Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation,
and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Maretta Ginting
1
, Hasan Basri Tarmizi
2
, Endang Sulistya Rini
1
, Yeni Absah
1
1
Department of Management, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jl. Prof. T.M Hanafiah, SH, Kampus USU, Medan, Indonesia
2
Department of Regional Planning Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jl. Prof. T.M Hanafiah, SH, Kampus USU, Medan,
Indonesia
Keywords: Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Horticultural
Product. Resource-based Theory.
Abstract: Competitiveness of Indonesian agricultural commodity products requires more attention from stakeholders.
The problems faced by farmers and traders of horticulture products are still low competitiveness. Horticultural
products have been unable to compete with agricultural products from ASEAN countries such as Thailand
and Malaysia. In a competitive marketplace, social approaches and social attributes and sustainability levels
of competitive advantages are, among others, explained through the RBT-resource-based theory of the firm's
approach. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of several constructs such as social capital,
business environment, product innovation towards sustainable competitive advantage. The present study used
a quantitative approach based on structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. The number of samples was
500 farmers from Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia. The empirical evidence indicates that social
capital has an insignificant effect on product innovation. The business environment has a significant effect on
product innovation. Social capital has an insignificant effect on sustainable competitive advantage. The
business environment has a significant effect on sustainable competitive advantage. The product innovation
has a significant effect on sustainable competitive advantage. The business environment has a significant
effect on the sustainable competitive advantage of horticultural products through product innovation. Social
capital has an insignificant effect on the sustainable competitive advantage of horticultural products through
product innovation. The ability to adopt technology should be in line with the ability to respond to the
movement of market behavior. Therefore, the role of farmers is expected to be more proactive in observing
the direction of changes in the horticultural product market behavior. Export market access is required and
standardize product according to market demand. Therefore, learning is needed to empower farmers to
achieve a target market that has broad coverage.
1 INTRODUCTION
Competitiveness of Indonesian agricultural
commodity products requires more attention from
stakeholders. Facts indicate an effort to improve the
competitiveness of Indonesian agricultural products
which has been underestimated in the mind and
creativity aspects which are the primary capital to
increase competitive advantage. (Haryono, 2013). It
is possible that Karo district has the highest
agricultural potential of all provinces in Indonesia.
The majority of people work as professional farmers.
Working as a farmer has a purpose other than
fulfilling daily living needs, the results of their
farming commodities have been marketed to other
areas.
In the highlands of Karo's land has the beauty of
mountain nature with the coolness of the air and it has
a characteristic of fruit and vegetable area. Among the
area's horticultural products there are some products
that most contribute to farmers in Karo District. The
results of the horticulture products are 324,200 tons
of orange, 92,551 tons of cabbage, 42,089 tons of
carrots, 7,000 tons of coffee, and 4,829 tons of
passion fruit. (With Data Statistic, 2017).
The problems faced by farmers and traders of
horticulture products are still low competitiveness.
Horticultural products have not been able to compete
Ginting, M., Tarmizi, H., Rini, E. and Absah, Y.
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0009200301370150
In Proceedings of the 2nd Economics and Business International Conference (EBIC 2019) - Economics and Business in Industrial Revolution 4.0, pages 137-150
ISBN: 978-989-758-498-5
Copyright
c
2021 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
137
with agricultural products from ASEAN countries
such as Thailand and Malaysia.Zimmere and
Scarborough (2005) believe that in order to win the
competition, it is necessary to build a sustainable
competitive advantage for all product outcomes.
Sustainable competitiveness is interpreted as a value
that the company can create for consumers. This
sustainable competitive advantage is also seen from
the suitability and accuracy of providing products in
the market and responds to consumer complaints such
as product quality, consumer needs, new market share
and continuous product innovation (Aditya, 2004).
Syahyuti (2008) believes that social capital is
proven to grow and accumulate over time and
significantly affect the performance of the
agricultural commodities trading system. Suriatna
and Ardianti (2013) in their paperwork state that there
is a link between social capital and product
innovation and all indicators of the two variables are
interconnected. Other scholars such as Muin (2013)
have investigated business capabilities, social capital
and its implications for the performance of SMEs in
the industrial sector in South Sulawesi. The empirical
results indicate that social capital has a positive and
significant effect on the performance of small
microenterprises in South Sulawesi. Furthermore,
Rapih (2015) recognizes social capital variables have
a positive and significant effect on SMEs'
performance where performance measurement is seen
by profit growth, customer growth, sales volume
growth, and asset growth. Wambugu et al. (2009)
found empirical evidence of social capital has a
positive influence on the performance of small
organizations, including marketing performance.
