from external influence, follow first of all their own 
national interests and maintain international relations 
(Brown, 2017). 
One  of  the  types  of  national  security  and  an 
important part of it is economic security, which has 
long been studied within the framework of economic 
science and has not been the subject of legal studies. 
In this regard, from the point of view of law, national 
security and the economic security included in it can 
be represented as a state of social relations regulated 
by  law,  in  which  it  is  possible  to  continuously  and 
effectively reproduce, distribute and consume goods 
in the interests of the individual, society and the state 
(Lev, 2020). 
Further, we note that in the scientific literature, the 
term  "national  security"  in general and the term 
"economic security" in particular are considered in a 
broad  and  narrow  sense  [Gerasimov,  2001].  In  a 
broad  sense,  it  is  a  national  program  for  the 
development of the state. In a narrow sense, it is a set 
of means and methods to counteract negative factors. 
In this study, national security is considered in the 
broadest  sense,  since,  in  our  opinion,  this 
understanding most fully reflects the essence of the 
problem  under  study,  includes  a  large  number  of 
different aspects and trends in the development of 
state-legal phenomena. 
In the Concept of national security of Russia, its 
national  security  is  understood  as  the  protection  of 
vital interests of citizens, society and the state, as well 
as national values and way of life from a wide range 
of  external  and  internal  threats,  different  in  nature 
(political,  economic,  information,  environmental, 
military, etc.). 
As for the cooperation of the state and society, it 
should be noted that it is the state that acts as a 
guarantor  of  national  or  public  security. Security  is 
the  most  important  function  and  duty  of  the  state, 
since  the  other  functions  of  the  state  become 
meaningful  only  when  society  develops  a  certain 
level of social trust in the state as an entity that can 
protect and take care of its citizens. 
In  turn,  a  society  that  does  not  understand  the 
moral conditionality of a person's position in it has no 
future.  In  this  regard,  the  direction  of  further 
development and the existence of the Russian state in 
general  should  be  adequate  to  the  morality, 
worldview and culture of our people. 
On  the basis of traditional  moral  values  and  the 
corresponding worldview, people create the concept 
of  the  organization  of  human  life  and  society  and 
actively  translate  it  into  reality.  Such  a  concept 
defines culture, and culture, in turn, defines the legal 
culture,  the  legislative  framework,  morality  and  the 
worldview of present and future generations. 
The concept of spiritual and moral values has been 
at  the  heart  of  the  debate  about  Russian  national 
security.  Today,  spiritual  and  moral  values  are 
considered  not  only  as  something  self-evident, 
eternal,  absolute  and  unchangeable,  but  also  as 
something that is attacked and subject to protection. 
Only such a legal mechanism, which has a reliable 
basis  in  the  morality  and  worldview  of  the  people 
themselves,  becomes  a  condition  for  their  social 
security and is able to provide the country with long-
term  crisis-free  development,  focused  on  the  long-
term future (Fenenko, 2006). 
The inclusion of the concept of spiritual and moral 
values  in  the  legal  mechanism  for  ensuring  the 
national security of the Russian Federation and in its 
national security strategy  is negatively evaluated by 
Western scientists. Thus, the literature suggests that 
spirituality and morality have taken a central place in 
the formation of the national identity of the Russian 
political regime and the establishment of a new social 
contract. Spiritual and moral values have become the 
link  that  justifies  the  increasingly  repressive, 
authoritarian,  economically  stagnant  and  essentially 
demodernizing  policies  of  the  regime.  Spiritual  and 
moral values became necessary for the survival of the 
regime, which, according to the regime, is necessary 
for the survival of Russia (Ostbo, 2017). 
This  statement  only  confirms  the  thesis  that 
spirituality  and  morality  are  at  the  forefront  of  the 
struggle  and  are  the  most  important  means  of 
ensuring  the  national  security of  the  state. Spiritual 
and moral values are more important than economics. 
In this regard, in order to ensure national security, 
the state must create the following essential elements 
of the life of society: 
1.  The  presence  in  the  country  of  an  ideology 
shared  by  the  majority  of  the  population, 
which, under the influence of negative factors, 
increases  the  cohesion  of  society  and  its 
resistance. 
2.  The presence of a high cultural and educational 
level of the population, as well as the presence 
of a strong economic, scientific, technological, 
political  and  information  base  of  the  country, 
increasing its role in the international arena. 
3.
  Education of a person who is aware of himself 
as  a  representative  of  his  people  and  his 
country, who thinks first of all about the well-
being of his compatriots, who feels patriotism 
and pride for his Homeland. 
As for ideology, the current of social thought has 
recently become more active in Russia, proclaiming