Improving ICC Profiles Color Management System Performance by
Testing CIELAB of Duplex Paper in Color Reproduction
Wiwi Prastiwinarti
1
, Saeful Imam
2
1,2
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Prof. Siwabessy Street.
Kampus Baru Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Keywords: ICC Profile, CIELAB, Duplex Paper, Color Difference
Abstract: Accurate color control is very important in order to have a predictable quality of final product. A Technique
is proposed for improving the color quality of digital color proof. This method investigates ICC Profile’s
performance by testing CIELAB (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage L*, a* and b*) value of Duplex
paper. Firstly, ICC profile with color target ECI2002CMYK is sent to offset machine, and the corresponding
CIELAB and the E color difference are obtained by spectrophotometer with color sensor. Secondly, the
CIELAB of duplex paper are measured, and a new color target is developed to create ICC profile based on
CIELAB of duplex paper. At last. For the purpose of testing the accuracy of the obtained ICC profile, these
color target is sent to offset machine, and the color eror E is calculated. In the experiment the average color
difference of ICC profile ECI2002 CMYK is 4.78E and the average color difference of ICC profile‘s duplex
paper color is 3.15E which is below the printing error threshold and 2D- color gamut visualization of ICC
profile ECI2002 CMYK and duplex paper color describe that creating ICC profile with approach of CIELAB
duplex paper closely follow the data of ICC profile’s color ECI2002CMYK.
1 INTRODUCTION
Color consistency is very important in printing
quality. The problems in color reproduction is the
difference between input device and output device
color model and color gamut. However, the color
devices used in the workflow have different color-
mixing models and color gamuts, which makes the
goal of color reproduction hard to accomplished (Liu
et.al, 2007). The repeatable quality of colour
reproduction is a growing challenge for producers of
digital printing devices as well as for paper producers.
The properties of the printing substrate such as
whiteness, brightness, gloss, opacity, porosity, surface
roughness, etc., the colourants and the printing
technology in different combinations together are all
factors that influence the overall print quality. Paper
properties are one of the most important factors
affecting the completeness of the image transfer and
image appearance (Ivana et.al, 2013)
Digital color proof on PrePress is a color reference
before sending it to the offset or digital machine. The
color management on PrePress uses a Color
Management System (CMS) for input and output
verification. CMS relationship regarding the CIE
LAB color model standards. The ICC (International
Color Consortium) profile is the key to achieving the
CMS workflow. ICC profile color transformation
begins by transforming the input device color on the
CIELAB color standard model, then mapping the
color gamut (collection of colors) from the input
device to the output device on the CIELAB model,
then transforming the color from CIELAB to the
output device (Zhen Liu et.al, 2009; Jure Ahtik,
2017). The fact shows that the color of CMS
application’s was not consistance between original
and the reproduced product, even though the printing
process is in accordance with the machine calibration
requirements in making color standards.
From the side of paper, making color standards
uses only one type of paper, while the color standard
is used to print several types of paper, such as duplex
and ivory paper with different color characteristics. It
is predicted that this paper color difference is one of
the factors causing the difficulty of achieving print
colors that match the color proofing, even though
CMS has been applied. This paper proposes the
design of the ICC Profile with a paper color approach
that is through testing the color of printed paper LAB,
using duplex paper. The Plate is printed with
Prastiwinarti, W. and Imam, S.
Improving ICC Profiles Color Management System Performance by Testing CIELAB of Duplex Paper in Color Reproduction.
DOI: 10.5220/0009969400002905
In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Southeast Asian International Seminar (ASAIS 2019), pages 149-152
ISBN: 978-989-758-468-8
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
149
ECI2002 color target, and send it to offset machine
using duplex paper; the former target is employed to
get sample data; the CIELAB and density of sample
data are measured. A New color target is developed
to modify the ICC profile digital color proof based on
CIELAB value of duplex paper. For the purpose of
testing the accuracy of the obtained digital color
proof, the color difference are calculated.
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 CIELAB Color Space
Color may be described using more color systems
such as XYZ, RGB, CMYK, CIELAB, which
quantify in different manners the three attributes of
color perception: hue, saturation and luminosity. The
present paper shows the data referring to the color
measurements in the CIELAB system to study the
color of ICC profiles transformations.
