The Relationship between Motivation and Stress Resistance in
Gymnastic Athletes
Ratna Budiarti
1
, Wisnu Nugroho
1
1
Sport Coaching Study Program, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Motivation, Stress, Gymnastic
Abstract: This study aims to investigate the relationship between motivation and resistance to stress among gymnastics
athletes in Yogyakarta province. This correlational research was conducted with 12 Yogyakarta National
Gymnastics athletes in 2019 with a purposive sampling method. The data analysis used in this study is linear
regression. The results of data analysis showed a significant positive relationship between motivation and
stress resistance with a significance level of 0.000.
1 INTRODUCTION
In sport, an achievement of each athlete means being
capable of showing special performance and reaching
maximum accomplishment. Several factors are
required to reach the maximum peformance namely
physical, technical, tactical, and mental factors. These
factors have their own mutually continuous meaning
and task in reaching a success of the athlete. Rushall
in Komaruddin (2014) explains that some individuals
feel that the process of good performance is 70 to 90%
influenced by mental factor.
Since in the championship sports arena or in other
words competition sport mental fitness can play an
important role to play in better performance, research
in the field of sport psychology can be in the forms of
some questions related to individual and team
behaviors in sports motor activity (Austin et.al, 2005;
Bailey, 1996).
Therefore, psychological factor in sports is one of
the factors that need to be investigated. There are
several psychological indicators that influence sports
achievement. In this study, the focus of the discussion
incudes motivation and resistance to stress.
Most previous studies have demonstrated that a
regulatory fit in motor and cognitive tasks will lead to
performance improvements. However, it remains
unclear which neurobiological mechanism lay behind
this fit-benefit. Higgins and Spiegel (2004) assume
that an increased motivational intensity can translate
into superior goal-performance. Higgins (2000)
postulates that an increased task-enjoyment and an
extended intrinsic motivation may cause this fit-
effect. The notion that stress as a physiological
parameter could also be a potential mediator to
explain the better performances in motivational fit-
situations is also remains a question. The aim of the
present study was to examine if physiological stress
responses, especially the activation of the
sympathetic nervous system (SNS), could explain the
enhanced performance in motivational fit-situations.
Such a relationship between motivational fit and
stress has not been examined yet.
In addition to these emotional disadvantages, the
factors that influence athlete’s performance may also
include stress resistance. Maramis (2005) says how
much the individual’s ability to deal with stress is
what is called tolerance to stress which describes
stress resistance or the threshold value of frustration.
In line with this opinion, Chaplin (2006) states that
tolerance to stress is the ability to bear or withstand
tension and suffer from failure, but without undue
psychological or physiological damage. Having a
tolerance to high stress is certainly very necessary for
someone to be able to survive and adapt well to
stressors. A person with this kind of tolerance will not
experience significant psychological and physical
problems so that he or she can still think and behave
efficiently as usual. Conversely, someone who has
low stress tolerance is not able to adapt to stress well
so he or she experiences distress.
764
Budiarti, R. and Nugroho, W.
The Relationship between Motivation and Stress Resistance in Gymnastic Athletes.
DOI: 10.5220/0009896007640766
In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports
(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 764-766
ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
2 METHOD RESEARCH DESIGN
This is a correlational study.
3 RESEARCH SUBJECT
The research subjects in this study were twelve
National Gymnastics athletes in Yogyakarta province
in 2019. These participants were recruited through
purposive sampling technique.
4 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT AND
DATA COLLECTION
TECHNIQUE
The data were collected using a questionnaire to
measure the level of motivational and stress
resistance. These data were then analysed by using
linear regresion.
5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The hypothesis test in this research was performed by
using linear regression. The explanation about the
result of hypothesis test in this research is presented
in Table 1.
The result of linear regression on the variable of
motivation and stress resistant showed significance of
0.000. Therefore, the hypothesis mentioning that
there is a correlation between motivation and stress
resistance in gymnastic athletes is accepted.
6 DISCUSSION
The result showed that there is an inverse and
significant relationship between motivation and stress
resistance. The first motivational orientation is the
ego-oriented motivation, which consists on valuing
one’s own ability by comparing oneself with other
people, giving priority to the result of one’s behaviour
over effort and execution. On the other hand, the task-
oriented motivation is characterized by assessing the
ability of the individual in a criterial way, prioritizing
effort and execution more than the results obtained.
This notion means that during the sports practice,
personal improvement and a greater mastery of sports
skills is pursued. In their daily life, people interpret
the different situations that they face, defining
success and failure in an individual way as a function
of the predominating motivational orientation that
they adopt. If an individual orientates towards the
task, they will focus on overcoming personal
challenges, putting a special emphasis on effort and
interpreting situations in which they make mistakes
as an important part of a progress. On the other hand,
if the predominant orientation is towards the ego, a
person will focus on bettering the performance of
others and purely demonstrating their ability. As a
result, any mistake is considered as failure as opposed
to being an important part of personal progress.
