Analysis of Smart Mobility Readiness in Banjarmasin City

Hendy Indrawan Sunardi, Selo Sulistyo and I Wayan Mustika

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Smart City, Smart Mobility, Readiness, Variable

Abstract:

The concept of smart city has begun to be widely applied in cities in Indonesia. One city that wants to

implement smart city is Banjarmasin. The aim of implementing smart city is to improve public services.

One aspect of fulﬁlling smart cities is smart mobility. Smart mobility in the era is now important because

besides requiring comfort, it also requires speed in terms of public services. The purpose of this study is to

measure the readiness level of Banjarmasin city smart mobility. The results of this study indicate that the city

of Banjarmasin gets a value of 8 with 3 variables in conditional ready conditions,which means that basically

the city of Banjarmasin can be said to be ready in the application of smart mobility, but the conditions for

repairs and procurement in someaspects of intelligent mobility mentioned the above needs to be fulﬁlled.

1 INTRODUCTION

With the development of current technology that very

quickly makes all aspects of life seem to depend on

technology. The community has now used technol-

ogy as a need that cannot be separated from everyday

life. Various technologies are developed including in

the ﬁeld of information technology. Lately in the ﬁeld

of information technology is crowded with the name

Smart City concept. Smart City is a concept of devel-

opment or management of cities with the use of in-

formation technology to connect, monitor and control

various existing resources in the city more effectively

and efﬁciently. Including by increasing the quality of

public services. Various countries have implemented

the Smart City concept to meet public needs. In-

donesia is no exception. One aspect that you want

to build is smart mobility. With the continued in-

crease in the population of vehicles which are causing

a lot of problems for the people, namely trafﬁc jams.

Smart mobility is one solution to overcome this prob-

lem, especially public transportation because travel

time is faster with the integration between transporta-

tion. Referring to the previous explanation, we need

an analysis of how the readiness of smart mobility in

the city of Banjarmasin as an aspect in realizing the

smart city concept.

Be advised that papers in a technically unsuitable

form will be returned for retyping. After returned the

manuscript must be appropriately modiﬁed.

2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

AND THEORY BASIS

2.1 Literature Review

Research related to the analysis of the application of

Smart City in Indonesia is still not widely done. How-

ever, there are several previous studies related to the

application of Smart City, namely research conducted

by Malang Widyagama University lecturers named

Wiwin Purnowati and Ismini(Purnomowati, 2014).

They researched the concept of Smart City and the

development of tourism in Malang city. From the

research it was concluded that the poor city govern-

ment seemed to have prepared human resources and

infrastructure to implement Smart City. But in its

implementation the Malang city government has not

implemented the Smart City concept as a whole, as

in the Tourism sector. Other research is carried out

by FajarP. Pongsapan, Yaulie D.Y. Rindengan, and

Xaverius B.N. Najoan (Pongsapan et al., 2014). They

examined the architecture of Smart City’s information

and communication technology network design in the

city of Manado. From the research it was concluded

that the selection of device speciﬁcations used must

be considered in order to produce the network qual-

ity expected in the application of Smart City in the

city of Manado. Furthermore, research on smart mo-

bility in Indonesia has also begun. Several research

papers on smart mobility in Indonesia, namely: Al-

fariani Pratiwi, Soedwiwahjono, and Ana Hardiana

158

Sunardi, H., Sulistyo, S. and Mustika, I.

Analysis of Smart Mobility Readiness in Banjarmasin City.

DOI: 10.5220/0009866401580162

In Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism and Information Management (ICCETIM 2019) - Creativity and Innovation Developments for Global

Competitiveness and Sustainability, pages 158-162

ISBN: 978-989-758-451-0

(Pratiwi et al., 2015) conducted research on the avail-

ability of smart mobility in the city of Surakarta. The

conclusions from their research were Surakarta city is

still classiﬁed as a conditional ready category which

means it can be prepared to implement smart mobil-

ity with terms of repairs and additions in several as-

pects to support smart mobility. By looking at previ-

ous studies it can be taken a hypothesis that the readi-

ness of the city of Banjarmasin in aspects of smart

mobility, especially in terms of infrastructure is still

lacking. To implement the Smart City concept in a re-

gion / city, good human resources and infrastructure

are needed so that its realization can run smoothly and

if there are obstacles, it can be resolved quickly and

precisely.

