Hotel Attributes, Satisfaction, and Travellers’s Intention to Revisit
Bali Cultured Hotels
Tanti Handriana
and Ketut Suryadinata Putra
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Keywords: Tourism, Hotel, Cognitive Attribute, Affective Attribute, Sensory Attribute, Satisfaction, Intention to
Revisit.
Abstract: This study aims to analyze the intention of travelers to revisit Bali cultured hotels. Several previous studies
have shown that the intention of traveler behavior to stay at hotels is influenced by room rate, service
quality, friend/family influence, and promotion. This research applied a survey method. The research
sample consisted of 161 travelers who had stayed at Bali cultured hotels. Structural Equation Modeling
(SEM), with Smart Partial Least Square (PLS) software was selected as the technique of analysis. This
study confirmed that three proposed hypotheses were supported. The affective attribute and sensory
attribute variables significantly influence travelers satisfaction, and the satisfaction variable significantly
influences the intention of the travelers to revisit Bali cultured hotels. Meanwhile, the cognitive attribute
variable doesn’t affect travelers' satisfaction.
1 INTRODUCTION
Tourism is an activity served by some industries
such as hospitality and transportation. The
hospitality industry is that in which all the
companies are involved in providing services to
guests such as hotels, inns, restaurants, and other
recreational activities (Horner and Swarbrooke,
1996). Among all the tourist destinations in
Indonesia, the region with the highest number of
visits based on data in 2014 is the island of Bali,
which had 40% of all visits, followed by DKI
Jakarta by 30%, and Batam by 25% (Tempo, 22
November 2014). For the sustainable development
of Bali tourism, one component is the amenities
component of lodging accommodation, one of
which is hotels. Kim and Perdue (2013) revealed
that the hotel has attributes that are categorized into
three areas, namely 1) Cognitive ie price, service &
quality of food, national, brand recognition, &
sports facilities; 2) Affective (ie. comfort and
entertainment); and 3) Sensory, namely the quality
of room and overall atmosphere. Meanwhile, Ro et
al. (2013) argue that an interesting place is an
effective combination of pleasure and arousal that
travelers experience when visiting the place. As for
Wu and Liang (2009), they suggest that related to
the sensory experiences of travelers, luxury hotels
have a high aesthetic.
By using culture as a tourist attraction, some
hotels in Bali implement the Bali cultured hotel
attributes. According to Wijaya (2002), the
application of traditional Balinese architectural
styles to the hotel is divided into two: 1) Village-
style Hotels; and 2) Palace-style Hotels.
Meanwhile, Albayrak et al. (2016) reveal that in
order to be successful in serving tourists, hotel
managers must understand which hotel attributes
are important to their market segment and the
influences of those attributes on customer
satisfaction.
Kotler and Keller (2016) define satisfaction as
the feeling of satisfaction or dissatisfaction when
consumers compare the performance of a given
product with previous experience. Product/services
attributes affect the satisfaction/dissatisfaction of
consumers depending on their performance level.
According to Jung et al. (2015), that satisfaction has
a strong influence on the intention to revisit.
Whereas Um et al. (2006) argue that the intention to
revisit has been regarded as an extension of
satisfaction rather than the initiator who reviewed
the decision-making process. This study focuses on
knowing the influence of the attributes of Bali
196
Handriana, T. and Putra, K.
Hotel Attributes, Satisfaction, and Travellers’s Intention to Revisit Bali Cultured Hotels.
DOI: 10.5220/0008429201960202
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World (ICIB 2019), pages 196-202
ISBN: 978-989-758-408-4
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
cultured hotels on the intention to revisit through the
satisfaction of travelers.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Cultural Tourism
Picard (2003) reveals that cultural tourism is a form
of tourism developed by using culture to attract
tourists and care for culture through income
generated by tourism. Responding to the doctrine of
Cultural Tourism, The New Order government and
the tourism industry gave a similar concept of
'cultural art' (Acciaioli, 1985). Bali province as a
tourist destination in Indonesia makes the culture of
Bali an asset, thus contributing to the development
of international tourism in the Republic of Indonesia
and to the fostering of Indonesian national culture
(Picard, 2003). Meanwhile, Zeren, Koç, and Konuk
(2014) revealed that tourism in developing countries
plays a fundamental role in economic growth and
development.
