Digital Rights Regulation in the European Union
Mikhail N. Kuznetsov
a
, Ekaterina P. Rusakova
b
and Viktor V. Zaitsev
c
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia
Keywords: digital rights, protection of digital rights, the right to protect personal data, the right to access the Internet, the
right to be forgotten, the European Union.
Abstract:
The development of digital rights is of concern to the European community and requires the creation of a new
regulatory framework. Today, the European Union is striving to unify the existing regulation of digital rights.
The purpose of the research is to analyze the concept of digital rights in Europe, identify trends in legal
regulation, and study the most important documents in the system of digital rights regulation. The importance
and relevance of the article is caused by the fact that the concept of "digital rights" still does not have a
generally accepted definition, there is no unified legislation on the territory of the European Union. Countries
in Europe have adopted controversial laws that may violate the right to freedom of expression, which causes
outrage among international organizations involved in the development of digital rights regulation. The result
of the work is the identification of two trends in relation to the definition of "digital rights", namely: to
consider digital rights as an independent right or a means for the realization of fundamental rights. The authors
draw the following conclusions: there is a tendency to replace Directives with the adoption of Regulations on
the regulation of digital rights, which contributes to the accelerated unification of legislation on the regulation
of digital rights; the existence of international organizations that provide legal assistance in legal disputes
involving digital rights. As a general conclusion, it can be noted that the European Community believes that
digital rights are under threat, in this regard, the European Union is actively developing rules for regulating
digital rights, protecting personal data, organizing public consultations on digital rights and taking into
account opinions on the regulation of artificial intelligence.
1 INTRODUCTION
The development of digital technologies requires
legal regulation and the formation of methods of
protection in case of violation of digital rights. Today,
digital rights are not something unknown to society.
It has become much more common to mention the
violation of digital rights, their acquisition, alienation,
and litigation, the subject of which is digital rights.
However, digital rights in Europe remain under
threat. In this regard, it is necessary to have an
effective legal framework aimed at regulating digital
rights. In this article, we propose to analyze the
experience of the European Union. It is important to
note that the concept of "digital rights" introduced in
the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is a special
a
https://orcid.org 0000-0001-7229-1351
b
https://orcid.org 0000-0001-6488-0754
c
https://orcid.org 0000-0001-6088-0941
branch concept and has no relation to the concept of
digital rights emerging in international law.
The appearance of the term "digital rights" was
preceded by other terminology: "human rights on the
Internet", "Internet rights" and others. To date, the
concept of "digital rights" has become widespread,
but has not yet been fully formed. The head of the
Digital Freedoms Foundation (DFF), Nani Jansen
Reventlow, believes that the concept of "digital
rights" should be interpreted broadly, and digital
rights should be understood as human rights in online
and online spaces. The content of digital rights and
the nature of the state's obligations to ensure digital
rights are considered by the authors in different ways.
Among digital rights, such topics as the right to be
forgotten, the right to protect personal data, and the
right to access the Internet are most often studied.
Kuznetsov, M., Rusakova, E. and Zaitsev, V.
Digital Rights Regulation in the European Union.
DOI: 10.5220/0010660200003224
In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Forum on Jurisprudence (WFLAW 2021), pages 45-49
ISBN: 978-989-758-598-2
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
45
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The theoretical basis of the study was the regulations
and directives of the European Union, the legislation
of the countries of the European Union, the works of
domestic and foreign scientists.
The research methodology includes general
scientific methods of cognition (dialectical, formal-
logical), private scientific methods (historical,
ethnographic, anthroposociological, statistical) and
special legal methods (legal-dogmatic and
comparative-legal).
The theoretical and methodological component of
the study is represented by the works of the authors-
Shugurov M. V., Tian Y.-J., Hugenholty P. B.,
Determann L., Vinton G., Tomalty J, Varlamova N.
V., Mikhailov S. V.
3 RESEARCH RESULTS
Digital rights can be considered in two aspects:
digital rights are new fundamental independent
human rights;
digital rights are only a means to realize
traditional human rights.
The European Union has created a universal
system for regulating digital rights.
One of the most recent acts regulating digital
rights is Directive (EU) No 2019/790 on copyright
and related rights in the Digital Single Market. The
purpose of this Directive is to create conditions for
the functioning of a single digital market. The
strategy of the single digital market is based on three
aspects:
improved consumer and business access to
online products and services across Europe;
creating an enabling environment for digital
networks and services to thrive;
increasing the growth potential for the European
digital economy.
