Antecedents and Preventions of Problematic Internet Use:
A Systematic Literature Review
Anis Aniza Awi
1
, Puteri Fadzline Muhamad Tamyez
1
, Nurhaizan Mohd Zainudin
1
and Siti Aisyah Panatik
2
1
Faculty of Industrial Management, University Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
Keywords: Problematic Internet Use, Addiction, Global Lessons, Children, Adolescent, Adult, Community.
Abstract: The aim of this systematic literature review is to map the investigation in the subject of Problematic Internet
Use (PIU) focuses on Evidences as well as Global Lessons. Further, this particular analysis endeavours to
review the substantial facts and lessons used in PIU research and to estimate the severity of problems that
persist when an individual uses the internet excessively. This review was guided and consistently compiled
using PRISMA which is considered a rigorous method for conducting a literature review. Furthermore, the
technique has a number of distinct unique advantages. Besides that, the authors have started the process by
providing the full text of all related articles from the search engine. All articles next will be reviewed after
full-text reading to ensure the suitability of focus literature. The initial search yielded 307 results. Following
a thorough inspection of the articles’ titles and abstracts, the articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria
were excluded. In a total of 62 studies, trends in the study of all age levels as well as children,
adolescent/emergent and adult PIU were discovered. These trends were conceptualized into specific, activity-
related and contextual elements. Findings suggested that sociodemographic and psychosocial factors are
actually likely the most explored that have demonstrated considerable relationships with PIU. While, more
research focuses on activity- related factors are required in order to accomplish a clearer in terms of
understanding the PIU behaviours and to incorporate into an extensive model which will guide future research
in this growing industry.
1 INTRODUCTION
The usage of the Internet has grown dramatically over
the last several decades and has become an important
aspect of daily life by offering worldwide
connectivity, access to information, and
entertainment opportunities (Tomczyk & Solecki,
2019). The rapid advances in technological
improvement and the global growth of the internet
has significantly enhanced the quality of the majority
of people all over the world.
The internet has broken through all borders across
the world and has become an essential source of
information and pleasure for individuals (Cacioppo,
Barni, Correale, Mangialavori, Danioni, & Gori,
2019). Starting from emails, social networks, instant
messaging, blogs and message boards has removed
the barriers between public and anonymous to
communicate about any topics (Randall, 2018). As to
date, the collection of various resources and services
in the internet has successfully become the most
powerful tool for all human beings that can bring
millions users in a single room (Gansner, Belfort,
Cook, Leahy, Colon-Perez, Mirda & Carson, 2019).
However, the rapid use of Internet technology has
skyrocketed and currently affected many human’s
lives specifically those users who have a flimsy line
between online and the actual world’s interaction due
to addictive reasons. This may exert many detrimental
effects on their personal lives and surroundings (Ke &
Wong, 2018). The presence of Problematic Internet use
(PIU) has drawn attention since the early of 90’s
among public until professionals and has led to
research relating to clinical cases that present negative
behaviour (Randall, 2018).
The literature related to the concept of PIU has
begun to accumulate since the majority countries in
this world have started to issue a seriousness of PIU
when the growth rate of PIU kept growing hundreds
percent every single year. Though, many researchers
Awi, A., Tamyez, P., Zainudin, N. and Panatik, S.
Antecedents and Preventions of Problematic Internet Use: A Systematic Literature Review.
DOI: 10.5220/0010810100003347
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPsyche 2021), pages 167-173
ISBN: 978-989-758-580-7
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
167
have defined the problems related to internet usage as
an addiction, however some researchers do not
believe the term ‘addiction’ appropriate to be use as
the term is actually for physiological dependence
which relates to stimulus such as substance (Tomczyk
& Solecki, 2019; Laconi, Kaliszewska-Czeremska,
Gnisci, Sergi, Barke, Jeromin, & Király, 2018).
