Problems of Risk-based Management as a Factor in Ensuring the
Strategic Development and Competitive Sustainability of Russian
Organizations under Current Conditions and the Ways to Solve
Them
Aleksandr Kiselev
1,2
, Marina Ugryumova
1
, Anna Strausova
1
and Marina Mayorova
1
1
Yaroslavl State Technical University, 88, Moskovsky Avenue, 150088, Yaroslavl, Russia
2
Yaroslavl Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 12a, Kooperativnaya Str.,
150003, Yaroslavl, Russia
Keywords: Risk, risk management, risk control, risk-based approach to management, strategic development, competitive
sustainability of the organization, risk-based management.
Abstract: With the transition of Russia to a market economy, Russian organizations tried to learn from the experience
of foreign organizations in a competitive environment, while being more open about their plans and actions,
that then often led to serious problems in effectiveness of their activities. Foreign organizations saw the
increasing competitiveness of Russian organizations as a threat to their competitive sustainability and tend to
be put in a position to affect the activities of Russian organizations in a way that would benefit them. At the
same time, foreign organizations are supported by their states, which in order to “damage” competitive
sustainability of Russian organizations, successfully operating in the world market, both by economic
methods in the form of sanctions, and by political methods, depriving Russian organizations of advantageous
foreign contracts for “artificial” reasons. Another important risk factor for loss of competitive sustainability
of domestic organizations is represented by current problems in the domestic economy and the orientation of
many Russian organizations only on “today’s” results, which leads to problems of their strategic development
and long-term competitive sustainability. This paper shows the problems of ensuring the competitive
sustainability of Russian organizations in current conditions, which affects their strategic development, and
possible ways to solve them using risk-based management. The formulation of such recommendations was
based on an analysis of the current competitive sustainability situation of domestic organizations and their
experience in operating in a market environment, as well as substantiating the essence of risk-based
management as a scientific category of the domestic science of organization management.
1 INTRODUCTION
The current situation in the world economy is subject
to rapid and dramatic changes, affecting the
performance of Russian organizations. Today
Russian organizations can work successfully only
when they are able to maintain the necessary level of
competitive sustainability. But it is quite difficult to
do so, firstly, in difficult external conditions
associated with the activities of other competitor
organizations, the policy of economic and political
sanctions by the United States and Western countries
against Russia and Russian organizations, and
secondly, in difficult internal conditions, which are
due to human, technological and organizational
factors that carry multiple risks of loss of competitive
stability of organizations. Consequently, for Russian
organizations “in order to achieve stable economic
growth today, it is fundamentally important to expand
sources of competitive advantages through
innovation, intellectual business” in order to achieve
their strategic development (Works.Doklad). But it
should be understood that the introduction of
innovations in organizations without a serious
analytical assessment and the need for their
implementation can also result in an increased risk of
losing certain competitive advantages.
Undoubtedly, all of this makes the work of
Russian organizations in modern conditions quite
risky, since they are constantly faced not only with
unforeseen circumstances, but also with the risks of
"non-market" actions by foreign organizations,
Kiselev, A., Ugryumova, M., Strausova, A. and Mayorova, M.
Problems of Risk-based Management as a Factor in Ensuring the Strategic Development and Competitive Sustainability of Russian Organizations under Current Conditions and the Ways to
Solve Them.
DOI: 10.5220/0010695800003169
In Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Ensuring the Stability and Security of Socio-Economic Systems: Overcoming the Threats of the Crisis Space" (SES 2021),
pages 165-171
ISBN: 978-989-758-546-3
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
165
affecting their competitive stability. As a result,
among Russian researchers and practitioners, the
effectiveness of managing organizations in such
conditions has become connected to a risk-based
approach. However, they began to call it risk
management, risk control and now risk-based
management. It is indisputable that any management
activity is already a priori associated with the need to
take into account the various risks that could
negatively affect the performance of the
organizations, and result in the high level of
performance and a stronger competitive position in
the long term. Thus, today there is a need to consider
in a scientifically sound manner risk-based
management as a factor in ensuring the necessary
level of competitive stability of Russian organizations
in the modern conditions of “bad faith” competition
from foreign organizations and, consequently, their
strategic development.
