The Review of Library Service Rule's Tun Abdul Razak Puncak
Alam Malaysia Library
Dewi Ambar Mawarni
1
, Nanda Restu Rahmania
1
, Endang Fitriyah Mannan
2
and Muhammad Rifky Nurpratama
2
1
Library Studies, Faculty of Vocational Education, Airlangga University, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Vocational Education, Airlangga University, Indonesia
Keywords: Code of Conduct, College Library, UiTM, Tun Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia.
Abstract: The library moves in the service of users with all the resources they have. To maximize it, code of conduct
is made as a reference for the implementation of services. Besides that, it also provides disciplined direction
for users who visit the library. The UiTM library includes those who have done it well but need
improvement so that the code of conduct is made more based on the behaviour of today's users. The method
used in this study is qualitative, namely by interviews and observations to explore data and information
about the code of conduct in the UiTM Library.
1 INTRODUCTION
The library does become the centre of all knowledge
stored in printed and digital collections (Harisanty,
Diba and Layyinah, 2020). The view of the library is
true but gradually shifts. Where the library has
begun to move in user service, in other words not
only focus on managing books and collections
(Suhariono et al., 2022). But it starts to move to
services that provide the widest creative
opportunities for users, example such as service
centres (Romadhona, Wati, et al., 2022). The
meaning that the library is a learning centre that
means it can be used to support learning (getting
information according to needs in the education
level) (Romadhona, Kurniawan, et al., 2022).
Second, the learning centre functions as a learning
centre (not just learning), meaning that the existence
of a library is used as a place to support the learning
and teaching process (Romadhona, 2022). Third,
information resources centre that means that through
the library all kinds and types of information can be
obtained because of its function as the centre of
information sources. Fourth, preservation of
knowledge centre that the function of the library is
also the centre of preservation of science as a result
of the work and writing of the nation which is stored
both as a collection of deposits, local content or
Gray literature. Fifth, dissemination of information
centre, that library functions not only collect,
process, service or preserve but also function in
disseminating or promoting information. Sixth,
dissemination of knowledge centre that besides
spreading information the library also functions to
disseminate knowledge (especially for new
knowledge) (Romadhona, 2020).
The latest library services as above, which have
been accommodated by the UiTM library (Tun
Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia), certainly do
not spontaneously serve but through design first.
Library services to users are built from service
design to service operations, because the more
complex the service, the more complex the
implementation design and the operational rules.
One that is also an important part in user service is
the service code of conduct that is included in the
operation of library services (Romadhona,
Subagyono and Agustin, 2022).
Library service rules are arranged in such a way
as to adjust to the conditions of users visiting the
relevant libraries (Subagyono, Chumaida and
Romadhona, 2022). Basically, there are many
variations or differences in behaviour and attitudes
between users with each other, even with other
library users. That difference in behaviour and
attitude, the code of conduct is designed to adjust the
conditions to provide effectiveness and efficiency of
154
Mawarni, D., Rahmania, N., Mannan, E. and Nurpratama, M.
The Review of Library Service Rule’s Tun Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia Library.
DOI: 10.5220/0008669600002300
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Record and Library: Local Knowledge, Past, Present, and Future (ICRL 2018), pages 154-159
ISBN: 978-989-758-712-2
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
services that will be received by users. In other
words, it will be useful in serving users quickly and
precisely. Quickly and precisely means that the
services provided are carried out in a short time,
while the exact purpose is to meet the needs of users
who use library services (Romadhona, Kurniawan,
et al., 2022).
The code of conduct is also not only designed to
be applied to users, but also as a standard work rule
for librarians or library organizations themselves in
serving users so as to minimize the potential for
errors or violations from internal libraries. That is
the problem, why code of conduct is an important
part of user service. The problem that most often
arises and is also experienced by the UiTM library is
that there are several rules of code of conduct that
are less flexible or still maintain conventional rules.
In addition, rules of code of conduct cannot be
separated from symbols, signs, or instructions
regarding the rules of code of conduct that have been
set. The most dominant problem is the lack of clarity
of the signs or instructions because visually cannot
be seen or the placement is not right. Therefore, the
researcher focuses on discussing the rules of code of
conduct that apply in UiTM and is associated with
the characteristics of users in the modern
information age.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Rules of Library Rules
According to the Dictionary of Indonesia Language
(Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia) (2007) code of
conduct is derived from two words namely
governance and regulations, management is a rules
(usually used compound) can be interpreted
principle, rules and composition, how to construct a
system. Whereas the code of conduct is organized
according to the rules, neatly. so, discipline is a rule-
a regulation that must be obeyed (discipline).
