Improvement of Thermal Resistance of Surface-emitting Quantum
Cascade Laser using Structural Function and 3D Thermal Flow
Simulation
Shigeyuki Takagi
1
, Hirotaka Tanimura
1a
, Tsutomu Kakuno
2
, Rei Hashimoto
2
, Kei Kaneko
2
and Shinji Saito
2b
1
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Technology,
1404-1 Katakura, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan
2
Corporate Manufacturing Engineering Center, Toshiba Corporation,
8 Shinisogo, Isogo, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Keywords: Quantum Cascade Lasers, QCLs, Surface-emitting QCL, Photonic Crystal, PhC, Static Method, Structure
Function, Thermal Resistance, Thermal Flow Analysis, Diamond Submount.
Abstract: We have evaluated the thermal resistance of the surface-emitting QCL, which is expected to increase the
output and improve the beam quality, based on the structure function and 3D heat flow resolution. From the
structure function, the thermal resistance of the surface emitting QCL was divided into the mesa for laser
excitation, the InP substrate, and the CuW mount, and the total thermal resistance of 8.0 K/W was obtained.
The thermal resistance obtained by the 3D thermal analysis simulation was estimated to be 8.3 K/W, which
was in good agreement with that obtained from the structure function. Furthermore, the effect of the diamond
submount was evaluated and it was shown that the thermal resistance was reduced to 5.2 K/W. It is considered
that the thermal resistance is reduced by the horizontal transfer of heat in the diamond submount.
1 INTRODUCTION
A quantum cascade laser (QCL) is an n-type
semiconductor laser that can obtain laser light in the
infrared region (Faist et al., 1994). Since the
oscillation wavelength of the QCL is in the infrared
region called the fingerprint region of the molecule,
many gases can be measured with high sensitivity.
From the advantages, it is expected to be applied to
trace substance detection and distant gas detection. In
the detection of trace substances, the amount of laser
light absorbed is measured, and it is necessary to
propagate a long optical path length, and high output
is desired. Further, in the distant gas detection, since
the reflected light at the time of laser light
propagation is detected, a high-power laser is
required as a high-power laser, watt-class laser
oscillation has been obtained by A. Evans et al.
(Evans et al., 2007). This laser is an end face emitting
type laser in which the directions of the laser
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-4602
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-6482
excitation and the laser emission coincide with each
other. The laser beam is excited by concentrating the
current in a narrow current path called a ridge.
Therefore, the heat dissipation is low, and the laser
beam is emitted from the narrow ridge into a wide
space, so that there is a problem that the beam quality
(M
2
) is low.
On the other hand, a surface-emitting QCL that
emits laser light in the vertical direction of the device
using a photonic crystal (PhC) has been proposed
(Colombelli, R., et al., 2003). By increasing the area
of the excited part called a mesa, improvements in
beam quality and heat dissipation can be expected. In
the surface-emitting QCL using PhC, laser oscillation
was reported by Colombelli et al. (Colombelli et al.,
2003), and laser oscillation of 5 W was reported by
Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2019).
One way to increase the output of the surface-
emitting QCL is to improve heat dissipation. We
determined the thermal resistance of the Au-
128
Takagi, S., Tanimura, H., Kakuno, T., Hashimoto, R., Kaneko, K. and Saito, S.
Improvement of Thermal Resistance of Surface-emitting Quantum Cascade Laser using Structural Function and 3D Thermal Flow Simulation.
DOI: 10.5220/0010896700003121
In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology (PHOTOPTICS 2022), pages 128-133
ISBN: 978-989-758-554-8; ISSN: 2184-4364
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
embedded type surface-emitting QCL from the
structurer functions obtained by the static method and
the 3D thermal analysis simulation (Takagi et al.,
2021). In this study, the thermal resistance of the InP-
embedded surface-emitting QCL was estimated using
these methods. Furthermore, as a method of
increasing heat dissipation, we have proposed a
method using a diamond submount. As a result of
evaluation using 3D thermal analysis simulation, it
was shown that the heat spreads horizontally in the
diamond submount and the temperature rise of the
mesa that excites the laser can be reduced to about
2/3.
2 SURFACE-EMITTING QCL
The structure of the surface-emitting QCL is shown
in Fig. 1, where (a) is a cross-sectional view, (b) is a
top view, and (c) is a bottom view. A mesa area where
the input power is supplied and a dummy ridge are
formed on an InP substrate with a thickness of 600
µm. In the mesa area, a photonic crystal (PhC) is
formed on the active layer that excites the laser and
PhC is embedded with InP. An Au electrode for
current supply is formed on the opposite side of the
InP substrate.