The success of an industry depends on industrial
relations with its environment (Porter, 1981). Amit
and Schoemaker (1993) also believe the organization
should be able to adapt to the environment because of
rapidly changing environmental and technological
advances to achieve competitive advantage. Luo,
Yadong (1999) mentions the impact of the dynamics
of a competitive environment has influenced
innovative, courageous risk-taking, and corporate
activity. In the ever-changing environment, Slater &
Narver (1997) recognizes the determination by
creativity and innovation to enable it to capture
customer satisfaction over competitors (Dicky,
2002). Furthermore, some research results (such as
Sinkoviccs, 2004; Nurbarokah, 2009) report
environmental adaptability dimensions that affect
competitive advantages. As with Mc Carthy &
Perreault (1996), their research confirms the factors
that determine the competitive advantage, among
others, the rate of change, the number of products, the
speed to enter the market. Other scholars, such as
Meutia (2013), highlight the ability to adapt to
changing business environment and competitive
advantage. Furthermore, the innovation and
technology adopted by the company more appropriate
have become a factor to achieve competitive
advantage.The recent research from Daiya Isogawa et
al., (2012) emphasizes that product innovation has a
significant effect on the marketing performance of a
company. Companies with new product innovations
tend to achieve high sales of new products, and are
less likely to suffer from cannibalizing effects.
Sugiyarti (2015) agreed that product innovation had a
significant effect on competitive advantage.
Companies that implement product innovation
systems tend to increase theSMEs’s competitive
advantage. Scholars such as Droge and Vickey (1994)
recognize product innovation is a source of
competitive advantage. Companies capable of
designing their products in line with customer's desire
tend to survive in the midst of tight competition, as
their products are still in demand for customers.
Luke and Ferrel (2000) recognize that marketing
and innovation are seen as a driver of economic
growth and a primary component of competitive
advantage. Nelly et al. (2001) believe product
innovation demonstrates the development and
recognition of new or improved products that are
successful in marketing. Drucker 1954, Berthon et al.
1999 acknowledged that product innovation is a
potential thing to create a mindset that ultimately
satisfies customer satisfaction. Dourgerty (1996)
notes product innovation is a relevant way for
companies to grow and tends to adapt to markets,
technology, and competition.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Social Capital
The social capital concept was reintroduced by
Putnam (1993) when researching in Italy in 1985. The
concept of social capital has been widely discussed in
social sciences over the last year (Field, 2010). One
of the resources that might provide a competitive
advantage is the resources developed through social
approaches known as social capital (Coleman, 1988).
In a competitive marketplace, social approaches and
social attributes and sustainability levels of
competitive advantages are, among others, explained
through the RBT-resource-based theory of the firm's
approach as seen in various studies undertaken by
academics, among others; (Amit & Schoemaker:
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
138
1993; Barney: 1991, Bharadwaj, Varadarajan, &
Fahy: 1993; Conner: 1991; Oliver, 1997).Cohen and
Prusak (2001) have defined the social capital as a
stock and an active relationship between society.
Meanwhile, Ancok (2013) emphasizes social capital
as embedded traits on individuals involved in social
interaction.
2.2 Business Environment
Knowledge of competitive environments can
encourage creativity, and the reason is
environmental knowledge analyzing highlighted
opportunities and weaknesses that should be
calculated (Menon et al., 1999; Mudiantono &
Khamidah, 2005). Competition intensity (Birchall et
al., 1996) environmental competition (Kim et al.,
1993) and Hadjimanolis, 2000), is a measure of
market innovation. Environmental changes related to
uncertainty and dynamics (Damanpour, 1996; and
Hadjimanolis, 2000).
According to Amit et al. (1993) innovation is an
interactive process, seen from the network of
economic relationships in its business environment
including changes in its resources. The business
environment has a strong influence on corporate
organizations, especially when the business world is
unlimited by a borderless world, (Hunger, Wheelen:
2007, Brooks: 1997). Companies that have
successfully adapted to the level of adaptability and
high flexibility with the surrounding business
environment, show good performance over
companies that do not succeed in aligning the low
level of flexibility strategy (Beal: 2000, Elenkov:
1997).
A company that lays down to survive and exits to
become a winner in a competitive business should
create a company-oriented policy pattern to achieve
a competitive advantage in the future (Barlett,
Ghoshal: 1999).
