On the Issue of the Management Paradigm and Improving the
Methodology for Assessing the Level of Economic Security of an
Economic Entity
E. Karanina
1
and N. Abasheva
1
1
Vyatka State University, Kirov, Russia
Keywords: Economic security, indicator approach, security risk assessment.
Abstract: The article examines problems of changing the management paradigm of business entities in the context of
achieving security goals and influencing the state on its formation. The authors state that to create security
conditions for an organization of any legal form and form of ownership, it is necessary to follow the purpose
and value of a particular entity, which is strategically the foundation for its security. Having analyzed the
experience of applying various methodological techniques to assessing the level of economic security of
organizations, the authors suggest and substantiate an approach based on using calculated indicators
(coefficients) of acceleration (deceleration) of quantitative values of economic security indicators. A specific
example demonstrates the possibility and feasibility of the proposed technology for diagnosing the security
state, proves the advantages of this assessment in the dynamics of the economic system.
1 INTRODUCTION
The problem of ensuring the economic security of
entities at the level of theoretical research and
implementing a risk-oriented mechanism in the
activities of the primary link of the economy is
currently based on a number of scientific approaches.
Each approach is a certain stage in the development
of scientific and practical thought within the
framework of the considered question. According to
the evolutionary method, we can distinguish the
following conceptual approaches to managing an
organization in the context of security problems:
- an informational approach based on the leading
role of the information subsystem and, in many
respects, ignoring other internal and external sources
of threats;
- a defensive approach, which prioritizes the
organization's readiness to confront current external
threats, ignoring their dynamics and creating a
preventive mechanism;
- an institutional approach providing the creation
of a full-fledged environment for the functioning of
an economic entity in a security mode, but at the same
time transfers the center of gravity in decision-
making in this area to the macro level;
- a competitive approach that motivates an
organization to form such key success factors that
allow to withstand competitive pressure or lead the
market, but at the same time concentrate its efforts on
creating competitive advantages, sometimes without
taking into account other risks to economic security;
- a resource-functional approach (embedded in the
definition of the "economic security"), it shifts the
center of gravity in assessing this phenomenon solely
on the factors of providing the organization with
various types of resources and their effective use,
which can often contradict the multifunctional role of
security requirements as conceptual basis for the
existence of an economic entity;
- a situational approach that focuses on the
specific situation with variables affecting the
activities of organizations, and is the foundation for
using a set of methods for interpreting the situation. It
is necessary for making decisions in the field of
security, but at the same time, often putting the
organization before choosing the priority of a specific
functional safety subsystems to the detriment;
- a process approach, which determines the need
to form a sequence of actions and operations, taking
into account the target to ensure the safety of various
subsystems of organizations.
Karanina, E. and Abasheva, N.
On the Issue of the Management Paradigm and Improving the Methodology for Assessing the Level of Economic Security of an Economic Entity.
DOI: 10.5220/0010694400003169
In Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Ensuring the Stability and Security of Socio-Economic Systems: Overcoming the Threats of the Crisis Space" (SES 2021),
pages 117-123
ISBN: 978-989-758-546-3
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
117
Subsequently, the evolution in views on security
issues led the scientific world to interpret this
phenomenon from the standpoint of forming new
paradigms in management, implemented on the basis
of an integrated, systematic and strategic approach.
However, despite their indisputable significance and
applied value in the management of an organization
with its focus on safety, there are methodological
problems that require immediate solutions, confirmed
by the low effectiveness of business entities in a
safety mode.
The authors' analysis of theoretical studies and the
assessment of the enterprises experience in different
industries, made it possible to divide the existing
methodological problems into 2 groups. The first
group relates to the purpose of the functioning of the
security system at the level of the primary link of the
economy. The second one is a directly related
assessment of the level of economic security of the
organization. The solution of these methodological
issues predetermined the goal and objectives of the
study Its novelty is determined, on the one hand, by a
different strategic vision of security tasks at the
micro-level, on the other hand, by the proposal of the
author's model for assessing the safety state of
business entities.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
Studying questions of the article was based not so
much on the economic meaning of the concept
"economic security", but on the emerging
contradictions of its logical interpretation from the
standpoint of cause-and-effect relationships. I.S.