Multiple terms exist in individual with excessive
internet usage including Problematic Internet Use
(Caplan, 2007), Pathological Internet Use (Davis,
2001), Internet Dependency (Scherer, 1997) and
Internet Addiction (Young, 1996). Although there is
a consensus among researchers that the 'PIU'
phenomenon exists, there is no unified definition
accepted by all researchers in the field. Before the
existence of the term ‘Problematic Internet Use’, back
to decades ago the term ‘Pathological Internet Use’
was more popular among researchers when the
meaning behind the word was ‘dependence in relation
to the internet’ (Sarchiapone & Wasserman, 2016).
Furthermore, the meaning also consists of two
types: specific and generalized. ‘Specific’ refers to
specific dependency, such as gaming or gambling
(online) (Zhang & Bian, 2020). In other words, it was
referring to a content-dependency, such as misuse of
the internet in specific internet content (Tam, 2016).
The dependency would still exist even though in the
absence of the internet. Meanwhile, for ‘generalized’
dependency, it is described as online without clear
purposes or in other meaning is ‘wasting time’ by
using the internet specifically for social functions
(Davis, 2001).
The same researchers have figured out the
symptoms includes (1) obsessive thought towards
internet, inability to decrease the dependency to the
internet, diminished the impulse control, overly
anticipating future online use, sense of guilt during
online use, less time spent of offline activities and
feeling internet is an only individual’s friend (Zhang
& Bian, 2020). Caplan (2002), second this by his
assertion, explained the term ‘addiction’ should not
be associated with the internet by suggesting a new
term ‘Problematic Internet Use (PIU)’.
Broadly speaking, PIU is often characterised as
uncontrollable on a habit, substance or procrastinate
that causes severe emotional, physiological and
psychological reactions (Laconi, Kaliszewska,
Gnisci, Sergi, Barke, Jeromin & Kiraly, 2018). The
words were initially developed by Beard and Wolf
(2001), who determined that the term 'problematic' is
the most acceptable for usage since it has less
theoretical inconsistencies than other terminologies.
On the one hand, PIU can be accurately defined as a
multifaceted illness characterised by cognitive and
behavioural symptoms that manifest as academic,
social, or professional difficulties (Caplan, 2002).
Following Davis (2001)’s work, Caplan (2018)
added the symptoms of PIU with mood alteration,
perceived social control when communicating or
interacting online instead of face-to-face and
becoming compulsive-excessive use of the internet.
Based on his own definition of PIU, Caplan (2018)
has developed a measurement to access PIU that
called as General Problematic Internet Use Scale
(GPIUS). Following this, an individual who has
potential high level of PIU might experience at least
three of the symptoms including large numbers of
usage during internet online, lack of control, has a
negative consequences, always become procrastinate
and lastly had negative consequences and continuation
(Rial, Golpe, Isorna, Brana, & Gomez, 2018). Thus,
this study aims to explore the antecedents and
preventions of problematic internet use.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature review is an essential process in academic
research that identifies and enriches prior knowledge,
which then updates as well as improves the
knowledge of existing research. Therefore, this
review was guided and consistently complied with the
PRISMA procedure (refer Figure 1), which is
considered as a rigorous method to conduct a
literature review. Furthermore, the procedure offers
several unique advantages. Firstly, it guides
researchers in clearly defining research questions and
directs researchers to identify the inclusion and
exclusion criteria for literature. The procedure also
provides guidelines for researchers to accurately
determine substantial databases within a reasonable
timeframe (Moher et al., 2016).
2.1 Search Strategy
Between May and July 2020, a literature search was
conducted using (4) electronic databases; Psych-
Article, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. All the
databases are more comprehensive than other
commonly used databases because it includes various
multidisciplinary databases. Series of search strings
was used by combining the following search terms
(and their derivatives): Problematic Internet Use’,
‘Internet overuse’, ‘Addicted of Internet’, ‘Excessive
internet use’, ‘Internet Addiction’, ‘Compulsive
Internet use’, ‘Pathological Internet use’ and ‘Internet
disorder’. Studies were selected based on the
following inclusion criteria.