The library is available to serve the environment,
especially users who incidentally are the dominant
community around the library. To serve users,
certainly library etiquette such as rules of conduct
cannot be avoided, so that these aspects can be
ascertained designed and announced. Rules of code
of conduct that must be in the library are intended to
guide users to resources and services in the library.
So that later can ensure the maximization of access
to collections and library services by users. In other
words, according to Owolabi, Idowu and Aliu
(2015) the rules of library discipline are to ensure
that all people who use libraries get maximum
benefits from their facilities and also provide
legitimacy to punish users who violate the rules.
Owolabi, Idowu and Aliu (2015) mentions that
often one of the users is that academics will use the
library as a meeting place, to talk to classmates
about upcoming examinations, or as a quiet place to
take a nap and in the afternoon, but when they
suddenly use library resources to reach the goal of
the activity they are working on, the results are that
they tend to experience anxiety. Therefore, it is
important to have a guide or set of rules for
controlling students in library use.
Montviloff (1990) observed that libraries must
formulate policies (including rules and regulations)
to ensure the effective and efficient use of their
sources of information. Designing and setting rules,
principles, and strategies is nothing but to help
realize the needs of libraries and users, because it is
a guide to decision making, so that it can ensure that
the goals and results of serving users are in
accordance with the standards that the library has
made.
Rules of conduct are generally designed and
determined by the contents of the process or flow of
library services. One of the things that is certain to
exist and is essential is the rules of lending rules and
returns such as member registration fees and
especially delays. Delay in return is identical to the
rules of regulation regarding fines. Rules of
discipline regarding this fine are related to library
income. Gill (2001) states that it is inappropriate for
fines to be used as the library's main income. Fines
are indeed enabled to ensure that there is no loss of
library resources, namely collections and user
discipline in borrowing collections. Besides that,
fines are also related to library ethics, where Gill
(2001) explained again that fines should not be set at
a level that would prevent anyone from using the
library. Fees are also sometimes charged for
personal services, such as photocopying or using a
printer. In other words, fines can be regulated in the
code of conduct as a responsibility of the library and
users regarding library resources. However, the rules
of the fine are not to be made as heavily as possible
because it will prevent anyone who wants to use and
visit the library.
Rules and regulations not only focuses on the
rules of running a service and accessing collections
such as borrowing and repayment, but also the need
for the rules of conduct library The behavior of
library users, reaction to situations such as theft or
destruction of the collection, or disruptive behavior,
should not only submitted to the assessment of
The Review of Library Service Rule’s Tun Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia Library
155
librarians or reporters and reported parties, but also
judged on the legal basis in the form of the rules of
the library rules.
2.2 Signage
Warren and Epp (2016) states that libraries and
librarians need to care about (signage) nameplate,
search direction, room markers, and accessibility
because all these factors directly impact library
experience before they use library services. Signage
is everywhere in the library, and while signage that
is good will direct and provide information to users,
ineffective signage will provide information that is
wrong, frustrates, and upsets the user.
Warren and Epp (2016) states that even many
researchers argue about signage that is good and
right to be applied in libraries. For example such as
the use of high contrast, large fonts, without
containing too many illustrations, and placed in a
position where the sign can be easily seen, with the
aim of better signage readability (Barclay and Scott,
2012; Stempler and Polger, 2013). In addition,
previous research on signage shows that library
signage must avoid jargon. For example, O’Neill
and Guilfoyle (2015) study shows that students who
seek help in libraries prefer the term "help" and
"research" above rather than "reference".
3 RESEARCH METHOD
The type of research that is used is research
descriptive if with a qualitative approach.
Information collection techniques are carried out in
two ways, namely observation and interview.
Observation is done by looking directly at the
performance of the library staff. Interviews are
conducted by asking several questions about how the
influence of the code of conduct on the development
of the library.
This research is in the Tun Abdul Razak
Malaysia Library of the Mara Technological
University (UiTM) Cawangan Selangor located in
Puncak Alam, Kuala Selangor. UiTM is designed as
a smart campus, this campus has a modern union
that is suitable for fostering teaching activities,
learning and investigation or research and
development of knowledge among UiTM residents.