Figure 1: Surface emitting QCL, (a) Cross-sectional view,
(b) top view, and (c) bottom view.
The surface-emitting device has an epi-side-down
structure in which the mesa and dummy ridge sides
are mounted on a CuW mount with AuSn solder.
Figure 2 is an external photograph of the surface-
emitting QCL used for the measurement, in which
mesas and dummy ridges are observed to be formed
on the InP substrate.
Figure 2: Photograph of surface-emitting QCL.
3 MEASUREMENT OF
STRUCTURE FUNCTION
3.1 K-factor Measurement
We reported on a method for measuring the thermal
resistance of end-face emitting QCLs using the static
method (Takagi et al., 2019). In this paper, the static
method was applied to the thermal resistance
measurement of InP-embedded QCL. A T3Ster
(Siemens AG) was used for the measurement. Since
the resistance of a semiconductor device changes with
temperature, the temperature change is proportional
to the voltage change at the end of the device when a
constant current is flowing. In the static method, this
voltage change ΔT
SP
[mV] is measured, and the
device temperature change ΔT
j
[K] is obtained using
∆𝑇
=𝐾∙𝑇

,
(1)
where K is a coefficient called K-factor.
The K-factor is required to measure the
temperature of a surface-emitting QCL in the static
method. Therefore, a surface-emitting QCL was
installed in the thermostat of the T3Ster, the
thermostat temperature was changed from 20 ° C to
70 ° C, and the K-factor was measured. The K-factor
was determined to be -0.022772.
3.2 Structure Function
T3Ster was used to measure the structure function by
the static method. The mounting part of the QCL
mount was cooled to 20 ° C, and the QCL device was
heated by supplying about 1.6 W of electric power.
After stopping the heating power supply, the QCL
temperature during cooling was measured and the
cooling curve was obtained. Assuming that the
thermal resistances of each element constituting the
Improvement of Thermal Resistance of Surface-emitting Quantum Cascade Laser using Structural Function and 3D Thermal Flow
Simulation
129
QCL is R
th
and the heat capacity is C
th
, the time
constant τ during cooling is expressed by
𝜏= 𝐶

∙𝑅

. (2)
The time constant τ was extracted from the
inflection point of the cooling curve, and C
th
and R
th
were obtained from τ using Eq. (4). In the structure
function, R
th
is plotted on the horizontal axis and C
th
is plotted on the vertical axis (Székely, 1997).
Fig. 3 shows the structure function of the surface
emitting QCL. As shown in Fig. 1, the surface
emitting QCL is divided into the mount, the InP
substrate, and the mesa area. From the thermal
conductivity and component size, it is estimated that
the structure function divided by the inflection point
corresponds to the three QCL components. In
addition, the flat region with a thermal resistance over
8.5 K/W or more changes depending on whether the
QCL is attached to a cooling plate. It is considered to
be the thermal resistance between the surface emitting
QCL and the T3Ster cooler, and the total thermal
resistance of the surface emitting QCL is estimated to
be about 8.0 K/W.
Figure 3: Structure function of surface emitting QCL.
4 HERMAL SIMULATION OF
SURFACE-EMITTING QCL
4.1 3D Thermal Flow Simulation
Model
As another method for analysing the thermal
characteristics of the surface emitting QCL, thermal
flow analysis using a 3D model was performed. A
simulation model was constructed by inputting the 3D
structure and physical property data of the surface
emitting QCL. The thermal flow analysis software
STEAM (MSC software) and FloTHERM (Mentor
Graphics Japan) were used as the simulator. The
thermal flow analysis is performed using a natural
convection model in which mesa area is overheated
and natural convection is generated. The equation for
gas flow is expressed by
𝜕𝜌
𝜕𝑡
+
𝜌𝑣
𝑥
x
+
∂𝜌𝑣
𝑦
y
+
𝜌𝑣
𝑧
z
=0 ,
(3)
where ρ is the density, t is the time, and v
x
, v
y
, and v
z
are the velocities in the x, y, and z directions,
respectively. The heat equation is determined as
𝜕𝑢
𝜕𝑡
=
𝐾
𝜎𝜌
𝜕
2
𝑢
𝜕𝑥
2
+
𝜕
2
𝑢
𝜕𝑦
2
+
𝜕
2
𝑢
𝜕𝑧
2
+
1
𝜎
𝐹
𝑥, 𝑦,𝑧, 𝑡
,
(4)
where u is the temperature and is a function of the
position and time. σ is the specific heat, and Κ is the
thermal conductivity. F is the external heating value
per time, and is a function of position and time.