2.2 Color Difference
For the purpose of testing the accuracy of the obtained
ICC profile, color difference is used to measure the
accuracy of ICC profile based on ECI2002CMYK
and CIELAB duplex paper. The Color difference E
is calculated depends on the color model. Because the
color stimulus can be represented as a point in space,
the difference in color E between two stimuli is
calculated as the distance between the points
representing these stimuli. The CIEL*a*b* and ΔEab
was introduced by the International Commission on
Illumination (CIE) in 1976. Given two colors in the
CIEL*a*b* color space, (L
1
, a
1
, b
1
) and (L
2
, a
2
, b
2
),
the ΔEab formula is defined as:
ΔE = (L
1
- L
2
)
2
+ (a
1
- a
2
)
2
+ (b
1
- b
2
)
2
Where L
1
– the CIE L* value of reference color
a
1
– the CIE a* value of reference color
b
1
– the CIE b* value of reference color
L
2
– the CIE L* value of sample color
a
2
– the CIE a* value of sample color
b
2
– the CIE b* value of sample color.
2.3 Color Gamut
In color reproduction systems, color gamut refers to
the subset of colors which can be accurately
represented in a given circumstance, such as within a
given color image or by a certain color device. While
the gamut boundary means the outer surface of the 3D
gamut, or the outer contour line of the 2D gamut.
Color gamut is often described in CIELAB space; this
is mainly because CIELAB color spaces are
independent of devices (Bangyong Sun, et al., 2014).
In this research, In order to determine the range of
the reproducible color, the 2D color gamut is used to
show that range color of ICC profile duplex and ICC
profile standar ECI2002 CMYK.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In the experiment, firstly, the color target ECI2002
CMYK which has 1485 patches for ICC profile is
printed out on a 190 gsm semiglossy paper 44 inch by
Epson Stylus 9700 printer, a kind of digital color
proof printer, and then the spectrometer X-rite 530 is
used to measure CIELAB values. Within the
measured results for 216 CMY sample data, the
maximal CIEL* value is 93.99 and the minimal
CIEL* value is 88.81, the maximal CIEa* value is -
0.56 and the minimal CIEa* value is -4.55, the
maximal CIEb* value is 92.95 and the minimal
CIEb* value is 5.56. Then these color target is sent to
offset machine to find out the ΔE color difference, the
results shows the everage error is 4.78ΔE with
maximal error 6.45ΔE.
Secondly, the CIELAB value of duplex paper with
250, 270, 310, 350, 400 gsm are measured on solid
color and 100% raster, and then the corresponding
CIELAB value are obtained by spectrophotometer
with color sensor. Between these CIELAB value, the
range of colors and tones achievable by an imaging
system of duplex color (the optimal value) of CIEL*
is 91.30, the minimum CIEL* value is 89.10, and the
maximum CIEL* value is 93.50. At last, these CIEL*
values are used to modify the ICC Profile with oris
color tuner before the color target is printed out. In
this process, 320 patches were randomly selected and
the CIELAB of the optimal, maximal, and minimal
value of color target are measured used
spectrophotometer. For the purpose of testing the
accuracy of achievable the range color between the
optimal, maximal, and minimal value, CIELAB of
these value are measured. The former target is
employed to compare the CIELAB optimal value and
CIELAB maximal value, and CIELAB optimal value
with CIELAB minimal value. If ΔE color difference
more than 3.5 then back to previous process to get ΔE
color difference less than 3.5. At last, The CIELAB
of maximal and minimal value are used to determine
the limit of CIELAB duplex paper. In this
experiment, the ΔE color difference between
ASAIS 2019 - Annual Southeast Asian International Seminar
150
CIELAB optimal value and CIELAB maximal is
2.97, and CIELAB optimal value and CIELAB
minimal is 2.78, and the duplex paper’s color target
optimal is used to create ICC profile and the
comparison between CIELAB of ICC profile with
color target ECI2002 CMYK and ICC profile with
duplex color modified in yellow color are obtained in
figure 1 to figure 3.
Figure 1: CIEL* of two ICC Profile
Figure 2: CIEa* of two ICC Profile
Figure 3: CIEa* of two ICC Profile
Figure 4: CIEa* and CIEb* ICC duplex and ICC standar
Figure 4 shows trend CIEa* and CIEb* of ICC profile
duplex and ICC profile with ECI2002 CMYK which
is duplex profile tend to a- (green) and b- (blue) and
ICC profile ECI2002CMYK tend to a- (green) dan b+
(yellow).
To test the accuracy of predictable color quality of
final product, ICC profile’s color reference of digital
color proof send to offset machine and compare the
ΔE color difference between the former data of ICC
profile with color target ECI2002 CMYK and ICC
profile based on the color of duplex paper. For all
testing color, the average error is 3.15 ΔE with the
maximal error 5.25 ΔE. Because for most of the
printing process, the average error threshold is 5 ΔE,
the experiment results is acceptable which indicate
the approach of color paper is suitable to create ICC
profile. In order to determine the range of the
reproducible color, the color gamut is obtained in
figure 5 below.
