Effect of Leadership, Safety, Health, and Motivation toward

Employee Performance in PT. Inti Dinamika Logitama in Klaten

Sudaryoto, Istiana Rahatmawati, Agus Haryadi, Risma Fristiyani

Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

Keywords: Leadership, occupational safety, and health, work motivation, employee performance

Abstract: This study aims to examine and analyze the effect of leadership on employee performance, the effect of

occupational safety and health (K3) on employee performance, and the influence of work motivation on

employee performance at PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama, Klaten. The study population was all employees of

PT. Core DinamikaLogitamaKlaten, amounting to 192 people, and 66 respondents were taken using the

proportionate stratified random sampling technique. Data analysis methods include Descriptive Analysis

and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis using SPSS for Windows version 16.0. The results found that: 1)

There is an influence between leadership on employee performance at PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama, Klaten;

2) There is an influence between K3 on employee performance at PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama, Klaten; 3)

There is an influence between work motivation on employee performance at PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama,

Klaten, and 4) There is an influence between leadership, K3, and work motivation on employee

performance together at PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama, Klaten.

1 INTRODUCTION

In the face of current global competition, many

companies are required to be more effective and

efficient in setting goals in the right way to improve

company performance. Increasing global

competition makes many companies compete in

increasing competitiveness that aims to maximize

profits, increase the value and image of the

company, and improve the welfare of its employees.

Employees are important assets to achieve company

goals, and employees should have a maximum

contribution to the company so that the objectives to

be achieved can be achieved. Companies that have

high-performance employees will be greatly

facilitated in achieving these goals, but in reality,

there is still employee performance that is not fully

in line with company expectations.

This study takes the object at PT. Inti Dinamika

Logitama Klaten is a service company that works

with PT. SarihusadaGenerasiMahardhika as a

warehouse for storing raw materials and finished

products. Seeing from the existing problems based

on the results of interviews conducted by one of the

employees found a phenomenon related to

occupational safety and health that has not been

optimal. This phenomenon is indicated by the lack

of awareness and awareness of employees in the use

of Personal Protective Equipment / PPE when doing

work. Other problems that can be seen from work

motivation, the difficulty of employees to get

promotions or promotions, so employees tend to

work carelessly. Seeing the leadership that is less

assertive from the leader of his employees, so there

are still employees who work arbitrarily.

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Leadership

According to Ricky W. Griffin (2003: 68), leaders

are individuals who can influence the behavior of

others without having to rely on violence; leaders

are individuals who are accepted by others as

leaders.

2.2 Occupational Safety and Health

According to Mangkunegara (2015: 161), the term

safety includes both terms, namely safety risk, and

health risk. Safety risks are aspects of the work

Sudaryoto, ., Rahatmawati, I., Haryadi, A. and Fristiyani, R.

Effect of Leadership, Safety, Health, and Motivation toward Employee Performance in PT. Inti Dinamika Logitama in Klaten.

DOI: 10.5220/0009963505490553

In Proceedings of the International Conference of Business, Economy, Entrepreneurship and Management (ICBEEM 2019), pages 549-553

ISBN: 978-989-758-471-8

549

environment (bruises, broken bones, etc.), while

health risks are factors in the work environment that

work beyond a specified period, an environment that

can create emotional stress or physical disturbance.

2.3 Motivation

According to Robbins (2017: 127) states the

definition of motivation as a process that explains

the strength, direction, and perseverance of someone

to achieve goals.

2.4 Performance

According to Prawirosentono (2008), performance is

the work that can be achieved by a person or group

of people in an organization, following their

respective authorities and responsibilities, to achieve

the objectives of the organization concerned legally,

not violating the law and following moral ethics.

Based on the existing theory, the authors formulated

the following hypotheses:

H1: Leadership influence on employee

performance.

H2: Safety and health affect an employee’s

performance.

H3: Work motivation affects an employee’s

performance.

H4: Leadership, Health, Safety, and work

motivation effects together on the employee's

performance.

3 RESEARCH METHOD

The research method uses survey research methods,

with primary and secondary data types. The

instrument test used is the validity test and the

reliability test. The data analysis technique used in

this study uses a Multiple Linear Regression

Analysis. The process of collecting data with

interviews and questionnaires distributed to 66

employees of PT. Inti Dinamika Logitama Klaten

using the slot in the formula:

 







4 RESULTS

4.1 Analysis Description

Primary data that has been successfully collected by

researchers are analyzed to determine the

characteristics of respondents, including position,

gender, age, last education, and length of work at

PT. Inti DinamikaLogitama, Klaten.