2.2 Hotels
Hotels are a business of providing accommodation
in the form of rooms within a building, which can be
equipped with food and beverage service,
entertainment activities and / or other facilities on a
daily basis for the purpose of obtaining benefits
(Regulation of Minister of Tourism and Creative
Economy No. 53/2013). The hotel class is
distinguished into non-starred and starred. Star
hotels are classified as one star hotels, two star
hotels, three star hotels, four star hotels, and five star
hotels. The classification of the hotel used as objects
in this study is a five star hotel.
2.3 Hotel Attributes
Basically, most of the products offered by the
hospitality and tourism industry to the consumer are
the experience (Tsaur et al., 2006; Williams, 2006 in
Kim and Perdue, 2013). Therefore, according to
Dube et al., 2003 in Kim and Perdue (2013), in
creating hotel products and services it is necessary to
differentiate them from competitors with experience-
related attributes. Kim and Perdue (2013), categorize
the attributes of the hotel into cognitive, affective,
and sensory.
Hotel Cognitive Attribute. Kim and Perdue (2013)
describe that cognitive attributes are physical
dimensions or non-physical qualities that can satisfy
utilitarian demand and provide functional benefit or
value. At a hotel, according to Kim and Perdue
(2013), cognitive attributes are price, service and
quality of food, national, recognized brand, and
sports facilities.
Hotel Affective Attribute. According to Kim and
Perdue (2013), affective attributes are the emotions
and feelings generated by the features of the object,
which are real, perceived, and imagined features. At
the hotel, according to Kim and Perdue (2013),
affective attributes are comfort and entertainment.
Associated with affective attributes, according to Ro
and Mattila (2013), an interesting place is an
effective combination of feelings of pleasure and
arousal that travelers feel when visiting the place.
The Hotel Sensory Attribute. is an attribute that
travelers receive through their senses and is
concerned with creating an atmosphere for the hotel.
Kim and Perdue (2013) assert that sensory attributes
are room quality and overall atmosphere.
2.4 Satisfaction
Kotler and Keller (2016) defined satisfaction as a
person’s feelings of pleasure or disappointment that
result from comparing a product’s perceived
performance (or outcome) to expectations. Shing
and Nathan (2012) explain that satisfaction is a
psychological response, feelings of pleasure or
disappointment of someone who emerged after
comparing the perception or impression to the
performance (result) of a product and their
expectations before and after consuming the
product/service. In the tourism sector, the
satisfaction of tourists is the result of the interaction
between the experience of tourists with the
destination area and the expansiveness they have
about the destination. When the total quality of the
experience compared to the expectation produces a
feeling of satisfaction, the traveler will be satisfied;
when the actual experience of travelers as compared
to their expectations produces a feeling of
dissatisfaction, travelers will be dissatisfied (Pizam
et al., 1978). Meanwhile, Pizam et al., (1978)
revealed that in most tourism products, the
satisfaction of tourists is more concerned with the
dimensions of expressive performance than the
instrumental, such as comfort, luxury, hospitality,
and reputation of hotels that emphasize room and
price functionality.
Hotel Attributes, Satisfaction, and Travellers’s Intention to Revisit Bali Cultured Hotels
197
2.5 Intentions to Revisit
In tourism destinations, the intention to revisit is
defined as the readiness and willingness of
individuals to make return visits to the same
destination (Stylos et al., 2016). The most accurate
predictions of the decision to revisit, for example,
are the purchase of a tour package to the same
destination (Han and Kim, 2010). So, the intention
to revisit is the intention of consumers to visit the
same destination. For travelers, the intention to
revisit is the intention of behaving travelers who are
willing to revisit to stay at the same hotel.
2.6 Interrelationship between Research
Variables
2.6.1 Cognitive Attribute on Satisfaction
Roman and Martin (2016) state that when consumers
want to choose which hotels to experience when
visiting a tourist destination, the hotel's cognitive
attributes have a significant influence on the hotel
selection decision. As Gursoy et al. (2006) explain,
cognitive attributes affect consumer satisfaction and
quality perceived by consumers. Cognitive attributes
contribute to satisfying consumer demand that is
utilitarian and provides functional benefit or value.