Yakshina in her works refers to a certain
contradiction in the definition of this concept. In her
opinion, “the phenomenon of economic security must
be considered from the definition of its derivative -
“economic danger”. Without it, according to the
dialectical approach, security cannot exist, therefore,
cannot be chosen as the beginning of research. In
modern Russian science, the concept of "security" is
interpreted as a state when there is no danger. Danger
is understood as some degree of threat. We believe
that there can be no “state when there is no danger”,
since if there is an object, then there is a set of factors
that threaten it” (Yakshina, 2013).
Studying this issue, the authors's purpose was not
to carry out a philological examination of the
concept,. But these conclusions made it possible to
form a new conceptual approach to defining the place
of the phenomenon "economic security" both for a
specific market entity and for the state as a whole,
focusing on national security problems. According to
the authors, the position of G.V. Ivaschenko should
be taken into account. In his work "On the concept of
security", he states that security is not a state of
protection of the subject's interests. Security means
conditions in which subjects preserve and reproduce
their values (Ivashchenko, 2000). As a consequence,
I.S. Yakshina offers the following interpretation of
this concept: “ensuring economic security is the
process of creating such conditions for the existence
of economic entities, which imply not only the
preservation and protection of a certain essential
position, but also the creation of opportunities for
entering a new, higher level development and
prosperity in conditions of uncertainty and risk, since
only development expands and strengthens internal
potential” (Yakshina, 2013).
The question is who should create these
conditions, who is the subject of forming security
conditions? Starting from a systematic approach and
taking into account that the security subsystem of an
economic entity is inscribed in the general system of
national security, it is necessary to place this problem
for joint management of the organization and the
state. At the same time, the role of the state should be
realized not only in the context of creating a
comfortable legal and other "field" for business,
providing the conditions when decisions on creating
a security system will be generated by each market
entity. It is about the role of the state, which will
subordinate these conditions, and, consequently, the
activities of economic entities to a certain doctrine.
Their essence is determined by the purpose of the
given entity in the market. First of all, it is necessary
to amend the current legislation. For example, the
Civil Code, defining the purpose of a business entity
in the market, orients the latter towards making a
profit. Profit for a commercial organization is
considered as the goal of its activities and a criterion
of economic security. At the same time, profit or loss,
as a category of economic science, is a financial
result, which means that it cannot be a goal. There is
a violation of cause-and-effect relationships.
The creation of security conditions proceeds from
the purpose and value of a particular entity, which is
strategically the foundation for its security. Taking
into account the existing economic culture, which is
emerging in the domestic market, such an ideological
position should be formed by the state, proceeding
from its own national security goals, subordinating
them to the security goals of a particular market
entity.
Let us give a specific example. The aim of
commercial banks is to fulfill the transmission task in
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
118
the economy, directing free financial resources of
enterprises and the population into the domestic
economy, including investment purposes. A sharp
decline in the share of lending, including investment
lending, in active banking operations and an increase
in income from speculative operations negatively
affect the economic security of the state. However,
given the significant growth in the banking sector's
profits, we can speak of an increase in the security
potential of the financial sector of the economy with
the existing assessment methods. Thus, the
strategically wrong accents and the infrastructure
system begins to work for itself, in spite of its
intended role in the national security system. Taking
into account the requirements for building a security
system in the state, there is a conflict: the goals (tasks)
of a lower level (specific market participants) begin
to conflict with the goals of a higher (national) level.
Only the state can correct this situation, having
clearly defined the target guidelines for building a
system of economic security of economic entities.
Another component of the problems is the
assessment of economic security at the micro-level.
This issue is natural, since the process of making
decisions on ensuring economic security begins with
the diagnostic stage. Its effectiveness is determined
by the methodological approaches and techniques
that the analyst uses in this activity.
At present, with a wide variety of methods for
diagnosing economic security systems of economic
entities, the main application is methods of indicator
assessment. Within this approach, the main questions
are about the indicators used for diagnostic purposes
and their thresholds. The most commonly used
indicators are for assessing the financial condition
and use of financial resources. According to some
authors (Sergeeva, 2019, Karanina, Ryazanova,
Gritsuk, 2018, Klychova, Zakirova, Dyatlova,
Klychova, Zaugarova, Zalyalova, 2019), the most
preferred indicators are for assessing liquidity,
financial stability, turnover and profitability. On the
basis of partial deviations from the threshold values,it
is possible to get an integral indicator, while
researchers offer different approaches to determining
the weight coefficients (scores) that define the
contribution of each indicator to the overall
assessment of the level of economic security
(Azarenko, 2017).