Table 1: Characteristics of Respondents by Position

No. Position

Number of

Employees

1 Admin 4

2 Team Leader 5

3 FLD FG 3

4 Admin Scales 4

5 Repack 2

6 WH Spv Admin 1

7 WH Spv FG 3

8 FG Checker 1

9 Admin FG Inventory 1

10 Team Leader Inventory 3

11 Admin Repack 1

12 Cleaning Service 1

13 HR Spv Development 1

14 HR & GA Spv 1

15 HSE Spv 1

16 QC Staff 1

17 HSE 1

18 Helper NC 3

19 Assistant Manager 1

20 Helper PM 2

21 Admin PM 3

Administration Inventory

23 Team Leader 4

24 Admin RM 8

25 WH Spv RM 3

Team Leader System &

KPI

27 FLD RM 1

28 Helper RM 3

Total 66

ICBEEM 2019 - International Conference on Business, Economy, Entrepreneurship and Management

550

Table 2: Characteristics of Respondents by Gender

Gender Amount

Percentage

(%)

Men 64 97.0%

Women 2 3.0%

Total 66 100%

Table 3: Characteristics of Respondents by Age

Age Number ( %)

16 - 25 years 2 3.0%

26 - 35 years 28 42.4%

36 - 45 years 23 34.8%

46 - 55 years 13 19.7%

> 55 years 0 0%

Total 66 100%

Table 4: Characteristics of Respondents Based on Last

Education Number of %

Elementary School 0 0%

Middle School 2 3.0%

Vocational School /

High School

55 83.3%

Diploma 0 0 %

Bachelor 9 13.6%

Total 66 100%

Table 5: Characteristics of Respondents Based on Length

of Working

Length of Working Number of (%)

1-3 years 23 34.8%

Years 14 21.2%

> 6 years 29 43.9%

Total 66 100%

Primary data sources processed, 2019

4.2 Quantitative

Analysis Quantitative analysis is the analysis used to

process data that has been obtained from

respondents. In this case, the statistical analysis used

is multiple linear regression analysis. The regression

equation used is:

Y = a + b1.X1 + b2.X2 + b3.X3 + e

From the data processing using SPSS 16.0 for

windows, the results can be seen in Table 1.6.

Results of Multiple Linear Regression analysis as

follows:

Table 6: Results of Multiple Linear Regression

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t Sign.

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) -0.069 0.372 -0.186 0.853

Leadership 0.210 0.089 0.224 2.375 0,021

Safety and

Health

0.302 0.114 0.272 2.653 0.010

Work

Motivation

0.484 0.108 0.447 4.473 0.000

R Square (R2): 0.652R2: Adjusted 0.635

F Statistics : 38,689 Sign. : 0,000

The primary data source is processed, 2019

Based on Table 1.6, the regression equation can

be obtained, and the estimated results are as follows:

Y = -0.069 + 0.210X1 + 0.302X2 + 0.484X3

Based on these equations can be described as

follows:

Constant value (a) = -0.069

The constant value of the results of the

regression equation of -0.069 means leadership, K3,

and work motivation at PT. The core of Logitama

Dynamics is -0.069 with the assumption that the

leadership, K3, and work motivation variables are in

a constant/constant state.

Leadership regression coefficient variable (X1) =

0,210

The leadership variable has a direct effect on

employee performance of 0.210, which means

providing evidence that the performance of

employees of PT. Core Dynamics Logitama will

immediately increase by 0.210. The significant level

of 0.021 is smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 <ɑ =

0.05). The better the leadership, the more impact, the

higher the performance, and vice versa, the less

good the leadership, the lower the employee's

performance.

Effect of Leadership, Safety, Health, and Motivation toward Employee Performance in PT. Inti Dinamika Logitama in Klaten

551

The regression coefficient of occupational safety

and health variables (X2) = 0.302

Work safety and health variables have a direct

effect on employee performance of 0.302, which

means providing evidence that the performance of

employees of PT. Core Dynamics Logitama will

directly increase by 0.302. The significant level of

0.010 is smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 < ɑ = 0.05).

The better the occupational safety and health will

have an impact on the higher performance, and vice

versa, the less good the occupational safety and

health, the lower the employee performance.

Coefficient of work motivation variable

regression (X3) = 0.484

Work motivation variable has a direct effect on

employee performance of 0.484, which means it

provides evidence that the performance of

employees of PT. Core Dynamics Logitama will

directly increase by 0.484. A significant level of

0,000 is smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 <ɑ = 0.05).

The better work motivation will have an impact on

the higher performance, and vice versa, the less

good work motivation will be the lower the

employee's performance.

4.3 Hypothesis Test 1

In this hypothesis, test H1, H2, and H3 are tested

using the t-test, which is to determine the

significance level of the influence of leadership,

occupational safety and health variables, and work

motivation on employee performance. Testing via

the t-test is to compare the error probability

significantly can tolerate (ɑ = 5%). Based on Table

1.6, it can be seen the calculation results obtained

for:

Leadership variable (X1) has a t-count of 2.375

with a significance level of 0.021 which is smaller

than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 <ɑ = 0.05). These results

indicate that leadership partially influences

employee performance.

Occupational safety and health variables (X2),

have at count of 2.653 with a significance level of

0.010 which is smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 <ɑ =

0.05). These results indicate that occupational safety

and health partially affect employee performance.

