Mitigating the Threat of Corruption in the Private Sector: The Role
of Business Principles
Peter Nikolaevich Kobets
1a
, Kristina Aleksandrovna Krasnova
2b
, Mátyás Szabolcs
3c
and Andrei Viktorovich Borisov
4d
1
Center for organizational support of scientific activity, Federal public establishment «National Research Institute of the
Ministry of Interior of the Russian Federation», Povarskaya street, 25 (bldg. 1), Moscow, the Russian Federation
2
Department of Criminal Law, The North Western branch of the Federal State Budget-Funded Educational Institution of
Higher Education «The Russian State University of Justice», Aleksandrovsky park, 5, Sankt-Petersburg, the Russian
Federation
3
Faculty of Law Enforcement, University of Public Service,
Ludovika tér, 2, Budapest, Hungary
4
Law Institute, the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian University of
Transport”, Obraztsova street, 9 (bldg. 9), Moscow, the Russian Federation
Keywords: Criminal Law, Corruption, Bribery, Combating Corruption, Business Principles.
Abstract: The relevance of the study is propelled by the fact that corruption remains a pressing problem in international
business. Bribery can only be effectively prevented and eliminated if private sector firms implement anti-
corruption management controls. The purpose of this study is to offer insight into the global business
principles of combating corruption, as well as to provide a detailed analysis of the impact of corruption on
business processes by testing the hypothesis about the negative impact of corrupt practices on the company's
reputation and by assessing the reliability of the assumption that the implementation of internationally
developed business anti-bribery principles help maintain the company's reputation of integrity. Methods: The
authors present a systematic review of Russian and international literature that investigates corruption,
identifying the factors of corruption in business and other economic activities. To search for relevant studies,
we used Scimagojr, Research Gate, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Sage Open. Results and novelty:
Certain international organizations recognize that corruption and bribery are detrimental to business integrity.
Bribery can only be effectively prevented and eliminated if companies and the private sector in general
implement anti-corruption management controls as a necessary and essential part of their day-to-day
governance on the same basis as economic security controls. Conclusions. Based on an in-depth review of
international anti-bribery business principles, the authors conclude that incorporating anti-corruption
principles into their daily operations enables them to compete and trade fairly around the world, supporting
investment and economic growth, and helping to fight corruption crime at the national and international levels.
1 INTRODUCTION
The fight against corruption remains on the agenda at
the supranational and national levels, despite the fact
that it affects the life of societies in different countries
of the world to varying degrees (Krasnova &
Nikonov, 2020). Various literature emphasizes that
each socio-political and economic system generates
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6527-3788
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-8025
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6416-1645
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3429-7370
its own model of corruption, and there is not a single
state in which corruption somehow does not exist,
although it is indisputable that corruption tends to be
more widespread in poor states (Sharifullin, 2020).
The most attention in the specialized literature is
traditionally paid to the study of the potential of
criminal law remedies in the implementation of anti-
corruption policy in business (Zhesterov, 2021;
Kurbanov & Krasnova, 2020), based on the
Kobets, P., Krasnova, K., Szabolcs, M. and Borisov, A.
Mitigating the Threat of Corruption in the Private Sector: The Role of Business Principles.
DOI: 10.5220/0010645700003152
In Proceedings of the VII International Scientific-Practical Conference “Criminal Law and Operative Search Activities: Problems of Legislation, Science and Practice” (CLOSA 2021), pages
415-419
ISBN: 978-989-758-532-6; ISSN: 2184-9854
Copyright
c
2021 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
415
successful experience of Great Britain (Nam,
Nguyen, Nguyen & Luu, 2020), USA ( Gorshunov,
Armenakis, Harris & Walker, 2021; Posthuma, 2021;
Liu, Liu, Ullah, Wei & Hu, 2021), China (Yang, Ma
& Cui, 2021) and a number of European countries
(Brzic, Dabic, Kukura & Podobnik , 2021; Ferris,
Hanousek & Tresl, 2021). At the same time, the
successful anti-corruption practices of individual
states do not cancel out such indisputable statements
as that today there is no global consensus on what
“corruption” is and that things that are considered to
be “illegal corruption” in one country are recognized
as a legitimate business practice in another (Bandeira,
2013).
In modern conditions, business representatives, in
an effort to avoid compliance risks (that is, regulatory
risks that arise for an organization as a result of losses
due to non-compliance with legislation), create
compliance management systems. They represent
internal controls over compliance with legal and
corporate anti-bribery requirements. They are usually
based on various guidelines proposed by regulators
and non-governmental organizations (Kobets &
Krasnova, 2020).
