Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of
Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women
without a History of Breast Cancer
Hee-Sun Oh
1
, Hee-Kyoung Oh
2
1
Seoul National University Research Institute of Nursing Science,
2
Soongsil University Research and Business Development Foundation,
Keywords: Breast Prosthesis, Breast Cancer in Women, Objective Human Physiological Responses, Subjective Sensory,
Dry and Wet Condition
Abstract: In order to contribute to the development of breast prosthesis products for breast cancer patients in Korea,
this experiment was conducted with 9 participants from June to July 2018, in Seoul, Korea. The breast
prosthesis consisted of three kinds of material: silicone breast prosthesis 1, silicon breast prosthesis 2 and
silk fabric breast prosthesis 3. Subjects were evaluated by touch in a dry state without water and a wet state
with 30~35degree hot water. Evaluation was performed using Schuhfried's biofeedback 2000x-pert wireless
multi-module for measuring skin conduction level, skin temperature, and blood flow. Subjective sensory
evaluation including thermal sensation, humid sensation, and feeling of comfortable was implemented with
the scale test. Results showed that there was no significant difference in an objective human physiological
response according to the state of dry and wet. However, there was a significant difference with subject
sensory perception in dry and wet. Furthermore, the breast prosthesis made with silk fabric, the humid
sensation was significantly higher in the wet state whereas a thermal sensation and feeling of
comfortableness were not significantly difference between dry and wet. Therefore, this study suggests that
researchers develop and apply other materials like silk for breast cancer patients.
1 INTRODUCTION
Today, breast cancer is the second most common
cancer for woman in Korea. In 2014, the number of
Korean women experiencing breast cancer was
16,521 people, which is more than four times higher
than the 3,801 people in 1996, 15 years ago.
However, breast cancer is relatively well treated and
overall has a high survival rate of over 90.0% when
detected early (National Cancer Information Center,
2013). In the case of breast cancer in the West, the
incidence is high in women after menopause.
In Korea, it highly occurs in women in their 40s
who are most active in family and society (Breast
cancer white paper, 2013). Thus, the increase of the
breast cancer’s incidence in a relatively younger age
group means that these women live longer as breast
cancer survivors. When breast cancer progresses,
more than half of breast cancer patients still need
complete mastectomy (Glaus & Carlson, 2009).
While this is a life-saving procedure for the breast
cancer patient, the loss of one or both breasts may
cause mental shock due to physical changes and
cosmetic damage (Kim et al., 2006). In other words,
it is not merely a re-sectioning of a part of the
biological body, but impacts the breast, with its
symbolic meaning of femininity, hence the
experience of stress as the appearance of the body
and the identity of femininity are both impacted
(Kwon & Yi, 2012). Therefore, in order to improve
physical image and quality of life, emotional stress
should be reduced for the patients (Roberts et al.,
2003). The use of breast reconstruction or using of
breast prostheses after mastectomy is helpful in the
recovery process of breast cancer survivors
(Gallagher et al., 2010). Due to the problem of
multiple operations for breast reconstruction and the
burden of cost, some breast cancer survivors have
chosen breast prosthesis over cosmetic surgery
(Baron, 2007).
Breast prostheses are produced in a variety of
sizes, shapes, and nipple types, so that women of all
ages can choose a breast that is almost identical to
Oh, H. and Oh, H.
Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without a History of Breast Cancer.
DOI: 10.5220/0008394100002442
In Proceedings of the Aceh International Nursing Conference (AINC 2018), pages 21-29
ISBN: 978-989-758-413-8
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
21
their own (Glaus & Carlson, 2009). However, in the
case of Korea, most Korean woman who have had a
mastectomy use silicone breast prosthesis imported
from western countries. The wearing of silicone
breast prostheses in summer, with its high humidity,
is uncomfortable due to the creation of sweat inside
the device, making some breast cancer patients
avoid breast prosthesis (Oh, 2016a; Oh, 2016b).