2.3 Product Innovation
Kotler (2007) defines product innovation as a
combination of various processes that interact with
each other. Nasution (2005) recognizes product
innovation as a new product or service introduced into
the market. Product innovations are categorized as
new products for the world, new product lines,
additions to existing product lines, revisions of
existing products, re-determination and cost reduction
(Nasution, 2005).Hadjimanolis (2000) suggests that
leadership capabilities, company capabilities, and
environmental factors are more influential on product
innovations that will be undertaken by the
company.Indriani and Prasetyowati (2008) in his
research show that innovation along with leadership
capabilities, company capabilities and engagement
have a positive and significant effect on product
innovation that ultimately affects corporate
performance. Companies that focus on innovation in
services are more capable of success in product
marketing that ultimately contributes to improved
performance (Eisingerich, Rubera, and Seifert, 2009).
According to a survey byTaghizadeh and Rahman
(2013), there is some information available about the
impact of innovation on the success of the company,
especially in the manufacturing sector. Research on
the impact of innovation on company performance has
been studied by scholars such as Cetindamar &
Ulusoy, 2008; Gunday et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2010).
2.4 Sustainable Competitive Advantage
In a company, there are two sources of competitive
advantage that are: superior skills and superior
resources as stated by Day and Wensley (1998).
Barney (1991) reveals that there are four things that
can be applied to produce sustainable competitive
advantage are value, rareness, inability to be imitated,
and imperfect substitution.O'Shannassy (2008)
outlines resources with four (four) valuable, rare,
implicit attributes, no strategic resources that are
strategically equivalent to a company; and strategy
resources help the company achieve and sustain a
Sustainable Competitive Advantage. RBV's theory
states that sustainable competitive advantages rely on
highly valuable, rare, imperfect and non-substitutable
(VRIN) organizational resources (VRIN) in
organizational settings with policies and procedures
for exploiting Barney resources, 1991; Barney &
Clark, 2007; Knott, 2003; Kraaijenbrink, Spender, &
Groen, 2010). Based on the resource-based view, the
organization can define the strategies it will perform
following organizational capabilities. (Purnomo,
2013).
Based on prior works and grounded
theoretically. The authors proposed the hypotheses
developed as follows:
H1: Social capital has a positive and significant effect
on the innovation of horticulture products.
H2: Business environment has a positive and
significant effect on innovation of horticulture
products.
H3: Social capital has a positive and significant effect
on the competitive advantage of horticulture
products.
H4: Business environment has a positive and
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
139
significant effect on the competitive advantage
of horticulture products.
H5: Product innovation has a positive and significant
effect on the sustainable competitive advantage
of horticulture products.
H6: Social capital has a positive and significant effect
on sustainable competitive advantage
through the innovation of horticulture products.
H7: Business environment has a positive and
significant effect on sustainable competitive
advantage through the innovation of horticulture
products.
3 METHOD
The present study uses a quantitative approach based
on structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis with
some exogenous variables and endogenous variables.
SEM is part of the multivariate dependent statistic;
SEM allows analysis of several dependent and
independent variables directly (Hair et al., 1995).
Ghozali (2008) notes that PLS is a powerful analysis
method since it is not based on many assumptions.
This research was conducted in Karo Regency, North
Sumatra, Indonesia. Data on the source research from
primary data and secondary data.Data also does not
have to have normal multivariate distributions
(indicator with category scale, ordinal, interval until
ratio can be used on the same model) the sample
should not be large. Software used in this research is
WarpPLS. Mahfud and Ratmono (2013: 7) stated that
SEM-PLS allows work efficiently with small sample
sizes and complex models. Also, the assumption of
data distribution in SEM-PLS relative is more flexible
than CB-SEM.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Results
4.1.1 Direct Effect
The direct effects between the variables have been
shown on the path coefficients in the structural model.
The value of path coefficients among variables is
presented in the table below.
Table 1. Direct Effect
Original
Sample
(O)
T Statistics
(|O/STDEV)
P
Values
Business Env -
> Product Inov
0,918 8,113 0,000
Business Env -
> SuComp
Adv
0,525 2,599 0,010
Product Inov -
> SuComp
Adv
0,377 2,774 0,006
Social Capital
-> Product
Inov
0,074 0,779 0,437
Social Capital
->SuComp
Adv
0,050 0,418 0,676
4.1.2 Indirect Effect
Indirect effects are the number of influences through
variable intermediaries. The indirect-effect of
business environment on sustainable competitive
advantage through product innovation is equal
to0.918 x 0.377= 0.346.
The summarize of indirect effects, direct effect and
total effect will present in Table 3 below.