The relevance of the analyzed issue is determined
by the fact that in current conditions it is risk-based
management that becomes the most important factor
in ensuring the necessary timely competitive
sustainability of Russian organizations and,
consequently, their strategic development. The pap
defines the problems associated with approaches to
define the essence of risk-based management as a
scientific category and ways to ensure Russian
organizations with the competitive sustainability they
need.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
To study the problem of risk-based management, a
review of scientific publications on the subject is
undertaken, analytical and statistical information on
the performance of domestic organizations in the
context of economic sanctions and ensuring their
competitive sustainability is studied, Interviews with
specialists of various levels of management in
organizations of the real sector of the economy of
Yaroslavl region as one of the developed industrial
regions of Russia are conducted. Research materials
on this topic are repeatedly presented for discussion
at various scientific and practical conferences and
“round tables” conducted jointly by researchers and
practitioners from organizations.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
It seems clear to everyone that under market
conditions Russian organizations need to be able to
constantly “fight for keeping their competitive
sustainability. But there’s always the question of how
to do it.
Unfortunately, various Russian researchers give
different notions of the competitive sustainability of
organizations, which makes it difficult to formulate
recommendations on how to provide it to Russian
organizations in practice. For example, A.A.
Alekseyev describes the competitive sustainability of
an organization as a complex characteristic of the
state of an organization, formed by many external and
internal environmental factors that determine the
strategic success of an organization. A.E. Putiatin
defines the competitive sustainability of an enterprise
as an economic potential, as well as its efficient use,
together with innovation activity in comparison with
the main competitors in the market. JI.P. Rachek
defines the essence of an competitive sustainability of
an organization in the ability of an enterprise to
withstand external influences by changing the
qualitative properties of economic efficiency by
increasing added value, balance of resources and
processes in the forward-looking development of the
organization. S.R. Bondarev believes that the
competitive sustainability of an organization is
identified by a combination of competitive
advantages to develop a competitive development
strategy for the organization. S.V. Sharovatov under
the competitive sustainability of the organization
suggests to consider its ability to achieve balanced
economic development and to strengthen its
competitive position in the context of the
development of the industry market. E.N. Bogdanov
defines the competitive sustainability of an
organization as a function of a stable operating and
evolving organization, influenced by a disturbed
competitive environment, which manifests itself in an
optimal balance of criteria and sustainability factors
and changes over time, etc. (Bogdanov, 2015). In our
opinion, the keyword in the analyzed concept is the
word “sustainability”, which in dictionaries is
interpreted as the ability of the system to maintain the
current state under the action of external influences
(Kartaslov). At the same time, it is more appropriate
to define the ability as an opportunity: organizational,
material, resource, etc. Consequently, under the term
“competitive sustainability” of the organization we
mean the possibility of the organization to maintain
its position in the market, reacting in a timely manner
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
166
to the actions of competitors and changes in the
external environment.
It should be noted that, under current conditions,
the activities of Russian organizations are associated
with many risks that arise from various uncertainties,
both the external and internal environment of the
organization. Uncertainty and risk are the relative
unpredictability of the future business environment,
the organizational environment, which most often
results in additional material and financial costs
(losses) in their operations. As a result, organizations
are increasingly focusing on monitoring and
preventing the negative impact of risks in their own
development activities (Kiselev, 2021). But it is
worth mentioning that organizations must take
deliberate risks in order to achieve better results and
maintain their competitive positions. Therefore, the
most important part of management activity in
Russian organizations is its risk-taking nature. The
problem is compounded by the fact that the market
mechanisms of competition are now being
“corrected” by force and political methods by United
States and a number of Western European countries
to eliminate “unnecessary” competitors in the form of
Russian organizations. And the risks of such unfair
competition on the part of these states become a
“conspiracy” against Russia. German Chancellor A.
