Osmanova, Yachmenev, 2020) and digital platforms 
(Belyakova,  Belyakov,  Fokina,  Shpak,  2020; 
Gribanov, Bezrukova, 2018).  
In  order  to  develop  the  stability  management  of 
nonlinear  functioning  of  industrial  enterprises,  the 
task is to ensure the use of poorly formalized source 
information  and  algorithms  of  fuzzy  sets  in 
management  technology,  which  opens  up  the 
possibility  of  saturating it  with  valuable  knowledge 
about the properties of enterprise behavior in the face 
of  increasing  threats.  As  a  result,  it  is  possible  to 
increase  the  information  transparency  of  decision-
making environment and the adaptability of industrial 
enterprise by responding to emerging risks in advance 
by maneuvering its resources. 
2  MATERIALS AND METHODS 
In the range of natural-scientific and economic views 
on  the  stability  of  motion  of  dynamic  systems,  the 
achievement of study  goal  is achieved by  attracting 
the ideas of systems analysis, cybernetics, nonlinear 
dynamics, catastrophe theory and information theory. 
Thanks  to  application  in  the  complex  of  these 
concepts  and  methodological  principles,  it  becomes 
possible  to  perform  an  information  analysis  of 
metamorphosis of nonlinear activity of an industrial 
enterprise,  the  bizarre  combinations  of  stable  and 
unstable phases of its functioning.    
3  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
Conceptually,  it  became  undeniable  that  with  the 
“jump  into  the  market”  on  the  transformation  of 
domestic enterprises was extremely powerful 
pressure  of  overwhelming  economic  dynamics, 
coming  from  the  reformers'  plan  of  rapid 
denationalization and privatization of the property of 
economic  complexes.  Obviously,  the  orthodoxy  of 
monetarism  left  no  other  levers  to  manage  the 
transition  processes  except  free  pricing  and  money 
supply regulation, which against the background of 
radicalization  of  institutional  change  caused  an 
unprecedented steepness of the processes caused by 
them.  
Chaotization of the  economic space has  become 
an  inevitable  consequence  not  only  of  structural 
discontinuities, among which the network irregularity 
of input and output commodity flows and interactions 
with counterparties, but also of the confusion with the 
economic activity rules. 
Meanwhile,  it  is  theoretically  argued  and 
practically  confirmed  that  in  a  highly  disturbed 
environment,  replete  with  critical  overloads  and 
burdened  by  the  lack  of  effective  government 
support,  the  work  of  industrial  enterprises  was 
shackled  by  fading  or  arrhythmia  of  supply  of 
consumed  resources  (raw  materials,  materials, 
energy,  products,  etc.),  a  shortage  of  their  own 
financial funds, uncertainty of partnerships, demand 
for  manufactured  products  and  their  supply.  The 
undermined reproduction of the enterprises' resources 
resulted in the containment, or even the damping of 
business activity, a sharp drop in output and sales, the 
exorbitant growth of debts and the risk of bankruptcy.  
The commodity-money imbalance and turbulence 
of the transitive Russian economy gave rise to critical 
transition  processes  and,  with  the  liberalization  of 
pricing, inflationary waves running over  each  other 
and  the  entrenchment  of  depressive  tendencies. 
Shocks  of  supply  and  demand,  as  a  reaction  to  the 
shocks of the country's deformed economic complex, 
rocked  its  financial  and  economic  mechanism  and 
condemned enterprises to exhaustion and depletion of 
resources.  Within  the  framework  of  monetarism 
postulates,  which  ignored  the  methods  of  state 
regulation, there was no need to rely on the damping 
and repayment of the prohibitive “bursts” of inflation 
(Chuprov, 2017).  
The dynamic picture of the enterprise functioning 
is undergoing restructuring, closing the slow and fast, 
smooth  and  “explosive”  phases  of  behavior.  In 
particular, during the evolution of enterprise, its state 
of  stable  equilibrium  may  merge  with  an  unstable 
equilibrium,  after  which  the  equilibrium  disappears 
and the enterprise economic system radically changes 
mode, making a leap (a “catastrophe” occurs).    
Phenomena of this kind are studied and described 
by  catastrophe  theory,  in which a dynamic system 
loses  stability  of  an  equilibrium  state  due  to  both 
bifurcation  of  this  state  and  a  spontaneous  process 
(Arnold,  1990).  Moreover,  with  the  loss  of 
equilibrium state, the system either moves to another 
equilibrium,  or  two  such  states  appear:  stable  and 
unstable equilibrium. 
It  would  appear  that  this  scenario  of  industrial 
enterprise's  transformation  is  inherent  in  the  first 
stage of its slide into crisis, when under the influence 
of  perturbations,  the  enterprise  is  gradually 
“squeezed” out of a stable equilibrium and over time 
it weakens and disappears. After that, the perturbed 
mode  of  enterprise's  functioning evolves to another 
equilibrium  state,  different  from  the  previous 
equilibrium. The enterprise is drawn into the process 
of  disintegration  and  deterioration  of  resource