Table 2. Indirect Effect
Original
Sample
(O)
T
Statistics
(
|
O/STDEV
|
)
P
Values
Business Env -
> Product Inov
-> SuComp
Adv
0,346 2,682 0,008
Social Capital -
> Product Inov
-> SuComp
Adv
0,028 0,873 0,383
4.1.3 Total Effect
Total effect generated from the analysis of the
structural model in the study is the sum of direct
effects and indirect effect. The total effect result
(business environment on sustainable competitive
advantage through product innovation)is equal to
0.525 + 0.346 = 0.871
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
140
Table 3. Summary of Research Variable Effects
Direct
Effect
Indirect
Effect
Total
Effect
Business Env ->
Product Inov
0,918
Business Env ->
SuComp Adv
0,525 0,346 0.871
Product Inov ->
SuComp Adv
0,377
Social Capital -
>Product Inov
0,074
Social Capital ->
SuCom
p
Adv
0,050 0,028 0,078
4.1.4 Hypotheses Testing
Table 4. Results of Hypotheses Test
Original
Sample
(O)
T Statistics
(|O/STDEV|)
P
Values
Conclusion
Business Env -
> Product Inov
0,918 8,113 0,000
Accepted
Business Env -
> SuComp Adv
0,871 3,870 0,000
Accepted
Product Inov -
> SuComp Adv
0,377 2,774 0,006
Accepted
Social Capital -
> Product Inov
0,074 0,779 0,437
Rejected
Social Capital -
> SuComp Adv
0,078 0,542 0,588
Rejected
Business Env -
>Product Inov
-> SuComp
Adv
0,346 2,682 0,008
Accepted
Social Capital -
> Product Inov
-> SuComp
Adv
0,028 0,873 0,383
Rejected
4.2 Discussion
4.2.1 The Effect of Social Capital on the
Sustainable Competitive Advantage of
Horticultural Products
The empirical findings show that t-statistics value is
lower than the t-table value. The t-statistics value is
0.779, and the t-table value is 1.96. (0.779 < 1.96)
and sig value (0.437 >0.05). The results indicate that
social capital has an insignificant effect on product
innovation. Contrary to the empirical findings by
Suriatna and Ardianti (2013) which have stated that
there is a link between social capital and product
innovation. Hence, the authors concludedthat the
hypothesis proposed is rejected.
4.2.2 The Effect of Business Environment on
the Innovation of Horticultural
Products
The empirical evidenceindicates that t-statistics value
is higher than the t-table value. The t-statistics value is
8.113, and the t-table value is 1.96. (8.113 > 1.96) and
sig value (0.000 <0.05). The results indicate that the
business environment has a significant effect on
product innovation. Therefore, the authors concluded
that the hypothesis proposed is accepted.The
empirical findings are consistent with the research
results by (2000), which found a positive influence on
the business environment on innovation, a faster
environmental change has demanded companies to
adapt quickly with continuous improvements through
innovations. The competition environment affects the
number and type of competitors that entrepreneurs
face. Knowledge of competitive environments can
encourage creativity, as knowledge of the competing
environment controlled by entrepreneurs makes them
aware of the opportunities that can be highlighted and
the weaknesses that are calculated (Menon et al.,
1999). The study also recognizes previous research
results such as Birchall et al., (1996), Kim et. al,
(1993); and Hadjimanolis, (2000) have found positive
influences between the business environment and
innovation, including product innovation, competition
intensity, and environmental competition, and are a
measure of the market for innovation.
4.2.3 The Effect of Social Capital on the
Sustainable Competitive Advantage of
Horticultural Products
The empirical findings show that t-statistics value is
lower than the t-table value. The t-statistics value is
0.542, and the t-table value is 1.96. (0.542< 1.96) and
sig value (0.588>0.05). The results indicate that
social capital has an insignificant effect on
sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, the
authors concluded that the hypothesis proposed is
rejected.Contrary to the empirical findings by
Pastoriza (2009) and Khamimah and Suyati (2015)
find that there is a social capital effect that consists
of networking, trust and commitment to the
competitive advantage of Small and Medium
Enterprises.If the network, trust and commitment to
a Small Medium Enterprises increase, there will be
an increase in the competitive advantage of the Small
Medium Enterprises. Social capital is a source of
sustainable competitive advantage of a company that
can describe the quality of relationships in a business
and measures inter-member relationships.
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
141
4.2.4 The Effect of Business Environment on
the Sustainable Competitive
Advantage of Horticultural Products
The empirical evidenceindicates that t-statistics value
is higher than the t-table value. The t-statistics value
is 3.870, and the t-table value is 1.96. (3.870> 1.96)
and sig value (0.000 <0.05). The results indicate that
the business environment has a significant effect on
sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, the
authors concluded that the hypothesis proposed is
accepted.This research findings support previous
research such as work by Beal, (2000); Sinkovics,
(2004), Nurbokah, (2009) where they highlight the
relevance of corporate environmental adaptability
and sustainable competitive advantage. These
findings also recognize the results of work from
Meutia (2013) which have found that there is
significant influence between adaptability to
changing business environment and competitive
advantage. Ability to adapt and rapid external
environment changes is a factor to enhance
competitive advantage.