2.2 Theoretical Foundation

2.2.1 Smart City

A city is deﬁned as a ’SMART’ city when human in-

vestment, conditions and social risks of society, cap-

ital / ﬁnance, energy resources, transportation, etc.,

are managed wisely, modernly, participatively and

sustainably integrated to ensure a better quality of

life (Caragliu et al., 2011). Another source quoted

from smartcityindonesia.org (smartcityindonesia.org,

2015) gave an explanation of Smart City, which is a

city that is said to be Smart if the city really knows the

state of the city in it, understands the problem more

deeply, and is able to take action on these problems.

Whereas in the book Introduction and Development

of Smart City (Supangkat et al., 2015), smart cities

are deﬁned as a concept of developing and manag-

ing cities by utilizing Information and Communica-

tion Technology (ICT) to more effectively connect,

monitor and control various existing resources in the

city and efﬁcient to maximize service to its citizens

and support sustainable development. So that it can

be concluded that Smart city is a development, imple-

mentation, and implementation of digital technology

(ICT) that is applied to a region / city with the aim of

improving service quality in the region and increas-

ing interaction between the government in the region

/ city and its citizens.

2.2.2 Smart Mobility

One indicator of smart city is smart mobility, which

is a movement system that enables the fulﬁllment of

needs with minimal movements as quickly as possi-

ble. As for indicators ofsmart mobility, according

to Boyd Cohen, there are three, namely Mixed cap-

ital access, Prioritized clean and non-motorized op-

tions, and integrated ICT.The essence of the move-

ment to fulﬁll needs is accessibility and mobility, a

good movement system is a system with a high level

of accessibility and with high mobility. But the level

of accessibility and high mobility alone is not enough

to say an intelligent movement system, an intelligent

movement system is a movement system that mini-

mizes the movement itself.By taking the red thread

from the explanation above, smartmobility can be in-

terpreted as a city with a movement system that allows

achieving goals with as little movement as possible

(less mobility), move freely, and less travel time.

2.2.3 Smart Mobility Indicator

(Gifﬁnger and Pichler-Milanovi

c, 2007)(Cohen,

2012) use the smart mobility indicator as follows:

1. Local Accessibility: The level of readiness of

local accessibility is seen from several aspects,

namely, public transportation networks, the level

of satisfaction with access and the quality of pub-

lic transportation.

2. Multimodal Access: The level of multi-mode ac-

cess readiness is seen from the presence of modes

integrated between land, rail and air.

3. International Accessibility: The level of interna-

tional accessibility readiness is seen from access

to the airport from within the city of Banjarmasin.

4. Information Technology and Mobility Support

Communication: The level of readiness of infor-

mation technology infrastructure and supporting

mobility communication consists of two aspects,

namely the availability of smart card systems and

their revenues and the availability of real time in-

formation.

5. Sustainable and safe transportation: The level of

sustainable and safe transportation readiness con-

sists of two aspects, namely aspects of green mo-

bility and trafﬁc safety.

3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The research approach in this research is deduc-

tive or commonly called general-speciﬁc, namely re-

searchers test research questions derived from theory.

The theory is ﬁrst explained explicitly and then can

be continued to test the research question. The data

analysis technique used in this study is the scoring

analysis technique. The data contained in this study

are nominal data that are qualitative in nature, which

are then converted into quantitative data by means of

scoring. To get the ﬁndings done by comparing the

results of scoring with the theory and conditions in

Analysis of Smart Mobility Readiness in Banjarmasin City

159

the city of Banjarmasin. The analysis techniques car-

ried out include: (1) readiness scoring analysis of the

parameters of each variable; (2) City Readiness Anal-

ysis of Smart Mobility. The data collection method

for this research is literature study for qualitative data

and questionnaire spreads for quantitative data. Qual-

itative data is taken from papers or articles related to

smart mobility. Quantitative data is done speciﬁcally

to get results on the parameters of public transporta-

tion satisfaction. To get quantitative data, a survey

was carried out on 100 city transportation users in

Banjarmasin with 15 questions related to city trans-

portation services. The method used to get the param-

eters of public transportation satisfaction is the cus-

tomer satisfaction index (Customer Satisfaction In-

dex) [9] which is an index to measure the level of

customer satisfaction based on certain attributes.

4 RESULTS

Figure 1: Local Accessibility Readiness Levels.

Figure 1 : In the parameters of the Public Trans-

portation Network and the access authority & quality

of transportation in Banjarmasin City gets a value of

6 with an average value of 2 which means it is ready

to be conditional. This is because the city of Banjar-

masin has public transportation in the form of public

transportation, small buses, public taxis, base motor-

bikes, and online motorcycle taxis.

