Consumption Structure Problems and Optimization Strategies of
Low-income Population in China’s Rural Areas
ShiBin Ye
School of Marxism, Hechi University, Hechi, Guangxi, China
Keywords: Rural Areas, Low Income Population, Consumption Structure, Optimization Strategy.
Abstract: In recent years, the income and consumption expenditure of China’s rural residents have been increasing, with
the growth rate of consumption expenditure higher than that of income. With the declining of the consumption
rate of urban residents year by year, the consumption rate of rural residents is rising. The overall consumption
rate of rural residents in poverty-stricken areas is high, so it is difficult to build a sustainable consumption
model. The consumption capacity of low-income population in rural areas is weak, and the expenditure
pressure on non-necessities is increasing year by year. The residents' consumption structure in rural areas can
be optimized in terms of forging an ecological lifestyle of controlling consumption, increasing the supply of
public goods in rural areas, building an intensive commodity sales network and optimizing individual
expenditure structure.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Higher Consumption Rate of
China’s Rural Residents
In recent years, with the rapid development of China's
economy, the income of urban and rural residents has
increased rapidly, and the income gap between urban
and rural residents has also been narrowing. From
2015 to 2020, the per capita disposable income of
urban residents increased from RMB 31,195 to RMB
43,834, and the per capita consumption expenditure
increased from RMB 21,392 to RMB 27,007. The per
capita disposable income of rural residents increased
from RMB 11,422 to RMB 17,131, and the per capita
consumption expenditure increased from RMB 9,223
to RMB 13,713. The growth rate of consumption
expenditure of rural residents was significantly
higher than that of urban residents in the same period.
The income and expenditure gap between urban and
rural residents has also been narrowing, but the
income gap between urban and rural residents was
still greater than the expenditure gap. In 2015, the per
capita disposable income of rural residents only
accounted for 36.61% of that of urban residents. In
the following years, the income growth rate of rural
residents was higher than that of urban residents, and
the income gap between rural residents and urban
residents narrowed gradually. By 2020, the per capita
disposable income of rural residents was equivalent
to 39.08% of the disposable income of urban
residents. In terms of per capita consumption
expenditure, the per capita consumption expenditure
ratio of rural and urban residents increased from
43.11% in 2015 to 50.78% in 2020. In other words,
by 2020, the per capita disposable income of rural
residents was less than 40% of that of urban residents,
while the per csapita consumption expenditure
reached more than 50% of that of urban residents. The
growth rate of per capita consumption of rural
residents was also greater than that of urban residents.
In terms of the ratio of per capita consumption
expenditure to per capita disposable income
(consumption rate), the consumption rate of urban
residents decreased year by year, from 68.58% in
2015 to 61.61% in 2020, while the consumption rate
of rural residents remained stable at more than 80%,
and reached the peak 83.19% in 2019.
Ye, S.
Consumption Structure Problems and Optimization Strategies of Low-income Population in China’s Rural Areas.
DOI: 10.5220/0011173800003440
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management (BDEDM 2022), pages 275-280
ISBN: 978-989-758-593-7
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
275
Table 1: Income and expenditure of urban and rural residents from 2015 to 2020, website of China National Bureau of
Statistics - Statistical Bulletin over the years(Website of the National Bureau of Statistics 2021).
Urban residents Rural residents Rural / urban (%)
Year
Per capita
disposable
income
Per capita
consumption
ex
p
enditure
Consumption
rate
Per capita
disposable
income
Per capita
consumption
ex
p
enditure
Consumption
rate
Income Consumption
2015 31195 21392 68.58% 11422 9223 80.75% 36.61% 43.11%
2016 33616 23079 68.65% 12363 10130 81.94% 36.78% 43.89%
2017 36396 24445 67.16% 13432 10955 81.56% 36.91% 44.81%
2018 39251 26112 66.53% 14617 12124 82.94% 37.24% 46.43%
2019 42359 28063 66.25% 16021 13328 83.19% 37.82% 47.49%
2020 43834 27007 61.61% 17131 13713 80.05% 39.08% 50.78%
1.2 Higher Overall Consumption Rate
of Rural Residents in
Poverty-Stricken Areas, Resulting
in the Difficulty to Build a
Sustainable Consumption Model
In recent years, the income of residents in poverty-
stricken areas has increased year by year, with the
increasing consumption. From 2015 to 2019, the per
capita income of rural residents in poverty-stricken
areas increased from RMB 7,653 to RMB 11,567.
