Besides, the high-tech medical information contained 
in patient requests could serve as a good basis for the 
formation  of  appropriate  datasets,  but  for  this  it  is 
necessary to develop appropriate organizational and 
motivational procedures. 
Thus, there is the problem of integration of social 
media  platforms  and  specialized  web  resources  for 
the  effective  use  of  high-tech  medical  information, 
which  is  especially  relevant  for  medicine  in 
developing  countries.  In  the  article,  this  task  is 
considered  in  relation  to  the  Russian-speaking 
segment of the Internet. 
Namely,  we  have  experimentally  studied  the 
structure  of  public  medical  Internet  communities 
typical  for  Russia.  We  found  that  they  are 
characterized  by  self-organization.  We  have 
developed  and  launched  a  web  resource  for  the 
effective use of high-tech medical information, and to 
form the motivational component of the resource, we 
use  the  identified  structure  of  already  existing 
network  communities  of  medical  focus.  We  use 
specialized  chat  bots  as  an  effective  means  of 
integrating  the  developed  resource  and  network 
communities. 
2  BACKGROUND AND RELATED 
WORKS 
Internet  services,  on  which  experienced  doctors 
provide the patient with their reports on his high-tech 
medical  information,  are  widely  represented  in 
medically developed countries, for example in USA 
– Second Opinions (from 29$), 2nd.MD ($3,000); in 
India  –  SeekMed  (video  communication  with  a 
specialist is provided). These services are websites or 
applications  with  a  strictly  defined  business  model, 
which  implies  the  legitimacy  and  security  of  the 
transmitted  information.  Most  of  these  services  are 
expensive and therefore not available to everyone. 
Similar services also exist in Russia, for example: 
Cardio-online;  National  Teleradiological  Network. 
But, all of them are not free and  have a very narrow 
specialization. 
In addition to specialized Internet-services, there 
is  also  the  possibility  of  interpreting  high-tech 
medical  information  through  social  networks,  like 
Facebook. In Russia and in most developing countries 
such as Iran, Malaysia etc., the Telegram messenger 
is much more popular. A large share of the Russian-
speaking segment of the Internet is also occupied by 
the  social  network  VKontakte.  In  these  social 
networks,  communities  related  to  medicine, 
cardiology, cardiac surgery, radiology, and neurology 
are  popular.  But,  although  these  communities  are 
usually  administered  by  professional  doctors,  it  is 
impossible  to  guarantee  the  adequacy  of  the 
interpretation of medical information here. 
The issues of obtaining and interpreting medical 
information  in  social  media  are  studied  in  the 
literature  mainly  in  the  aspect  of  crowdsourcing 
(Wang,  2020;  Kalantarian,  2019;  Tucker,  2019). 
(McCoy, 2014) defines crowdsourcing to outsource a 
task  to  a  group  or  community  of  people.  (Tucker, 
2019)  concerns  crowdsourcing  activity  as  online 
collaboration systems. 
Many  studies  suggest  crowdsourcing  to  perform 
only separate, well-structured tasks - for example, for 
pre-clinical  research  (Tucker,  2019),  for  formatting 
incoming information, for improving the quality of the 
extracted  facts  (Kalantarian,  2019).  To  process 
information  at  a  higher  level  by  means  of 
crowdsourcing,  it  is  proposed  to  involve  specialists. 
For example, in (Yoshida, 2016) hundreds of scientists 
were  recruited  first  to  generate,  and  then  to  assess 
competing health research ideas using a pre-defined set 
of priority-setting criteria. At the same time, there are 
examples  of  using  crowdsourcing  in  artificial 
intelligence projects, most often related to annotation 
of medical data (Wang, 2020).  
Insufficient  attention  is  paid  to  the  composition 
and  structure  of  the  interaction  of  crowdsourcing 
participants. As noted in the review (Créquit, 2018), 
сrowd  workers’  characteristics  and  crowdsourcing 
logistics are poorly reported in the reviewed articles. 
Crowd  workers’  characteristics  are  frequently 
missing:  even  age  and  gender  are  not  reported  for 
about 60% of the studies.  
Among  the  motivating  factors  for  contribution  or 
collaboration  in  medical  crowdsourcing,  various 
researchers  distinguish  recognition,  curiosity,  intrinsic 
satisfaction, or, in some situations, financial incentives 
(McCartney,  2013;  Go,  2015;  Chiauzzi,  2015].  The 
(WHO,  2018)  recommendations  for  underdeveloped 
countries  suggest  such  an  unexpected  mechanism  for 
motivating  crowdsourcing,  as  the  organization  of 
challenge contests for health. However, in general this 
aspect of crowdsourcing remains outside the attention of 
researchers: according to the review (Créquit, 2018), of 
202  studies  motivations  of  crowd  workers  were 
recorded for 5 only. 
The  analysis  performed  allows  us  to  draw  the 
following conclusions. 
The  use  of  communities  in  social  networks  is 
convenient  and  accessible  to  all  segments  of  the 
population, but at the same time it does not guarantee 
the  legitimacy  and  reliability  of  the  interpretation