The Effect of Kinesiotape For Dynamic Balance of Chronic Ankle
Instability (CAI) in Youth Indonesian Athletes
Abdurrasyid
1
and Ayu Rahmayana
2
1
Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jl. Arjuna Utara No.9, Jakarta, Indonesia
2
Student Sport Education Center (SSEC), Ragunan, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Chronic Ankle Instability, Kinesiotape, Chronic Sprained Ankle, Dynamic Balance.
Abstract: The effect of kinesiotape (KT) to correction and facilitation techniques after ten minutes of dynamic balance
using the star excursion balance test (SEBT) on chronic ankle instability injury (CAI). One hundred eleven
(111) subjects were divided into group 1 correction techniques (n = 21), group 2 facilitation techniques (n =
26), and group 3 controls / normal (n = 64). Quasi experimental randomized controlled trial by testing the
SEBT percentage pre and post, and testing the SEBT percentage after 10 minutes in group 1 and group 2,
compared to normal 3-ankle group. Paired sample t-test pre (87,62% ± 9,631) and post (98,14% ± 10,556)
group 1 p = 0,000 (p <0,005) there is difference of dynamic balance, paired sample t-test pre (90, 12.5% ±
8,529) and post (96,5% ± 14,049) group 2 p = 0,015 (p <0,05) there is difference of dynamic balance,
independent sample t-test post group 1 and group 2 p = 0,659 (p> 0 , 05) and ANOVA group 1, group 2, &
group 3 (95,13% ± 11,31) p = 0,585 (p> 0,05) there is no difference of dynamic balance. Both techniques of
KT on ankle have a neurophysiological effect on dynamic balance same as normal ankle.
1 INTRODUCTION
Sprain lateral ligaments of the ankle joint are the
most commonly injured by active athletes. The
impairment found that this ligament will cause signs
and symptoms such as pain, swelling, and feel the
joints slack or unstable (Kobayashi and Gamada,
2014). Athletes who have already experienced this
injury will be the risk of recurrent or repetitive
injuries with symptoms not getting better or worst
(Bonnel et al., 2010). Some opinions suggest that
this injury occurs after repeated injuries more than
twice and more than 3 months (Gribble et al., 2014).
One data explains that during the 11-year league
UEFA Champions were 1080 occurrences of ankle
injuries with a ratio of 0.7-1 / 1000 hours (Walden et
al., 2013). Lateral sprain ankle is the most
commonly experienced limb injury in the athlete
with an incidence rate of 20% -40% in various sports
(Walden et al., 2013, Sawkins K, 2007). Ankle
injuries are more common in women and children
active in team sports.
A subjective complaint by some athlete who had
a history of ankle injuries, they will feel painful and
unstable when they practiced and played (Donovan
and Hertel, 2012). There is some athlete who
suffered repetitive injuries and some are not. Some
studies explained that chronic ankle instability (CAI)
is caused by instability of the ankle joint alongside a
single motion. In this case, there are two types of
joint instability, namely mechanical stability and
functional stability (Giannini et al., 2014, Kobayashi
and Gamada, 2014).
Individuals with CAI will be had hypermobility
and joint hypomobility, hypermobility due to
decreased joint stability and hypomobility due to
changes in the position of the distal talocrural and
tibiofibular joint (Hoch and Grindstaff, 2012,
Hubbard and Hertel, 2006). Hypomobility is
characterized by the limitations of dorsal flexion and
plantar flexion. This limitation will be decreased the
action of the joint mechanism and proprioceptors,
reduce muscle contraction, static and dynamic
control of postural, and the pattern of gait that affect
to recurrent injuries (Hoch and Grindstaff, 2012).
The x-ray observations in this condition and sub-
acute sprained ankle explained that this injury will
change the position of fibular bone shift to the
anterior of tibia (Hubbard et al., 2006, Hubbard and
Hertel, 2008). Furthermore, talus bone also shifts to
the anterior, this reasons why athlete felt pain at
140
, A. and Rahmayana, A.
The Effect of Kinesiotape For Dynamic Balance of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Youth Indonesian Athletes.
DOI: 10.5220/0009569201400144
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Health (ICOH 2019), pages 140-144
ISBN: 978-989-758-454-1
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
anterior side of the ankle, difficult for dorsal flexion
and it will facilitate the ankle joint in the
plantarflexion and inversion position (Wikstrom and
Hubbard, 2010).