The 3D structure of the surface-emitting QCL
shown in Fig. 1 were input, and a three-dimensional
model was constructed. Figure 4 (a) is a three-
dimensional model of a surface-emitting QCL. The
surface-emitting QCL has an epi-side-down structure
in which the mesa area and dummy ridge sides are
mounted on a CuW mount with AuSn solder. Fig. 4
(b) is a top view of the 3D model as in the photograph
of Fig. 2 The outline of the InP substrate, mesa,
dummy ridge, and Au electrode on the back surface
are shown.
In the 3D model, the physical property values
were as follows. The thermal conductivity of CuW
mount, AuSn solder, InP, SiO
2
, Ti, Au, Cu is 157, 59,
68, 1.38, 21, 296, 403 W/mK, respectively. For the
PhC part in which InP was embedded, the thermal
conductivity was calculated based on the volume ratio
of the PhC and the InP. In the active layer, thin films
of Al
0.638
In
0.362
As and Ga
0.331
In
0.669
As are alternately
laminated. The thermal conductivity of the active
layer was calculated by multiplying the film thickness
ratio with InAlAs of 10.0 W/mK (Kim et al., 2002)
and InGaAs of 5.6 W/mK (Adachi, 1985), and was
estimated to be 7.5 W/ mK. The temperature
boundary condition is fixed at 0 ° C on the mount with
a cooling Peltier, and the ambient temperature of the
surface emitting QCL is set at 25 ° C.
PHOTOPTICS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology
130
Figure 4: 3D simulation model of surface emitting QCL. (a)
perspective view and (b) top view.
5 SIMULATION RESULTS
5.1 Thermal Resistance of Surface
Emitting QCL
The temperature distribution of the surface emitting
QCL was calculated under the conditions of the of 10
W input power to the mesa area. Figure 5 shows the
temperature distribution of the surface-emitting QCL
in the central cross section. The CuW mount has high
thermal conductivity and the most of the mount is
kept at 0 ° C. The temperature around the mesa area
is higher than that in other parts. Since the
temperature rise at an input power of 10 W is 82.63 °
C, the thermal resistance of the surface emitting QCL
was calculated to be 8.3 K/W. This value was almost
the same as the thermal resistance of 8.0 K/W
obtained from the structure function. It shows the
validity of the 3D thermal analysis simulation.
Figure 5: Temperature distribution of surface emitting
QCL.
5.2 Effect of Diamond Submount
A diamond submount has a large value of 2000
W/mK, and it has been reported that the thermal
resistance of light emitting device is reduced
(Bezotosnyi et al., 2014). To reduce the thermal
resistance of the surface emitting QCL, the thermal
resistance of structure in which diamond was inserted
between the substrate and the mount was evaluated
by 3D thermal analysis simulation. Figure 6 is a 3D
simulation model of a surface emitting QCL using a
diamond submount. It is assumed that the lower
surface of the diamond submount is soldered to CuW
with AuSn having a thickness of 5 µm, and the InP
substrate is soldered to the upper surface with AuSn
having a thickness of 5 µm. The thermal conductivity
of the diamond submount and AuSn was set to be
2000 W/mK and 59 W/mK in the calculation,
respectively.
Figure 6: 3D simulation model of surface emitting QCL
with diamond submount.
We applied the input power of 10 W to the mesa
area of the QCL with diamond submount, and the
temperature rise of the mesa area was calculated.
Figure 7 (b) shows the simulation results. For
comparison, Fig. 7 (a) shows the calculation results
of the temperature distribution of the QCL without
diamond submount. In the QCL with diamond
submount (b), the temperature rise at an input power
of 10 W was 52.47 ° C, and the thermal resistance was
reduced to 5.2 K/W. Figure 8 shows the temperature
rise of the mesa area when the power input is changed
from 4 to 10 W. As the input power increases, the
temperature difference with and without the diamond
submount increases. It has been shown that the
diamond submount is more effective under high input
power operating conditions.
Improvement of Thermal Resistance of Surface-emitting Quantum Cascade Laser using Structural Function and 3D Thermal Flow
Simulation
131
Figure 7: Comparison of temperature distribution between
QCLs with and without diamond submount.
Figure 8: Relationship between input power and
temperature rise in the mesa area.
6 DISCUSSION
We discussed the factors that reduce the thermal
resistance by using the diamond submount. In the
QCL without submount (Fig. 7(a)), the isotherms of
the temperature distribution under the mesa are semi-
circular, and the heat generated with the input power
is transmitted concentrically around the mesa area.