ICPsyche 2021 - International Conference on Psychological Studies
168
2.2 Search Process
The author has started the process by providing the
full text of all related articles from the search engine.
All articles next will be reviewed after full-text
reading to ensure the suitability of focus literature.
The initial search yielded 307 results. Following a
thorough inspection of the articles’ titles and
abstracts, the articles that did not meet the inclusion
criteria were excluded. The process of review is
presented in Figure 1. Additional articles were
identified through searching the citations in the
literature selected, resulting in the inclusion of
another nine studies.
Figure 1: The Flow Diagram of The Study.
2.3 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The current literature review that has the author
included which: had to (1) relating to problematic
internet use with contain of empirical data; (2) have
been published after 2010; (3) include samples and/or
interventions for Internet; (4) were published in peer-
reviewed journals that focuses on social science (5)
presented in full-text article; and (6) be published in
English, as the present authors speak these language.
The characteristics and basic information about the
studies included in the review can be found in
3 RESULTS
3.1 Factors Associated with
Problematic Internet Use
The Internet is seen as a technological marvel that
facilitates the individual development especially
towards children and adolescents, including the
access to knowledge, study, problem-solving,
innovation and critical thinking. The use of internet is
usually something natural that everyone does in daily
life, however the Internet has been shown to have a
detrimental effect on the creation of personal skills
due to unnecessary, unregulated and non-purposeful
use. Tendencies to become over user towards internet
have been studied in the past literature and the result
comes out as it definitely has an impact on people’s
lives. Present studies interested in explanations why
the internet can become problematic to use.
3.1.1 Sociodemographic Variable
Out of 28 studies related to sociodemographic
variable has been fully reviewed, it is reported the
level of family income (3), gender (5), living in urban
and/or rural areas (4), age (12), family conflict (2) and
financial difficulties (2) has reported to be associated
with PIU. From our review, gender and age are the
most commonly used variables which the results
differ from one study to another. For example, studies
by Liu et. al. (2013) found that girls in adolescents
age are more likely to have high levels of PIU than
boys. these statements are supported by studies from
western countries which express similar results
(Randall, T. C., 2018; Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M.
D., 2018).
However, new data indicated that both genders
have a possibility of having a high level of PIU,
although prior adult study revealed that boys are more
likely to have a high degree of addiction (Ioannidis et.
al., 2019; Wartberg, L., & Lindenberg, K., 2020). In
terms of family conflict, evidence has indicated that
children or adolescents who originate from broken
families have a highly significant internet exposure
that leads to PIU. The results clearly demonstrate that
parents have a significant role in their children's lives,
and those involved in family conflict have a higher
risk of receiving PIU than those involved in non-
family conflict. Aside from that, another intriguing
result indicated that those who live in cities are more
likely to be addicted than those who live in rural areas
(Machimbarrena et. al., 2019). This is because certain
counties have had the biggest economic downturns,
causing them to become the least connected
Antecedents and Preventions of Problematic Internet Use: A Systematic Literature Review
169
countries. Furthermore, the presence of hurdles such
as the fact that they cannot afford to have internet
connection and that people are unaware of it, is the
major reason why the number of individuals with
high PIU in rural areas does not exceed the number of
people with high PIU in urban areas.
3.1.2 Internet Use Exposure
Out of 21 studies related to Internet use exposure
focusing on group age has been fully reviewed, 13
studies were found to be correlated with PIU in all age
groups. Behind their high PIU levels there are many
reasons. Studies have found that people with high PIU
use the Internet as a tool of entertainment, online
gaming and social life. With better internet coverage,
the use would increase silently (Kircaburun, &
Griffiths, 2018). For children, studies have shown
that parents are the biggest influencer towards
children’s PIU and tend to be the first person
introduce digital technologies to them. Even though
they influence their children the most, many parents
are still uncertain about how much their children have
been in access with the internet daily due to lack of
monitoring and lack of concern. This resulted in the
inability of children with PIU to control and regulate
the internet connection behaviour. Hence, it is not
surprising when children become overused to this
virtual world more easily when parents are not given
close attention and monitor them deeply.