Based on the above paragraph explanation, there
needs external support using Kinesio tape (KT) to
improve the position of the fibula and talus bone to
increase the function of mechanoreceptor which
implies the dynamic balance and reduces the risk the
recurrent tear of ligament during practice. According
to Kumbrink (2012), there are four techniques using
Kinesio tape, namely muscle facilitation, ligament
correction, bone position correction, and lymphatics.
In this study, the techniques designate used are
muscle facilitation and bone position correction
applied to the ankle. This technique will enhance the
work of sensory function mechanoreceptor which
increase the joint position and proprioception to
become more stable.
KT gives an effect to correct the muscle tone and
muscle contraction because of the activation
subcutaneous mechanoreceptor that regulates
sensory feedback stimulation of the fascia and
muscle layers. This feedback will respond to the
proprioceptive to transmit information to the central
nervous system (CNS) and return back to the
peripheral motor system to controlled muscle tone
whether it facilitates and inhibits according to
desired needs and stimulation. Furthermore, to some
pathologies caused by autonomic controls, KT
should be able to provide information through the
mechanoreceptors into the hypothalamus thereby
providing stimulation of tone control globally (Seo
et al., 2016, Chang et al., 2015).
2 METHOD
2.1 Subject
One hundred eleven (111) feet of observations were
obtained from students of the Student Sport
Education Center (SSEC) Ragunan Jakarta,
Indonesia divided into three (3) groups, with
inclusive for CAI (group 1 (KT with Bone position
correction technique) and group 2 (KT with Muscle
facilitation technique) male and female aged 15-20
years, have a history of ankle injuries more than
once times (≥1 times) in the presence of
inflammation and physical activity limitation, ever
felt more than 2 times feeling unstable at the ankle
joints, recurrent injuries without any new
inflammation condition, and self-assessment of
ankle injuries with CAIT <24 point. For group 3
with a normal foot, the criteria are male and female
athletes 15-20 years old, had no history of injury
ankle and knee, self-assessment of ankle injury
with Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
≥24 point. The exclusion criteria of the subject
there were having a history of musculoskeletal
surgery actions including bones, ligaments,
muscles, and nerves around the ankle joint, has a
history of foot fracture, musculoskeletal acute
injuries (sprains, strains, and fractures) within a
period of three months during the examination. The
randomized control trial group with a twenty-one
(21) feet with CAI entered in group KT with bone
position correction technique, twenty-six (26) feet
with CAI entered in group KT with muscle
facilitation technique, and sixty-four legs (64)
healthy or without CAI were not given any
intervention.
2.2 Instrument
Measurements the dynamic balance was using the
Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) were
performed before and after 10 minutes given KT in
both intervention groups. Whereas the healthy foot
group can measurements were taken at any time.
2.3 KT Technique
2.3.1 Bone Position Correction Technique
Using four pieces of KT attached to the area of the
fibula bone to maintain the position of the fibula.
2.3.2 Muscle Facilitation Technique
Using three pieces of KT attached to the peroneus
longus and brevis muscles and given resistance to
the anterior ankle (figure 1).
Table 1: ANOVA.
The Effect of Kinesiotape For Dynamic Balance of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Youth Indonesian Athletes
141
Figure 1: Muscle facilitation technique (Bicici, et al,
2012).
Figure 2: Fibulla correction technique.
3 RESULT
For group 1 the dynamic balance before and after
given KT with bone position correction technique
was tested using paired sample t-test. The results
show that there was a difference in dynamic balance
with p = 0,000 (<0.005). This describes that there
was an effect for KT in increasing of dynamic
balance in athletes with CAI. While in group 2 was
given KT with muscle facilitation technique was
tested using paired sample t-test. The result shows
that there was a difference in dynamic balance with
p = 0,015 (<0,005). This also describes that there
was a difference in dynamic balance in athletes with
CAI (table 2).
Seeing the benefits of these KT techniques will
be compared with normal ankle SEBT values tested
using ANOVA. The result shows that there was no
difference in the dynamic balance between KT
applied and normal feet with p = 0,539 (> 0,005).
This describes that the use of this KT gives the same
dynamic balance effect as a normal ankle (Table 1).