Therefore, it is necessary to develop a functional
breast prosthesis that is comfortable even in the high
humidity of a Korean summer.
In order to improve the quality of breast
prosthesis for breast cancer patients, this study
showed the reality of physical and physiological
discomfort to discern the differences in materials for
breast prosthesis.
2 METHODS
This experiment was exempted from IRB and it was
conducted in the clothing laboratory (26 ± 1 %, 50 ±
10% RH) of the university from June to July 2018,
Seoul, Korea. A total of 9 female Korean
participants in their 40s without a history of breast
cancer and no experience with breast prosthesis
participated. The subjects could participate in the
experiment 2 hours after eating and the 3 kinds of
breast prostheses were touched with the left hand.
Breast prosthesis 1 is a silicone prosthetic by T
company, Breast prosthesis 2 is a silicone prosthetic
by S company, and Breast prosthesis 3 is handmade
product of silk fabric (Table 1). Subjects were
evaluated by touching the prostheses under 2 kinds
of conditions: First, they were touched in a dry state
without water and secondly, in a wet state with 30 ~
35 degree hot water to replicate sweat.
The contents of the experiment are an objective
human physiological responses evaluation and
subjective sensory evaluation. The former was
performed using Schuhfried's biofeedback 2000x-
pert wireless multi-module for measure skin
conductance level (SCL), skin temperature (TEMP),
blood volume pulse (BVP), and pulse (Puls). The
measurement was performed automatically at
intervals of 0.038 sec., or 1578 times per minute.
The sensor was attached to the right hand of the end
of the third finger using a Velcro band. The
measured data output used Biofeedback 2000xpert
Tele-BFB ver. 2.0 software. Meanwhile the latter as
thermal sensation (7 scale), humid sensation (4
scale), and feeling of comfortableness (4 scale) was
implemented via survey method (Table 2). As the
number increases, thermal sensation and humid
sensation refers to heat or humidity, and the feeling
of comfortableness means greater or less comfort.
Prior to questioning, the definitions of thermal
sensation, humid sensation, and feeling of
comfortableness were defined
Table 1: Three kinds of breast prosthesis for experiment.
AINC 2018 - Aceh International Nursing Conference
22
Table 2: Subjective sensory evaluation.
All quantitative data for objective human
physiological responses evaluation and subjective
sensory evaluation were expressed as mean and
standard deviations (Mean, ±S.D.). In order to
analyze the touch evaluation for dry and wet breast
prostheses, a Kruskal-Wallis Test was performed for
the 3 conditions--dry, wet, and no touching status
with three kinds of breast prosthetics. Once a
significant main effect was found, a post hoc
analysis using the Mann-Whitney U-test was
undertaken. All statistical analysis of experimental
data was carried out using SPSS (Version 24.0,
SPSS Inc., USA).
3 FINDINGS
3.1 Dry, Wet, and No Touching
The experimental results showed that there was no
significant difference in an objective human
physiological experiment between the state of dry
and wet. However, table 3 shows the mean and
standard deviation of objective human physiological
response as skin conduction level, skin temperature,
blood flow and pulse for breast prosthesis, as well as
χ
2
and p-values in dry, wet, and no touch conditions
by a Kruskal-Wallis Test. It reveals a statistically
significant difference. Skin temperature was higher
for the no touch breast prosthesis than dry and wet
conditions χ
2
=10.900, p< .01; in other words, when
subjects touched a breast prosthesis under dry and
wet conditions, it made a lower skin temperature
than no touch (Fig. 1). In order to ascertain which of
the breast prostheses is statistically significantly
different from the other in conditions of dry, wet and
no touching, a Post hoc analysis was conducted. The
result of the Mann-Whitney U-test revealed
statistically significant differences for all three kinds
of breast prosthesis with no touch under dry
conditions χ
2
=15.998, p< .01, <Fig 2>. But in wet
conditions, breast prosthesis 1 was only significantly
different with no touching χ
2
=14.222, p< .01. Breast
prosthesis 2 and breast prosthesis 3 were not
significantly different with no touch (Fig 3).