3.1.3 Psychosocial Factors
Out of 13 studies related to psychosocial factors that
have been fully reviewed, 10 studies found that users
with a high level of PIU have established a substantial
interaction with psychosocial factors. As a result,
internet users who report low life satisfaction,
negative outcomes, a lack of trust and a lack of social
support have a significant likelihood of being
statistically associated with PIU and resulting in
severe repercussions. The adverse effects between
PIU are repression, family problems, and poor
employee productivity. The severe effects of PIU are
correlated not only with the quality of life and family
institutions, but also with issues of health such as
serious soleness and depression. The psychological
dependency can begin to manifest various symptoms.
In another empirical study, the researcher
identified people under serious PIU were started to
neglect certain actual life responsibilities, to neglect
daily tasks, to interrupt parental-child relations and
began to avoid activities in everyday life. For
instance, this claim can be contended by researchers
in Southeast Asia who indicate that the group with
high PIU displayed higher levels of procrastination
compared to people who are not under the group. As
a result, preventative measures must be taken
promptly to avoid the situation becoming further out
of control.
3.2 Prevention of Problematic Internet
Use
PIU has sent an alarming red alert to the majority of
the world's countries and has taught many countries
after the majority of PIU-related research showed
substantial findings. According to the present
research review, most studies have recommended
several strategies for policymakers and governments
to guarantee that the number of internet users with
high PIU does not reach pandemic proportions.
3.2.1 Monitoring & Supervise
Out of 62 research that were thoroughly evaluated, 36
studies advised that the government, universities and
parents take a proactive approach to preventing the
PIU from becoming a severe pandemic. Researchers
have revealed that earlier intervention required less
time and effort needed. In other words, it is easier to
promote and deal with someone who has a low level
of PIU and are less influenced. There are particular
difficulties for those who are already heavily addicted
and unable to retain control over their minds and
bodies (Gomez, Harris, Barreiro, Isorna, & Rial,
2018). According to the findings from researchers in
China, each age group which includes children,
adolescents, and adults has its own unique method of
addressing the target audience. For example, children
who have been diagnosed with a high PIU must be
handled on an individual basis (Zhai, Li, Jia, Liu, Sun,
& Wang, 2019). Direct eye contact and face-to-face
communication are required.
Adults with high PIU, on the other hand need to
be approached in a group or team. To keep the
problems from worsening, every country should start
by collaborating with professionals who are qualified
to train people, such as delivering health information
to the potential high level PIU. It is more sustainable
and empowers everyone to care for their own bodies
and situations (Kojima, Sato, Akiyama, Shinohara,
Mizorogi, Suzuki, & Yamagata, 2019).
3.2.2 Strengthening and Developing
Parenting Skills
Out of 62 research that have been fully reviewed, 12
studies proposed by providing free learning packages
ICPsyche 2021 - International Conference on Psychological Studies
170
to all parents or potential parents in order to provide
an in-depth understanding of the role of parents and
how to use appropriate parenting techniques. This
includes two-way communication between parent
and children as well as raising the children's self-
esteem (Ioannidis, Hook, Goudriaan, Vlies, Fineberg,
Grant, & Chamberlain, 2019).
Furthermore, research has shown that children
who are subjected to tight parenting have a lower risk
of developing PIU than children who are subjected to
a non-strict parenting style. When explicit rules are
established, children have a lower risk to develop PIU
(Kircaburun & Griffiths, 2018). Other study, to date
and emphasise has revealed a similar outcome on this
subject. The study found that regardless of the
difficulties that bind their children, parents play an
essential role. This is because parents have a
responsibility to train their children. If the parent has
a strong relationship to their children and knows the
appropriate role to portray in front of them, it will
decrease the children's dangerous internet exposure
(Randall, 2018).
3.2.3 Increasing Community Understanding
with Fully Information Campaign
Out of 62 studies that have been fully reviewed, 6
studies suggested to sensitising and informing
Government officials as well as community chiefs
regarding the PIU by doing workshops as well as,
ultimately, to legitimise the prevention programme.