4 DISCUSSION
Based on the results, the effect of dynamic balance
using SEBT concomitant with a research report by
Tamburella et al (2014) which explained the use of
KT for 48 hours in neurological cases can improve
balance in the spinal cord injury, spasticity and road
patterns. According to this KT will enhance sensory
input by providing a reciprocal response to
proprioceptive and controlling muscle tone
(Tamburella et al., 2014). Cortesi, et al (2011) also
reported that in cases of multiple sclerosis, KT
applied at the ankle will improve motion control,
exteroceptive afferent function, and motor
excitability in the soleus muscle when standing one
foot with the eyes closed. The use of KT on the
ankle can also improve posture stability (Cortesi et
al., 2011). Both reports explain that the elastic
adhesive (Kinesio tape) has an effect on the
neurophysiological functions in the target area the
function of stability will be increased. It describes
that the use of KT can help improve the function of
joint structures so that athletes with CAI can feel
more stable in joint awareness. Followed by
Mohamed et al (2016) explaining KT applied to a
first-degree ankle injury will speeds up functional
improvement.
In this study, there was no difference of SEBT
value between group 1 (bone position correction
technique) 98,14 ± 10,556, group 2 p(muscle
Table 2: Before and After Both Group (Paired sample t-test).
ICOH 2019 - 1st International Conference on Health
142
facilitation technique) 96,5 ± 14,049 and group 3
(normal ankle) 95,13 ± 11,31. Both KT techniques
employed provide balance enhancements parallel to
normal ankle balances. Park and Lee (2016) describe
the use of KT in 12 hemiplegic stroke patients with
decreased body coordination and motion can
improve the ability to walk straight. Improved body
and motion coordination after KT may be caused by
afferent stimulation of the mechanoreceptors of the
skin that responds to efferent feedback on the
muscle. So, the work of the cutaneous fusimotor
reflex and gamma motor fibers will increase muscle
fiber and motor muscle tone (Kim et al., 2014, Park
and Lee, 2016). William et al. (2012) in his meta-
analysis report explained that the effect of KT can be
used as prevention tools for ankle recurrent injuries
even though the resulting motor enhancement
increases not satisfied (Wilson and Bialocerkowski,
2015).
The CAI condition had found in this study is
ankle injury will need the basic physiology of the
somatosensory function that was damaged while
injured cannot provide the efferent/motoric feedback
system on ankle stability would be a risk of recurrent
injury (Williams et al., 2012, Mohamed et al., 2016).
Kinesiotape applied to the ankle joint may perform
as an external control to give a perception on the
ankle joint to increase automation of motor control
while neurophysiological excitability in dynamic
balance for the athlete with CAI condition (Lemos et
al., 2017).
5 CONCLUSIONS
CAI is a condition of ankle injuries that often occur
in athletes and high risk for recurrent injuries. The
use of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
(CAIT) can serve as a diagnostic tool for CAI so that
the determination for the therapy program is more
appropriate. The dynamic balance with SEBT can be
used as a standard to see motor control of the lower
limbs to measure the risk of recurrent ankle injuries.
The use of Kinesio tape can be given before the
athlete/sportsman during exercises or competition to
give some perceptions of stability in the ankle joint.
REFERENCES
Bicici, S., Karatas, N. and Baltaci, G. 2012. Effect of
athletic taping and kinesiotapin on measurements
of functional performance in basketball players with
chronic inversion ankle sprains. International journal
of sports physical therapy, 7, 154-166.
Bonnel, F., Toullec, E., Mabit, C. and Tourné, Y. 2010.
Chronic ankle instability: biomechanics and
pathomechanics of ligaments injury and associated
lesions. Orthopaedics & traumatology: surgery &
research, 96, 424-432.
Chang, W.-D., Chen, F.-C., Lee, C.-L., Lin, H.-Y. and Lai,
P.-T. 2015. Effects of kinesio taping versus mcconnell
taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Evidence-based
complementary and alternative medicine: ecam, 2015,
471208.
Cortesi, M., Cattaneo, D. and Jonsdottir, J. 2011. Effect of
kinesio taping on standing balance in subjects with
multiple sclerosis: a pilot study\m {1}.
Neurorehabilitation, 28, 365-372.
Donovan, L. and Hertel, J. 2012. A new paradigm for
rehabilitation of patients with chronic ankle instability.