Figure 2: Multimoda Access.

Figure 2: In the multi-modal access parameter,

Banjarmasin City gets a value of 2, which means it

is ready for conditional. This is because the city of

Banjarmasin has an integration of public transport be-

tween planes and taxis but there is no train yet.

Figure 3: International Accessibility.

Figure 3: In the parameters of international acces-

sibility readiness the city of Banjarmasin gets a value

of 2, which means it’s ready for conditional. This

is because access to the airport can only use taxis or

private vehicles such as cars and motorbikes because

there are no trains.

Figure 4: ICT.

Figure 4 : In the parameters of the smart card and

realtime information the city of Banjarmasin gets a

total value of 2 which means it is not ready. This is

because there is no smart card or real time information

available in Banjarmasin city.

Figure 5: Local Accessibility Readiness Levels.

Figure 5 : In the parameters of green mobility

and trafﬁc safety the city of Banjarmasin gets a value

of 1 and 2. In the city of Banjarmasin there are al-

ready pedestrians for pedestrians but there is no spe-

cial track for bicycles. This is because the roads are

already very narrow and small.

ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management

160

Figure 6: Sustainable and safe transportation.

Figure 6 : Based on the results of the research of

the 5 variables above, the total value of Banjarmasin

city is 8 with 3 variables to determine the readiness

of smart mobilty in the category of conditional readi-

ness. So the readiness of the city of Banjarmasin in

smart mobility is in a condition of conditional readi-

ness.

Smart Mobility comparison in some cities based

on qualitative data collected from varioussources such

as the ofﬁcial city government website and national

articles :

1. Jakarta

Figure 7: Smart Mobility Readiness Levels.

Figure 7 : Based on the smart city literature study,

the city of Jakarta gets a total value of 14 of the

5 measured variables which means that the city of

Jakarta is in the category of being ready for the

application of smart mobility.

2. Surakarta

Figure 8 : Based on the Surakarta city smart city

literature study get a total value of 9 out of 5

variables that are measured which means that the

city of Surakarta is in the category of conditional

Figure 8: Smart Mobility Readiness Levels.

readiness in the application of smart mobility. In-

formation : The total value for the Ready cate-

gory: 3 or more variables are in a ready condition

The total value to be categorized as Ready Ready:

3 or more variables are in a condition ready for

conditional The total value for entering the cate-

gory is not ready: 3 or more variables are in an

unprepared condition

5 CONCLUSION

Based on the aforementioned characteristics regard-

ing each aspect of smart mobility in Banjarmasin City,

the scoring analysis of the level of readiness for the

application of smart mobility in the city of Banjar-

masin received a value of 8 with 3 variables in condi-

tional conditions, which meant that Banjarmasin City

was basically ready to implement smart mobility, but

the conditions for repairs and procurement in some

aspects of the intelligent mobility mentioned above

need to be met.

REFERENCES

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., and Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart

cities in europe. Journal of urban technology,

18(2):65–82.

Cohen, B. (2012). The top 10 smart cities on the planet. Co.

Exist, 11.

Gifﬁnger, R. and Pichler-Milanovi

c, N. (2007). Smart

cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities.

Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of

Technology.

Pongsapan, F. P., Rindengan, Y. D., and Najoan, X. B.

(2014). Desain arsitektur jaringan teknologi informasi

dan komunikasi untuk manado smart city; studi kasus

pemerintah kota manado. Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan

Komputer, 3(3):31–31.

Analysis of Smart Mobility Readiness in Banjarmasin City

161

Pratiwi, A., Soedwiwahjono, S., and Hardiana, A. (2015).

Tingkat kesiapan kota surakarta terhadap dimensi mo-

bilitas cerdas (smart mobility) sebagai bagian dari

konsep kota cerdas (smart city). Region: Jurnal

Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perencanaan Partisipatif,

6(2):34–41.

Purnomowati, W. (2014). Konsep smart city dan pengem-

bangan pariwisata di kota malang. Jurnal JIBEKA, 8.

smartcityindonesia.org (2015). Deﬁnisi smart city.

Supangkat, S., Arman, A., Nugarah, I., et al. (2015). Pen-

genalan dan pengembangan smart city. Bandung: e-

Indonesia Initiatives Institut Teknologi Bandung.

ICCETIM 2019 - International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism Information Management

162