Evaluation of National Training Management (Puslatda)

Special Region of Yogyakarta

Lismadiana

, Agung Nugroho

, Ria Lumintarso

Faculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keyword: Evaluation, Puslatda Management, KONI Special Region of Yogyakarta.

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the management of Yogyakarta Special Region training

center by using the CIPP (Contexs, Input, Process, and Product) evaluation model.This research is an

evaluation research. The subjects of this study were 50 people who were the management, trainers, and

athletes of Yogyakarta's Puslatda. The data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires,

and documentation. The data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis. The

results showed that the evaluation of the management of Puslatda in DIY in terms of contexts had been

going well. In terms of inputs related to facilities and infrastructure is still lacking. In terms of input, there

are trainers, athletes and parental support as expected. In terms of the process, it has been going well

because the implementation of the training program and monitoring and evaluation which has been carried

out in accordance with the provisions and the implementation of the training program. In terms of product,

generally, the achievements show a good result.

1 INTRODUCTION

Sports achievements are something that is visible

and measurable, meaning that sport coaching is

carried out with a scientific approach starting from

scouting talent to the coaching process. Sports

training must start from an early childhood so that

one’sbody and mind can be developed progressively

and systematically. This must be done with program

planning and management that is truly mature and

does not only for short periods of time (Dikdik, 2008

: 30).

Sports achievements are the culmination of

sports coaching. In an effort to reach the peak of

achievement, it requires a continuous coaching

model or a coaching pyramid model. In theory, the

coaching model is a systematic, tiered and

continuous coaching process. This pattern of sports

coaching must be understood as a whole perspective

in understanding programs that include massive

actions, nurseries and achievement coaching

programs. According to KONI (2012: 42) to fain an

achievement, the sports coaching system of the

Office of the Ministry of Youth and Sports should be

arranged in a set of government policies in the field

of sports, the process of sports coaching towards

optimal achievement.

Structuring a national sports coaching system

includes a system of massive actions, nurturing,

scouting and developing talented athletes. One of the

supporting factors to achieve maximum sports

achievement is from the coaching and development

of the sport itself, because to achieve optimum sport

achievements could affect competition results both

in a national and international scope. Development

of sport achievements was carried out and directed

to achieve sports achievements at the regional,

national and international levels. Coaching is carried

out by the parent organization of sports both at the

regional and national levels. Coaching is also carried

out by empowering sports associations, fostering

national and regional sport coaching centers and

continuously holding competitions with certain

stages (Law No. 3/2005).

The long-term achievement sport coaching

system that illustrates the synergy of coaching

between the Ministry of National Education and

sports organizations can be described systematically,

with a continuous and progressive coaching stage,

interrelated, as shown in the following figure:

724

Lismadiana, ., Nugroho, A. and Lumintarso, R.

Evaluation of National Training Management (Puslatda) Special Region of Yogyakarta.

DOI: 10.5220/0009802107240729

In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports

(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 724-729

ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2

Pemb

Prestasi

Pemb

Prestasi

Pemb

Pem bibit-

Pemb

Pem bibitan

Pembinaan

Pemassalan

Pembinaan

Pemassalan

TALENT SCO UTING

KONI

Depdikbud

Figure 1: Proyek Garuda Emas (1997-2007:28)

The main problem in the sports coaching system

is lack of seriousness of sport coaching itself.

Medals must be considered as a logical consequence

of sports organized and integrated in an established

system, even though the quality and quantity of

trophies or medals obtained could be an indicator of

sport progress and an indicator of the nation’s

character or mentality. The purpose of sport is not

only to win a trophy or medal, but to build the

nation's character and mentality (Alisjahbana, 2008)

There are four government programs that will be

implemented in the national sports agenda, namely

the Sports Development Program and Harmony

Policy; the Sports Correctional and Physical Fitness

Program; Talent Guidance and Sports Nursing

Programs; and Sports Performance Improvement

Program. The development programs are carried out

frequently, systematically and are integrated for all

levels of society throughout the country by adjusting

the nation's geographical and cultural conditions.