The physician and sportsmedicine, 40, 41-51.
Giannini, S., Ruffilli, A., Pagliazzi, G., Mazzotti, A.,
Evangelisti, G., Buda, R. and Faldini, C. 2014.
Treatment algorithm for chronic lateral ankle
instability. Muscles ligaments tendons j, 4, 455-60.
Gribble, P. A., Delahunt, E., Bleakley, C. M., Caulfield,
B., Docherty, C. L., Fong, D. T.-P., Fourchet, F.,
Hertel, J., Hiller, C.E., Kaminski, T.W., Mckeon, P.O.,
Refshauge, K.M., Van der Wees, P., Vicenzino, W.
and Wikstrom, E.A. 2014. Selection criteria for
patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled
research: a position statement of the international
ankle consortium. Journal of athletic training, 49,
121-127.
Hoch, M.C. and Grindstaff, T.L. 2012. Effectiveness of
joint mobilization in patients with chronic ankle
instability: a review of the literature. Athletic training
and sports health care, 4, 237-244.
Hubbard, T.J. and Hertel, J. 2006. Mechanical
contributions to chronic lateral ankle instability. Sports
medicine, 36, 263-277.
Hubbard, T. J. and Hertel, J. 2008. Anterior positional
fault of the fibula after sub-acute lateral ankle sprains.
Manual therapy, 13, 63-67.
Hubbard, T.J., Hertel, J. and Sherbondy, P. 2006. Fibular
position in individuals with self-reported chronic ankle
instability. Journal of orthopedic & sports physical
therapy, 36, 3-9.
Kim, W.-I., Choi, Y.-K., Lee, J.-H. and Park, Y.-H. 2014.
The effect of muscle facilitation using kinesio taping
on walking and balance of stroke patients. Journal of
physical therapy science, 26, 1831-1834.
Kobayashi, T. and Gamada, K. 2014. Lateral ankle sprain
and chronic ankle instability: a critical review. Foot
ankle spec, 7, 298-326.
Kumbrink 2012. K-taping an illustrated guide. Berlin:
springer-verlag.
Lemos, A., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R. and Chiviacowsky,
S. 2017. Autonomy support enhances performance
expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning.
Psychology of sport and exercise, 31, 28-34.
The Effect of Kinesiotape For Dynamic Balance of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Youth Indonesian Athletes
143
Mohamed, M.A., Radwan, N.L. and Al Shimaa, R.A.
2016. Effect of kinesio-taping on ankle joint stability.
International journal of medical research and health
sciences, 5, 51-58.
Park, Y.-H. and Lee, J.-H. 2016. Effects of proprioceptive
sense-based kinesio taping on walking imbalance.
Journal of physical therapy science, 28, 3060-3062.
Sawkins, K, R.K., Kilbreath, S, Raymond, J. 2007. The
placebo effect of ankle taping. Med sci sports,
39(5):781-7.
Seo, H.-D., Kim, M.-Y., Choi, J.-E., Lim, G.-H., Jung, S.-
I., Park, S.-H., Cheon, S.-H. and Lee, H.-Y. 2016.
Effects of kinesio taping on joint position sense of the
ankle. Journal of physical therapy science, 28, 1158-
1160.
Tamburella, F., Scivoletto, G. and Molinari, M. 2014.
Somatosensory inputs by application of kinesiotaping:
effects on spasticity, balance, and gait in chronic
spinal cord injury. Frontiers in human neuroscience,
8, 367.
Walden, M., Hagglund, M. and Ekstrand, J. 2013. Time-
trends and circumstances surrounding ankle injuries in
men's professional football: an 11-year follow-up of
the uefa champions league injury study. Br j sports
med, 47, 748-53.
Wikstrom, E. A. and Hubbard, T. J. 2010. Talar positional
fault in persons with chronic ankle instability.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 91,
1267-1271.
Williams, S., Whatman, C., Hume, P. A. and Sheerin, K.
2012. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of
sports injuries. Sports medicine, 42, 153-164.
Wilson, B. and Bialocerkowski, A. 2015. The effects of
kinesiotape applied to the lateral aspect of the ankle:
relevance to ankle sprains a systematic review. Plos
one, 10, e0124214.
ICOH 2019 - 1st International Conference on Health
144