5  DISCUSSION 
Our findings have highlighted that Android users are 
more  responsive  to  the  advertisements  in  terms  of 
both  downloads,  the  primary  metric  of  interest,  as 
well as engagement metrics. This shows that Android 
may be a more cost-effective platform as more results 
were  found  directly  from  the  advertisements 
themselves,  and  via  their  higher  engagement, 
Android users  effectively  market the  app  further  to 
their  contacts  via  their  greater  activity  and 
interactions  with  both  the  advertisements  and  the 
Elena+  Facebook  page.  It  is  possible  therefore  that 
Android  users  as  a  whole  are  less  data  privacy 
sensitive, and thus interact more. This may be likely, 
as Android phones can range from relatively cheap to 
very expensive when bought firsthand and brand new, 
whereas iOS models are always relatively expensive. 
As income level is indicative of education (Tolley & 
Olson,  1971),  and  higher  digital  literacy  results  in 
more  privacy  protective  behaviors  (Park,  2011),  it 
may be due to less affluent/less educated individuals 
being represented amongst Android users. 
  Regarding  the prevalence of middle-aged aged 
and  above  females  being  primary  downloaders  and 
those exhibiting engaged behaviors, the authors feel 
that this perhaps is related to either the ad or app 
content. It may be simply that men and youth found 
the simple advertisements we used less attractive, as 
these groups, stereotypically, exhibit greater affinity 
to new technology and technological devices (Olson 
et al., 2011; Venkatesh & Morris, 2000). Thusly, for 
targeting  youth  or  men,  perhaps  better  ad  content 
(media, text) was required. Alternatively, however, it 
may  simply  represent  that  middle-aged  and  older 
women  are  a  particular  at-risk  group  for  the 
intervention  used  in  this  study  i.e.  Elena+  Care  for 
COVID-19.  Often middle-aged and older women are 
responsible for care roles in the family (Dahlberg et 
al., 2007) (i.e. caring for children, caring for elderly 
relatives  or  both),  and  may  also  still  be  in 
employment.  Adding  the  additional  strain  of  the 
pandemic  and  social  distancing/isolation 
requirements  on  top  of  all  other  respective  duties 
could therefore disproportionally affect the group of 
middle-aged  women  and  could  be  an  alternative 
explanation  as  to  why  they  downloaded/engaged 
most often after being exposed to advertising.  
 
 
 
 
 
6  CONCLUSIONS 
In  summary  these  preliminary  findings  from  the 
Facebook advertising campaigns are not to be taken 
as definitive proof due to the relatively small budget 
and duration of the campaigns and the fact that there 
are  likely  many  variations of  success  contingent on 
the  medical  intervention  being  utilized  and  patient 
population. However, it is hoped that by sharing our 
findings  on  utilizing  social  media  for  driving 
downloads of app, Elena+ Care for COVID-19, others 
may benefit and that needless costs are not duplicated 
by  repeatedly  running  trial  and  error  advertising 
campaigns to find what works best, and may enable 
practitioners to draw meaningful conclusions in their 
own fields more speedily, saving budget for reaching 
potential  beneficiaries  of  their  digital  health 
interventions.  
REFERENCES 
Arigo, D., Pagoto, S., Carter-Harris, L., Lillie, S. E., & 
Nebeker,  C.  (2018).  Using  social  media  for  health 
research: Methodological and ethical considerations for 
recruitment and  intervention  delivery. Digital Health, 
4,  205520761877175. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618771757 
Canhoto,  A.  I.,  Clark,  M.,  &  Fennemore,  P.  (2013). 
Emerging  segmentation  practices  in  the  age  of  the 
social customer. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(5), 
413–428. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2013.801609 
Chou, W. S., Prestin, A., & Kunath, S. (2014). Obesity in 
social media: a mixed methods analysis. Translational 
Behavioral Medicine,  4(3),  314–323. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0256-1 
Dahlberg, L., Demack, S., & Bambra, C. (2007). Age and 
gender of informal carers: A population-based study in 
the  UK.  Health and Social Care in the Community, 
15(5),  439–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
2524.2007.00702.x 
Javed,  B.,  Sarwer,  A.,  Soto,  E.  B.,  &  Mashwani,  Z.-R. 
(2020).  Impact  of  SARS-CoV-2  (Coronavirus) 
Pandemic on Public Mental Health. Frontiers in Public 
Health,  8,  292. 
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00292 
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2016). Marketing 
4.0: Moving from traditional to digital. John Wiley & 
Sons. 
Ma, J., & Du, B. (2018). Digital advertising and company 
value:  Implications  of  reallocating  advertising 
expenditures.  Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 
326–337. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-002 
Ollier,  Joseph  &  Kowatsch,  T.  (2020).  Elena+ Care for 
COVID Website. 2020. elena.plus