.
Table 3: Result of measurement for objective human physiological responses from touching abreast prosthesis in dry
conditions and wet, and no touch.
** P<.01
Thermal sensation very hot (3) hot (2) warm (1) normal (0) little cold (-1) cold (-2) very cold (-3)
Humid sensation very humid (3) little humid (2) little humid (1) normal (0)
Feeling of comfortable comfortable (3) little uncomfortable (2) little uncomfortable (1) uncomfortable (0)
M ean (SD) M ean (SD) M ean (SD)
SCL(us) 0.424 (0.201) 0.418 (0.184) 0.292 (0.189) 3.877
Temp(
) 31.442 (2.936) 31.991 (3.054) 34.409 (0.905) 10.900 **
BVP(ml/m/n/100g) 49.286 (0.147) 49.347 (0.196) 49.205 (0.288) 1.384
Puls(bbm) 72.250 (8.352) 73.649 (8.521) 78.035 (9.256) 2.725
breast prosthesis
condition
objective human
phy siological resp onses
dry wet No touching
x
2
Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without
a History of Breast Cancer
23
P<.05, ** P<.01
Figure 1: Result of measurement for skin temperature with touching a breast prosthesis in dry and wet conditions, as well
as no touching.
Meanwhile, Table 4 shows the mean and standard
deviation of objective human physiological response
for three kinds of breast prosthesis χ
2
and p-values
in touching under dry and wet conditions and no
touching by the Kruskal-Wallis Test. It reveals a
statistically significant difference in skin
temperature between touch conditions and no touch
for breast prostheses. Skin temperature was higher in
no touch breast prostheses than in touching for all of
the three breast prostheses. In order to ascertain
which of the breast prostheses were statistically
significantly different from one another in the
condition of touch/ no touch, a Post hoc analysis was
conducted. The result of the Mann-Whitney U-test
revealed statistically significant differences for
silicone breast prostheses than no touch under dry
conditions χ
2
=12.673, p< .01. The silk breast
prosthesis did not show any significant difference.
Table 4: Result of measurement for objective human physiological responses from touching breast prosthesis 1~3, and no
touching
** P<.01*
M ean (SD) M ean (SD) M ean (SD) M ean (SD)
SCL(us) 0.38 (0.199) 0.49 (0.221) 0.39 (0.135) 0.29 (0.189) 5.912
Temp(
) 30.91 (2.731) 31.88 (3.299) 32.35 (2.864) 34.41 (0.905) 15.998 **
BVP(ml/m/n/100g) 49.33 (0.240) 49.34 (0.174) 49.29 (0.075) 49.21 (0.288) 0.704
Puls(bbm) 73.17 (8.965) 73.20 (8.895) 72.48 (7.952) 78.04 (9.256) 2.717
Breast prosthesis 3 No touching
x
2
breast prosthesis
condition
objective human
phy siological resp onses
Breast p rosthesis 1 Breast prosthesis 2
31.44
31.99
34.41
30
32
34
36
dry wet no touching
(℃)
**
*
AINC 2018 - Aceh International Nursing Conference
24
** P<.01
Figure 2: Result of measurement for skin Temperature with touching breast prosthesis 1 ~ 3, and no touching it.
3.2 Subject Sensory Perception under
Dry and Wet Conditions
Table 5 presents the average values and standard
deviations for the subject sensory evaluation as
thermal sensation, humid sensation, and feeling of
comfortableness along with χ
2
and p-values of dry
and wet conditions by Paired-samples t-tests. They
revealed a statistically significant difference in all
three values. Thermal sensation is significantly
higher in wet conditions than dry t =-4.108, p< .001,
and humid sensation is significantly higher in wet
conditions than dry t =-5.851, p< .001. However,
feeling of comfortableness is significantly higher in
dry conditions than dry t =6.248, p< .001. This
shows that, in the wet condition, the touching of the
breast prosthesis regarding thermal sensation and
humid sensation is higher than under dry conditions,
but the feeling of comfortableness is lower than
under dry conditions.