The programs should also involve all national’s

potential and strength so that a family, community,

and nation that has sports ability can be realized.The

programs can ultimately improve the quality of life

and sporting achievements at the national, regional

and international levels (Law No. 25/2000).

Success in coaching is of course achieved

through a series of efforts and performance from

management and the training process which are

carried out together in a programmed and tiered

manner. KONI DIY started the initial stage of

preparation for XX National Sports Week (PON) in

Papua in 2020. This stage was carried out by

administering a regional training center (Puslatda)

involving 168 athletes and 57 trainers from 26

sports. This Puslatda is utilized to prepare the

athletes as candidates for DIY representatives in the

event.

The management evaluation of the local training

center can also be utilized to improve the

management process for coaching athletes who have

not implemented systematic, sustainable and

sustainable management.

2 CIPP EVALUATION

The CIPP concept evaluates the CIPP model

(context, input, process and product) offered by

Stufflebeam whobelieves that the important purpose

of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.

Evaluation of the CIPP model can be applied in

various fields such as education, management,

companies as well as in various levels of projects,

programs and institutions (Eko, 2014: 181).

In terms of Stufflebeam's CIPP evaluation

model, a very useful approach to educational

evaluation is known as the CIPP, or Context, Input,

Process, Product approach. Basically, the CIPP

evaluation model requires that a series of questions

be asked about the four different elements of the

model in context, input, process, and product

(Tiantong & Tongchin, 2013: 159). 

The CIPP evaluation model belongs to the

improvement/accountability category, and is one of

the most widely applied evaluation models (Zhang,

Guili, et al, 2011: 59). CIPP evaluation is included

in the category of improvement/accountability, and

has been one of the most widely used evaluation

models. Classifying the evaluation model based on

its purpose, the CIPP evaluation includes a

management analysis model that aims to evaluate a

manager's decisions/policies. The CIPP evaluation

model is carried out comprehensively to understand

program activities ranging from the emergence of

program ideas to the results achieved upon the

program completion.

The CIPP evaluation model is carried out

systematically to evaluate whether the program has

been implemented with the correct steps. Context

evaluation is carried out to review the considerations

that underlie a proposed program so that it could

identify whether the proposed program is

appropriate to the athletes’ needs and whether the

objectives of the program address the needs. Input

evaluations are conducted to learn whether program

design has considered available resources. Process

evaluation is carried out to learn whether the

program implementation follows the plan. Product

evaluation (product) is carried out to determine

whether the program objectives have been achieved

well (Mulyatiningsih, 2012: 124).

Evaluation of National Training Management (Puslatda) Special Region of Yogyakarta

725

3 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Evaluation Model

The evaluation model that will be used in this

research is the CIPP Model because the CIPP Model

is a complex evaluation that includes Context, Input,

Process, and Product. The CIPP model is seen as a

very comprehensive evaluation model. Based on the

various evaluation models available, the CIPP model

is an evaluation model that functions to see whether

the program has been running as desired and

produce products as planned. In the CIPP model, the

evaluators do not usually relate directly to the

program to be evaluated, but they can work with one

of the people in the program. In addition, evaluators

must be able to work together with people who work

as staff in the implementation of the program. This

needs to be done so that the evaluators can

determine and obtain all information and also draw

data interpretation that will be considered for

decision making. The CIPP model will have

maximum implementation if there is good

collaboration between the program evaluator and the

executors.

3.2 Research Participants

Population is a generalization area consisting of

objects/subjects that have certain qualities and

characteristics determined by researchers to be

studied. The population of this research comprises

Puslatda athletes, trainers, DIY KONI

administrators. The subjects of this study were

KONI DIY Management, athletes and Puslatda

trainers. 

3.3 Research Instruments

In this study, the instruments used were

questionnaires, interview guidelines, observation

sheets and documents.

3.4 Data Analysis

The data analysis technique used in this evaluation

research is quantitative and qualitative descriptive

analysis. It was conducted by describing and

interpreting data from each evaluated component in

both quantitative and qualitative data. Data from the

questionnaires were analyzed quantitatively and data

from the interviews will be analyzed qualitatively.