With the growth of income, the per capita
consumption expenditure of rural residents in
poverty-stricken areas also increased from RMB
6,656 to RMB 10,011. In terms of residents'
consumption rate, the consumption rate of rural
residents in poverty-stricken areas has remained
above 85% from 2015 to 2019, with about 5% higher
than the national per capita consumption rate of rural
residents in the same period, about 20% higher than
the consumption rate of urban residents in the same
period, including 16% higher than the national
average consumption rate in 2019. In 2019, the per
capita disposable income of rural residents in
poverty-stricken areas increased by RMB 1,196 and
the consumption expenditure increased by RMB
1,055. The overall consumption rate of residents in
poverty-stricken rural areas was too high and the
balance was too small, which will seriously affect
their savings and investment and reduce their ability
to deal with risks in the future. The current urgent
demand for consumption expenditure of rural low-
income population has almost exhausted all their
income. They can not plan long-term consumption
and investment plans, but can only choose short-
sighted consumption behavior.
Table 2: Income and expenditure of rural residents in poverty-stricken areas (data source: calculated based on the relevant
data of China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report over the years)( Household Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics
2020).
Income and expenditure
(y
uan /
p
erson
)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
National average in
2019
Per capita disposable income 7653 8452 9377 10371 11567 30733
Per capita consumption
ex
p
enditure
6656 7331 7998 8956 10011 21559
Food, tobacco and alcohol 2411 2567 2689 2808 3121 6084
Clothing 405 423 453 488 549 1338
Dwelling 1376 1543 1695 1995 2173 5055
Daily necessities and services 411 448 485 537 585 1281
Traffic communication 693 803 935 1045 1200 2862
Education, culture and
entertainment
680 790 883 1017 1163 2513
Medical care 567 638 725 919 1054 1902
Other supplies and services 114 118 134 147 166 524
Balance of payments 997 1121 1379 1415 1556 9174
Consumption rate (%) 86.97 86.74 85.29 86.36 86.55 70.15
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
276
1.3 Weaker Consumption Ability of
Low-income Population in Rural
Areas
In recent years, the proportion of national residents'
expenditure on food, tobacco, alcohol and other
necessities of life has decreased year by year,
including rural residents in poverty-stricken areas, the
Engel coefficient of residents has been declining, and
the living conditions of residents have been greatly
improved. However, the proportion of food, tobacco
and alcohol expenditure of rural residents in poverty-
stricken areas in the total personal consumption
expenditure was still higher than the national average.
In 2019, for example, 28.8% of the per capita
consumption expenditure of residents in China was
spent on food, tobacco and alcohol, while the
expenditure of rural residents spent on food, tobacco
and alcohol in poverty-stricken areas accounted for
31.2%. in terms of consumption, continuously
reducing the expenditure proportion of this project
can better reflect the improvement of the living
conditions of the poverty-stricken people. However,
this does not mean that the excessive proportion of
food, tobacco and alcohol expenditure of specific
population is unreasonable. In terms of ratio, the
expenditure on food, tobacco and alcohol of rural
residents in poverty-stricken areas in 2019 was higher
than the national average, and there seems to be room
for reduction of this expenditure of poverty-stricken
population. However, in terms of specific amount, the
per capita expenditure on food, tobacco and alcohol
of residents in China was RMB 6,084, while that of
rural residents in poverty-stricken areas was only
RMB 3,121, with an average of about $1.3 per person
per day. The higher food expenditure ratio and lower
actual amount of low-income population just show
that their consumption ability is weak and they have
to spend a considerable part of their consumption on
survival expenses.
Table 3: Breakdown proportion of consumption expenditure of rural residents in poverty-stricken areas (Annual Report on
Income Distribution of Chinese Residents 2020).