Aside from the dispositional factors related with
the personal motivational orientation of each
individual, environmental factors also exist such as
the prevailing motivational climate, which promote
the diverse agents involved in the context of physical
activity engagement. Furthermore, the involved
agents, such as the trainers, coaches or physical
education teachers can promote motivational
climates, which are orientated either towards the task
or the ego. A certain climate can emerge over the
other as a function of the characteristics of these
agents. This in turn impulses their athletes or students
to become oriented predominantly towards the ego or
towards the task. As much in the academic context as
in physical activity or sport, motivation constitutes a
fundamental element in all teaching-learning
processes. This can be seen through the fact that
individuals who identify objectives that they seek to
achieve in the form of personal goals, will also
acquire a higher motivation and their learning will be
more efficacious and long-lasting. The motivational
climate is considered as a set of signals, as much
explicit as implicit, such as the use of feedback,
grouping systems, type of evaluation, and task design,
which predispose individuals to achieve success.
Depending on how this set of signals is used,
motivational climates will be created, which are
orientated towards ego and performance, or towards
task and mastery.
In the context of team sports, coaches will create
motivational climates that will affect the motivational
orientation of athletes, generating more frequent task-
oriented motivational climate. This condition not only
strengthens the ethic work, the persistence and the
improvement in the executions, but also strengthens
the social responsibility and the capacity of
cooperation between the members of the group, as
well as increases the interest for learning. The task-
oriented motivational climates protect athletes from
feelings of frustration and demotivation.
Nevertheless, athletes who work in a context related
to ego-oriented climate prevail and tend to have a
greater difficulty maintaining high-perceived
The Relationship between Motivation and Stress Resistance in Gymnastic Athletes
765
competence. This will increase when they overcome
the opponent and demonstrate greater skill than the
rest, but will decline when this objective is not
achieved, thus reducing their interest in carrying out
the activity and decreasing their level of effort.
Following the indications of Cervelló et al.,
(2007); Duda et al., (1992); and Chase (2001),
athletes who work in motivational contexts focused
on the task show behaviours that promote maximum
motivation in physical activity, regardless of the level
of their skill perceptions. This is because athletes
judge their skill level with their own reference
standards and not with the rest of their teammates and
rivals. This goal disposition implies a greater effort
and persistence in the realization of task and
exercises, a lower state-anxiety and a greater level of
enjoyment for the accomplishment of the activities.
However, motivational climates focused on the ego
are characterized by focusing on the adaptive model
of achievement, in which, if athletes perceive high
levels of ability, they will be motivated to persist in
the task. On the contrary, if the perceived ability is
low, a model of little adaptive achievement will be
developed, which implies a reduction of effort, high
state-anxiety, attributions centred on the ability, and
a negative response to failure, decreasing motivation,
and the persistence in the activity.
AM, or the absence of motivation, refers to
athletes who do not believe their actions have an
effect on performance outcomes and has been related
to decreased athletic performance (Gillet & Gobance,
2009; Pelletier, 1995). AM may be a particular
interest due to its correlation with athlete burnout.
Athlete burnout is a condition that is characterized by
physical and emotional exhaustion, reduced personal
accomplishment, and sport devaluation (Raedeke &
Smith, 2001). This construct has been linked to
negative performance consequences and decreased
well-being, and may result in the discontinuation of
sport. Burned-out athletes generally show a shift from
a self-determined involvement in sport to a lesser
degree of self-determination, the extreme of which is
AM.
Past research has also demonstrated that
individuals with high levels of conscientiousness are
more likely to have self-determined motivation. In
support of these claims, conscientiousness
significantly predicted all three facets of AM, as well
as the facet of extrinsic motivation with the highest
level of self-determinism (i.e., identified regulation).
This suggests that high levels of conscientiousness
predicted high levels of self-determined motivation in
our sample, which was expected. Alternatively, high
levels of conscientiousness were predictive of low
levels of AM or the least self-determined type of
motivation. Conscientiousness is related to being task
and goal oriented, which is somewhat contrary to the
learned helplessness observed in AM. These results
could be important when attempting to identify
athletes at risk for burnout. In other words,
conscientiousness may serve as a protective factor for
this condition.
7 CONCLUSION
There is a significant relationship between emotional
maturity and resistance to stress among twelve
National Gymnastics athletes in Yogyakarta
province.
The present study also offers some
recommendations as follows: 1) the need to pay
attention to factors or psychological conditions of
athletes who are trained to always be controlled; 2)
the need for exercises that involve psychological
aspects.
REFERENCES
Bailey, D.M. & Davies, B. (1997) Physiological
implications of altitude training for endurance
performance at sea level: a review. British Journal of
Sports Medicine. Vol 31: 183-190.
Briere, N., Blais, M., Pelletier, L., & Vallerand, R. (1995).
Developpement et Validation d’une Mesure de
Motivation Intrinsèque, Extrinsèque et d’Amotivation
en Contexte Sportif: L’Echelle de Motivation dans les
Sports (EMS). International Journal of Sport
Psychology, 26, 465-489
Chaplin, J.P. 2006. Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Jakarta: PT.
Raja Grafindo Persada
Gillet, N., Berjot, S., & Gobance, L. (2009). A motivational
model of performance in the sport domain. European
Journal of Sport Science, 9, 151-158. doi:
10.1080/17461390902736793
Maramis W.F. Catatan Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa. Surabaya:
Airlangga University Press; 2005. p. 63-9
Raedeke, T. D., & Smith, A. L. (2001). Development and
Preliminary Validation of an Athlete Burnout Measure.
Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 281-306.
Rushall B. (2008) Mental Skill Training for Sport.Sport
Science Associates.
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
766