3.5 Success Criteria

Based on the data, the successful criteria will be

determined through a Likert scale. The basic

principle of a Likert scale is to determine the

location of one's position on a continuum of attitudes

toward the object of attitude, ranging from very

negative to very positive. To determine someone's

responses, the researchers calculate and quantify

respondents’ answer on the item

questions/statements provided. With a Likert scale,

the variables to be measured are translated into

indicator variables. Then the indicator is used as a

starting point to compile the instrument items in the

form of questions/statements.

4 RESULT

The results of the study will be discussed in detail

from the used evaluation model. In this case, what

will be done is to explain the quantitative and

qualitative analysis of the data from all aspects used

in the study and all the factors that support to

produce the actual research data. The results of the

data analysis are summarised as follows.

Table 1: The results of the data analysis

Aspects Achievement

Input Category Mean Note

Coach Good 3.175 Good Input

Athlete Good 3.165 Good Input

Sarana Dan

Prasarana

Kurang 3. 077

Sarana Dan

Prasarana Masih

Kuran



Pendanaan Baik 3,176 Sudah Baik

Dukungan

Oran

tua

Baik 3.270

Dukungan Yang

Positif Dari Oran

4.1 Contexts Evaluation

In this case there are several aspects used in

evaluating contexts. Based on the results of

interviews/qualitative data, it can be explained that

the management of DIY Puslatda has been going

well according to the existing background and

objectives.



YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS

2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)

726

Table 2: Evaluation Results on Contexs

ects Achievement

Contexs Cate

 Mean Note

Background of

Puslatda Programs

 3.263

Developed

as Puslatda

Objectives of

Puslatda

rams

 3.261

Achieved

olas

Management

Program of

Puslatda

 3.258

Arranged as

the athletes’

needs

4.2 Input Evaluation

Based on the results of interviews/qualitative data

from several respondents, it can be concluded that

the role of administrators, trainers, athletes and

parents is very important in developing and

improving all aspects of KONI DIY Puslatda

management. The management of KONI DIY in the

procurement of facilities and infrastructure as well

as funding issues must be in accordance with the

needs of the training center. The trainers should also

be able to carry out his obligations as a mentor for

the athletes they coach. Parents should also

motivate his children to continue to practice and to

improve their abilities and get their best

achievement.

Table 3: Evaluation Result on Input

Aspects Achievement

Input Categor

Mean Note

Coach Goo

 3.175 Good Input

Athlete Goo

 3.165 Good In

Sarana Dan

Prasarana

Kurang 3. 077

Sarana Dan

Prasarana

Masih Kuran

Pendanaan Bai

 3,176 Sudah Bai

Dukungan

Orangtua

Baik 3.270

Dukungan

Yang Positif

Dari Orangtua

Based on the results of the interview and the

input evaluation above, it can be concluded that all

aspects revealed have been implemented well,

except for facilities and infrastructure.

4.3 Process Evaluation

The process in this evaluation includes aspects of the

training programs, the training program and

monitoring and evaluation (monitoring and

evaluation). The exercise program has been going

well. Coaching and monitoring and evaluation

programs (monitoring and evaluation) run well by

scheduling monitoring and evaluation to every kind

of sports. The results of the evaluation on the DIY

Puslatda management comprise several aspects of

processes, namely (1) training ground, (2) training

schedule, (3) giving allowance, (4) facilities and

infrastructure, (5) field rental, (6) training

constraints, (7) implementation of coaching, (8)

planning and implementation of training programs,

(9) competitions/try outs that are joined before PON.

Table 4: Evaluation Results on Process

Aspects Achievement

Process Categor

Mean Note

Training

rams

Good 3.296

Good

lementation

Puslatda

rams

Good 3.267

Good

lementation

Monev

(Monitoring

Evaluation)

Good 3,169

Comprehensive

monitoring and

evaluation

4.4 Product Evaluation

Product evaluation discusses the achievements of

athletes, both from the local level to the national

level. Achievement is a measure of the success in a

coaching program that has been carried out by each

sport event. It is often implied that the more

achievements are achieved, the better the coaching

program. Achievement also marks a pride for all

stakeholders connected to and support the athletes

and the sport events.