4.2.5 The Effect of Product Innovation on
the Sustainable Competitive
Advantage of Horticultural Products
The empirical evidenceindicates that t-statistics value
is higher than the t-table value. The t-statistics value
is 2,774, and the t-table value is 1.96. (2,774> 1.96)
and sig value (0.006<0.05). The results indicate that
product innovationhas a significant effect on
sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, the
authors concluded that the hypothesis proposed is
accepted. The research findings are in line with the
findings of Sugiyarti (2015) which states that product
innovation has a significant effect on competitive
advantage. Companies that implement the product
innovation system will increase the competitive
advantage of Small Medium Enterprises in rapidly
changing environmental conditions. The
paperworked by Slater and Narver (1997) believes
that competitive advantage is determined by
creativity and innovation that can satisfy customers'
expectations rather than competitors. Droge and
Vickey (1994) found that product innovation was
used as one of the sources of competitive advantage.
Companies that are able to design their products
according to customer's desire to survive in the
middle of competition because their products will
remain attractive to customers.
4.2.6 The Effect of Business Environment on
the Sustainable Competitive
Advantage of Horticultural Products
through Product Innovation
The empirical evidenceindicate that t-statistics value
is higher than the t-table value. The t-statistics value
is 2.682, and the t-table value is 1.96. (2.68 2> 1.96)
and sig value (0.008 <0.05). The results indicate that
the business environment has a significant effect on
the sustainable competitive advantage of horticultural
products through product innovation. Therefore, the
authors concluded that the hypothesis proposed is
accepted.
4.2.7 The Effect of Social Capital on the
Sustainable Competitive Advantage of
Horticultural Products through
Product Innovation
The empirical findings show that t-statistics value is
lower than the t-table value. The t-statistics value is
0.873, and the t-table value is 1.96. (0.873 < 1.96) and
sig value (0.383 >0.05). The results indicate that
social capital has an insignificant effect on the
sustainable competitive advantage of horticultural
products through product innovation. Hence, the
authors concluded that the hypothesis proposed is
rejected.
5 CONCLUSIONS &
SUGGESTIONS
The empirical pieces of evidence indicate that social
capital has an insignificant effect on product
innovation. The business environment has a
significant effect on product innovation. Social
capital has an insignificant effect on sustainable
competitive advantage.The business environment
has a significant effect on sustainable competitive
advantage. The product innovation has a significant
effect on sustainable competitive advantage. The
business environment has a significant effect on the
sustainable competitive advantage of horticultural
products through product innovation. Socialcapital
has an insignificant effect on the sustainable
competitive advantage of horticultural products
through product innovation. The ability to adopt
technology should be in line with the ability to
respond to the movement of market behavior.
Therefore, the role of farmers is expected to be more
proactive in observing the direction of changes in the
horticultural product market behavior. Export
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
142
market access is required and standardize product
according to market demand. Therefore, learning is
needed to empower farmers to achieve a target
market that has broad coverage.
REFERENCES
Aaker, D. A. & Joachimsthaler, E. (1999). The lure of
global branding. Harvard
Business Review, (77), pp. 137-144.
Abubakar Binta. (2002). Developing A Framework For
Understanding A Tourism
Service Setting: An
Exploratory Study. Services Marketing Quarterly,
Vol. 23, No. 3.
Adisubrata, Winata. 2004. Menyongsong Kongres
Pariwisata Indonesia 2004
Belajar DariKongres
Pariwisata WTO 1980 Manila.
Aditya, Helmi, 2004. “Analisis Pengaruh Merk, Orientasi
Strategik, Dan Inovasi TerhadapKeunggulan Bersaing
(Studi pada UKM Tanggulangin di Kota Sidoarjo)”.
Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia, Vol III, No 3
Program Magister Manajemen.Universitas
Diponegoro.
Alderson, W., (1957), Marketing behavior and executive
action, Richard D. Irwin,Homewood, IL,
Alderson, W, (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior,
Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
Al-Ansari, Y, Altalib, M & Sardo, M 2013, 'Technology
orientation, innovation and business performance: a
study of Dubai SMEs,' The International Technology
Management Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-11.
Ali Rizwan, Leifu Gao, Rahman Ramiz ur Rehman.
(2016). The Impact of Technology Orientation and
Customer Orientation on Firm Performance: Evidence
Form Chinese Firms, International Journal of
Management and Marketing Research. Vol, 9, No.1, pp
1-11
Alegre Joaquín, & Cladera Magdalena, (
2009).
