products  and  services  like  internet  banking,  mobile 
banking,  ATMs,  Tele-Banking,  to  their  customers. 
Latest  technology  helped  the  banks  to  reduce  their 
transaction  cost.  But  certain  risks  associated  with 
innovative technology and technology related frauds 
were  found  to  increase”  (Karuppusamy  and 
Palanichamy, 2011). 
In  fact,  in  Aladwan's  (2001)  investigation  of  web 
based  banking,  potential  clients  evaluated  web  security 
and  client's  protection  as  the  most  significant  future 
difficulties  that  banks  are  confronting.  Observed 
efficiency  of  online  banking  has  a  direct  impact  on  the 
acceptance  of  web  banking,  too  (Aladwani,  2001). 
Customers stress that unapproved people can access their 
online  record  and  heavy  monetary  consequences  will 
take  place.  In  India,  slowly  the  Indian  customer  is 
moving  towards  web  banking.  However,  they  are  very 
concerned  regarding  the  security  and  privacy  of  web 
banking  (Malhotra  and  Singh,  2009).  (Dixit  and  Datta, 
2010) Infact, a majority of studies highlight the fact that 
“security”  is  the  biggest  single  concern  for  customers 
when  faced  with  the  decision  to  use  web  banking. 
Security has an issue perpetually, but its scope has been 
modified  from  mere  doubts  regarding  the  privacy  of 
personal information to worries of monetary loss. (Sayar 
and Wolfe, 2007). 
A  study  done  by  Neha  Dixit  and  Dr  Saroj  K. 
shows  that  Security  and  protection,  trust  and 
originality,  have  a  positive  impact  on  the 
acknowledgment  of  web  banking  in  India.  Their 
study  aimed  to  find  out  the  level  of  acceptance  of 
online banking among those customers who are over 
thirty five years of age. (Dixit and Datta, 2010) 
Jayaram. J and Dr P. N. Prasad (2013) deduce in 
their  examination  that  the  greater  part  of  the 
investigations  that  have  been  done  on  issues 
concerned  with  web  banking  in  countries  like 
Australia  (Sathye,  1999),  Malaysia  (Mukti,  2000; 
Chung and Paynter, 2002; Sohail and Shanmugham 
2004), Singapore (Gerrard and Cunningham, 2003a, 
2006b), Turkey versus UK (Sayar and Wolfe, 2007) 
and  Saudi  Arabia  (Sohail  and  Shaikh,  2007). 
(Jayaram and Prasad, 2013 ) A considerable measure 
of work has not been done in India with importance 
to e-banking concerns. 
The  current  study  intends  to  understand  the 
amount  of  level  of  usage  of  mobile banking  and  E 
wallets  and  problems  relating  to  the  security  and 
privacy  problems  among  the  masses  in  the  Indian 
context. 
3  RESEARCH MODEL 
To  investigate  the  E  wallet  and  E  banking  Usage 
patterns and related security concerns, we designed a 
survey  questionnaire.  The  questionnaire  contains 
three  part:  Demographics,  E  wallet  and  E  banking 
usage patterns and related Security Concerns. 
We  used  Google  forms  to  create,  distribute  the 
survey and store the responses online. A total of 348 
responses were received. 
4  RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 
4.1  Demographics and Personal 
Attributes 
1.Age:  81%  of  participants  were  18-30  years  old. 
9.2%  were  younger  than  18  years  old,  and  8.6% 
were  between  30-50  years.  Only  1.1%  of  the 
participants were above 50 years of age. 
 
Figure 1: Age distribution. 
2.Profession:  77.8%  of  the  participants  were 
students  and  17.3%  were  salaried  professionals. 
While  only  3.2%  of  the  participants  were  self-
employed, 1.4% were home makers. The majority of 
the  participants  were  from  Non-IT  domain 
accounting  for  77.8%.  The  remaining  17.3%  were 
associated with the IT industry. 
 
Figure 2: Profession. 
4.2  Usage Patterns 
1.E-wallet  type:  The  majority  of  the  participants 
used  Paytm  as  their  E-wallet,  accounting  to  78.4%. 
While  17.3%  used  Freecharge,11.4%  used 
Mobikwik, 7.5% used PayU money, and 3.2% used 
M-pesa. The remaining 20.2% of participants didn’t 
use any.