Table 5: Evaluation Results on Product

Aspect Achievement

Product Categor

Mean Note

Achievem

ent

Good 3.187

Good Athletes’

Achievement

Evaluation on the DIY Puslatda management is

needed so that the targeted achievements can be

better. The KONI DIY management should have a

good guiding management reference. It aims to be a

benchmark of success in achieving the champion's

target. Benchmark of success that can be used as a

reference for achievement is Jakarta because it can

retain the champion at the competition.



Evaluation of National Training Management (Puslatda) Special Region of Yogyakarta

727

5 DISCUSSION

The discussion here involves a summary of the

overall analysis and evaluation results in contexts,

inputs, processes and products in all the results as

benchmarks to improve performance of Puslatda

management.

5.1 Context Evaluation

Based on the results above, contex evaluation shows

that Puslatda management must have clear

objectives so that each indicator can work according

to the established procedures. Context evaluation

presents data about the reasons for setting program

goals and priority goals. According to Borg & Gall

(2004: 89), "context evaluation involves the

identification of problems and needs that occur in a

specific educational setting, which provides an

essential basis for developing objectives whose

achievement results in program improvement".

Contextual evaluation involves identifying problems

and needs in special education settings, which could

provide an important basis for developing goals that

excel in improving the programs.

5.2 Input Evaluation

Input evaluation is the initial ability of a situation to

support a program. Input evaluation explains aspects

related to the problems encountered by coaches,

athletes, facilities and infrastructure, funding and

parental support. Achievements can be achieved

through the relationship of all the indicators that

exist in a coaching program. Stufflebeam

(Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen, 2004: 89)

explained that: "Input evaluations, to serve

structuring decisions: after defining needs and

considering organizational assets and potential

interventions, using input evaluation help managers

to select a particular strategy to implement and to

resolve the problem and make decisions about how

to implement it". Input evaluation is an activity to

analyze resources, in this case athletes,

coaches,funds, facilities and infrastructure needed to

achieve the program objectives.

5.3 Process Evaluation

Process evaluation serves as material to implement a

decision, in this case whether or not the

implementation of a program follows the determined

process. Process evaluation explains about how the

training program is implemented and how it is

monitored and evaluated. The implementation of a

puslatda program belongs to a process to achieve its

objectives and this program serves as a reference

material for the coaching program that has been

prepared, so that it can determine how far the

Puslatda program goes.

As explained by Suharsimi & Cepi (2009: 47),

the process evaluation is directed at the extent to

which the activities within the program is carried out

based on the plan. Stufflebeam (Fitzpatrick, Sanders

& Worthen, 2004: 89) proposes that: “Process

evaluation, to serve implementing decisions: once

the programs has begun, the important decisions

concern how to modify its implementation. Key

evaluation questions are: is the program being

implemented as planned? What change have been

made? What barriers threaten its success? What

revisions are needed? As these questions are

answered, procedures can be monitored, adapted,

and refined”.

5.4 Product Evaluation

Product evaluation explains about the results that

have been achieved from a coaching program. Every

sport event has gained excellent achievements. Such

achievements cannot be easily achieved, but it

requires athletes’ hard work, guidance of qualified

coaches, and government support for progress and

mutual pride. In this case, Borg & Gall (2004: 89)

explain that: “Product evaluation involves

determining the extent to which the goals of the

program have been achieved. In this type of

evaluation, measures of the goals are developed and

administered, and the resulting data are used to

make decisions about continuing or modifying the

program”.

6 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the discussion pertaining to data analysis

and evaluation on KONI DIY Puslatda management,

the conclusions are presented as follows. 1) Overall

evaluation according to the CIPP management

model at Yogyakarta Special Region training center

demonstrated that it has been carried out well,

proven by accessible funding, good training

programs and good monitoring and evaluation; 2)

Evaluation of Puslatda management in terms of

existing contexts has been carried out well and the

evaluation of all aspects showed the positive results;

3) Evaluation of Puslatda management in terms of

input, analysis and evaluation of Puslatda

YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS

2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)

728

management in DIY showed the lack of facilities

and infrastructure; 4) Evaluation of the achievement

training program showed that the process undertaken

by the DIY Puslatda has been carried out based on

procedures. Training, monitoring and evaluation

programs have been well implemented, and it

implies that the programs set by the Puslatda

management has been optimally carried out; 5)

Evaluation of achievement training programs in

terms of products showed good achievements at the

national and international levels for several sport

events.

