
2 BACKGROUND 
The introduction of mobile technologies is changing 
and influencing the way society communicates as 
well as the entire framework of society. The primary 
determinants of communication, space and time, are 
quickly disappearing as the introduction of mobile 
phones into society keeps people available for 
contact wherever they are at any time of day. 
Patterns of communication that were shaped by a 
person’s central geographic position in respect to the 
social network they participated in, as well as their 
ability to share information, are no longer restricted 
by human relocation or geographic boundaries 
(Hossain et al., 2007). They are now configured and 
arranged by the relevancy of the information one has 
to give to the network. This shared information is 
only relevant if it fits the needs of the users within a 
social network, the available operating system in the 
technology used to communicate, and the geo-
graphic environment of the user at the time of their 
communication/information needs.  
A social network is the structure existing among 
a set of people and their relationships that act as a 
source of social support. Social support has been 
defined as all or part of the following: the act of 
providing a resource; the outcome of support (such 
as having a sense of well-being or being cared for); 
and as a relationship between the recipient and 
provider. While different from the concept of social 
support, social networks and social support are inter-
related.  
Social support networks can occur naturally or 
can be created by commonality of circumstances. It 
has been theorized that social support creates an 
interpersonal environment that alleviates 
accumulated stress that might overwhelm the 
individual's ability to cope while also contributing to 
the adaptive capacity of the individual. It has been 
argued that the main effects of social support 
influences health by way of the social network 
(Cohen, 1991). When a SOS does not utilize a social 
support network, the likelihood of experiencing 
complicated grief symptoms is increased.  
As part of the social support network, family 
members and friends of the deceased may also 
experience devastating psychological effects when a 
death by suicide occurs. Affective, behavioral, and 
cognitive changes may occur during the period of 
bereavement. If they go untreated, the possibilities 
for severe psychological changes increase. To 
illustrate the experience of survivors following a 
death by suicide, the theory of social impact can be 
used. With this theory the affective, behavioral, and 
cognitive changes in a person occur because of the 
impact of an information source (e.g., a person, a 
document, a movie, etc.) with respect to: the number 
of others recommending the information; who gives 
the information; the geographic closeness of the 
person giving the information, and the strength of a 
particular individual within the network. By building 
new utilities and manipulating the available 
functions, short text messages services (SMS), short 
multi-media messages services (MMS), etc…, on 
mobile phones and applying the social impact 
theory, there is the potential to prevent a 
bereavement-related crisis in survivors of suicide. 
Communication establishes structure for society. 
Methods of communication vary from hand signals, 
to verbal exchanges, to reading the written word, or 
viewing pictures. Mobile phones are a tool that 
increases the ability to communicate with voice, 
text, and images at any time and in any geographic 
environment. Following the patterns of information 
sharing in social networks, a SOS’s network will 
have an inner-network of people in close proximity, 
either geographically, physically, or emotionally, 
and an outer-network of people, either geo-
graphically, physically, or emotionally. Each person 
within the network may be conceptualized as being 
an actor, playing a role within the support system. 
The relationships established by the actors in the 
network are built on the amount of time spent 
communicating, the emotional intensity among the 
actors, mutual confiding, and the offering of 
reciprocal services. Figure 1 illustrates our proposed 
model of a SOS’s social support network. Depicted 
are the possible actors in the social support network. 
The actors have been divided into two resource 
groups, personal and clinical, revealing the role they 
play within the social network and their role within 
the support system (throughout the bereavement 
process).  
At this time, there is no published literature 
defining a survivors’ of suicide social support 
network, their communication patterns, or their 
information needs. We propose that by using 
COMPANION and providing appropriately tailored 
information, it will be possible to enhance the 
health-related quality of life (QOL) for survivors, 
and inhibit severe psychological changes in 
survivors of suicide as they live through the 
bereavement process. 
HEALTHINF 2009 - International Conference on Health Informatics
358