Based on the above explanation, the following
hypothesis is proposed:
Hypothesis 1: Hotel cognitive attributes have a
significant positive influence on travelers'
satisfaction.
2.6.2 Affective Attribute on Satisfaction
Albayrak et al., (2016) say that the performance or
achievement of the attributes in hotels has an
influence on the satisfaction of travelers in the form
of a satisfied or dissatisfied judgement. According to
Pham (1998), affective attributes have an influence
especially on consumer ratings of products that are
usually based on hedonism and feelings related to
the criteria. Meanwhile, Mano and Oliver (1993) and
(2004) concluded that affective attributes have a
crucial influence on purchasing evaluation and
satisfaction after consumers experience consuming.
As for Barsky and Nash (2002), they argue that the
emotional response created from the affective
attributes of hotels is an essential component of
satisfaction and loyalty. Based on the above
explanation, the following hypothesis is made:
Hypothesis 2: Hotel affective attributes have a
significant positive influence on travelers'
satisfaction.
2.6.3 Sensory Attribute on Satisfaction
Albayrak et al. (2016) argue that the performance of
the attributes of the hotel affect the feelings of
satisfied or unsatisfied travelers against the stayed-at
hotel after the travelers evaluated the hotel's
services. As for Kim and Perdue (2013), they reveal
that the combination of sensory attributes in the
atmosphere or the atmosphere of the hotel has a
major influence on the evaluation of hotel services
made by travelers in determining their satisfaction or
dissatisfaction that influences the choice of hotel and
the intensity of the purchase. Based on the above
explanation, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Hypothesis 3: The hotel's sensory attributes have a
significant positive influence on travelers'
satisfaction.
2.6.4 Satisfaction on Intention to Revisit
Cronin and Taylor (1992) state that consumer
satisfaction influences the intention to repurchase
significantly in the service sector. According to Su et
al., (2016), in the context of tourism, there is a
relationship between consumer satisfaction and
intention to revisit. Meanwhile, Kim et al. (2009)
reveal that in upscale hotels, travelers will want to
revisit the same hotel when the traveler has felt the
satisfaction of the hotel services, therefore the hotel
manager should be able to give satisfaction to ensure
the intention of travelers to make a revisit. Based on
the above explanation, the hypothesis is proposed as
follows:
Hypothesis 4: Satisfaction has a significant positive
influence on travelers' intentions to revisit a Bali
cultured hotel.
All hypothesis can be seen in the model as in
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Analysis Model.
H
1
H
2
H
4
H
3
Cognitive
A
tt
ri
butes
Affective
A
tt
ri
butes
Sensory
A
tt
ri
butes
Satisfaction
Intention
to
R
ev
i
s
i
t
ICIB 2019 - The 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World
198
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Approach, Sampling
Technique, and Analysis
Techniques
This research uses a quantitative research approach
with survey method. In this study there are three
exogenous variables (ie cognitive attributes,
affective attributes, and sensory attributes) and two
endogenous variables (ie satisfaction and intention
to revisit). The data were collected through
questionnaires using 161 respondents who stay in a
5-star hostel with a Balinese culture concept. This
research uses a purposive sampling technique. The
analysis technique used in this study is Structural
Equation Modeling (SEM), with Smart Partial Least
Square (PLS) software.
3.2 Identification and Operational
Definition of Variables
The cognitive attribute variables are defined as the
attributes of a Bali cultured hotel that can satisfy the
utilitarian demands of travelers. Affective attribute
variables are the attributes of Bali cultured hotels
that play a role in creating the emotions and feelings
of the travelers. Sensory attribute variables are
defined as the attributes of Bali cultured hotels that
play a role in creating the traditional atmosphere of
Balinese culture felt by travelers. The satisfaction
variable is the feeling of pleasure or disappointment
of travelers at a Bali cultured hotel after they
compare between what they expect and the reality.
The intention to revisit is defined as the desire and
willingness of the travelers to the Bali cultured
hotels to stay again at the hotel in the future. ach
indicator in this research is measured using a five-
level Likert scale, namely 1 = strongly disagree; 2 =
disagree; 3 = undecided; 4 = agree; and 5 = strongly
agree.