"Analysing the effect of
satisfaction and previous visits
on tourist intentions to return," European Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 43 Iss: 5/6, pp.670 – 685.
Altindag, E. Zehir, C. & Acar, A.Z. (2010). Strategic
Orientations and Their Effects on Firm Performance in
Turkish Family Owned Firms, Journal Eurasian
Business Review, Vol. 1. pp. 18-36.
Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, & Donald R.
Lehmann. (1994). “Customer
Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability:
Findings From Sweden,"
Journal of Marketing, 58
(July), pp. 53-66.
Andreassen, T.W., & Lindestad, B., (1998).
Customer
Loyalty and Complex
Services: The impact of the
corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction
and
loyalty for customers with varying degrees of
service expertise,
International Journal of Service
Industry Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7-23.
Andriani Nurita, Zain Djumilah, (2010). Pengaruh Modal
sosial, Kualitas Informasi, dan Kompetensi Pemasaran
terhadap Kinerja Pemasaran, (Studi pada Industri Kecil
dan Menengah Garmen di Jawa Timur), Jurnal Aplikasi
Manajemen, Vol. 8. No. 4.
Ansari Al Yahya -, Altalib Marwan, Sardoh Muna (2011),
Technology Orientation, Innovation and Business
Performance: A Study of Dubai SMEs , The
International Technology Management Review, Vol. 3,
No. 1, 1-11.
Ansoff, Igor (1965), Corporate Strategy McGraw Hill, New
York.
Ambler, T. & Puntoni, S. (2003), Measuring Marketing
Performance. In Hart, S (Ed.), Marketing Changes,
London, UK: Thomson Learning, pp. 289- 309.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H.(1993), "Strategic Assets
and Organizational Rent", Strategic Management
Journal, 14, pp. 33 - 46
Ancok, Djamaludin. (2007). Revitalisasi SDM dalam
menghadapi perubahan pada pasca krisis. Diakses pada
29 April, 2014 dari Word Wide Web:
http://ancok.staff.ugm.ac.id/h-15/revitalisasi-sdm-
dalam-menghadapiperubahan pada pasca-krisis.html.
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An Empirical
Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and
Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product
Innovations. Organization Science, 12 (1): 54–74.
Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1998). Employee behavior in a
service environment: A model and test of potential
differences between men and women. Journal of
Marketing, 62, pp. 77-91.
Baker, William. E. & Sinkula, J.M. (1999). Learning
Orientation, Market Orientation, and Innovation:
Integrating and Extending Models of Organization
Performance, Journal Market-Focused Management,
Vol. 4, pp. 295-308.
Baker, W.E.& Sinkula, J.M. (2005). Market Orientation
and The New Product Paradox, Journal Product
Development and Management Association, Vol. 22.
Pp. 483-502.
Baker, W.E. & Sinkula, J.M. (2009). The complementary
effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial
orientation on profitability in small businesses, Journal
of Small Business Management, Vol. 47. Pp. 443-464.
Barney, Jay B. (2001). Is The Resource-Based "View" A
Useful Perspective For Strategic management
Research? Yes. Academy of Management. The
Academy of Management review. Vol. 26. No. 1. Pp:
41–56.
Barney, Jay B. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained
Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management; 17,
(1), pp.99 – 120.
Bebko Charlene Pleger, (
2000). "
Service
intangibility and its impact on
consumer expectations
of service quality," Journal of Services Marketing.
Beerli, A., Martin, J.D., & Quintana, A. (2004). A model of
customer loyalty in the
retail banking market.,
European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 38, No. 1/2,
PP.
253-275. Berita Resmi Statistik No. 09/ VII / 3 Februari
2004, Halaman 1-2
Bharadwaj, Sundar G., Varadarajan, P Rajan, & Fahy, John,
(1993), "Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
143
Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research
Proposition," Journal of Marketing, October, Vol.57,
Iss. 4, pg. 83, 17 pgs
Binta Abubakar. 2002. Tourism Servicescapes: A
Conceptual Overview, Swinburne University of
Technology.
Biong, H. (1993).
Satisfaction & Loyalty to Suppliers
within Grocery Trade
."
European Journal or
Marketing. Vol 27, pp. 21-28.
Blomqvist, H.C., Grönroos, C. & Lindqvist, L.J. (1992).
Economics and Marketing. Essays in Honour of Gosta
Mickwitz, Economy and Society,
No.48. Swedish
School of Economics and Business Administration,
Helsingfors, Finland pp. 109-24.
