Figure 12: IRST model with PI controller 
PI controller Parameter values:{ Kg=2000, Kf= 0.027, 
Kt= 0.07, R=10, L=1e-05, Kd = 5, I/J=8.6, PI & AI value 
are tunable} 
During simulation, when we setup the parameter 
of PI  controller [proportional (P) =240  and Integral 
(I)  =180],  the  simulation result  showed  there  much 
error in target position and senor measured position 
as  figure  13..After  tuning  and  simulation  we  found 
that  at  PI  Proportional  (P)  =1000  and  Integral  (I) 
=500, there is less error found in actual position and 
senor measured position as shown in figure 14. 
 
Figure  13:  Graph  target  position  and  senor  measured 
position[Proportional (P) =240 and Integral (I) =180] 
 
Figure  14:  Graph  target  position  and  senor  measured 
position [Proportional (P) =1000 and Integral (I) =500] 
6  CONCLUSION 
The  proposed  IRST  system  have  IR  channel,  TV 
camera,  and  LRF  is  installed  in  a  single  optical 
window with two different signal processer, first IR 
signal  processor  use  for  IR  signal  processing  in  IR 
channel and second video signal processor for video 
signal  in  Thermal/  video  channel.  The 
communication  between  IRST  CPU  (ICPU)  with 
aircraft  system  done  by  using  two  type  of  bus 
protocol.  The  IR  signal  processor  use  ARINC 
429/1535b  bus  protocol  and  video  processor  use 
ARINC  8181  bus  protocol  under  control  and 
supervision ICPU. The Proposed modification in the 
IRST  system  improve  the  performance,  reduce  the 
size, and weight that is basic need of fighter aircraft. 
 
The  simulation  result  shows,  that  the  Tracker 
JPDA  and  TOMHT  with  IMM  filter  tracks 
maneuvering  targets  more  precisely  and  did  not 
break or  lose the track even during the turns and  in 
the ambiguous region. The targets are more precisely 
tracked during the turn and are sufficiently separated 
in the ambiguity region However,  the runtime for a 
tracker  TOMHT  is  significantly  longer  than  using 
tracker  JPDA  and  computational  data  is  less  hence 
required less memory space than tracker JPDA. 
REFERENCES 
Yilmaz,  A.,  Shafique,  K.  and  Shah,  M.  (2003).  Target 
tracking in airborne forward looking infrared imagery. 
Elsevier Science. 
Nengli, D., Qi J. G., and Jiaguang,  M.  (2001).  New 
approach to detect dim moving point targets based on 
motion analysis.  SPIE. 
Yang, Hi.(2015). Detection and Tracking of Infrared Dim 
Small  Image  Sequence  Moving  Target.  The  Open 
Automation and Control Systems Journal. 
Blom,  H.,and  Bar-Shalom,  Y.(1988).  The  interacting 
multiple model algorithm for systems with Monrovian 
switching  coefficients.  IEEE  Transactions  on 
Automatic Control. 
Konstantin,  P.,  Udvarev  A.,  and  Semerdjiev  T.(2003).  A 
Study  of  a  Target  Tracking  Algorithm  Using  Global 
Nearest  Neighbor  Approach.  InternationalConference 
on Computer Systems and Technologies. 
Tchango,  A.  F., Thomas.  V.,  Buffet, O., Dutech, A., and 
Flacher  F.,  Tracking  Multiple  Interacting  Targets 
Using  A  Joint  Probabilistic  Data  Association  Filter. 
Thales Services SAS Company. 
Blackman, S.S. (2004).  Multiple  Hypothesis  Tracking for 
Multiple  Target  Tracking.  IEEE,  A&E  Systems 
Magazine. 
Li, Q., Liu L., and Tang S.(2017). Composite Axis Control 
System  Development  of  Airborne  Electro-Optical 
Platform. IEEE 8th International Conference 
 Koretsky  G.M.,  Nicoll  J.  F.,  and  Taylor  M.S.(2013).  A 
tutorial  on  Electro-optical  /  Infrared  (EO/IR)  theory 
and systems. Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA). 
Mazor, E., Averbuch, A., Bar-shalom, Y., Dayan, 
J.(1998). Interacting multiple model in target tracking: 
a survey. IEEE Trans. Aerospace.