Merkel at the Congress “For a future-oriented
transatlantic partnership” said about the necessity of
influence on Russia and its economy so: “Only
together with the USA can we participate effectively
in globalization, we are much stronger if we share
common positions” (News.mail.ru).
Concerning external factors affecting the
competitive sustainability of Russian organizations, it
should be noted that many researchers believe that “in
modern conditions, most industrial enterprises, often
possessing unique technologies with huge material
and technical base, have become not only
uncompetitive in modern market economy, but have
lost the accumulated intellectual and innovative
potential (Works.Doklad). Unfortunately, to some
extent it can be accepted. Even Gazprom, the largest
Russian company, uses imported equipment and
machinery to support its activity. And, for example,
in 2012 Gazprom encountered a forced remote
shutdown of Austrian LMF compressors on its
pipelines, which shows that foreign organizations,
suppliers of equipment for Russian organizations,
may disrupt the work of Russian organizations
(RBC). Therefore, Russian organizations, using in
their activity equipment produced by foreign
organizations, can at any moment lose the necessary
level of competitiveness at the “wish” of foreign
suppliers of equipment, becoming dependent on
them. And Russian President Vladimir Putin
announced an import substitution strategy. Statistical
data show that, in implementing the Program to
Ensure Import Substitution of Russian Industry,
which has been implemented by the Russian
Government since September 2014, full import
substitution in Russia has unfortunately not yet
occurred. In 2020, according to the Ministry of
Industry of the Russian Federation, every second unit
of oil and gas equipment on the Russian market was
produced in the Russian Federation. However, the
Russian Federation’s share of oil and gas equipment
imports was about 40%. The share of imported
equipment used to increase oil recovery, including for
the drilling of inclined and horizontal wells has fallen
to 61%, and that of refinery equipment to 49%,
equipment for the production of liquefied natural gas
and for offshore projects - up to 67.8%, geological
exploration equipment - up to 48% (CDU).
Consequently, an important indicator for Russian
organizations will be the share of import substitution
and the support of the state for their activities on the
world market.
At the same time, it should be borne in mind that
today the competition for the consumer is not only at
the level of quality or price of the product and the
ability of organizations to offer a new consumer
characteristic embodied in the product or service, but
also at the level of using political and power pressure
from stronger states like the USA on other states to
develop their national economies. Russia, which has
serious resource potential for developing its
economy, is no exception. A clear example of this are
the actions of the USA and a number of European
states aimed at disrupting the construction of the gas
pipeline “Nord Stream-2”, the organization by the
Czech leadership of a diplomatic scandal, related to
the expulsion of Russian diplomats from the country
on absurd charges of involvement of Russian special
services in the explosion of ammunition depots as
early as 2014 only to prevent the delivery of Russian
vaccine “Sputnik V” and exclude the possibility of
concluding a large contract with Rosatom for the
nuclear plant construction, and the European
Parliament in general proposed to disconnect Russia
from SWIFT, as well as renounce Russian oil and gas
(RBC). In most cases, this is done for benefits of the
USA at the expense of the interests of the Russian
economy and Russian organizations. In other words,
Russian organizations are now being actively targeted
in the field of ensuring their competitive
sustainability along with economic and political
measures to reduce the competitiveness of Russian
Problems of Risk-based Management as a Factor in Ensuring the Strategic Development and Competitive Sustainability of Russian
Organizations under Current Conditions and the Ways to Solve Them
167
organizations. At the same time, USA sanctions can
be imposed at any convenient time, despite the fact
that all issues of joint activity can be agreed upon and
agreements concluded between Russian and foreign
organizations. This was the case, for example, when
frightened of American sanctions, the Swiss company
Allseas refused to proceed with the construction of
the gas pipeline “Nord Stream-2” (BFM). And such
unforeseen risks in the activities of Russian
organizations from foreign states and organizations
are becoming more and more, which carries
increasing threats of loss of fair “won” Russian
competitive positions. On April 21, 2021, the
President of the Russian Federation, in a message to
the Federal Assembly, compared Russia’s enemies to
the heroes of Kipling’s story, noting that some are
clinging to the Russian Federation for no reason and,
like Tabaki, howling to appease their sovereign (IZ).