The provisions of the sample in this study were
informants who were employees of the Tun Abdul
Razak Library. The number of informants was 3
employees who had library education backgrounds.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Based on observations in the Tun Abdul Razak
Puncak Alam Malaysia library, each service has a
set of rules. Rules of code of conduct in the library
are available on the official website, at the same
time in the field it can be ascertained to be in the
form of symbols or signs for the rules of the code of
conduct, such as red marks which mean prohibited
from speaking loudly and green marks for discussion
rooms. The markers have been introduced by the
library when conducting socialization during user
service for each new student with the aim of creating
code of conductions and comfort for its users. The
purpose of designing and including the rules is that
the users who visit the library do not cause noise at
services or rooms that have been specifically
designated as quiet rooms or silent rooms and do not
cause confusion about the processes and flows of
existing and expected related services can improve
UiTM library services. The problem that is present is
quite a cliché, namely the reading or signs of the
related rules, but that problem is indeed present and
requires improvement.
Mandel and Johnston (2019) states that in
facilities in the library, librarians must first assess
the signs needed, then develop a list of signs and
locations to be placed, or even equipped with
supporting photos, and study the list of signs to
determine which signs should be removed or
replaced and where additional marks are needed.
Bosman and Rusinek (1997) recommend an
inventory of all signs, paying attention to size,
shape, colour, format, type, installation method,
message, and their destination based on physical
location, including photographs.
Rules of discipline are several, starting with the
rules of speech. Rules of speech or crowd code of
conduct have been set by the UiTM library into three
parts, namely discussion, quiet and silent. Freedom
to speak in a tone of voice loud enough can be done
by visitors in the discussion room and free area. For
quiet rooms, the rules are free to speak, but in a low
voice, while the silent room is given a rule, you
cannot speak at all or you can, but in a whisper. In
addition to the above rules, plus supplementary rules
that are equally important are prohibited from
changing furniture settings or in other words not
allowed to change/shift furniture, chairs cannot be
code of conducted, collection vandals and furniture
are not permitted and are not permitted dating/dating
in the library.
These rules of code of conduct have been
intended with a positive purpose but need
ICRL 2018 - 3rd International Conference on Record and Library
156
improvement which is based more on the needs of
today's library users, where the style and behaviour
of users from various times also change. In the
current era of information technology and dominated
by digital natives with all its instant and easy
characteristics. Their learning and discussion
patterns are also developing, namely multitasking,
they can learn while doing other activities such as
discussions, playing gadgets, etc. According to
Connaway (2015) Infrastructure growth is not only
about volume growth in content, but the growth of
resources needed to meet service demands. Changes
in the information environment require libraries to
explore more about space and the concept of
collaborating, learning, teaching, playing, relaxing,
and researching. Moreover, the collection has been
directed to electronic or digital so that the room can
be maximized for the benefit of user activities.
Some rules that need to be revised because they
need to be adjusted based on the development of the
library that has been conceptualized as above,
namely that library users can be allowed to be able
to change the arrangement or arrangement of
furniture such as chairs, tables and blackboards. That
is because, the activities of today's users tend to be
multitasking, so the room can be changed as flexibly
as possible for them to be able to freely move and
learn. Such a room, conceptually referred to as
makerspace, where library space can be used for any
purposes ranging from learning, discussion, or even
as an entertainment and recreation space
accompanied by furniture arrangements that can be
changed according to user needs. If it is not possible
to apply to all spaces, then it can be applied to
certain rooms or specifically as makerspace spaces.
The second rule that is common in libraries is
about eating and drinking. The rules for eating and
drinking in the UiTM library are permitted as long
as the place has been determined such as a self-
service canteen on the second floor in the library, so
visitors are not allowed to bring food from outside
the library and bring it to a room that is forbidden to
eat and drink. Rules regarding eating and drinking if
specified are not permitted because indeed dirt or
used food and drink can stain books or pollute the
air and room temperature feared to affect the
humidity of the book or even tarnish the collection
directly. But on the other hand, many libraries,
especially in America and Europe, have applied the
rules and can eat and drink in any room. There are
also restrictions on certain rooms such as discussion
rooms, circulation but are not allowed in special
reference rooms and collections. Pros and cons mark
this rule, because some parties consider eating and
drinking can damage collections, while on the other
hand eating and drinking is an activity of visitor
freedom because of reading or learning requires.
Also based on the characteristics of multitasking
users, the rules of code of conduct that can be
changed to be adjusted are the rules of eating and
drinking. The patterns or learning styles of each
individual are different, especially with the current
multitasking characteristics, so it is natural that
eating and drinking can be allowed. At a minimum,
it can be applied to special spaces such as discussion
rooms and not just in the canteen. It is also possible
in all rooms to be permitted but with only drinks
without food. Even if it is possible for all rooms to
be allowed to eat and drink, with consequences if
there is damage to the collection, the user is obliged
to replace the fine at the collection price.