This is because current analysis reported that
someone with PIU is usually addicted to surfing the
web (not related to office work) throughout the
business hours.
3.2.4 To Raise Awareness among
Community
Out of 62 studies that have been fully reviewed, 5
studies suggested distribution of banners, pamphlets,
stickers and leaflets on the nature as well as scope of
the PIU by publishing of those in strategic locations
across the town. A community wide regarding the
seriousness of this' drug' info campaign through talks
and campaigns including several community groups
(e.g. students), school teachers, religious groups,
youth, and parents and in facilities.
3.2.5 Strengthening Parenting Abilities
Out of 62 studies that have been fully reviewed, 3
studies suggested developing learning packages for
parenting education. This includes the coming
things/topics as well as skill development: the nature,
extent and scope of the PIU. The parents' roles as
prevention and great parenting education to
understand the child even better and interaction in the
family by increasing the discipline.
4 FINDINGS
To date, a total 62 studies have met the inclusion
criteria. The majority of studies investigated the
relationship between Problematic Internet Use and
Social Demographic factors; however, other
important factors such as Internal Exposure and
Psychosocial on PIU were also included. Research
from East Asia has been well represented the PIU in
terms of demographics, with most studies from
China, Hong Kong, and India. While for Western
countries most studies related to PIU comes from
Germany, Italy and Russia. The prevalence of
generalised PIU ranged from 12.3 to 67.8 percent.
The other findings have also shown that PIU can
increase a range of risk factors including anxiety,
mood disorders, suicidal inclinations, impulsivity,
and aggression. More study is needed to see if the
intervention strategies have an effect.
5 DISCUSSION
In the current modern century, Internet is ‘no more’
referring to what we do, however now people around
the world started to have strong bond that relate to one
another. Just like recently, the internet has drawn
attention people around the world when many online
networks started to shoot up an unprecedented
number of virtual online ‘audiences’ due to the
pandemic situation, Coronavirus 19 (Covid-19).
These phenomena prove that modern technology has
made people ‘connect’ their life into the virtual world
easily no matter where they live. Based on the study
view, the author highlighted that no standard
diagnosis and criteria exists. Most of the previous
studies revealed the effects of the internet on human
cognitive ability. The impact of the internet on the
human brain based on minor studies by previous
researchers has shown that it can both improve certain
cognitive abilities such as memory and learning,
however major studies revealed that it can be
detrimental and cause structural brain changes (Zhai,
B., Li, D., Jia, J., Liu, Y., Sun, W., & Wang, Y.,
2019). A recent meta-analysis of cognitive
performance among people with high problematic
internet usage found that this disorder was associated
Antecedents and Preventions of Problematic Internet Use: A Systematic Literature Review
171
with major cognitive deficits in executive control,
concentration, motor inhibition, decision making, and
executive function (Ioannidis, 2019).
In addition, PIU has possible effects on various
interrelated features of cognition, namely memory,
critical thought, metacognitive judgement, discovery
(curiosity), and reading (Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths,
M. D., 2018). As a result of this disparity in the
population, people have become even more shallow
thinkers (Ke, G. N., & Wong, S. F., 2018). This
systematic review was aimed to track and analyze the
topics related with Problematic Internet Use globally.
The results highlighted the factors influencing the
level of PIU and lessons globally based on journal
review for 10 years of studies.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Overall, this paper has outlined factors of associated
PIU, global lessons and potential strategy in
combating PIU based on empirical literature of
studies after 2010. The author also concludes that
different group age of PIU have different approaches.
To date, the diagnostic criteria to identify potential
PIU disorders used are not yet globally agreed upon.
Researchers are welcome to collaborate in future
studies in order to develop better efficient and
effective treatment approaches especially for those
who started to have PIU symptoms. In this case,
future studies will help to contribute to many people,
especially policy makers and to healthcare.