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this article, we present a systematic review of
documents developed by nongovernmental
associations and literature that investigates
corruption, identifying the factors of corruption in
business and other economic activities. To search for
relevant studies, we used Scimagojr, Research Gate,
Science Direct, Google Scholar, Sage Open.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Corruption risks in business. Currently, the risks
associated with corrupt practices are a growing
concern for both large and small companies, which
face demands to take bribes, both from their
competitors acting in a corrupt manner and from their
own employees who violate established codes of
conduct.
Increased enforcement of bribery laws abroad,
record-breaking fines, and the threat of criminal
penalties for directors and employees (Zhesterov,
2020) are prompting executives to consider how to
step up their anti-corruption efforts. In addition, in
modern conditions, the pressure on business is
increasing more and more from socially responsible
investment funds and indices, which add criteria for
assessing the fight against bribery to their selection
procedures almost every year. Development banks
and export credit agencies are increasingly imposing
prohibitive sanctions on companies that are known to
be involved in corruption. As a result, the
management of most companies understands the need
to protect and promote their reputation for integrity,
since not only business partners, but also society as a
whole becomes less tolerant of corruption.
Business principles of anti-bribery. In today's
environment, companies have the opportunity to
respond positively to growing corruption risks and
mitigate threats with robust anti-corruption policies.
To help companies develop and implement effective
anti-bribery policies, international organizations such
as Transparency International (TI) and Social
Accountability International (SAI) have joined forces
to launch Business Principles for Countering Bribery.
The development of these principles, which can be
introduced into business and other economic
activities, was carried out with the participation of
many stakeholders in cooperation and with the
support of a Steering Committee, which included
representatives of the international business
community, academia, trade unions and other non-
governmental organizations.
Business Principles nowadays play the role of a
code of good anti-bribery practice for many
companies. They have influenced many local anti-
corruption codes, tools and guidelines. Their
introduction has stimulated the development of other
similar anti-bribery codes. Multinational companies
and researchers now look to them as a benchmark.
For example, ENKA's Code of Corporate Conduct
states that the company has adopted the principle of
“zero tolerance for bribery” and is committed to abide
by the relevant laws, rules and principles in its
“Global Business” section.
Global PACI initiative. At the beginning of the
third decade of the 21st century, the Partnering
Against Corruption Initiative (hereinafter, PACI) has
become the leading platform for discussing anti-
corruption issues in the private sector. PACI is based
on anti-bribery principles, which are the product of
the work of a target group created by member
companies of the World Economic Forum (World
Economic Forum, hereinafter referred to as WEF)
[11, p. 8]. Discussion of the corruption agenda takes
place at the WEF’s annual meetings, based in
Cologny, canton of Geneva, Switzerland. The WEF
mission is worded as an aspiration to improve the
state of the world. The Forum provides a platform for
businesses, governments and civil society to work
together on numerous projects and initiatives. WEF
CLOSA 2021 - VII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “CRIMINAL LAW AND OPERATIVE SEARCH
ACTIVITIES: PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATION, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE”
416
also prepares a series of reports and engages its
members in sectoral initiatives.
Today, PACI works with business leaders,
international organizations and governments to focus
on implementing global anti-corruption agendas. The
PACI's goal is to identify innovative anti-corruption
approaches and global, regional and sectoral agendas
in collaboration with representatives from civil
society, academia and governments. In other words,
the PACI initiative acts as a global platform based on
the above principles and works to ensure that
companies can maximize their collective influence in
the fight against corruption (Pryazhnikova, 2019).
Currently, guided by the identified needs and
interests of its member companies, PACI is taking
initiatives to address industry, regional or global
issues related to anti-corruption and compliance.
Since its inception in 2004, PACI serves as the main
CEO-led platform in the global anti-corruption arena,
relying on public and private sector collaboration,
responsible leadership and technological
advancement (Krylov, 2012). The PACI Task Force
is a dedicated group of senior leaders who oversee
compliance, ethics, strategy and various other
corporate functions and create a safe space to interact
with peers to implement the core principles
underlying PACI principles, improve organizational
compliance and raise overall standards of business.
The PACI Principles were revised and updated in
2013 and renamed the PACI Principles for
Countering Corruption. The revised PACI principles
expand the focus beyond bribery and represent a
natural evolution of the goals of the PACI signatory
community (Sterhov, 2014). These principles are
intended to provide a guiding framework for a
business willing to take the lead in combating
corruption in all its forms.
The PACI Principles begin with six core
aspirational principles that underpin the ongoing
pursuit of transparency, honesty and ethical business
conduct. They also include a set of implementation
guidelines that outline the key steps companies must
take to translate their commitments into concrete
action. Recognizing the power of multilateral
cooperative action in transforming the global,
regional and sectoral anti-corruption agendas, the
PACI principles also serve as a call to action for
companies around the world to join collective action
initiatives that increase public confidence in business,
ensure fair markets and level the playing field by
combatting corruption.
Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce.
In this context, it is also necessary to talk about the
rules of the International Chamber of Commerce,
which also contribute to countering corruption in
business. The International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) is the largest and most influential business
organization in the world. Its global network includes
more than 6 million companies, chambers of
commerce and business associations in more than 130
countries, covering the entire private sector of
economy. The worldwide network of National
Committees regularly informs the ICC International
Secretariat in Paris of national and regional business
priorities. More than 2,000 experts from ICC member
companies use their knowledge and experience to
develop ICC's position on specific business issues.
ICC interacts with the UN, the World Trade
Organization, the G20 and other intergovernmental
organizations.
The ICC was the first commercial organization to
issue anti-corruption regulations, publishing its anti-
extortion and anti-bribery code of conduct back in
1977. It updated these rules in 1996, 1999 and 2005
to reflect the adoption of key international legal
instruments such as the 1997 Convention against
Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development and the
2003 UN Convention on Corruption. These
documents, which are the most important milestones
in the fight against corruption, have received active
support from the business community. The revised
2011 ICC Anti-Corruption Rules reflect an
impressive evolution in the ethics and compliance
practices of leading companies. They are based on
numerous contributions from ICC National
Committees, member companies and experts from the
Corporate Responsibility and Anti-Corruption
Commission.
The main idea of the ICC Rules for the Promotion
of Commercial Negotiation is that the best deals are
made between negotiating partners who not only want
or need cooperation, but also trust each other. Aimed
at small, medium or large businesses across many
sectors, ICC rules are a concise set of principles to
help negotiators conduct effective commercial
negotiations. In today's multicultural business world,
it is often difficult for parties to reach a successful
mutual agreement due to differences in interests, legal
practice, traditions or negotiating styles and
experiences. The ICC rules were developed with the
assistance of international negotiating experts and are
used in the context of a wide variety of different
business transactions. The rules are also used as a
checklist to consider when preparing for a
negotiation, as a basic set of guidelines to be agreed
with negotiating partners, or as a guideline for
guiding a party's own behavior during the negotiation
Mitigating the Threat of Corruption in the Private Sector: The Role of Business Principles
417
process in order to conclude sustainable business
deals.
Anti-corruption business principles of the World
Federation of Chambers of Commerce. In 2019, The
Center for International Private Enterprise
(hereinafter, CIPE) and the World Chambers
Federation (hereinafter, WCF) of the International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC) developed another set
of principles to help business associations and
chambers of commerce in preventing, identifying and
mitigating corruption risks.
CIPE and ICC WCF have developed these
principles in light of the unique set of risks faced by
business organizations, as well as feedback from
business associations, chambers of commerce, and
association management and anti-bribery experts
from around the world with a focus on emerging
markets. These principles complement the CIPE and
WCF Joint Governance Principles for Business
Associations and Chambers of Commerce, ICC Anti-
Corruption Rules for Enterprises and other business
guidelines such as Transparency International's
Business Principles for Countering Bribery.
These principles apply to associations, chambers
of commerce and federations of associations
operating at the international, national, regional and
local levels that serve as trade bodies representing the
collective interests of their business members,
whether they are sole proprietorships, companies or
other organizations. These principles are voluntary
and the implementation of the association's
compliance program is based on a risk-based
approach, where policies, procedures and controls are
reasonable and proportionate to the corruption risks
faced by the business association.
It should be emphasized that CIPE and ICC WCF
strive to support the efforts of the business
community to implement effective anti-corruption
measures by providing the business community with
a variety of tools.
World Bank Group Business Principles. It is also
worth mentioning another anti-corruption tool, the
World Bank Group Integrity Guidelines (hereinafter
referred to as the Guidelines). This document
includes standards, principles and components that
are generally accepted by many institutions and
organizations as methods of good governance and the
fight against fraud and corruption. Their content is
based on anti-corruption regulations, in particular: the
2009 OECD Recommendation for Further
Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in
International Business Transactions; the Anti-
Corruption Integrity Compliance Program of the
Global Infrastructure Anti-Corruption Center; the
World Economic Forum's Basic Anti-Bribery
Principles Partnership Against Corruption, etc.