There is no doubt that in such difficult circumstances
Russian organizations must “restructure” their
activities to external conditions and make changes in
their own business and production activities in order
to ensure their competitive sustainability. As a
consequence, Russian organizations are now obliged
to ensure that, in such a difficult environment created
by foreign states and organizations, the necessary
level of competitive sustainability is maintained,
allowing them to successfully overcome the emerging
risks, seeking to find new management approaches
for this. As a consequence, Russian researchers began
to consider the risk management system that exists in
foreign organizations as an increase in the efficiency
of Russian organizations, often calling it the “Russian
way” risk management system.
The risk management system is really actively
applied in the activities of foreign organizations, as in
the world of business it is easy to “go to the bottom”
due to force-majeure, unscrupulous counterparties or
unfavourable market situation etc. As a result, risk
management, which is a regular activity in foreign
organizations, is aimed at monitoring and preventing
dangerous situations of their own development - risks
and ensuring competitive sustainability in the long
term. For example, in analyzing and interpreting the
annual performance of foreign organizations in an
explanatory note to the balance sheet, it seems
necessary to highlight the risks of their future
development. The responsibility for this analysis lies
with the expert observers who assess whether all
officials are fulfilling their tasks of using the
resources at their disposal to achieve the
organization’s competitive advantage and whether
the organization’s monitoring and control system is
functioning effectively. The starting point of the risk-
management process in this case is to define and link
all business objectives and to establish the boundaries
necessary to identify risk in terms of its suitability for
successful business development, and, finally, the
identification and development of measures to avoid
or reduce negative impacts on the work process and
performance of organizations (Kiselev, 2021). As a
consequence, in foreign organizations, risk
management refers to the activities of certain
professionals - risk managers who, as specialists in
certain fields of activity, assess management
decisions from the perspective of certain risks,
calculate the consequences of the risks that the
organization is intentionally taking in order to get the
best result, and prepare proposals to managers to
reduce the negative consequences of possible risks
from competitors and partners. Unfortunately,
Russian organizations often still operate on the
principle: “The main task is to close the year, and
there we will see”. At best, in Russian organizations
we are talking about crisis managers to solve the
problem of getting organizations out of crisis
situations. Therefore, Russian researchers, speaking
about the need for risk management, most often
consider only methods for assessing possible risks
and the need to use a risk-based approach in making
management decisions. For this reason, the
establishment of risk management services in Russian
organizations can be considered as still exotic
(Kiselev, 2021). And it is in this that one can see the
weakness of the activities of many Russian
organizations in relation to foreign organizations,
since what Russian organizations consider
advantageous in cooperation with foreign
organizations today, in the long run, it may be more
difficult to achieve the right level of competitive
sustainability. It’s like in chess. One of the players
can “expose” and give several pieces to the opponent,
which will please the other player as he will consider
it his success. However, this can be done knowingly
by the first player, due to the the chosen strategy he
creates favorable conditions for his losing in the long
run. In such conditions it is important to manage
organizations from a risk based perspective.
But when we say that the competitive
sustainability of an organization should ensure
strategic development, such management in Russian
organizations should be systematic and continuous.
Consequently, in this context, researchers
characterize governance in Russian organizations as
risk-based management, which aims to ensure that
organizations have the right level of competitive
sustainability.
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
168
It is important to note that in defining the essence
of the competitive sustainability of organizations,
Russian researchers often relate it to strategic
components. For example, a number of researchers
believe that “if an organization’s competitive
advantage is protected from competitors, they form
the “strategic capacity of an organization” under
which, as a rule, understand the totality of resources
and capacities available to develop and implement an
organization’s strategy. Accordingly, a strategy based
on the enterprise’s strategic potential will be more
successful, as it is more competitive and durable”
(Works.Doklad). Others believe that “strategic
management of an organization’s development is
about modeling, the ability to identify the need for
change, the design of the strategy itself, and the
ability to implement the strategy in life. However,
strategic management is the framework for action
needed to achieve the objectives, often with limited
resources. Moreover, the organization's strategy
consists of both deliberate, purposeful actions and
actions that are a reaction to an unforeseen
development of events” (PSYERA). As a
consequence, Russian researchers and experts are
concerned with improving the management of
organizations from a risk-based perspective approach
to the strategic development of organizations and the
building of their competitive sustainability on that
basis (Andreeva, 2010). And it’s the right thing to do.