Ultimately, intervention and prevention policies
could minimize all negative repercussions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researchers would like to express they’re thanks
to all reviewers for the suggestions to improve this
paper. The researchers would also like to
acknowledge University Malaysia Pahang,
RDU200315 for funding this research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this article content has no
conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017).
Internet use and Problematic Internet Use: A systematic
review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence
and emergent adulthood. International Journal of
Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430-454.
Balhara, Y. P. S., Doric, A., Stevanovic, D., Knez, R.,
Singh, S., Chowdhury, M. R. R., & Arya, S. (2019).
Correlates of Problematic Internet Use among college
and university students in eight countries: An
international cross-sectional study. Asian Journal of
Psychiatry, 45, 113-120.
Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the
proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction.
Cyberpsychology & behavior, 4(3), 377-383.
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and
psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-
based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument.
Computers in human behavior, 18(5), 553-575.
Caplan, S. E. (2018). The changing face of problematic
internet use: An interpersonal approach. Peter Lang
International Academic Publishers.
Cacioppo, M., Barni, D., Correale, C., Mangialavori, S.,
Danioni, F., & Gori, A. (2019). Do attachment styles
and family functioning predict adolescents’
problematic internet use? A relative weight analysis.
Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(5), 1263-1271.
Chang, S. M., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Online gaming motive
profiles in late adolescence and the related longitudinal
development of stress, depression, and problematic
internet use. Computers & Education, 135, 123-137.
Costa, R. M., Patrão, I., & Machado, M. (2019).
Problematic internet use and feelings of loneliness.
International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice,
23(2),160-162.
Fernandes, B., Maia, B. R., & Pontes, H. M. (2019). Internet
addiction or problematic internet use? Which term
should be used, Psicologia.
Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of
pathological Internet use. Computers in human
behavior, 17(2), 187-195.
Gansner, M., Belfort, E., Cook, B., Leahy, C., Colon-Perez,
A., Mirda, D., & Carson, N. (2019). Problematic
internet use and associated high-risk behavior in an
adolescent clinical sample: Results from a survey of
psychiatrically hospitalized youth. Cyberpsychology,
Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(5), 349-354.
Gomez, P., Harris, S. K., Barreiro, C., Isorna, M., & Rial,
A. (2018). Profiles of Internet use and parental
involvement, and rates of online risks and problematic
Internet use among Spanish adolescents. Computers in
Human Behaviour, 75,826-833.
Ioannidis, K., Hook, R., Goudriaan, A. E., Vlies, S.,
Fineberg, N. A., Grant, J. E., & Chamberlain, S. R.
(2019). Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use:
meta-analysis of 40 studies. The British Journal of
Psychiatry, 215(5), 639-646.
ICPsyche 2021 - International Conference on Psychological Studies
172
Ke, G. N., & Wong, S. F. (2018). A healthy mind for
problematic internet use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior,
and Social Networking, 21(10), 637-645.
Kojima, R., Sato, M., Akiyama, Y., Shinohara, R.,
Mizorogi, S., Suzuki, K., & Yamagata, Z. (2019).
Problematic Internet use and its associations with
health‐related symptoms and lifestyle habits among
rural Japanese adolescents. Psychiatry and Clinical
Neurosciences, 73(1), 20-26.
Kitazawa, M., Yoshimura, M., Murata, M., Sato‐Fujimoto,
Y., Hitokoto, H., Mimura, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2018).
Associations between problematic Internet use and
psychiatric symptoms among university students in
Japan. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 72(7),
531-539.
Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). The dark side of
internet: Preliminary evidence for the associations of
dark personality traits with specific online activities and
problematic internet use. Journal of behavioral
addictions, 7(4), 993-1003.
Király, O., Potenza, M. N., Stein, D. J., King, D. L.,
Hodgins, D. C., Saunders, J. B., & Abbott, M. W.
(2020). Preventing problematic internet use during the
COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.
Comprehensive Psychiatry, 152180.