7 SUGGESTION

Based on the results of the KONI DIY puslatda

management evaluation, some suggestions/

recommendations are presented as follows.1)The

Regional Government, in this case KONI DIY, must

provide a more maximum contribution, especially in

terms of providing funding, infrastructure, and

facilities for achieving the expected results; 2)

Managers and trainers in sports must improve the

implementation of the Puslatda program and

improve its performance; 3) Recruitment of Puslatda

athletes must be carried out in accordance with the

established procedures; 4) The relationship between

administrators, coaches, athletes and parents of

KONI DIY puslatda can be better established so

they can work together to progress training and

achievement at a higher level.

REFERENCES

Bompa, T.O. (2009). Theory and methodology of training

ed). Champaign, II: Human Kinetics.

Dean, T.S. (2008). Program evaluation in practice. United

States of America: Jossey-Bass.

Denzin, N.K., & Yvonna S.L. (2000). Handbook of

Qualitative Research (2

ed). London: Sage

Publication, Inc, International Educational and

Professional Publisher.

Donald, B.Y., Lyn, M.S., Rodney, K.H., & Flora, A.C.

(2011). The program evaluation standards. United

State of America: SAGE publications.

Eko Putro Widoyoko. (2014). Evaluasi program

pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Endang Mulyatiningsih. (2012). Riset terapan bidang

pendidikan & teknik. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.

Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen, B.R. (2004).

Program Evaluation alternative approaches and

practical guidelines (3rd ed). Boston: Pearson

Education, Inc.

Harsuki. (2012). Pengantar manajemen olahraga. Jakarta:

PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hogan, R.L. (2007). Online journal of workforce

educational and development: The historical

development of program evaluation: Exploring the

past and present. Volume II, Isuue 4.

Husnaini Usman. (2008). Manajemen: Teori, Praktek, dan

Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Julitriarsa, D. (2001). Manajemen umum sebuah

pengantar. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta

Lunenburg, F.C., & Omstein, A.C. (2000). Educational

administration: concepts and practices (3

ed).

Belmont: Thompson Learning.

McDavid, J.C., & Laura R.I Hawthorn. (2006). Program

evaluation & performance measurement. Thousand

Oaks. London. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Parkhouse, B.L. (2001). The management of sport its

foundation and aplication. United States:

McGraw-Hill.

Pedersen, P.M., Janet, B., Jerome Q., & Lucie, T. (2011).

Contemporary sport management (4

ed). United

States: Human Kinetics.

Proyek Garuda emas 2007. Rencana Induk Pengembangan

Olahraga Prestasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: KONI.

Republik Indonesia. (2000). Undang-undang RI nomor 25,

tahun 2000, tentang Pembangunan olahraga nasional.

. (2005). Undang-Undang

RI Nomor 3, Tahun 2005, tentang Sistem

Keolahragaan Nasional.

Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003). The CIPP Model evaluation.

Presented at the 2003 Annual conference of the oregon

program evaluators network (OPEN).

Terry, G.R., & Rue, L.W. (2010). Dasar-dasar

manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Tiantong, M., & Tongchin, P. (2013). A Multiple

Intelligences Supported Web-based Collaborative

Learning Model Using Stufflebeam’s CIPP Evaluation

Model. International Journal of Humanities and Social

Science. Vol. 3. Hal: 159.

Zhang, G., dkk. (2011). Using the context, input, process

and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a

comprehensive frame work to guide the planning,

implementation, and assessment of service-learning

programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and

Engagement, Vol. 15, No. 4, Hal. 57.

Evaluation of National Training Management (Puslatda) Special Region of Yogyakarta

729