4 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Hypothesis 1 states that cognitive attributes have a
positive and significant influence on travelers'
satisfaction. The result of calculation by using
SmartPLS 2.0 software shows the influence of
cognitive attribute variable on travelers' satisfaction
is a positive influence with beta coefficient value
0.0302 and t-statistics of 0.4149 (less than 1.65); this
means hypothesis 1 is not supported. Next is the
affective 2 b hypothesis that influence attributes
have a positive and significant influence on travelers'
satisfaction. The result of data show that the
affective attribute variable on travelers’ satisfaction
is a positive influence with beta coefficient value
0.4714 and t-statistic value 4,6874 (more than 1.65),
thus hypothesis 2 is supported.
Meanwhile, hypothesis 3 states that sensory
attributes have a positive and significant influence
on travelers' satisfaction. The analysis shows the
influence of the sensory attribute variable on
travelers’ satisfaction is a positive influence with
beta coefficient value 0.3786 and t-statistics of
4.3704, this means that hypothesis 3 is supported.
Hypothesis 4 states the satisfaction of travelers has a
positive and significant influence on the intention to
revisit. The calculation result using SmartPLS
software shows the variable path of travelers'
satisfaction with the intention to revisit has a
positive influence with a beta value of 0.5436 and T-
statistics of 5.7696, this means that hypothesis 4 is
supported.
4.1 Discussion
The result of hypothesis testing as seen table 1
shows that the cognitive variable has no influence on
the satisfaction of travelers. This is in contrast to a
study by Gursoy et al. (2006), who found that
cognitive attributes influence consumer satisfaction
and the perceived quality of consumers. Cognitive
attributes contribute to satisfying consumer demand
that is utilitarian and provides functional benefit or
value. There are several reasons that cause cognitive
variables to have no influence on the satisfaction of
travelers; for example that the sports facilities
provided are only a swimming pool and yoga
pavilion.
Table 1: The Results of Hypotheses Testing.
The results of hypothesis 2 testing show that
affective variables influence the satisfaction of
travelers. According to Kim and Perdue (2013),
hotel affective attributes are the attributes associated
with creating emotions and feelings when
Relationship between
Variables
Original
Sample
t
Statistics
Result Explanation
CognitiveSatisfaction
0.0302 0.4149
Not Significant H1 Rejected
Affective Satisfaction
0.4717 4.6874 Significant H2 Accepted
Sensory Satisfaction
0.3786 4.3704
Significant H3 Accepted
Satisfaction Revisit
0.5436 5.7696
Significant H4 Accepted
Hotel Attributes, Satisfaction, and Travellers’s Intention to Revisit Bali Cultured Hotels
199
consuming hotel services. Affective attributes have
an assessment influence that is usually based on
hedonism feelings related to criteria. In this case,
that is included in the affective attribute of the hotel
of comfort and entertainment. The results of this
study support research conducted by Pham (1998),
Mano and Oliver (1993), and Wong (2004), that
affective attributes have a crucial influence on
purchasing evaluation and satisfaction after
consumers experience consuming.
Next is the third hypothesis testing, indicating
that the sensory variables influence the satisfaction
of travelers. Gobe (2011) reveals that sensory
attributes play a role in creating an ambience in a
hotel that influences guest ratings. According to
Gobe (2001), the combination of sensory attributes
can have a strong influence on changes in consumer
behavior. The hotel's sensory attributes are room
quality and overall atmosphere. The results of this
study are in line with the results of research
conducted by Albayrak et al. (2016) and Kim and
Perdue (2013) that the combination of sensory
attributes in the hotel’s atmosphere creates a
significant influence on the evaluation of hotel
services performed by guests in determining guest
satisfaction or dissatisfaction that influences the
choice of hotel and purchase intensity.
Finally, the findings of the analysis show that the
variable of satisfaction of travelers influences the
intention to revisit. In the tourism sector, the
satisfaction of tourists is the result of the interaction
between the experience of tourists with the
destination area and the expectations they have
about the destination. When the total quality of the
experience compared to the expectations produces a
feeling of satisfaction, the traveler will be satisfied,
when the actual experience of the tourist as
compared to his or her expectations produces
dissatisfaction, the traveler will be dissatisfied
(Pizam et al., 1978). According to Pizam et al.