The Guidelines describe the components of an
integrity program that aims to prevent, detect and
eliminate corruption, collusion, coercion and fraud
(misconduct) within the company. This effective
program incorporates all the integrity efforts of the
parties and functions as an integral part of daily
practices. The guidelines under review are constantly
being updated. Thus, the Guidelines should be
recognized as reflecting generally recognized
standards of corporate ethics and compliance.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Corruption as a social and economic phenomenon is
interpreted too ambiguously in different countries and
at different levels of legal regulation. As a result, at
the global level, a universal approach has not yet been
developed that allows to unambiguously identify the
impact of anti-corruption programs in the economic
sphere. This requires a deeper knowledge of how to
properly assess the success in the fight against
corruption. The rapid growth in development and use
of anti-corruption metrics over the past two decades
suggests that corruption and anti-corruption
assessments are increasingly recognized as essential
tools for analyzing trends and monitoring global,
national, regional and local anti-corruption efforts.
While huge resources are invested at various
levels in the fight against corruption, documenting
and reporting results remains challenging. Limited
evidence on the effectiveness of newly developed
anti-corruption principles, programs or national
strategies may be wrongly recognized as evident of
their effectiveness or, on the contrary, failure. In this
regard, it is necessary to continue scientific research
of methods and tools that objectively measure the
impact of anti-corruption programs.
REFERENCES
Bandeira, G.N., 2013. “Corruption” and social and
economic criminal law: Criminology, criminal policy,
political science and law & economics A new idea
about criminal liability of legal entities. In Tékhne.
11(2). pp. 105-113.
Brzić, B., Dabić, M., Kukura, F., Podobnik, B., 2021. The
effects of corruption and the fraction of private
ownership on the productivity of telecommunication
companies. In Technology in Society. 65.
CLOSA 2021 - VII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “CRIMINAL LAW AND OPERATIVE SEARCH
ACTIVITIES: PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATION, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE”
418
Building foundations against corruption:
Recommendations on anti-corruption in the
infrastructure & urban development industries, 2015. p.
10.
Ferris, S. P., Hanousek, J., Tresl, J., 2021. Corporate
profitability and the global persistence of corruption. In
Journal of Corporate Finance. 66.
Gorshunov, M. A., Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. A., Walker,
H. J., 2021. Quad-qualified audit committee director:
Implications for monitoring and reducing financial
corruption. In Journal of Corporate Finance. 66.
Kobets, P. N., Krasnova, K. A., 2020. Positive experience
in combating corruption of international state and non-
state organizations in collaboration with representatives
of civil society. In Philosophy of law. 3(94). pp. 156-
161.
Krasnova, K. A., Nikonov, P. V., 2020. Economic approach
to anti-corruption. In Bulletin of the University of the
Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. 5(79).
pp. 113-118.
Krylov, I. S., 2012. Comparative analysis of the main
regulatory mechanisms of global economic processes.
In Comparative policies. 3(3). pp. 66-84.
Kurbanov, A. Sh., Krasnova, K. A., 2020. Prevention of
Corruption in Business Activities. In Proceedings for
the day of a lawyer in the framework of research
activities at the Faculty of Law. pp. 53-57.
Liu, T., Liu, Y., Ullah, B., Wei, Z., Xu, L.C., 2021. The
dark side of transparency in developing countries: The
link between financial reporting practices and
corruption. In Journal of Corporate Finance. 66.
Nam, V. H., Nguyen, M. N., Nguyen, D. A., Luu, H. N.,
2020. The impact of corruption on the performance of
newly established enterprises: Empirical evidence from
a transition economy. In Borsa Istanbul Review. 20(4).
pp. 383-395.
Posthuma, R. A., 2021. High Compliance Work Systems:
Innovative Solutions for Firm Success and Control of
Foreign Corruption. In Business Horizons.
Pryazhnikova, O. N., 2019. World Economic Forum and
the fight against corruption. Social and humanities
sciences. In Domestic and foreign literature. Series 2:
Economics. 1. pp. 30-43.
Sharifullin, R. A., 2020. International legal regulation
against corruption. In Current problems of
constitutional, municipal and international law. pp.
135-140.
Sterkhov, A. P., 2014. Combating fraud and corruption is
the most important element in ensuring security and
business. In Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Economic
Academy. 3. pp. 9-15.
Yang, K., Ma, P., Cui, L., 2021. Subnational corruption and
foreign firms’ performance: Evidence from China. In
Journal of Business Research. 123. pp. 106-116.
Zhesterov, P. V., 2020. Directives: a private opinion of a
shareholder representative or "indulgence" from
criminal repression of members of the board of
directors in companies with state participation? In
Business security. 6. pp. 22-26.
Zhesterov, P. V., 2021. The inevitability of criminal
liability of legal entities for corruption crimes. In
Business security. 1. pp. 37-40.
Mitigating the Threat of Corruption in the Private Sector: The Role of Business Principles
419