Furthermore, in order to know which of the
breast prostheses are statistically significantly
different from the others, a Post hoc analysis was
conducted. The result of the Mann-Whitney U-test
revealed a statistically significant difference with
each of the three kinds of breast prostheses in
subject sensory evaluation. Breast prosthesis 1 had
significantly higher thermal sensation in wet
conditions than dry χ
2
=5.913, p< .001, but the
feeling of comfortableness was significantly higher
in dry conditions than wet χ
2
=14.069, p< .001.
Breast prosthesis 2 had significantly higher thermal
sensation in wet conditions than dry χ
2
=10.971,
p< .001, and also the humid sensation was
significantly higher in wet conditions than dry χ
2
=9.946, p< .01 but a feeling of comfortableness was
significantly higher in dry conditions than wet χ
2
=11.306, p< .01. Breast prosthesis 3 had only a
significantly higher humid sensation in wet
conditions than dry χ
2
=7.344, p< .01, Breast
prosthesis 1 and breast prosthesis 2 had significantly
higher thermal sensation in wet conditions than dry t
=-2.921, p< .05, t =-5.289, p< .001, and humid
sensations higher in wet condition than dry t=-2.292,
p< .05, t =-5.096, p< .001, but the feeling of comfort
was higher in the dry condition than wet t=7.019,
p< .001, t =5.541, p< .001. However, in the case of
the breast prosthesis made with silk fabric, the
sensation of humidity was significantly higher under
wet conditions than dry t=-3.377, p< .01. There was
no significant difference between the thermal
sensation and feeling of comfort between dry and
wet states.
30.91
31.88
32.35
34.41
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Breast prosthesis 1 Breast prosthesis 2 Breast prosthesis 3 No touching
(℃)
**
**
Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without
a History of Breast Cancer
25
Table 5: Result of survey for subjective sensation evaluation from touching breast prostheses in dry and wet conditions.
* P<.05
Figure 3: Result of survey for subjective sensation evaluation from silicone breast prosthesis 1.
** P<.01
Figure 4: Result of survey for subjective sensation evaluation from silicone breast prosthesis 2.
1
0
1
2
3
thermal sensation humid sensation feeling of comfortable
Silicone breast prosthesis1
dry wet
*
*
1
0
1
2
3
thermal sensation humid sensation feeling of comfortable
Silicone breast prosthesis2
dry wet
**
**
**
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
thermal sensation -0.26 (1.163) 0.92 (0.830) -4.108 ***
humid sensation 0.52 (0.643) 1.96 (1.083) -5.851 ***
feeling of comfortable 2.30 (0.609) 1.08 (0.776) 6.248 ***
dry wet
t
condition
Subjective sensation
AINC 2018 - Aceh International Nursing Conference
26
** P<.01
Figure 5: Result of survey for subjective sensation evaluation from silicone breast prosthesis 3.
4 DISCUSSION
It is important to maintain lower humidity for
breasts prosthetics as this affects the quality of life
of breast cancer patients. Tamura (2008) and Yatagai
et al. (2012) showed that the temperature and
humidity of a brassiere were the same in the right
and left breast in healthy women. But in case of
breast cancer survivors, the surgery part of breast
side was higher in these than the healthy breast side.
A mastectomy patient particularly is clearly different
with a partial resection. The reason for the high
temperature and humidity in brassieres of breast
cancer patients is that they wear silicone breast
prostheses, which does not have hygroscopicity and
moisture permeability. The other reason is that
radiation therapy for breast cancer creates a loss
sweating functions in the skin, increasing dryness
around the breast, and therefore, in the side of the
brassiere with a silicone breast prosthesis,
temperature is higher.