(1978), in most tourism products, travelers'
satisfaction is more concerned with the expressive
performance dimensions than the instrumental ones,
such as comfort, luxury, hospitality, and reputation
of hotels that emphasize room functionality and
price. Satisfaction in this research is satisfaction at
hotel performance. The findings of this study
support research conducted by Han et al. (2009),
Cole and Chancellor (2009), and Cronin and Taylor
(1992) that consumer satisfaction influences the
intention to repurchase significantly in the service
sector.
5 CONCLUSION &
IMPLICATION
Based on the findings of the data and the findings of
the analysis in this study, the findings are that the
hotel cognitive attributes have no influence on the
satisfaction of travelers, while affective attributes
and attributes of sensory hotels have a significant
positive influence on traveler satisfaction, and
sensory attributes have a positive influence on
traveler satisfaction. Meanwhile, the satisfaction of
travelers has a significant positive influence on the
intention to revisit the Bali cultured hotels.
It is recommended for future researchers to
conduct a study on attributes at the various
Indonesian traditional nuanced (cultured) hotels in
various classifications of hotel class (1 star, 2 stars, 3
stars, 4 stars, 5 stars and non starred) and hotel type
category (commercial, airport, economy, suite,
residential, casino, and resort). This is because of the
view that the tourism industry is one of the foreign
exchange contributors to the country with a wealth
of culture is one of the things that make Indonesia an
attractive tourist destination. Indonesia has a
diversity and uniqueness of culture in each province
with its diversity of ethnic and religious
communities, so that research on this subject is very
interesting and not much studied in research.
Balinese hotel management can improve the
quality of hotel services, for example by providing
traditional Balinese entertainment that allows the
audience to actively engage in such activities, such
as the Joged Bumbung dance, where audiences can
dance with dancers amusingly, in the Balinese
language or in English. Hotel managers are also
expected to provide travelers with access to
traditional and religious ceremonies in the hotel
environment, such as piodalan (holy day anniversary
based on the Saka calendar) at the hotel's pelinggih
(Hindu prayer center) as a cultural attraction, but in
a manner so that the Hindu religious rules are not
violated in Bali
.
REFERENCES
Acciaioli, G., 1985. Culture as Art: From Practice to
Spectacle in Indonesia, Canberra Anthropology, Vol.
8, No. 1 & 2, pp. 148-172.
Albayrak, T., Caber, M., and Bideci, M., 2016.
Identification of Hotel Attributes for Senior Tourist by
Using Varva's Importance Grid, Journal of Hospitality
and Tourism Management, Vol. 29, pp. 17-23.
Barsky, J. and Nash, L., 2002. Evoking Emotion:
ICIB 2019 - The 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World
200
Affective Keys to Hotel Loyalty, Cornell Hotel and
Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 43, pp. 39-
46.
Cole, S.T., and Chancellor, H., 2009. Examining the
Festival Attributes That Impact Visitor Experience,
Satisfaction and Revisit Intention, Journal of Vacation
Marketing, Vol. 15, pp. 323-333.
Cronin, J. J. and Taylor S. A., 1992. Measuring Service
Quality - A Reexamination And Extension. Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 56, pp. 55-68.
Dube, L., Bel, J.L., and Sears, D., 2003 .From Customer
Value to Engineering Pleasurable Experiences in Real
Life and Online”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant
Administration Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 5/6, pp. 124–
130.
Gobe, M., 2001. Emotional Branding the New Paradigm
for Connection Brands to People. Allworth Press,
New York.
Gursoy, D., Spangenberg, E., and Rutherford, 2006. The
Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attendees'
Attitudes Toward Festivals, Journal of Hospitality and
Tourism Research, Vol. 30, pp. 279-294.
Han, H., Back, K.J., and Barrett, B. 2009. Influencing
Factors on Restaurant Customers’ Revisit Intention:
The Roles of Emotions and Switching Barriers,
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
Vol. 28, pp. 563-572.
Han, H., and Kim, Y., 2010. An Investigation of Green
Hotel Customers’ Decision Formation: Developing An
Extended Model of The Theory of Planned Behavior,
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 659–666.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.01.001
Heesup, H., Back, K.J., and Barrett, B., 2009. Influencing
Factors on Restaurant Customers’ Revisit Intention:
The Roles of Emotions and Switching Barriers,
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
Vol. 28, pp. 563-572.