E. Neal Blue Robert N. Wisner and E. Dean Baldwin,
(2004) Performance of Selected Pre-harvest and Post-
harvest Corn and Soybean Marketing Strategies vs.
Alternative Market Benchmarks, paper presented at the
NC134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price
Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management
St. Louis, Missouri,
Blomqvist, R., Dahl, J .& Haeger, T. (1993).
Relationsmarknadsforing Strategi och method fōr
servicekonkurren, (Relationship marketing. Strategy and
Methods for Service Competition), Goteborg, Sweden,
IHM Forlag.
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc.. (1982). New product
management for the 1980s. New York. p. 27.
Brahmana Evariana, Rochayanti Christina, Susilo M, edy
(2009), Nilai-Nilai Gotong-Royong Dalam Tari Mbuah
Pa Ge (Analisis Semiotika Nilai-Nilai Gotong-Royong
Dalam Tari Mbuah Pa Ge Pada Acara Adat Merdang-
Merdem Di Desa Perbesi Kecamatan Tigabinanga
Kabupaten Karo Sumatera Utara), Jurnal Ilmu
Komunikasi, Vol. 7, No. 1 Januari april 2009, UPN
Veteran, Yogyakarta.
Briefing Paper. (2007), Can tourism offer pro-poor
pathways to prosperity? :
Examining evidence on the
impact of tourism on poverty, Overseas
Development
Institute.
Bunch, Roland. (2001) Dua Tongkol Jagung: Pedoman
Pengembangan Pertanian Berpangkal Pada Rakyat.
Edisi ke dua. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta
Calantone, S.T., Cavusgil & Zhao Y. (2002). Learning
orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm
performance, Industrial Marketing Management,
Vol.3. pp. 515-524.
Camelia C. (2012).The Impact Of Latest It Technologies
Over The Efficiency Of A Knowledge-Based
Organization Management In Romania, Revista
Economica, Vol. Supplement pp. 68-76
Carpenter, H. (2010). Definition of innovation, WWW/
Claudio /202/definition of innovation, 29 Juni 2010
Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E.. (1977), From entry barriers
to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and
contrived deterrence to new competition", Quarterly
Journal of Economics, Vol. 91, pp. 241-261.
Chadee, Doren D. and Mattson, Jan. 1998. " Do Service and
Merchandise Exports Behave and Perform Differently: A
New Zealand Investigation," European Journal of
Marketing Vol.32 No.9/10, pp.831-832.
Chaniotakis Ioannis E.,& Constantine Lymperopoulos.
(2009). Service quality on
effect on satisfaction and
word of mouth in the health care industry
.
Managing
Service Quality Volume: 19 Issue: 2
Chepkwony Joel (2012), Market Orientation and Firm
Performance in the Manufacturing Sector in Kenya,
European Journal of Business and Management www.
Liste.org ISSN 22221905 (paper) ISSN 22222839
(online) Vol. 4, No. 10, 2012.
Chon, K.S. Weaver, P. A. & Kim. C.Y, (1991). Marketing
your community: Image
analysis in Norfolk
. Cornell
Hotel and Restaurant Administration
Quarterly. 31 (4)
.
Coghlan, Alexandra,& Prideaux, Bruce. (2009).
Responding to stakeholder
research needs using a
visitor monitoring survey: the case of the Great
Barrier Reef tourism industry. Tourism in Marine
Environments, 5 (2). Pp. 175-185. ISSN 1544-273X.
Coleman, J (1988), “ Social Capital in the creation of
human capital," American Journal of Sociology, 94,
Supplement, pp. 95-120.
Cooper, R.D., & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986). An
investigation into the new product process: steps,
deficiencies, and impact. J. Product Innovation
Management. 3 (2) pp. 71-85.
Cronin, J.J. & S.A. Taylor. (1992). Measuring Service
Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of
Marketing. Vol.56 (July), pp. 55-68.
Cooper, D.R., and C.W. Emory, (1995).
Business
Research Methods,
5th Ed
Richard D. Irwin, Inc. New
York.
Covin, J.G, & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management
of small firms in hostile and Benign environments.
Strategic management journal ,10,75-8
Covin, J. and Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of
entrepreneurship as firm behaviour. Entrepreneurship
Theory and Practice, 16(1):7-25.
Covin, J.G. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2011). Entrepreneurial
orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed
construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5):
855-872.
Cristina, S. (2011). The Marketing Entrepreneurship and
The SMEs Competitiveness, Journal of Knowledge
Management, Economics and Information Technology,
Vol. 1. pp. 8-25.
Crouch, G.I. & J.R.B. Ritchie. (1999)
Tourism,
Competitiveness and Societal
Prosperity, Journal of
Business Research, 44 (3) pp. : 137-152.