Another common approach to assessing the level
of economic security is the approach tested in risk
management technology. The variety of methods
existing here can be summarized by qualitative and
quantitative interpretation of risks. Some authors
propose a methodology for integral risk assessment,
where the materiality of risk is taken as a weighting
indicator (Aleksandrov, 2019). There are other
approaches to assessing the level of economic
security: an integrated approach that basically
combines an indicator approach and an approach
based on risk diagnostics; bankruptcy diagnostics and
others.
However, practical experience with various
methods does not give the analyst satisfying results.
The main reasons of it are the following. First of all,
such a widespread approach requires an objective
selection of evaluation criteria for the organization's
activities in the safety mode, and a set of indicators
that determine each of the criteria. It is simply
illogical to use here standard approaches without
taking into account the specifics of the organization's
activities. But the problem is associated with the
threshold values of indicators, which, in some cases,
should have a completely different meaning than the
generally accepted one. For example, the autonomy
coefficient for trade enterprises, and in some cases, it
is simply impossible to establish threshold
(normative) values. However, from a methodological
point of view, the described situation is even more
problematic.
For the stage of assessing the actual state of the
economic security of an enterprise, using the
indicator method is extremely convenient. It
determines its widespread distribution. There are also
information bases that allow to get the initial
information. Its users can be third parties interested in
the assessment, for example, creditors. But after all,
analysis and assessment is the basis for planning, in
this case based on a system of indicators.
Unfortunately, in the practice of domestic enterprises,
such planning often leads to "technocratic methods of
correcting the values of indicators", substituting
tactical decisions for the strategy of forming a system
of economic security. Moreover, taking into account
the frequency of forming credentials, the safety
management process is more reminiscent of episodic
decisions of a spontaneous nature to bring individual
security subsystems into a stable state. Considering
that the balance sheet data is a state of the
organization on a specific date, which does not reflect
the actual dynamics in the development of the system,
it is necessary to switch to assessing the dynamics of
indicators. It is also advisable for domestic
enterprises to select those indicators which help to
more clearly assess the state of security. Each
industry needs its own threshold values of indicators,
since the goal is to achieve an optimal level of safety.
In the next section of the article, we substantiate these
proposals giving an example of the financial
On the Issue of the Management Paradigm and Improving the Methodology for Assessing the Level of Economic Security of an Economic
Entity
119
subsystem of economic security of the timber
industry complex of the Kirov region.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Improving the indicator assessment mechanism in
order to analyze and monitor the financial subsystem
of the economic security of enterprises, the authors
proceed from the following provisions.
1. It is necessary to eliminate the separation of
actual methods of assessing the financial
condition and the values of indicators calculated
on this basis from the calculation of
performance indicators and risks of financial
and economic activities, calculated on the basis
of data of internal management accounting and
strategic analysis of the environment (for
example, analysis of strategic risks of financial
activities, etc.).
2. It is necessary to make industry-specific
adaptation of threshold values of indicators and
their actualization, taking into account modern
realities and adjustments to the concept of
financial management. For example, if in the
early 2000s the value of the financial leverage
ratio exceeding 2 was considered critical, now a
large number of organizations, especially public
ones, demonstrate values that significantly
exceed this indicator.
3. It is necessary to change the methodological
approach to using threshold values of indicators,
which should be based not on the level of
achievement of the desired value of the
indicator, but on its dynamics. It is necessary to
ensure proper correctness in the estimates of the
financial subsystem of the organization due to
the deterioration of the parameters of the
external environment in conditions of
deployment the global financial crisis and the
consequences of the pandemic.
Let us illustrate this approach using the example
of enterprises in the forestry and logging industry.
Initially, the geometric mean formula calculates
changes in the values of indicators for a set of
financial indicators, the average industry values for
which are determined on the basis of the consolidated
statements of enterprises in the industry, for example,
for the period 2014-2019.