But by strategic development they often mean some
long-term indicators or the development of the
strategy of the organization in the form of some
“master plan”, as well as “no form” strategic
management of the organization, since management
is management (Kiselev, 2020).
However, an organization’s strategy is always
linked to the actions of competitors and is defined as
the general idea of ensuring (achieving) the right level
of the organization in a timely manner. Our analysis
of the problem leads us to believe that strategic
development does not imply something distant in
time, but rather the need for a timely and adequate
response to changes in actions by competitors seeking
to “move” an organization on the market and
adequate response to such actions (Kiselev, 2012). In
other words, it is connected with the necessity of
immediate reaction on the principle “here and now”
on emerging, including unforeseen risks. At the same
time, in developing measures to mitigate the negative
impact of risks arising from the actions of
competitors, the organization itself is often forced to
take risks. Otherwise, the organization may lose its
competitive position. For example, the organization
decided to start the production of fashionable summer
shoes which is in demand in the market in late May.
However, there were competitors who decided, in
view of consumers' desire to buy such shoes, to
organize their activities so that their production would
begin in mid-May. As a consequence, the first
organization, if the product is released on schedule,
does not realize its plans, so consumers will already
satisfy their demand for this product. Thus, the former
organization, taking into account the plans of
competitors, should preact them in releasing their
products in order to get the planned profit and the
possibility of further successful work. This requires
the organization to develop and implement a
competitive strategy that will enable it to maintain its
competitive strength and thus its ability to develop
strategically.
By studying the theoretical aspects of the studied
problem and how it is solved in practice, it is possible
to identify the main ways of solving it. The most
important direction in ensuring the strategic
development of Russian organizations and ensuring
the competitive sustainability of Russian
organizations is the implementation of an import
substitution strategy and the engagement of Russian
organizations with an appropriate level of
sustainability in the world market. As early as 2015,
E. Okisheva noted that Russian producers often do
not have a scientific and production base (e.g.
intellectual capital) and do not have service centers in
Russia, which negatively affects the implementation
of the import substitution strategy. At the same time,
the share of imported equipment on the territory of
Russia as of 2015 reached 80% and more. And a
number of organizations which were positioned as
“Russian producer” were organizations with a very
small share of domestic components, or at all realized
“hardback production” (RusCable.ru). But the
strategy of import substitution is a strategy of catch-
up, therefore it should lead not just to the
establishment of the production of domestic products,
but to production at a high competitive level of the
most modern Russian production. To organize the
production of products capable of supplying foreign
counterparts, enterprises need state support. Today, as
a result of such support, the share of imported
equipment on the territory of Russia began to
decrease.
The Russian government planned to replace
imports with domestic counterparts, but contrary to
these expectations, the number of Russian
organizations willing to refuse imports is declining.
This has been demonstrated by surveys of industrial
managers conducted over the past three years. Thus,
in 2015, 30% of Russian organizations were ready to
Problems of Risk-based Management as a Factor in Ensuring the Strategic Development and Competitive Sustainability of Russian
Organizations under Current Conditions and the Ways to Solve Them
169
forego the purchase of imported equipment, and in the
fourth quarter of 2017 remained only 7%. Similar
trends are for raw materials: Three years ago, 22% of
respondents reported plans to convert to domestic
analogues, and last year this percentage fell to 8%. At
the same time, the main obstacle to import
substitution remains the lack of production in the
territory of the Russian Federation of the necessary
equipment, components and raw materials, noted in
monitoring. The second problem is the poor quality
of domestic products. However, these problems are
worsening: in 2015, 62% of respondents stated that
they could not stop purchasing imported equipment
because Russia did not produce analogues, and in
2017, 69% of respondents said so. In 2015, 35% of
those surveyed complained about the poor quality of
Russian equipment and raw materials, and in 2017,
37%. These factors remain virtually unchanged today
(Upravleniye-Zakupkami). Thus, according to
customs statistics, Russian imports in January-
December 2020 amounted to 233.7 billion US dollars
and decreased by 5.7% compared to January-
December 2019. At the same time, the share of non-
CIS countries accounted for 89.3%, for the CIS
countries - 10.7%. Machinery and equipment
accounted for the largest share in the merchandise
composition of imports - 47.6% (46.1% in January-
December 2019) (ALTA-SOFT). This situation still
allows foreign competitors to influence the efficiency
of Russian organizations by prohibiting or reducing
deliveries of products that are not produced in Russia.