In addition to the rules of code of
conduct above which are pro-contra, there is one
more rule that can also be seen from the side of the
pros and cons of the rules of clothing for visitors to
the library. Generally, the prevailing code of conduct
is prohibited from wearing impolite clothes, if UiTM
is called unprofessional clothing. One of them is a
shirt/t-shirt, shorts/torn for men and shorts/short
skirts for women and sandals. The neatness of hair is
also regulated, where male students must be neat
even though they are long but still neat, especially if
tattooed is not allowed to enter as a visitor to the
library.
Dressing problems are generally adjusted to the
culture of the country, city or region and related
universities. The problem of the type of clothing that
is used must be according to the standards set must
have been designed by library policy makers such as
the head of the library and head of the service sector.
Types of clothing such as t-shirts, shorts, and
sandals if in Malay culture are indeed disrespectful
and are interpreted as individuals who do not respect
individuals and the place where they are located.
Therefore, in a Malay country or a predominantly
Muslim country like Malaysia and Indonesia, the
dress code is very much considered because it
involves culture and religion. So that it is
understandable if the rules do not allow the use of t-
shirts, short pants / skirts, and sandals. But the rules
of dress code are not valid if in Europe, America and
even Asia itself such as Singapore, Taiwan etc.
There is freedom of dress that people believe in
these countries because it is considered as freedom
of expression and the appointment of individual
identity.
Rules of code of conduct that are also prioritized
are about borrowing and returning collections. Users
The Review of Library Service Rule’s Tun Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia Library
157
are prohibited from carrying out books without loan
procedures. The rules of lending rules are also strict,
if there is a loss of collections, there are
consequences of severe penalties, namely anti-book
plus RM 20.00 (20 Malaysian Ringgit) and late
penalties or paying book prices plus RM 20.00 (20
Malaysian Ringgit) and late penalties, with own
delay is worth RM 0.20 cents per day. If indeed
there are still fine debts during the lecture, then the
maximum payment is 2 weeks before students
graduate or graduation, otherwise the graduation
transcript will be arrested.
The rules of code of conduct were implemented
by the library based on the library not only a room,
but also facilities that support education. The
existence of an code of conduct code of conduct can
be used as a product of a library that aims to make
all existing activities run smoothly and in a
controlled manner ( in this case the user must obey
the rules of code of conduct in the library ). In other
words, the right to obtain library services for
visitors, is also accompanied by the necessity to
fulfil the obligation to comply with the rules and
regulations that have been implemented. The
obligation to obey the rules does not only function as
a means of optimizing services but also as the
responsibility of visitors in visiting can even
characterize the personality of each user as an
academic. Rules of code of conduct that have been
established by the UiTM Library are in line with
Owolabi, Idowu and Aliu (2015) that tighter
measures are imposed to impose sanctions or punish
every violator of library rules and regulations to
ensure compliance with regulations and regulations.
However, it should be noted that not all services can
be given strict rules of conduct. Like for example the
prohibition of eating and drinking, shifting furniture
can be given flexible rules to adjust the
characteristics of current library users which are
dominated by digital natives.
In addition to the enactment of rules and
regulations that are tightened specifically on certain
services such as circulation of loans and returns,
which function as repressive measures. Whereas
preventive action can be done through a user service
program when admitting new students. According to
Owolabi, Idowu and Aliu (2015) more usage service
programs must be made in the university library to
enable students to be fully aware of the rules and
regulations available so that they can always
comply. Library users must be educated further
through library orientation, and other means to
always comply with library rules and regulations to
ensure optimal and effective library use.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Rules of code of conduct are needed by libraries to
regulate the purpose of the library itself and users in
the use and service of the library. Rules can be made
by adjusting the services in the relevant library and
not behind the rules regarding user behaviour in the
library UiTM includes running it all , such as the
application of fines, provision of signage, and code
of conduct behaviour of users in the library. But
specifically, for user behaviour in the library, it can
be further developed by adjusting the needs and
characteristics of today's user behaviour, namely
digital natives that prioritize multitasking, flexibility,
and freedom. So that it is expected that the rules of
conduct at UiTM do not curb the behaviour of
today's users but still in accordance with culture and
code of conduct in Malaysia.