Variable work motivation (X3), has a count of

4.473 with a significance level of 0.000 which is

smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig 0,000 <ɑ = 0.05). These

results indicate that work motivation partially

influences employee performance.

Thus H1, H2and H3, which states variables of

leadership, health, and safety, and work motivation

partially influence the performance of employees at

PT. Inti Dinamika Logitamais supported.

4.4 Hypothesis 2

In a test of this hypothesis, H4 was tested using the

F test to calculate the level of significance that

together influence the variables of leadership, health

and safety, and work motivation on employee

performance. Testing through the F test is to

compare the probability of error Fcalculated with a

significance that can be tolerated (ɑ = 5%). Based on

Table 1.6, it can be seen the results of calculations

obtained F count equal to 38.689 with a significance

level of 0.000, which is smaller than ɑ = 0.05 (sig

0.000 <ɑ = 0.05) or so H4 are supported. The

hypothesis means that the variables of leadership,

occupational safety and health, and work motivation

together have a significant effect on employee

performance at PT. Inti Dinamika Logitamais

supported.

Table 1.6 also shows that the coefficient of

determination(R2 Adjusted) amounted to 0.635

means that the influence of variables of leadership,

health and safety, and work motivation on employee

performance amounted to 63.5% while other

variables outside this research influence the

remaining 36.5%.

5 CONCLUSIONS AND

SUGGESTIONS

Based on the results of the discussion analysis, the

following conclusions can be drawn:

Leadership influences the performance of

employees at PT. Core Dynamics Logitama,

Kemudo, Klaten are thus H1 supported.

Occupational Safety and Health (K3) affect the

performance of employees at PT. Core Dynamics

Logitama, Kemudo, Klaten thus H2 supported.

Work motivation affects the performance of

employees at PT. Core Dynamics Logitama,

Kemudo, Klaten thus H3 supported.

Leadership, Occupational Safety and Health

(K3), and work motivation simultaneously influence

the performance of employees at PT. Core

Dynamics Logitama, Kemudo, Klaten thus H4

supported.

Based on the research results and conclusions

obtained, the advice that can be given is that PT. The

essence of Logitama Dynamics in increasing work

motivation can be done by strengthening the kinship

ICBEEM 2019 - International Conference on Business, Economy, Entrepreneurship and Management

552

(Gathering). PT. Core Dynamics Logitama can

improve the performance of its employees by

strengthening family relationships among fellow

employees by holding a "gathering" or regular

monthly meetings to establish the intimacy of the

employees in the company so that it is expected that

from these activities employees will feel more

comfortable when working with colleagues. With

this, employee performance can improve.

REFERENCES

AA Anwar PrabuMangkunegara. 2015. Human Resources

ManagementThe company. 12th print. PT

RemajaRosdaKarya, Bandung.

Dessler, Gary. 2009. Human Resource Management.

Tenth Edition.PT. Indeks. Jakarta.

Elphiana et al., 2017. The Effect of Occupational Safety

and Health on Employee Performance (Study on the

Employees of PT. Pertamina Ep Asset 2 Prabumulih).

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Application of Multivariate

Analysis with SPSS Program. Fifth Matter. Semarang:

Diponegoro University Publisher Agency.

Griffin, Ricky W., 2003. Management. Seventh Edition.

Volume1.Erlangga, Jakarta.

Henry, Simamora, 2011, Human Resource Management,

Edition Three, First Printing, Yogyakarta, STIE

YKPN.

Indriyo G, and Sudita, Nyoman. 1997. Organizational

Behavior. First edition, Yogyakarta, BPFE.

JusufUdaya and Kadarman, AM 2001. Introduction to

Management Science. PT Prenhallindo, Jakarta.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Research Methods for Business

& Economics. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Maesaroh, Siti. 2015. The Effect of Leadership, Work

Motivation and Safety, Health, Safety (K3) on

Employee Performance (Study of Employees of PT.

MasscomGraphy, Semarang). Jurnal

Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 2008. Human Resource

Management, Employee Performance Policy, Tips for

Building a Competitive Organization in the World

Free Trade Era. Second Edition, Yogyakarta, BPFE.

Rahman, Fariz. 2016. The Effect of Leadership,

Motivation, Work Environment, and Work Discipline

on Employee Performance (Study of PT.

IntanPariwara's Employees in Klaten, Central Java).

Thesis UPNV YK.

Robbins, Stephen P, 2017. Organizational Behavior. Issue

16. 5th print. SalembaEmpat, Jakarta.

Siswanti, Yuni, 2016. Achieved Organizational Success

with 'Smart' Managerial Leadership with an Empirical

Research Approach. 2nd printing. Digital Etose.

Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono 2012. Business Research Methods (Quantitative,

Qualitative and R&D Approaches). 16th print.

Alfabeta. Bandung.

Effect of Leadership, Safety, Health, and Motivation toward Employee Performance in PT. Inti Dinamika Logitama in Klaten

553