For example, the calculation of the geometric
mean by the current liquidity ratio is the following:
К=
1,1415 ∗ 1,1554 ∗ 1,1928 ∗ 1,1679 ∗ 1,1980
= 1,08
Calculations are made in the same way for the
entire list of indicators selected for analysis. Let us
call the obtained values the coefficients of
acceleration (deceleration) of financial indicators.
Comparing the indicator of industry dynamics for
the corresponding indicator with a similar indicator
for the investigated enterprise, it is possible to
determine the nature of the development of the
hazard, or, on the contrary, strengthening the security
potential of the enterprise to the basic level.
The table below summarizes the results of
comparative calculations for the selected range of
indicators for enterprises in the timber industry.
Table 1: Comparative table of the acceleration (deceleration) coefficients of the values of the financial indicators of the studied
enterprise and the average values of the indicators for the enterprises of the timber industry.
Financial indicator
Acceleration
(deceleration)
coefficient for the
enterprise
Acceleration (deceleration)
coefficient for the timber
industry
Deviation of the coefficient
for the enterprise from the
industry coefficient%
Assessment (impact
on the state of
economic security of
the enterprise)
Financial soundness indicators
Autonomy ratio 3,26 1,15 183 positive
Financial leverage ratio
0,4 0,85 -53 positive
Equity capital
flexibility ratio
0,41 0,96 -57 negative
Solvency indicators
Current liquidity ratio
1,81 1,08 68 positive
Quick ratio
1,81 1,03 76 positive
Absolute liquidity ratio
0,37 1,09 -66 negative
Profitability indicators,%
Return on sales,% 1,7 0,92 85 positive
Return on assets,% 0,7 0,82 -15 positive
Return on equity,% 1,2 0,84 43 positive
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
120
Next, let us move to building a risk map based on
the proposed improved indicator assessment method.
Fig. 1 shows the map of financial security risks within
the framework of the proposed methodology for
comparing the acceleration (deceleration)
coefficients of the values of the financial stability
indicators of the studied enterprise with the values of
the indicators for the timber industry. As it is seen, the
coefficient of acceleration of the autonomy indicator
in the enterprise is 183% higher than the industry
average. The company is increasing its financing of
its activities from its own funds at a faster rate than
the enterprises of the industry, which has a positive
effect on the state and safety potential.
The deceleration coefficient of the capital
maneuverability indicator shows that the capital of
the studied enterprise is prone to immobilization
compared to organizations on average in the industry.
It will have a negative impact when comparing their
security potentials.
Figure 1: Map of financial security risks within the framework of the proposed methodology for comparing the acceleration
(deceleration) coefficients of the values of the financial stability indicators of the studied enterprise with the values of the
indicators for the timber industry.
Figure 2 presents a map of financial security risks
within the framework of the proposed methodology
for comparing the acceleration (deceleration)
coefficients of the values of the solvency indicators
of the studied enterprise with the values of the
indicators for the timber industry.
The acceleration coefficient for the current
liquidity indicator of the enterprise is higher than the
analogous coefficient for the industry in general. This
means that the enterprise increases its prospective
solvency every year. Enterprises in the timber
industry do this at a slower rate.
A similar situation is observed regarding the
acceleration factor for the quick liquidity indicator.
The analyzed coefficient of the enterprise is 76%
higher than the average for the industry enterprises.
This determines great opportunities for the studied
organization in comparison with the industry
enterprises to repay short-term liabilities using the
most liquid assets (cash and short-term investments),
as well as timely collection of short-term receivables.
The opposite conclusion concerns the rate of
deceleration of the absolute liquidity indicator. The
deviation of this indicator for the enterprise in
comparison with the coefficient of its acceleration for
the industry in general is 66%, which may indicate an
increase in problems with instant solvency and cause
serious risks from the standpoint of economic security
On the Issue of the Management Paradigm and Improving the Methodology for Assessing the Level of Economic Security of an Economic
Entity
121
Figure 2: Map of financial security risks within the framework of the proposed methodology for comparing the acceleration
(deceleration) coefficients of the values of the solvency indicators of the studied enterprise with the values of the indicators
for the timber industry.
Next, we conduct a study of the acceleration
(deceleration) coefficients of profitability indicators
(within the selected set of indicators) for the studied
organization and for the industry as a whole and
illustrate it using the risk map in Figure 3.