REFERENCES
Barclay, D.A. and Scott, E.D. (2012) ‘Directions to library
wayfinding’, American Libraries, 43(3/4).
Bosman, E. and Rusinek, C. (1997) ‘Creating the
UserFriendly Library by Evaluating Patron Perception
of Signage’, Reference Services Review, 25(1), pp. 71–
82.
Connaway, L.S. (2015) The Library in the Life of the
User: Engaging with People Where They Live and
Learn. ERIC.
Gill, P. (2001) The public library service: IFLA/UNESCO
guidelines for development. NBD Biblion Publishers.
Harisanty, D., Diba, A.F. and Layyinah, K. (2020) ‘The
Effectiveness Program of User Education at University
of Malaya’s Library’, Library Philosophy and
Practice, pp. 1–15.
Mandel, L.H. and Johnston, M.P. (2019) ‘Evaluating
library signage: A systematic method for conducting a
library signage inventory’, Journal of Librarianship
and Information Science, 51(1), pp. 150–161.
Montviloff, V. (1990) ‘National Information Policies. A
Handbook on the Formulation, Approval,
Implementation and Operation of a National Policy on
Information.’
O’Neill, K.L. and Guilfoyle, B.A. (2015) ‘Sign, sign,
everywhere a sign: What does “reference” mean to
academic library users?’, The Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 41(4), pp. 386–393.
Owolabi, S., Idowu, O.A. and Aliu, B.D. (2015)
‘Awareness and compliance to library rules and
regulations by undergraduate students in two
university libraries in Southwest Nigeria’,
International Journal of Library Science, 4(1), pp. 1–
6.
Romadhona, M.K. (2020) Pengaruh Keterlibatan Kerja
Dan Keterikatan Kerja Terhadap Tingkat Intensi
ICRL 2018 - 3rd International Conference on Record and Library
158
Turnover Serta Dampak Pada Organizational
Citizenship Behavior Karyawan Engineer (Studi
Pasca PHK Massal pada Karyawan PT. Tjiwi Kimia
Tbk. Sidoarjo). UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.
Romadhona, M.K. (2022) ‘Does the Pandemic Affect
Unemployment Rate in East Java? (A Study of Pre and
Post COVID-19 Pandemic in 2016 to 2021)’, The
Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development
Planning, 3(2 SE-Policy Paper), pp. 164–176.
doi:10.46456/jisdep.v3i2.308.
Romadhona, M.K., Wati, I., et al. (2022) ‘IMPROVING
DIGITAL PLATFORM AS TOURISM
DEVELOPMENT: A ECONOMIC BENEFICIAL
FOR UMBUL PONGGOK COMMUNITY,
KLATEN, CENTRAL JAVA’, Jurnal Pendidikan
Sosiologi Undiksha, 4(3), pp. 102–114.
Romadhona, M.K., Kurniawan, F., et al. (2022)
‘Pengembangan Objek Wisata Potensial “Kampong
Tenggher”: Tantangan dan Strategi’, Jurnal Dedikasi
Hukum, 2(1 SE-Articles), pp. 38–50.
doi:10.22219/jdh.v2i1.20217.
Romadhona, M.K., Subagyono, B.S.A. and Agustin, D.
(2022) ‘Examining Sustainability Dimension in
Corporate Social Responsibility of ExxonMobil Cepu:
An Overview of Socio-Cultural and Economic
Aspects’, Journal of Social Development Studies, 3(2),
p. 130.
Stempler, A.F. and Polger, M.A. (2013) ‘Do you see the
signs? Evaluating language, branding, and design in a
library signage audit’, Public Services Quarterly, 9(2),
pp. 121–135.
Subagyono, B.S.A., Chumaida, Z.V. and Romadhona,
M.K. (2022) ‘Enforcement of Consumer Rights
Through Dispute Settlement Resolution Agency to
Improve the Consumer Satisfaction Index In
Indonesia’, Yuridika, 37(3 SE-Civil Law), pp. 673–
696. doi:10.20473/ydk.v37i3.34943.
Suhariono, A. et al. (2022) ‘Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran
Tanah (Kajian Sistem Publikasi Negatif Bertendensi
Positif)’, Notaire, 5(1), pp. 17–30.
Warren, R. and Epp, C. (2016) ‘Library Space and
Signage Kindness Audits: What Does Your User
See?’, Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library
and Information Practice and Research, 11(1).
The Review of Library Service Rule’s Tun Abdul Razak Puncak Alam Malaysia Library
159