kPa and p
b
 = 0. The same harmonious movement as 
in  the  previous  experience  is  simulated  with  the 
kinematic  parameters:    starting  position 
q
0 
=  260°, 
amplitude q
m
 = 23° and frequency of ω = 2,7 rad/s. 
Figure 7 b) shows the force of interaction which is the 
result  of  the  sum  of dynamic  forces,  gravity  forces 
and elastic  forces  in the chambers of the pneumatic 
cylinders. The elastic force acts as an elastic balancer 
of the gravity load. The interaction force is 0 at the 
initial  position  and  fluctuates  ±  4.5  N  around  this 
value, as in the previous experiment.  
5  CONCLUSIONS 
The  paper  reveals  the  mechanical  design  of  an 
exoskeleton  of  the  upper  limbs,  which  uses  the 
scheme of hybrid drive  with  electric  and pneumatic 
actuation, thus producing a lower impedance due to 
pneumatics, while maintaining high driving force and 
rapid force response due to electric actuation. Further 
reduction of the mechanical impedance is achieved by 
placing  the  components  of  the  hybrid  drive  in  the 
fixed base.  
Several  experiments  with  the  available 
mechanical  prototype  of  the  exoskeleton  were 
performed in the work to test the hypothesis that the 
proposed  hybrid  drive  is  able  to  provide  the  two 
modes  of  interaction:  a)  “robot  in  charge”  mode, 
when the exoskeleton applies forces with high 
impedance and b) “patient in charge” mode when the 
forces of interaction with the operator are low due to 
the reduced impedance of the robot. 
In the experiments, the force between the operator 
and  the  exoskeleton  was  evaluated.  The  force  of 
interaction was obtained from passive forces, which 
are the result of inertia, friction and gravity, as well 
as the elasticity of pneumatics. In “patient in charge” 
way  the  patient-initiated  harmonic  motion  was 
studied  in  two  cases  -  without  pressure  in  the 
chambers and with pressure for gravity 
compensation.  
In  the  first  case,  the  force  of  interaction 
determined  mainly  by  the  exoskeleton  gravity 
indicates that the exoskeleton arm is relatively heavy 
(
F
h 
=-8.2 N). As a result of added inertia and friction 
forces  from  harmonic  movements,  this  force 
oscillates  from  -5.8  to  -10.2  N.  When  gravity  is 
compensated passively by pressure in the chambers 
of  pneumatic  cylinders,  the  force  of  interaction  is 
determined by the elastic forces of compressed air, as 
well  as  by  the  inertia  forces  and  friction.  For  the 
selected harmonic deviations, the force of interaction 
reaches relatively high values (
Fh = ± 4.5 N).  
The  work  also  includes  several  computer 
experiments to assess the parameters of the actuators 
and the correctness of the constructed mathematical 
model. Computer experiments show a similar change 
in the  interaction force  as  in the  real  experiment. It 
can  be  noted  that  the  parameters  introduced  in  the 
model such as exoskeleton mass and coefficients of 
Coulomb and viscous friction in the actuators (Table 
1) have quite high values. 
The  conducted  experiments  show  that  the 
resulting  forces  of  interaction  in  passive  mode  are 
essential in terms of transparency, but are not a threat 
of security. In active mode of operation, the forces of 
interaction can be reduced by active compensations, 
but  the  created  low  values  of  the  forces  in  passive 
mode are a guarantee of general security.  
The  design  and  control  of  this  exoskeleton  are 
under  development.  Future  work  will  be  done  by 
incorporating  the  controller  and  assessing  the 
transparency and safety of the interaction between the 
patient and the exoskeleton in active mode. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
This  research  was  supported  by  the  Operational 
Program  "Science  and  education  for  smart  growth" 
through the project “MIRACle”, № BG05M2OP001-
1.002-0011,  to  which  the  authors  would  like  to 
express their deepest gratitude. 
REFERENCES 
Manna  S.  K.,  Dubey  V.  N.,  2018.  Comparative  study  of 
actuation systems for portable upper limb exoskeletons, 
Medical Engineering and Physics, 60, 1–13. 
Jarrasse, N., T. Proietti, et al., 2014. Robotic Exoskeletons: 
A  Perspective  for  the  Rehabilitation  of  Arm 
Coordination  in  Stroke  Patients,  Frontiers in Human 
Neuroscience, Vol.8, Art.947, 1-13. 
Veneman,  J.F.,  R.  Ekkelenkamp,  et  al.,  2006.  A  series 
elastic-  and  bowden-cable-based  actuation  for  use  as 
torque  actuator  in  exoskeleton-type  robots,  The Int. 
Journ. of Rob. Research, vol. 25(3), 261-281. 
Hogan  N.,  1985.  Impedance  Control:  An  Approach  to 
Manipulation,  ASME J. Dynamic Systems Meas. & 
Control, 107: 1-24. 
Ansarieshlaghi,  F.  and  P.  Eberhard,  2019.    Hybrid 
Force/Position  Control  of  a  Very  Flexible  Parallel 
Robot Manipulator in Contact with an Environment. In 
Proc. of the 16th International Conference on 
Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 
(ICINCO 2019), Vol.2, 59-67.