The acceleration coefficients in terms of return on
sales and return on equity in the studied enterprise are
higher than the average for enterprises in the industry,
which positively characterizes the commercial
subsystem and the potential for strengthening the
economic security of the enterprise.
The organization invests its own funds more
efficiently in production and economic activities in
comparison with using its own funds in the forest
industry as a whole. As for the rate of deceleration of
the profitability of assets, we can conclude that the
efficiency of using assets at the enterprise, in the
presence of a downward trend in the industry as a
whole, is much lower.
Figure 3: Map of financial security risks within the framework of the proposed methodology for comparing the acceleration
(deceleration) coefficients of the values of the profitability indicators of the studied enterprise with the values of the indicators
for the timber industry
4 CONCLUSIONS
The approach proposed by the authors allows a more
correct assessment of the level of economic security
of the primary link of the economy, supplementing
the traditional indicator approach with the
introduction of calculated indicators (coefficients) of
acceleration (deceleration) of quantitative values of
indicators. The set of the latter is determined by the
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
122
analyst. This technology allows to solve the problem
of the threshold values of indicators that are specific
for each industry. On the other hand, it provides an
opportunity to assess the state of safety in dynamics,
and not to fix the fact of deviation from any standard
value, the value of which is not always objective.
Moreover, this approach allows to take into account
the industry characteristics and the influence of the
external and internal environment on the processes in
the industry, which makes the conclusions more
objective, and the decisions in the field of economic
security realizable.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The article was prepared with the support of the grant
of the President of the Russian Federation NSh-
5187.2022.2 for state support of the leading scientific
schools of the Russian Federation within the
framework of the research topic «Development and
justification of the concept, an integrated model of
resilience diagnostics of risks and threats to the
security of regional ecosystems and the technology of
its application based on a digital twin».
REFERENCES
Azarenko, N. Yu., 2017. Application of the system-target
development model in assessing the economic security
of an economic entity. In International scientific
research journal. 10(64). 2. pp. 70-74.
Aleksandrov, G. A., 2019. Economic security and
investment attractiveness of enterprises: the nature of
the relationship and the problem of assessment. In
Economic relations. 9(3). pp. 2269-2284.
Ilysheva, N., Karanina, E., Baldesku, E., Zakirov, U., 2017.
Detection of the Interdependence of Economic
Development and Environmental Performance at the
Industry Level. In Montenegrin Journal of Economics.
13(4). pp. 19-29.
Ivashchenko, G.V., 2000. On the concept of "safety". In
Theoretical journal CREDO. 24.
Karanina, E., Ryazanova, O., Gritsuk, N., 2018. Conceptual
approach to the assessment of economic security of
economic entities on the example of transport
enterprises. In International Scientific Conference
Environmental Science for Construction Industry –
ESCI 2018 MATEC Web Conf. 20 August 2018. 193. p.
8.
Karanina, E., Kartavyh, K., 2017. Economic security of
modern Russia: The current state and prospects. In
MATEC Web of Conferences: 2017 International
Science Conference on Business Technologies for
Sustainable Urban Development (SPbWOSCE 2017),
St. Petersburg, 20-22 Deсember 2017. p. 170.
Karanina, E. Yurieva, L., Dolzhenkova, E., 2018. Assessing
the innovative attractiveness of industrial companies in
the conditions of high uncertainty. In Espacios. 39. 28.
Klychova, G., Zakirova, A., Dyatlova, A., Klychova, A.,
Zaugarova, E., Zalyalova, N., 2019. Methodological
tools to ensure economic security in the personnel
management system of enterprises. In Innovative
Technologies in Environmental Science and Education
(ITESE-2019) E3S Web Conf. 04 December 2019. 135.
p. 13.
Sergeeva, I.A., 2019. Analysis of methodological
approaches to assessing the economic security of an
enterprise. In Modern economy: problems and
solutions. 8 (116). pp. 64-78.
Yakshina, I.S., 2013. Modern theoretical approaches to the
content of the category of economic security of subjects
of economic activity. In Humanitarian research. 10.
On the Issue of the Management Paradigm and Improving the Methodology for Assessing the Level of Economic Security of an Economic
Entity
123