Most Korean breast cancer patients wear
imported silicone breast prostheses. The purchase of
the breast prosthetics is often directly introduced in
hospital in Korea, but there are many cases where it
is necessary to find products personally, creating
hassle in the purchasing procedure and the
inconvenience caused by this, which is not taken
under consideration (Choi & lee, 2001; Kim, 2004).
In Korea, wearing breast prosthetics in summer, with
its high humidity, is highly uncomfortable due to
heat, sweat, and moisture. Experimental results
showed no significant difference in objective human
physiological responses evaluation as skin
conductance level (SCL), skin temperature (TEMP),
blood volume pulse (BVP), and Pulse (Puls) under a
dry or wet status. However, the result of comparing
with touch under dry conditions and wet breast
prosthesis and no touching, the no touching
temperature average was 34.409 (SD = ±0.905),
significantly higher than the touching of breast
prosthesis. It is considered that the body skin
temperature without breast prosthesis is significantly
higher than the touching of breast prosthesis. For
this study, the breast prostheses materials were at a
temperature of 27  in the laboratory, and, in order
to replicate a breast prosthesis with sweat, the breast
prosthesis was soaked in hot water at 30 to 33 .
The breast prosthesis with silicone material was
lower in temperature than the silk fabric breast
prosthesis. According to the Morooka (2015)
experiment, the humidity of the silicone breast
prosthesis was almost zero in hygroscopicity and
moisture permeability, while cotton material was
higher than silicone. Meanwhile, there was a
significant difference between silicone breast
prosthesis 1, silicone breast prosthesis 2 and no
touching in objective human physiological responses
evaluation. There was no significant difference in
touching the silk fabric breast prosthesis and no
touch.
The results of this survey for subjective sensory
perception of silicone breast prostheses found that
they were less comfortable in wet conditions than in
1
0
1
2
3
thermal sensation humid sensation feeling of comfortable
Silk fabric breas t prosthesis3
dry wet
**
Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without
a History of Breast Cancer
27
dry conditions. However, the silk fabric breast
prosthesis was found to have no difference in
dryness and wetness in terms of comfort. Mooroka
(2015) showed that a breast prosthesis should be
characterized by high moisture, and that such
materials are good for breast prosthetics for women
who have undergone a mastectomy.
Silk is very skin-friendly. Silk is composed of
fibroin (70 ~ 75%) in the middle and is surrounded
with sericin (25 ~ 30%). These are 85% or more
protein. Fabric is made from the fibroin remaining
after dissolving sericin by hot water extraction. It is
composed of more than 90% of amino acids such as
glycine, alanine, serine and tyrosine, etc. It is known
that when attached to the skin surface with an extra-
humidifying ability, it maintains the moisture
required by the skin and activates collagenase in the
cells to help skin fibrosis. It also has the function of
holding or releasing moisture by temperature and
humidity. Recently, due to the rapid development of
the applied biomedical industry, silk has also been
studied for various bio applications as a very
friendly component to the human body as a protein
resource material. As such, breast prostheses should
not be limited to silicon as they are now, but can be
produced in various forms such as with human-
friendly materials.
5 CONCLUSION
In order to contribute to the development of products
for breast cancer patients in Korea, this experiment
was performed with nine female Korean participants
in their 40s who did not have a history of breast
cancer using three kinds breast prostheses. In Korea,
the most common age group for breast cancer is
women in their forties. Experimental materials were
composed of silicone breast prostheses and one
made of silk fabric. According to objective human
physiological responses, only temperature was
significantly different between touching and no
touching of the breast prostheses. Skin temperature
without breast prosthesis showed a higher skin
temperature than touching. However, comparing
three kinds of breast prostheses and no touching,
only silk was not significantly different to no
touching of the breast prosthesis. According to
subjective sensation in touching dry and wet breast
prosthesis, the thermal and humid sensation was
significantly higher in wet conditions, but the feeling
of comfort was significantly higher in dry conditions.