Horner, S., and Swarbrooke, J., 1996. Marketing Tourism,
Hospitality and Leisure in Europe. International
Thompson Business Press, UK.
Jung, T., Ineson, E., Kim, M., and Yap, M., 2015.
Influence of Festival Attribute Qualities on Slow Food
Tourists' Experience, Satisfaction Level and Revisit
Intention: The Case of the Mold Food and Drink
Festival, Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 21, pp.
277-288.
Kim, D., and Perdue, R., 2013. The Effect of Cognitive,
Affective, and Sensory Attributes on Hotel Choice,
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
Vol. 35, pp. 246-257.
Kim, T., Kim, W.G., and Kim, H.B., 2009. The Effects of
Perceived Justice on Recovery Satisfaction, Trust,
Word-of-Mouth, and Revisit Intention in Upscale
Hotels, Tourism Management, Vol. 30, pp. 51-62.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L., 2016. Marketing
Management. 15
th
edition. Pearson Education,
London.
Mano, H. and Oliver R L., 1993. Assessing the
Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption
Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction,
Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 3,
pp.:451-66.
Pham, M.T., 1998. Representativeness, Relevance, and
The Use of Feelings in Decision Making, Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 25, pp. 144–159.
Picard, M., 2003. Touristification and Balinization in a
Time of Reformasi, Indonesia and The Malay World,
Vol. 31, pp. 108-118.
Pizam, A., Neumann, Y., and Reichel, A., 1978.
Dimensions of Tourist Satisfaction With a
Destination Area, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 5,
pp. 314-322.
Ro, H., Lee., S., and Mattila, A., 2013. An Affective
Image Positioning of Las Vegas Hotels, Journal of
Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, Vol.
14, pp. 201-217.
Roman, C., and Martin, J.C., 2016. Hotel Attributes:
Asymmetries in Guest Payments and Gains - A Stated
Preference Approach, Tourism Management, Vol. 52,
pp. 488-497.
Shing, G.L., Koh, C., and Nathan, R. J., 2012. Service
Quality Dimensions and Tourist Satisfaction towards
Melaka Hotels, International Journal of Economic and
Management Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 26-32.
Stylos, N., Vassiliadis, C., Bellou, V., and Andronikidis,
A., 2016. Destination Images, Holistic Images and
Personal Normative Beliefs: Predictors of Intention to
Revisit a Destination, Tourism Management, Vol. 53,
pp. 40-60.
Su. L., Swanson, S. R., and Chen. X. 2016. The Effects of
Perceived Service Quality on Repurchase Intentions
and Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Tourists: The
Mediating Role of Relationship Quality, Tourism
Management, Vol. 52, pp. 82-95.
Tsaur, S.-H., Chiu, Y.-T., and Wang, C.-H., 2006. The
Visitors Behavioral Consequences of Experiential
Marketing: An Empirical Study on Taipei Zoo,
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 21,
No. 1, PP. 47–64.
Um, S., Chon, K. and Ro, Y. H., 2006. Antecedents of
revisit intention, Annals of tourism research, Vol. 33,
No. 4, pp. 1141-1158.
Wijaya, M., 2002. Architecture of Bali: A Source Book of
Traditional and Modern Forms, University of Hawai’i
Press, Honolulu.
Williams, A., 2006. Tourism and Hospitality Marketing:
Fantasy, Feeling and Fun, International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 18, No.
6, PP. 482–495.
Wong, A., 2004. The Role of Emotional Satisfaction in
Service Encounters, Managing Service Quality, Vol.
14, No. 5, pp. 365-376.
Wu, C. and Liang, R., 2009. Effect of Experiential Value
on Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters in
Luxury Hotel Restaurants, International Journal of
Hospitality Management, Vol. 28, pp. 586-593.
Zeren, F., Koç M., and Konuk F., 2014. Interaction
Between Finance, Toursm and Advertising: Evidence
Hotel Attributes, Satisfaction, and Travellers’s Intention to Revisit Bali Cultured Hotels
201
From Turkey, Tourism and Hospitality Management,
Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 185-193.
www.travel.tempo.co/read/news/2014/11/22/202623647/3
-daerah-indonesia-penyumbang-turis-asing-terbesar,
accessed on 15 November 2018
www.royalpitamaha-bali.com, accessed on 17 December
2018.
ICIB 2019 - The 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World
202