It is especially true of high-tech machines and
equipment. Thus, only by fully implementing the
state import substitution program, the Russian
organization will rule out the risks of blackmail and
reneging on agreements as a result of declared
economic sanctions by foreign companies and states,
ensure their competitive sustainability.
The risks of the internal environment in Russian
organizations are related to human, organizational
and technological factors. And Russian researchers
tried to solve the problems of internal environmental
risks by introducing control and management
accounting. However, the problem has proved to be
quite complex, especially in relation to the human
factor. In the course of the study, we have come to the
conclusion that the time has come to say that today,
as a crucial factor in the formation of the competitive
stability of Russian organizations, there is scope for
compliance control.
Compliance is an internal system of measures of
the organization aimed at preventing violations of the
law, preserving the reputation of the organization,
identifying risks, evaluating them and proposing
measures to reduce the negative consequences of their
occurrence, establishing common rules and standards
of conduct both within the organization and with
competitors. Generally, compliance is a rule that
deals with the preservation of reputation and assets of
a business. They help to avoid problems with
regulators responsible for keeping the cleanliness of
doing business by economic entities
(Blog.Calltouch). Compliance should not be
confused with internal rules and operating procedures
of the organization, with management accounting,
control, etc. Its task is to keep the activities of the
organization’s employees within the framework of
the legal environment, including eliminating
corruption in their activities, which is important for
Russian organizations. It is supported by the mass of
reports in the media about corruption in organizations
and on the part of officials at various levels. For
example, corruption became a major threat to the
national project “Sochi-2014”, as all competitions for
participation in the construction of Olympic facilities
were won by organizations having “friendly”
relations with officials. For example, the competition
“on the construction of the first stage of the cruise
center in the framework of preparation of Sochi for
the Olympics-2014”. Inzhtransstroy Corporation was
chosen as its contractor, which promised to
accomplish the task for 2.561 billion rubles, although
another organization for the same work asked for 250
million rubles less (Vavilon-plen). In 2006-2009,
during the construction of the Vostochny
cosmodrome using advances on 11 state contracts for
purposes unrelated to the construction of
cosmodrome objects, the damage was caused to the
Russian Federation in the amount of 5.2 billion
rubles. By the end of 2017, 13 people had been
convicted in criminal cases following construction
inspections by prosecutors. But in January 2018, the
Center for operation of space ground based
infrastructure (TsENKI) discovered a new theft
during the construction of the Vostochny
cosmodrome totaling 7.6 million rubles. The fraud
was carried out by the organization's employees in the
supply of equipment and materials for the
construction of the launch and technical complexes of
the cosmodrome (RIA News). And this is only in the
implementation of large projects of all-Russian scale.
In this case, the active application of compliance
control in Russian organizations will make it possible
to redistribute information flows and management
templates in such a way as to minimize the risks to
the organization caused by the incorrect behavior of
employees, responsible persons and managers, and
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
170
ensure the organization’s proper external appearance
and image (Blog.Calltouch).