At the same time, a number of countries adopt
controversial legislation in the field of freedom of
speech on the Internet. For example, in Germany, on
18.06.2020, a law on "hate speech" in social networks
was adopted, which caused heated discussions.
The legal community in Europe is faced with a
number of issues that have not yet been resolved in
the context of resolving digital rights disputes,
namely, whether it is necessary to initiate proceedings
in different jurisdictions simultaneously; to adhere to
the same strategy for protecting digital rights in
different jurisdictions, or to use different strategies in
different countries. These issues should be openly
discussed by the legal community of the European
Union, and the experience gained in Europe can be
used in other countries of the world.
4 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
The right to be forgotten and the right to the
protection of personal data is considered as an
element of the right to respect for privacy. The right
to be forgotten is a legal opportunity to demand the
removal of links in search engines to inappropriate,
outdated, inaccurate, incomplete information about a
person, if they can cause him harm .
The European Order initially recognized personal
data as an inherent right to respect for private and
family life. With the advent of digital technologies,
the Internet, personal data has "flowed" into the
digital space, where it has received similar
recognition as an integral element of the right to
respect for privacy, protection and protection of
fundamental rights. Given the increased threat of the
dissemination and disclosure of personal data, the
European Union has created special legislation in this
area . One of the first acts that established the
protection of personal data, and therefore the
protection of digital rights, was the data protection
Law adopted by the federal State of Hesse in 1970 .
The right to access the Internet can be considered
in two ways: technical and political-ideological. The
right to access the Internet in the technical aspect
implies the implementation of digital rights with the
help of the appropriate technical infrastructure, in the
political and ideological aspect it is considered as a
guarantee of free access to the information contained
in the "Network". While the rights to be forgotten and
the right to the protection of personal data were
considered as an element of the right to respect for
privacy, the right to access the Internet is an element
of the right to freedom of expression. The right to
access the Internet was internationally recognized in
the Report of the Special Rapporteur on the
promotion and protection of the right to freedom of
opinion and expression of 16 May 2011
(A/HRC/17/27) (hereinafter referred to as the UN
Report) , which emphasized the attribution of this
right to fundamental human rights. However, in the
doctrine, some authors did not agree with the
interpretation of the UN Report on the attribution of
the right to access the Internet to fundamental rights,
believing that this statement is controversial and the
right to access the Internet is a means of realizing the
WFLAW 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM ON JURISPRUDENCE
46
right to freedom of expression and the right to
information .
In the development of digital rights, great
importance is given to their protection. In the context
of digital activity, the rights to privacy and freedom
of expression are often violated. In the European
Union, this issue is actively resolved by the ECHR,
which considers disputes related to the use of
electronic means (tracking of electronic
correspondence, mass introduction of video cameras,
indefinite storage of fingerprint data, cell samples and
DNA profiles in electronic banks, etc.) . The scope of
digital rights and their protection is not limited to the
practice of the ECHR.
For example, the Charter of Human Rights on the
Internet establishes:
the right to access the Internet, which follows
from article 26 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, which guarantees the right to
education;
the right to freedom of expression and
association (Article 18-20 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights the right to participate
in online protests);
the right to access knowledge, according to
article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (the right to freedom of information);
The right to free and open source software and
technology (article 27 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights);
the right to privacy, freedom from surveillance
and encryption (article 12 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights);
the right to Internet governance, which includes:
the right to an open Internet architecture; the right to
transparency and accessibility of decisions related to
the governance and development of the Internet; the
right to multilateral democratic oversight of Internet
governance;
the right to know, protect and exercise rights on
the Internet.
This list is not exhaustive, since the development
of technologies, the Internet, content, and services
contributes to the emergence of new digital rights,
which in turn need to be protected and protected.
In Europe, the protection of digital rights is one of
the most relevant topics. In October 2017, the Digital
Freedoms Foundation was established in Berlin, the
main goals of which were: strengthen cooperation
between digital rights protection actors and provide
them with the means to pursue strategic litigation.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),
adopted by the European Parliament on December 17,
2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation), was
created to unify the provisions governing the
protection of personal data of individuals in the
European Union, and is mandatory for the countries
of the European Union, since it was adopted in the
form of a regulation.
The Regulation sets out specific types of safety
that can be considered «risk-appropriate», including:
pseudonymization and encryption of personal
data;
the ability to ensure the continued
confidentiality, integrity, availability, and
sustainability of processing systems and services;
the ability to restore the availability and access
to personal data in a timely manner in the event of a
physical or technical incident;
the ability to restore the availability and access
to personal data in a timely manner in the event of a
physical or technical incident.