Proportion of various
consumption items (%)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Trend
National
average in 2019
(%)
Per capita consumption
ex
p
enditure
100 100 100 100 100 100
Food, tobacco and alcohol 36.22 35.02 33.62 31.35 31.2 28.8
Clothing 6.08 5.77 5.66 5.45 5.5 6.2
Dwelling 20.67 21.05 21.19 22.28 21.7 23.4
Daily necessities and services 6.17 6.11 6.06 6.00 5.8 5.9
Traffic communication 10.41 10.95 11.69 11.67 12.0 13.3
Education, culture and
entertainment
10.22 10.78 11.04 11.36 11.6 11.7
Medical care 8.52 8.70 9.06 10.26 10.5 8.8
Other supplies and services 1.71 1.61 1.68 1.64 1.7 2.4
1.4 Increasing Expenditure Pressure
on Non-Necessities Year by Year
For the consumption expenditure of rural residents in
poverty-stricken areas, this article takes the data of
2019 as an example. In terms of the actual amount of
expenditure, the expenditure of most projects was
less than 50% of the national average level, and only
the expenditure on food, tobacco and alcohol and
medical care barely reached more than 50% of the
national average level. In terms of the proportion of
various expenditures, the proportion of expenditure
on food, tobacco, alcohol, medical and health care of
rural residents in poverty-stricken areas exceeded the
national average consumption level. The items with
single consumption expenditure accounting for more
than 10% included food, tobacco and alcohol,
housing, transportation and communication,
education, culture, entertainment and medical care in
order from high to low. The total proportion of these
five items reached 87%. The pressure on the growth
of consumption expenditure of poverty-stricken
residents mainly comes from transportation and
communication, education, culture, entertainment
and medical care. In most years, the growth rate of
these three expenditures was much higher than that of
total consumption expenditure and per capita
disposable income. The above data show that the
expenditure pressure on non-necessities of life of
rural residents in poverty-stricken areas is increasing
year by year.
Consumption Structure Problems and Optimization Strategies of Low-income Population in China’s Rural Areas
277
Table 4: growth rate of income and expenditure of rural residents in poverty-stricken areas compared with the previous year
(data source: calculated based on the relevant data of Annual Report on Income Distribution of Chinese Residents 2020).
Growth rate of income and
ex
p
enditure (%)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Per capita disposable income 11.69% 10.44% 10.94% 10.60% 11.53%
Per capita consumption expenditure 10.80% 10.14% 9.10% 11.98% 11.78%
Food, tobacco and alcohol 9.74% 6.47% 4.75% 4.43% 11.15%
Clothing 9.46% 4.44% 7.09% 7.73% 12.50%
Dwelling 10.61% 12.14% 9.85% 17.70% 8.92%
Daily necessities and services 7.59% 9.00% 8.26% 10.72% 8.94%
Traffic communication 12.68% 15.87% 16.44% 11.76% 14.83%
Education, culture and entertainment 15.25% 16.18% 11.77% 15.18% 14.36%
Medical care 10.96% 12.52% 13.64% 26.76% 14.69%
Other supplies and services 15.15% 3.51% 13.56% 9.70% 12.93%
2 ANALYSIS ON THE CAUSES
OF UNREASONABLE
CONSUMPTION STRUCTURE
OF LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS
IN RURAL AREAS
2.1 The Consumption Choice of
Low-income Population Is Not
Scientific Enough
In terms of the choice of different consumer goods,
the purchasers bought goods with high price but
poverty-stricken quality under the publicity of
merchants due to the limitation of the total short-term
disposable income and the lack of grasp of relevant
knowledge. In the short term, the poverty-stricken
people will spend less on these commodities and the
consumption pressure will be low. However, the
durability of such commodities is not enough, and
consumers need to speed up the replacement cycle of
supplies and spend repeatedly on similar
commodities. In the long run, the poverty-stricken
people may spend more on such goods than the non
poverty-stricken people, resulting in increased
expenditure pressure on the poverty-stricken people.