Laconi, S., Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K., Gnisci, A., Sergi,
I., Barke, A., Jeromin, F., & Király, O. (2018). Cross-
cultural study of Problematic Internet Use in nine
European countries. Computers in Human Behavior,
84, 430-440.
Lukavská, K., Vacek, J., & Gabhelík, R. (2020). The effects
of parental control and warmth on problematic internet
use in adolescents: A prospective cohort study. Journal
of Behavioral Addictions.
Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Ortega-
Barón, J., Beranuy-Fargues, M., Álvarez-Bardón, A., &
Tejero, B. (2019). Profiles of problematic internet use
and its impact on Adolescents’ health-related quality of
life. International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, 16(20), 3877.
Moher, D., Stewart, L., & Shekelle, P. (2016).
Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for
prospective authors. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–2.
Pasarelu, C. R., & Dobrean, A. (2018). An Investigation of
Mediators for the Relationship between Parent Mental
Health and Adolescent Problematic Internet Use: A
Cross-Sectional Study in Romanian Adolescents.
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 18(2).
Prievara, D. K., Piko, B. F., & Luszczynska, A. (2019).
Problematic internet use, social needs, and social
support among youth. International Journal of Mental
Health and Addiction, 17(4), 1008-1019.
Randall, T. C. (2018). Predicting Problematic Internet Use
in Adolescents: Its Relationship to Attachment and
Parenting Behaviors (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant
International University).
Rial, A., Golpe, S., Isorna, M., Braña, T., & Gómez, P.
(2018). Minors and problematic Internet use: Evidence
for better prevention. Computers in Human Behavior,
87, 140-145.
Sarchiapone, M., & Wasserman, C. (2016).
Psychopathological factors associated with problematic
alcohol and problematic Internet use in a sample of
adolescents in Germany. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 240,
272–277.
Scherer, K. R. (1997). The role of culture in emotion-
antecedent appraisal. Journal of personality and social
psychology, 73(5),902.
Schimmenti, A., Musetti, A., Costanzo, A., Terrone, G.,
Maganuco, N. R., Rinella, C. A., & Gervasi, A. M.
(2019). The unfabulous four: Maladaptive personality
functioning, insecure attachment, dissociative
experiences, and problematic internet use among young
adults. International Journal of Mental Health and
Addiction, 1-15
Tam, P. G. (2016). Problematic Internet use in youth: An
outline and overview for health professionals.
Australian Clinical Psychologist, 2(1), 802.
Tomczyk, L., & Solecki, R. (2019). Problematic internet
use and protective factors related to family and free
time activities among young people. Educational
Sciences: Theory & Practice, 19(3).
Vargas, T., Maloney, J., Gupta, T., Damme, K. S., Kelley,
N. J., & Mittal, V. A. (2019).
Measuring facets of reward sensitivity, inhibition, and
impulse control in individuals with problematic Internet
use. Psychiatry research, 275, 351-358.
Wartberg, L., & Lindenberg, K. (2020). Predictors of
Spontaneous Remission of Problematic Internet Use in
Adolescence: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.
International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 17(2), 448.
Young, K. S. (1996). A case that breaks the stereotype.
Psychological reports, 79,899-902.
Zhai, B., Li, D., Jia, J., Liu, Y., Sun, W., & Wang, Y.
(2019). Peer victimization and problematic internet use
in adolescents: The mediating role of deviant peer
affiliation and the moderating role of family
functioning. Addictive behaviors, 96, 43-49.
Zhang, M., & Bian, Y. (2020). An analysis of the brain
structures underlying the link between pathological
Internet use and anxiety. Addictive Behaviors,
112,106632.
Zhou, N., Cao, H., Li, X., Zhang, J., Yao, Y., Geng, X., &
Fang, X. (2018). Internet addiction, problematic
internet use, nonproblematic internet use among
Chinese adolescents: Individual, parental, peer, and
sociodemographic correlates. Psychology of Addictive
Behaviors, 32(3), 365.
Antecedents and Preventions of Problematic Internet Use: A Systematic Literature Review
173