Figure 5: color gamut of ICC standar and ICC duplex
85
87
89
91
93
95
10
30
50
70
90
Lightness (L*)
Lightness (L*)yellow
Duplex
standar
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
10 30 50 70 90
chromatictya*
Kordinata*yellow
Duplex
standar
1
21
41
61
81
10
30
50
70
90
chromatictyb*
Kordinatb*yellow
Duplex
standar
0
20
40
60
80
100
10 50
Kordinatb*
kordinata*
duplex
standar
80
30
20
70
120
100 0 100
duplex
standar
y
R
M
B
C
G
Improving ICC Profiles Color Management System Performance by Testing CIELAB of Duplex Paper in Color Reproduction
151
Figure 5 shows that range color of ICC profile duplex
and ICC profile standar ECI2002 CMYK are
different, Color gamut of duplex paper tend to a+
(red) and b- (blue), and it is follow the data of
CIELAB duplex paper.
4 CONCLUSIONS
A technic of create ICC profile by applying the
CIELAB of paper color has been proposed and the
approach of color paper is suitable to create ICC
profile. Results shows the accuracy is acceptable. To
achieve the visualization and parametric description
of color gamut is very significant for the accurate
evaluation of color gamut performance and
capabilities on color output device.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This works is supported Center for Research and
Community Service Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, and
Printing and Publishing Department of Politeknik
Negeri Jakarta.
REFERENCES
Ahtik, Jure. 2017. Comparison of ICC and DNG Colour
Profile Workflows Based on Colorimetric Accuracy.
Journal of Print and Media Technology
Research.6(2017)3.pp 115-121.
Bangyong Sun, Shisheng Zhou. 2012 Study on the 3D
Interpolation Models Used in Color Conversion.
ACSIT International Journal of Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, February.
Bangyong Sun, et.al. 2014. Calculating Cyan-Magenta-
Yellow-Black (CMYK) Printer Gray Component Data
Based On Polynomial Modelling. Academic Journal.
Vol. 9 No. 9. Pp 352-356.
Bangyong Sun, et.al. 2014. A Color Gamut Description
Algorithm for Liquid Crystal Displays din CIELAB
Space.The Scientific World Journal Volume 2014,
article IC 671964.
Chuan, Zhi. Chuan, Shi Yi, and Sun Bangyong. 2016.
Research on Gamut Visualization Method of the Color
Output Device. Journal of Display Technology Vol. 12
No. 5
CIE. 2018. CIE 15:2018. Colorimetry. Vienna: CIE. DOI:
10.25039/TR.015.2018
Durmus, Dorukalp. 2019. Evaluation of Hue Shift Formula
in CIELAB and CAM02. Proceedings of the 29th CIE
SESSION Washington D.C., USA, June 14 – 22.
Juric Ivana, et. al. 2013. Optical paper properties and their
influence on colour reproduction and perceived print
quality. Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal Vol
28 no. 2.
Kamenov, 2018.Research on The Capabilities of Color
Toner Based Printer for Quality Printing Using Custom
Generated ICC Color Profiles. International Scientific
Journal Industry 4.0. ISSN 2534-997X. pp. 39-42.
Lin, Maohai. et.al. 2009. Quality Analysis in Digital
Printing Based on Color Management System.
Intenational Journal of Engineering and Technology
Vol 1 No.2.
Liu Zhen, et.al. 2009. The Research on Mechanism of Color
Management System based on iCAM Color Appearance
Model. Computer and Mathematics with Applications
57 (2009) pp 1829–1834.
Oulton, David. 2013, Technology for Colour Management.
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on
Digital Technologies for the Textile Industries
Manchester, UK.
R H Liu, P Zeng, and Y F Wang. “A color calibration
method of printer using adaptive regression,”.Acta
Electronica Sinica, 2007, vol. 35, no.11, pp. 2201-
2204.
Sardjeva, Rossitza. 2014. Study of Color Quality
Uniformity in Digital Dry Toner Electro-photographic
Printing. International Journal of Modern
Communication Technologies & Research (IJMCTR)
ISSN: 2321-0850, Volume-2.
Singh, Nishan. et.al. 2017. Color Control in Sheet-Fed
Offset Printing Presses Using Mellow Colour
Management System. International Journal of
Enggineering Sciences & Research. ISSN: 2277-9655
Zhao, Lei. 2016. Study on the Gamut Mapping Method
Based on BP Neural Network. Journal of Computers
Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 149-162.
ASAIS 2019 - Annual Southeast Asian International Seminar
152