The Regulation defines the concepts of «personal
data», «controller», «operator», «project data
protection», «pseudonymization», «profiling» and
others. The Regulation sets restrictions on the transfer
of personal data to "third countries" (i.e. outside the
EU) and to international organizations. The rights of
personal data subjects are regulated, including: the
right to access, the right to rectification, the right to
deletion, the right to restriction, and the right to
portability.
The Directive (EU) No 2019/790 on copyright
and related rights in the Digital Single Market
regulates the issues of expanding the list of
mandatory restrictions and exceptions, establishes
new rules for works that have gone out of circulation,
regulates the legal regime of expanded collective
licensing, recognizes publications in the press as new
objects of exclusive rights, and creates special
regulations for certain categories of online platforms.
In accordance with this law, social network
operators are required to inform the Federal Criminal
Investigation Department about incitement to
national hatred, depiction of acts of violence,
propaganda, use of prohibited symbols, preparation
of serious crimes, and death threats. Opponents of the
law, including the UN Special Representative for
Freedom of Speech, David Kay, believe that the law
violates the rights of subjects on the Internet and will
lead to greater censorship. Similar trends are
observed in France, where laws have been passed to
curb terrorism, but these laws seriously violate the
rights to freedom of speech . In France, it was
proposed to adopt the so-called «Air Law», but this
bill was rejected due to the disproportionate impact
on freedom of speech .
Digital Rights Regulation in the European Union
47
The civil and legal community is actively
involved in the regulation of digital rights. The
Digital Freedoms Foundation, the Foundation for
Democracy and Media, and the Renewable Freedom
Foundation plan to create a project on future digital
rights challenges as a complement to the support for
judicial work that the Digital Freedoms Foundation is
actively pursuing. These funds plan research in the
field of artificial intelligence, ensuring equal
conditions in the digital sphere, and defining the
boundaries of freedom of thought.
On February 19, 2020, the European Commission
adopted the digital strategy of the European Union,
which, in addition to regulating digital rights,
addresses the development of legal norms for the
development and implementation of artificial
intelligence. According to this strategy, it is planned
to attract European, public and private funding for the
development of the digital space. One important
aspect is to keep the focus on human needs in the
development of artificial intelligence, especially in
industries such as law enforcement. In line with this
strategy, the European Commission plans to initiate
public consultations on digital rights and the
development of artificial intelligence systems.
At the same time, the strategy adopted a document
entitled Shaping the digital future of Europe («White
Paper on Artificial Intelligence»), which covers the
regulation of digital rights and artificial intelligence .
The European Community is concerned about the
digital transformation in society, the economy, the
protection of human rights, digital rights.
With regard to digital rights and data, the
document regulates the following aspects:
the formation of a regulatory framework that
will motivate the exchange of data between
government agencies and commercial organizations,
without forgetting about the protection of digital
rights, personal data and consumer rights;
incentivize by encouraging public authorities to
disclose high-value data sets;
encouraging the creation of data sets for the
European Union, which focus on the areas of
industrial production, digital rights protection, and
mobility.
In the regulation of digital rights, there is a
tendency to replace the Directives of the European
Union with a Regulation, for example, in 2020,
discussions began on changing the Directive on e-
Commerce to the Law on Digital Services, adopted in
the form of a Regulation. The main purpose of the
Digital Services Act is to unify the rules on the
territory of the European Union regarding the
suppression of illegal and malicious content on the
Internet. In Europe, there is already a practice of
creating such laws, as examples mentioned above
were Germany and France, which adopted or tried to
adopt a law to regulate the removal of illegal and
malicious content. The Digital Services Act provides
for the creation of a certain "notification and action"
mechanism that will ensure that online services have
the same processes for removing content in the event
that it has been found illegal. The Law on Digital
Services applies not only to the states of the European
Union, but also defines the range of organizations.
One of these organizations is the Corporation for the
Management of Domain Names and IP Addresses,
which interacts with states in the framework of the
regulation of digital rights and carries out technical
regulation in the Internet system.
The Law on Digital Services provides for certain
requirements for Internet companies, including
penalties that may follow for non-compliance with
these requirements:
Internet platforms must share some data with
regulators and even competitors;
users should be able to delete pre-installed
applications and download other software;
Internet platforms should strengthen their
control over ambiguous, illegal or misleading
content;
in case of non-compliance with the rules on the
part of Internet sites, temporary blocking is possible;
setting fines in case of non-compliance with the
requirements of the Digital Services Act.
It is assumed that the Law on Digital Services will
create a certain order in the field of legal regulation
of digital rights and personal data. The Law sets out
two main objectives: to create safe and reliable
services, while protecting freedom of expression.