In our country, compliance control is already
being introduced into the business culture not only by
the state in the form of its own rules and laws, but also
in the framework of the self-regulation of market
actors. Since 2012, Russia has had a separate National
Compliance Association, founded on the basis of
unfavorable market conditions, and the Compliance
was to prove itself as the most effective strategy for
the development of organizations. Unfortunately,
today it is rare in which Russian production
organizations there is such a thing at all, and if there
is such, it is more often just “declared on paper”. Of
course, the Russian compliance control system may
be perceived as awkwardness and too costly for
organizations. However, if the compliance control
organization is subject to transparency and other
generally accepted standards and on the basis of
scientific advice, this not only enhances the
reputation of the enterprise, but can also be classified
as one of the most valuable assets (Works.Doklad).
Thus, having solved two risk-based management
problems, firstly, related to the active solution of
import substitution problems, especially in the high-
technology sectors of the economy and the production
of equipment needed by Russian organizations, and
ensuring competitive stability in relations with
foreign organizations, and secondly, the introduction
in each organization of a real working system of
compliance control, Russian organizations can
confidently realize their development strategies,
considering the constant changes in the market and,
consequently, new and emerging risks, while
maintaining its competitive sustainability.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Today, risk based management problems have
become clear and need to be addressed by Russian
organizations in the context of modern competition.
The topic is broad enough and require serious
scientific consideration. In this paper we have only
identified several key areas that can serve as a basis
for scientific discussion on the application of risk-
based management in Russian organizations, which,
in a volatile market environment and often unfair
competition from foreign competitors, can help to
ensure that Russian organizations have the
competitive sustainability they need, and allows to
speak about the possibility of organizations to their
strategic development, that is, to gain a better position
in the market relative to competitors, primarily
foreign, avoiding or minimizing the negative
consequences of risk. At the same time, risks related
to internal factors in Russian organizations can be
successfully solved by creating an active system of
complementarity and control.
The time has come, therefore, to address these
issues from a scientifically sound perspective, so that
Russian organizations receive such guidance on the
use of risk based management, which could be used
effectively in the practical activities of Russian
organizations.
REFERENCES
Formation and implementation of competitive advantages
of the enterprise. https://works.doklad.ru/
Bogdanov, E.N. Competitiveness management as a basis
for the development of the enterprise organizational
environment. https://vestnik-mgou.ru/
The meaning of the word “sustainability”.
https://kartaslov.ru/
Kiselev, A.A., 2021. Risk management. M.: KnoRus. p.
167.
Merkel announced a change in the balance of power in the
world because of Russia. https://news.mail.ru/
Imported equipment of Gazprom was forcibly turned off via
satellite. https://www.rbc.ru/
The revival of the oil and gas equipment market.
https://www.cdu.ru/
The European Parliament adopted a resolution calling for
Russia to be disconnected from SWIFT.
https://www.rbc.ru/
The Swiss Allseas refused to continue the construction of
the “Nord Stream -2”. https://www.bfm.ru/
The USA reacted to Putin’s words about Sherkhan and
Tabaki jackals.https://iz.ru/
Strategic development of organizations. https://psyera.ru/
Andreeva, A.A. Types and elements of strategic
development of an enterprise. https://cyberleninka.ru/
Kiselev, A.A., 2020. Fundamentals of strategic
management and the essence of strategic planning in
organizations. Moscow; Berlin: Direct-Media. p. 343.
Kiselev, A.A., 2012. Strategic planning in the enterprise
(organization) management system: problems and
solutions. Yaroslavl: YSTU Publishing House. p. 182.
Import substitution: prospects and opportunities for the fuel
and energy complex. https://www.ruscable.ru/
Import of industrial equipment to Russia in 2020.
http://upravleniye-zakupkami.ru
Federal Customs Service of Russia: Russian export-import
data for January-December 2020. https://www.alta.ru/
What is compliance and what it is for.
https://blog.calltouch.ru/
Corruption, embezzlement and distribution at the Sochi
2014 Olympics. http://vavilon-plen.ru/
Criminal cases of theft on the Vostochny cosmodrome.
https://ria.ru/
Problems of Risk-based Management as a Factor in Ensuring the Strategic Development and Competitive Sustainability of Russian
Organizations under Current Conditions and the Ways to Solve Them
171