In terms of different types of consumption behavior
choices, the poverty-stricken people may prefer
consumer goods that can immediately bring
themselves a certain sense of satisfaction, rather than
making more pragmatic choices. This short-sighted
impulse consumption will inevitably lead to the
compression of the expenditure on necessities of life
of the poverty-stricken people, or lead to the further
reduction of the annual balance. Finally, it is even less
possible for them to make scientific consumption
planning choices.
2.2 Individual Imitation Caused by
Population Consumption Habits
In terms of the choice of consumption behavior, there
is phenomenon of follow-suit consumption. For
example, in terms of the consumption of household
appliances, the activities of home appliances to the
countryside were carried out all over the country
many years ago, "so that farmers' home appliance
consumption is in advance, and farmers under credit
constraints must reduce the current consumption of
other products. (
Zheng 2012, Jiang 2012, Lin 2012)Due
to the mode of subsidized purchase, some rural
families possess durable consumer goods that exceed
their consumption level in advance. In 2019, the
number of major durable consumer goods per 100
households of rural residents in China at the end of
the year is very close to the average level of rural
areas in China. In 2019, the per capita disposable
income of rural residents in China was RMB 16,021,
and the per capita income of rural residents in
poverty-stricken areas in China was RMB 11,567 in
the same year. In case that the actual purchasing
power of some poverty-stricken families is
insufficient, the follow-suit consumption in
household appliances deprives the normal
consumption expenditure of the families and affects
the satisfaction of other consumption needs of family
members.
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
278
Table 6: Ownership of major durable consumer goods per 100 households of rural residents and residents in poverty-stricken
areas in 2019 (data source: China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report 2020).
Consumer goods
category
Ownership of major
durable consumer
goods per 100
households of rural
residents at the end of
2019
Ownership of major
durable consumer
goods per 100
households of rural
residents in poverty-
stricken areas in 2019
Ownership of major
durable consumer
goods per 100
households in
contiguous poverty-
stricken areas in 2019
Ownership of durable
consumer goods per
100 households in
rural areas of key
poverty alleviation
counties in 2019
Household car
(
set
)
24.7 20.2 19.6 19.9
Washin
g
machine
(
set
)
91.6 90.6 90.8 90.4
Refri
g
erator
(
set
)
98.6 92.0 91.5 91.6
Mobile phone
De
artment
261.2 267.6 272.0 266.8
Com
p
uter
(
set
)
27.5 17.7 16.5 18.0
2.3 Location Disadvantage Leading to
the Rise of Consumption Costs
Based on the China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report
published in 2020, by 2019, except for a few areas in
Qinghai and Jilin, all natural villages where poverty-
stricken households live have been connected by road
and telephone, and the main roads to more than
99.5% of the natural villages where poverty-stricken
households live have been hardened. The proportion
of farmers who can take buses in the natural villages
where the poverty-stricken areas are located is 76.5%,
only 55% in Guangxi. In some remote villages, with
relatively small population and long transportation
distance, residents can travel only by renting cars,
cluster carpool, or motorcycles by themselves. This
increases the consumption expenditure of travel. For
consumer goods purchased by rural residents, except
for some agricultural products directly produced in
the region, with the relatively low price, the prices of
other commodities are basically the national unified
price system. In addition to the profits of distributors
and transportation costs, the prices of consumer
goods in rural market towns are not lower than those
in large and medium-sized cities.
2.4 Failure of Credit Mechanism
Resulting in the Inability to Plan
Long-Term Consumption
The current banking system has high requirements for
residents' credit. Fixed income, personal or family
property status and expenditure status are important
references to review whether the conditions of credit
granting are met. Rural residents in poverty-stricken
areas do not know enough about credit, do not have a
good understanding of credit, do not dare to borrow,
worry about being unable to repay when due, and it is
not cost-effective to pay interest. Some people also
think that the procedures are too cumbersome to
handle.