These tasks are aimed at achieving a common goal,
namely, to guarantee users access to a wide range of
services online .
One of the important issues for the European
community is the protection of children's rights in the
digital space. The Council of Europe has adopted the
following documents: Recommendation CM/Rec
(2008) 6 of the Committee of Ministers for the
member States of the Council of Europe "On
measures to promote respect for freedom of speech
and information in connection with Internet filters",
Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on
Protecting the Dignity, Safety and Privacy of
Children on the Internet (2008), Recommendation of
the Committee of Ministers CM/Rec (2009) 5 on
measures to protect children from harmful content
and behavior and to promote their active participation
WFLAW 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM ON JURISPRUDENCE
48
in the new information and communication
environment.
5 CONCLUSION
Thus, at the present time in Europe, there is no
definitive concept of "digital rights". Most European
organizations use a broad interpretation of the
concept of "digital rights". Digital rights are defined
as individual rights, such as the right to access the
Internet, the right to be forgotten, and the right to
protect personal data. It is still an open question
whether these rights are independent rights or
represent a means for the realization of independent
fundamental rights such as the right to respect for
private life, the right to freedom of expression. The
European Community is concerned about the
regulation of digital rights, their protection and the
protection of personal data. The authorities of the
European Union adopt appropriate regulations and
strive to unify the rules governing digital rights. The
tendency of states to adopt legislation on the
suppression of illegal activities on the Internet is
causing a heated debate in Europe, as a number of
experts believe that these laws are a direct violation
of freedom of speech and expression. The European
Union strives to take all aspects into account in order
to create effective legal regulation, for example, by
holding public consultations on digital rights and
taking into account the views of citizens on the
regulation of artificial intelligence. The
corresponding legal regulation is also adopted in the
field of protection of children's rights on the Internet.
An important role is played by international
organizations and Internet companies, one of the most
notable is the assistance provided by the Digital
Freedoms Foundation (DFF) in the litigation of a
dispute over digital rights. In this regard, it should be
noted that Europe is committed to regulating all
issues of digital rights, establishing unified rules, and
most importantly the absence of a threat to digital
rights in Europe.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Acknowledgement. the research was carried out with
the financial support of the russian foundation for
basic research in the framework of scientific project
NO. 20-011-00450
REFERENCES
Akinfieva, V. V. (2021). Digital financial assets as a new
type of digital rights. Ex jure. Vol. 3.pages 46-55.
Dudin M.N., Shakhov O.F., Shakhova M.S., Rusakova
E.P., Sizova Y.S. (2019). Digital technologies as a
driver of intellectual stratification of human resources:
socio-economic inequality. International Journal of
Recent Technology and Engineering, (2). pages 4436-
4440.
Grin, O. S. (2020). Binding relations concerning digital
objects of civil rights. Lex Russica. Vol. 73, 10. pages
21-31.
Khamdamova, F. (2020). The impact of digital technologies
on human rights. TSUL Legal Report. Vol. 1. Pages
134-146.
Kirillova, E.A., Bogdan, V.V., Surkov, A.N., Baumshteyn,
A.B., Novichkov, V.E.Y. (2019). Digital rights and
digital objects: features of control and regulation.
Journal of advanced research in dynamical and control
systems. Vol. 11 (S10). pages 567-573.
Kuznetsov, M.N., Ocaqli U. (2020). Information
Communication Technologies and Legal Education
Correlation in Russian Federation and European Union.
Pixel International Conferences the Future of
Education. pages 333-336.
Ostanina, E., Titova, E. (2020). The protection of consumer
rights in the digital economy conditions - the experience
of the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal..Vol. 7. P.
119-146.
Perry, S., Roda C. (2016). Human rights and digital
technology: digital tightrope. American University of
Paris. P. 1-203.
Rusakova, E. P., Inshakova, A.O. (2021). Industrial and
manufacturing engineering in digital legal proceedings
in the Asia-Pacific region: a new level of quality based
on data, blockchain and ai. International Journal for
Quality Research. 15 (1). pages 273-289.
Rusakova, E.P., Inshakova, A.O., Frolova, E.E. (2021).
Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional
Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. ISC 2019.
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 198. pages
1515-1521.
Tomalty J. (2017). Is There a Human Right to Internet
Access? Philosophy Now. Vol. 118. pages 6–8.
Vinton, G. (2012). Cerf Emergent Properties. Human
Rights, and the Internet. IEEE Internet Computing. Vol.
16(2). pages 87-88.
Digital Rights Regulation in the European Union
49