On the other hand, in (b), due to the large thermal
conductivity of the diamond, the heat spreads
horizontally and is transmitted vertically in CuW. To
investigate the heat flow in more detail, the heat flux
of the surface emission QCL was calculated. Fig. 9(a)
shows the distribution of the heat flux vector without
submount, and Fig. 9 (b) shows the distribution of the
heat flux vector with submount. In Fig. 9(a), the heat
flux is mainly directed from the mesa area to the CuW
mount, while in (b) horizontal flux vector is generated
in the diamond submount. From the temperature
distribution in Fig. 7 and the heat flux distribution in
Fig. 9, it is estimated that the heat resistance is
reduced by the horizontal transfer of the heat by the
diamond submount.
Figure 9: Comparison of heat flux between QCLs with and
without diamond submount.
7 CONCLUSIONS
To evaluate the thermal resistance of the InP-
embedded surface-emitting QCL, the structure
function and 3D thermal analysis simulation were
adopted. Using the structure function, the thermal
resistance of the surface emitting QCL was divided
into the mesa area, the InP substrate, and the CuW
mount and the thermal resistance of 8.0 K W was
obtained. The temperature distribution of the surface
emission QCL at an input power of 10 W was
calculated by the 3D thermal analysis simulation. The
thermal resistance obtained from the temperature rise
in the mesa area was 8.3 K/W, which was in good
agreement with the thermal resistance obtained from
the structure function.
Furthermore, the effect of the diamond submount
was evaluated by 3D thermal analysis simulation, and
it was shown that the thermal resistance was reduced
to 5.2 K/W. From the calculation results of the
temperature distribution and the heat flux
distribution, it was estimated that the heat resistance
is reduced by the horizontal transfer of heat by the
diamond submount.
PHOTOPTICS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology
132
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by Innovative Science and
Technology Initiative for Security (Grant Number
JPJ004596), ATLA, Japan.
REFERENCES
Faist, J., Capasso, F., Sivco, D. L., Sirtori, C., Hutchinson,
A., & Cho, A. Y. (1994). Quantum cascade laser.
Science, 264, 553-556.
Evans, A., Darvish, S. R., Slivken, S., Nguyen, J., Bai, Y.,
& Razeghi, M. (2007). Buried heterostructure quantum
cascade lasers with high continuous-wave wall plug
efficiency. Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 071101-1-3.
Colombelli, R., Srinivasan, K., Troccoli, M., Painter, O.,
Gmachl, C. F., Tennant, D. F., Sergent, A. M., Sivco,
D. L., Cho, A. Y., & Capasso, F. (2003). Quantum
cascade surface-emitting photonic crystal laser.
Science, 302, 1374–1377.
Wang, Z., Liang., Y., Meng, B., Sun., Y-T., Omanakttan,
G., Gini, E., Beck, M., Ilia, S., Lourdudoss, S., Faist, J.,
Scalari, G. (2019). Large area photonic crystal quantum
cascade laser with 5 W surface-emitting power. Opt.
Express, 27, 22708–22716.
Takagi, S., Tanimura, H., Kakuno, T., Hashimoto, R., Saito,
S. (2021). Evaluation of thermal resistance of surface-
emitting quantum cascade laser using structural
function and 3D thermal flow simulation.
PHOTOPTICS2021, #12.
Takagi, S., Tanimura, H., Kakuno, T., Hashimoto, R., Saito,
S. (2019). Thermal analysis and heat dissipation
improvement for quantum cascade lasers through
experiments, simulations, and structure function. Jpn.
J. Appl. Phys., 58, 091008-1–6.
Székely, V. (1997). A new evaluation method of thermal
transient measurement results. Microelectron. J., 28,
277–292.
Kim, Y. M., Rodwell, M. J. W., Gossard, A. C. (2002).
Thermal characteristics of InP, InAlAs, and AlGaAsSb
metamorphic buffer layers used in In0.52Al0.48
/In0.53Ga0.47As heterojunction bipolar transistors
grown on GaAs substrates. J. Electron. Mater., 31,
196–199.
Adachi, S. (1985). GaAs, AlAs, and AlxGa1−xAs: Material
parameters for use in research and device applications.
J. Appl. Phys., 58, R1–R29.
Bezotosnyi, V. V., Krokhin, O. N., Oleshchenko, V. N.,
Pevtsov, V.A., Popov, Y. M., Cheshev, E. A. (2014).
Thermal modelling of high-power laser diodes mounted
using various types of submount. IEEE J. Quantum
Electron. 44, 899–902.
Improvement of Thermal Resistance of Surface-emitting Quantum Cascade Laser using Structural Function and 3D Thermal Flow
Simulation
133