurofound. (2021). Living and Working in Europe 2020.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European
Union.
European Centre for the Development of Vocational
Training (Cedefop). (2015). Skills forecasts country
reports [2015, 2018].
European Commission. (2020). Digital Economy and
Society Index (DESI) 2020.
European Commission. (2021). Union of Equality: Strategy
for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030,
COM (2021) 101 final. Brussels.
Fana, M., Tolan, S., Torrejon, S., Brancati, C. U., &
Fernandez-Macias, E. (2020). The COVID confinement
measures and EU labour markets. Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
Fundacion ONCE (Organisation) ILO Global Business and
Disability Network (Organisation). (2021). An inclusive
digital economy for people with disabilities.
Gaunt, P. M., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2014). Overcoming
Misperceptions About Hiring People with Disabilities.
Retrieved from CPRF: https://www.cprf.org/studies/
overcoming-misperceptions-about-hiring-people-with-
disabilities/
Gold, P. B., Oire, S. N., Fabian, E. S., & Wewiorski, N. J.
(2012). Negotiating reasonable workplace
accommodations: Perspectives of employers, employees
with disabilities, and rehabilitation service providers.
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37(1), 25-37.
Hertel, G., & Zacher, H. (2018). Managing the aging
workforce. In The SAGE handbook of industrial, work
and organization psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 396-428).
SmartWork 2021 - 2nd International Workshop on Smart, Personalized and Age-Friendly Working Environments
466
Holland, P. (2021). Will Disabled Workers Be Winners or
Losers in the Post-COVID-19 Labour Market?
Disabilities, 1(3), 161-173.
Inclusive Design Research Centre. (2021). Future of Work
and Disability - Inclusion, artificial intelligence,
machine learning and work. A Report to Accessibility
Standards Canada, Toronto.
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J.,
Batra, P., Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained:
Workfroce transitions in a time of automation.
McKinsey Global Institute, 150.
Ozimek, A. (2020). The future of remote work. Available
at SSRN 3638597.
Schur, L. A., Ameri, M., & Kruse, D. (2020). Telework
after COVID: a “silver lining” for workers with
disabilities? Journal of occupational rehabilitation,
30(4), 521-536.
Szopa, A. M., Jordan, J. B., Folmar, D. J., & Vanderheiden,
G. C. (2019). The auto-personalization computing
project in libraries. International Conference on
Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 802-
812). Springer.
Trewin, S. (2018). AI fairness for people with disabilities:
Point of view. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10670.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A
review and a research agenda. The journal of strategic
information systems, 28(2), 118-144.
Whittaker, M., Alper, M., Bennett, C. L., Hendren, S.,
Kaziunas, L., Mills, M., West, S. M. (2019). Disability,
bias and AI. AI Now Institute.
Digital Inclusion at the Workplace Post Covid19
467