3 OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY
OF CONSUMPTION
STRUCTURE OF LOW-
INCOME RESIDENTS IN
RURAL AREAS
3.1 Establishment of an Ecological
Lifestyle of Controlling
Consumption
The consumption behavior of rural low-income
population is guided and standardized with moderate
consumption morality, and people's arbitrary
consumption and excessive consumption are
prevented and controlled. "Moderate" appropriate
consumption concept is cultivated to stop irrational
desire consumption behavior in time. Publicity and
education are strengthened, cultural popularization is
expanded, ideological understanding is improved,
and the awareness of self-moral restraint of rural low-
income population is constantly strengthened to
promote the formation of rational consumption
patterns. Furthermore, the contradiction between
savings shortage and bad consumption habits among
low-income population are eliminated.
3.2 The Government Increased the
Supply of Public Goods in Rural
Areas
The relative shortage of public goods supply is bound
to increase the consumption cost in rural areas and
restrain the consumption demand and consumption
ability of farmers, especially low-income population.
Consumption Structure Problems and Optimization Strategies of Low-income Population in China’s Rural Areas
279
From the last kilometer of poverty alleviation road to
the last kilometer of rural revitalization, infrastructure
is the key. These infrastructures include hardware
transportation, communication, Internet coverage,
water and electricity for production and life, as well
as the equalization and sinking of educational
services, high-quality medical resources of the grass-
roots society, and the construction of adequate
pension and other social security systems. Whats
more, this article explores a reasonable path to
implement the construction of residents' consumer
and operational credit system in rural areas.
3.3 Construction of An Intensive
Commodity Sales Network
Many rural residents have low educational level and
insufficient ability to identify commodity quality and
function. The use and maintenance of various
commodities need to seek after-sales support from
merchants. They are in lack of bargaining power for
commodity price and after-sales guarantee. Merchant
are in a strong position in the rural sales network.
Local governments should guide all kinds of online
and offline formal commercial entities to step into the
rural market, and increase the promotion of a mature
large-scale online and offline sales system to cover
counties and townships and extend to rural areas. A
comprehensive business supermarket system is built
at the county and township levels, the professional
operation capacity is improved, and the after-sales
service system is optimized. Costs are reduced and
sales service quality is improved by means of
systematization, specialization and integration.
3.4 Optimization of Individual
Expenditure Structure
Education on residents' rational planning and
personal and family consumption is strengthened, and
residents are guided to take action to effectively
reduce unreasonable expenses and optimize other
kinds of expenses. The production and life of rural
residents are integrated, and many consumer needs
can be met by self-sufficiency. The restoration and
development of courtyard economy in rural areas
should be promoted, and consumer should be
provided with goods for household needs in the form
of independent production. Technicians should be
selected to guide farmers to make full use of land
resources and family resources, so as to appropriately
plant products that can produce certain economic
benefits.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Managers should take the initiative to understand
macro statistical data, and conduct data analysis
according to the situation of the region, to understand
the actual consumption status of rural residents in the
region. And use the big data resources provided by
various Internet platforms to guide the planting of
agricultural products, supply of consumer goods and
distribution of commercial outlets. The
synchronization of farmers' products into the market
and consumption behavior should be promoted. A
reasonable household consumption system should be
built. We should apply for credit from financial
institutions appropriately, plan premature
consumption demand steadily, and reduce the
pressure of emergency expenditure on household
property.
FUND PROJECT
"Research on wealth ethics strategy of targeted
poverty alleviation" of 2017 western project of
National Social Science Foundation of China
(17XKS010)
REFERENCES
Department of employment and income distribution,
national development and Reform Commission,
Annual Report on Income Distribution of Chinese
Residents 2020, Beijing: Social Sciences Academic
Press, May 2021, page 152.
Household Survey Office of the National Bureau of
Statistics, China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report
2020, Beijing: China Statistics Press, December 2020,
pages 312, 300, 309, 336, 354 and 310.
Website of the National Bureau of Statistics - Statistical
Bulletin over the years,
http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/ndtjgb/ (reference
date: August 7, 2021).
Zheng Xiaoting, Jiang Yi and Lin Huang. Does public
finance subsidize specific consumer goods to promote
consumption?—— Evidence from pilot counties of
"home appliances to the countryside", Economics,
2012, Issue 4,pages 1323.
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
280