In modern conditions, with a change in views on 
the  professional  activity  of  a  specialist,  the 
competence-based approach considered in the works 
of  Kuramaeva,  T.A.  (Kuramaeva,  2018),  Ulyanina, 
O.A. (Ulyanina, 2018), Rakhimov, Zh.B. (Rakhimov, 
2018),  Repina,  E.  G.  (Repina,  2017)  and  others, 
seems to be relevant. 
The problem of coping and getting out of critical, 
stressful situations, including the professional sphere, 
is devoted to the works of both domestic and foreign 
scientists, such as Ponikarova, V.N. Pokudina, T.N. 
(Ponikarova  and  Pokudina,  2019),  Starovoit,  N.V. 
(Starovoit,  2018),  Chernomyrdina,  T.N. 
(Chernomyrdina, 2018), Wilfried F. Admiraal, Fred 
A.J.  Korthagen  and  Theo  Wubbels  (Wilfried, 
Korthagen  и  Wubbels,  2000),  Abdukadirova,  L.Y. 
(Abdukadirova, 2020).  
 In the modern dynamic and competitively active 
world,  high  requirements  are  imposed  on  the 
competencies  of  specialists,  the  formation  of  soft 
skills as the basis for the success of employees in their 
professional  activities  (Gluzman,  Yu.V.  (Gluzman, 
2019),  Batsunov, S.N., Derecha  I.I.,  Kungurova, 
I.M., Slizkova, E.V. (Batsunov, Derecha, Kungurova 
and Slizkova, 2018), Ivenskikh, I.V., Sorokoumova, 
S.N., Suvorova, O. V. (Ivenskikh, Sorokoumova and 
Suvorova,  2018),  Ponikarova,  V.N.  (Ponikarova, 
2020),  Chulanova,  O.L.,  Ivonina,  A.I.  (Chulanova 
and Ivonina, 2017). 
3  RESULTS 
The study was conducted in the period from 2007 to 
2020, the general population of the sample was more 
than 1,500 people, the representative sample was 782 
people, pupils, students, teachers and specialists who 
implement  inclusive  education  in  the  Northwestern 
Federal  District  of  the  Russian  Federation.  Of  the 
total number of subjects, 30 people were selected who 
went  through  all  stages  of  the  study  (experimental 
group). 
To study professional coping behavior, we used a 
set  of  complementary  methods,  which  included 
questionnaires  “Methods  of  coping  behavior” 
(according  to  R.  Lazarus  and  S.  Folkman) 
(Clayburgh,  2004);  determination  of  individual 
coping strategies (according to E. Heim) (Clayburgh, 
2004);  leading  ways  to  overcome  professional 
difficulties  in  the  field  of  inclusive  education 
(according to Ponikarova, V.N.) (Ponikarova, 2000); 
expert assessment "The level of risk  in professional 
activity"  (according  to  Zmanovskaya,  E.V.) 
(Clayburgh, 2004) and others. 
Based on the results of the ascertaining part of the 
study,  we  identified  the  following  types  of 
professional coping behavior - Adaptive (34% of the 
subjects  in  the  control  group  and  50%  in  the 
experimental group) and the Crush type (24% of the 
subjects  in  the  control  group  and  23%  in  the 
experimental group).   
Based  on  the  assessment  of  coping  behavior  in 
terms  of  productivity  and  non-productivity,  we  can 
classify the following types of professional behavior: 
Creative,  Adaptive,  Mix  -  to  conditionally 
productive;  Smash  type  -  to  productive;  Crush  - 
unproductive professional coping behavior. 
The Mix type was most often noted by us among 
students  of  secondary  vocational  educational 
organizations, the types of coping behavior Creative 
and Smash were observed among students of higher 
education, while among students under conditions of 
additional vocational education - Adaptive and Crush. 
The problems that teachers face in their work are 
due  to  stressful  situations  in  working  with  children 
with disabilities in inclusive educational institutions. 
The study made it possible to identify the following 
circumstances that present significant difficulties for 
teachers: 
  The main activities of the teacher of inclusive 
education;  
  Forms of organization of subjects of inclusive 
education; 
  Acquaintance  with  the  legislative  and  legal 
framework  for  the  activities  of  the teacher  of 
inclusive education and the implementation of 
legal acts; 
  Providing  special  educational  conditions  for 
people with disabilities; 
  Meeting  the  special  educational  needs  of 
people with disabilities; 
  Professional  burnout  and  professional 
deformation. 
The study of problem situations was carried out 
according to a number of criteria: the orientation of 
social  interaction, professionally  important  qualities 
(PIQ),  risk  factors,  functions  of  coping  behavior, 
coping strategy, competence, etc. 
The  analysis  of  the  results  of  studying  the 
professional coping behavior of the respondents made 
it possible to create a generalized description of the 
most significant problem situations. 
In  accordance  with  the  direction  of  social 
interaction of the subjects of inclusive education, we 
have  identified  three  groups  of  situations: 
interpersonal, intrapersonal and extrapersonal. 
It should be noted that these types of interaction 
to  one  degree  or  another,  directly  or  indirectly,  are