Furthermore, an analysis of three kinds breast
prosthesis respectively found that the breast
prostheses of silicone and silk fabric had high humid
sensations in wet states but that the silk fabric beast
prosthesis still felt as comfortable as in the dry state.
Therefore, it is necessary to change the direction of
making breast prostheses from only concentrating on
verisimilitude in shape and touch to considering
biometric reactions such as body temperature and
moisture. This study suggests silk as an alternative
to silicone. In the future, it will be necessary to study
the application of silk as a breast prosthetic to breast
cancer patients and to study the suitability of other
natural fibers such as cotton and wool.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Ministry of
Education of the Republic of Korea and the National
Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-
2018S1A5A8027072)
REFERENCES
Baron, R. H. (2007). Surgical management of breast
cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 23, 10-19.
Vasconcelos, A., Freddi, G., and Cavaco-Paulo, A. (2008).
Biodegradable Materials Based on Silk Fibroin and
Keratin. Biomacromolecules, 9 (4), 1299-1305.
Breast cancer white paper. 2017. Korean Breast Cancer
Society. Retrieved from
http://www.kbcs.or.kr/journal/file/
2017_Breast_Cancer_Facts_and_Figures.pdf
Choi, H. S. & Lee, K. M. 2001. A study on the
development of mastectomy bras and breast prosthesis.
Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 51, 5-18.
Morooka, H. Sano, K., & Yatagai, M. 2015. Water
Properties of Breast Pad Materials for Females Post
Breast Cancer Surgery from the Viewpoint of Thermal
Comfort. Journal of the Japan research association
for textiles end-uses, 56(1), 54-60.
Gallagher, P., Buckmaster, A., O’Carroll, S., Kieman, G.,
& Geraphty, J. 2010. External breast prostheses in
post-masterctom care: Women’s qualitative accounts.
European journal of Cancer Care, 19, 61-71.
Glaus, W.W., & Carlson, G.W. 2009. Long-term role of
external breast prosthesis after total mastectomy.
Breast Journal, 15, 385-393.
Kim, J. G. 2004. Body as others, the body of the
community. Seoul: Konkuk University Press.
Kim, S.H., Jun, E. Y., & Lee, W. H. (2006). The factors
influencing depression in patients with breast cancer.
Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing, 6(2), 133-142.
Kwon, E. J. & Yi, M. S. (2012). Distress and Quality of
life in breast cancer survivor in Korea. Asian
Oncology Nursing, 12(4), 289-296.
AINC 2018 - Aceh International Nursing Conference
28
Oh, H. K. (2016)a. Survey of clothing behavior for breast
cancer women after surgery: Comparison between a
breast conserving surgery group and a mastectomy
group. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 19(1), 49-60.
Oh, H. K. (2016)b. Survey of Suitable Clothes for Breast
Cancer Patients-Changes in Clothing Habits Before
and After Surgery-. Journal of the Korean Society of
Clothing and Textiles, 40(3), 526-538.
Roberts, S., Livingston, P., White, V., & Gobbs. A. (2003).
External breast prosthesis use: Experiences and views
of women with breast cancer, breast care nurses, and
prosthesis fitters. Cancer Nursing, 26, 179-186.
National Cancer Information Center. 2013. Statistics for
cancer. Retrieved from
https://www.cancer.go.kr/lay1/program/S1T211C217/
cancer/view.do?cancer_seq=4757
Tamura, T. (1998). Measuring Techniques for Thermal
Comfort of Clothing. Sen'i Gakkaishi, 54(9), 313- 317.
Yatagai, M., Okabe, K., & Sato, A. (2012). A field
experimental investigation on clothing microclimate of
the women who underwent breast cancer
surgery. Journal of the Japan Research Association for
textile end-uses, 53(3), 215-220.
Subjective Sensation and Objective Body Physiology Responses of Breast Prosthesis in Dry and Wet States among Korean Women without
a History of Breast Cancer
29