Dabholkar, P. A., Shepherd, C. D., & Thorpe, D. I.,
(2000).
A comprehensive
framework for service
quality: an investigation of critical conceptual
and
measurement issues through a longitudinal study
.
Journal of
Retailing 76(2), 139-173.
Damanik, Jonianton & Helmut F.Weber. (2006).
Perencanaan Ekowisata, Dari Teori ke Aplikasi.
Penerbit Kerjasama Puspar UGM & Andi Offset.
Yogyakarta.
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
144
Darmanto. (2014), Keterkaitan Orientasi Strategi dan
Kinerja Pemasaran: Kemampuan Perubahan Organisasi
Memoderasi Orientasi Pasar pada Orientasi Inovasi
UKM Makanan di Surakarta, Desertasi, Program
Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis
Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.
Daiya Isogawa, Kohei Nishikawa, Hiroshi Ohashi, (2012),
New-To-Market Product Innovation And Firm
Performance: Evidence From A Firm-Level Innovation
Survey In Japan, RIETI (The Research Institute Of
Economy, Trade And Industry) Discussion Paper Series
12-E-077 December 2012, Japan.
Day, G.S & R Wensley (1988), Assessing Advantage: A
Framework for Diagnostic Competitive Superiority,
Journal of Marketing, Vol 52, April, pp.1-20.
De Holan PM, & Phillips N, (1997). Remembrance of
things past? Managing
Legitimacy in Ecotourism, Tourism Management, Vol:18.
Deshpande, Rohit., John U. Farley, & Frederick E.
Weebster, Jr (1993) “Corporate Culture, Customer
Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A
Quadrad Analysis “,Journal of Marketing, Vol.
57,pp.23-37
Dewi Sensi Tribuana, (2006). Analisis Pengaruh Orientasi
Pasar dan Inovasi Produk terhadap Keunggulan
Bersaing untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemasaran
(Studi Pada Industri Batik Di Kota dan Kabupaten
Pekalongan), UNDIP, Semarang.
Dharmayanti, Diah. (2006). Analisis Dampak Service
Performance dan
Kepuasan sebagai Moderating
Variabel terhadap Loyalitas Nasabah
(Studi Pada
Nasabah Tabungan Bank Mandiri Cabang Surabaya).
Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran. Vol.1.No.1.
Drucker, Peter F. (1994).Management: Tasks,
Responsibilities, Practices.Harper & Row Publishers,
Inc. New York
Dwyer, F.R., Shurr, P.H. & Oh, S.,(
1987).“Developing
buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing”, Jurnal
Marketing, Vol. 51.
Dwyer L., & P Forsyth, & P Rao (2000). The Price
Competitiveness of Travel and Tourism: a comparison
of 19 destinations., Tourism Management, 21 (1), pp. 9-
22
Ekmekci Asli Kucukaslan. (2010). The Importance of
Product Positioning and Global Branding for
Sustaining Competitive advantage within the
Companies’ global Marketing strategy. Chinese
Business Review, ISSN 1537-1506, Volume 9, No.4
Serial No. 82.
Ellis, Christopher L., and Vogelsong Hans, (2008).
“Some
Consumer Surplus
Estimates for North Carolina
Beaches,”
Marine Resource Economics
20:145-161,
2005.
Fandy Tjiptono. 2014. Service Manajemen Mewujudkan
Layanan Prima. Andi.
Yogyakarta.
Ferdinand Augusty. 2006. Metode Penelitian Manajemen
Pedoman Penelitian
Untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi Ilmu
Manajemen, BP
Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Ferdinand, A. (2006). Strategic Pathways Toward
Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Unpublished
DBA, Theses.Southern Cross. Lismore. Australia.
Fox Dennis, Horváth Csilla, Paap Richard, & Philip Hans
Franses. (
2006).
A
Hierarchical Bayes Error
Correction Model to Explain Dynamic Effects of
Price
Changes.
Journal of Marketing Research: Vol. 43, No.
3, pp. 443-
461.
Foltean, F. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Approach in
Marketing, Journal Management & Marketing, Vol. 2.
pp. 46-58
Ford, D. (ed.). (1990). Understanding business markets:
Interaction, relationships
, and networks, First edition, London, Academic Press.
Fournier, S. & Mick, D.G. (1999) "Rediscovering
Satisfaction," Journal of Marketing,63(October), pp.
5-23.
Francesco, B, & Mario, P. (2011). Engines of Growth.
Innovation and Productivity in Industry Groups,
Journal Structural Change, and Economic Dynamics,
Vol. 22. Pp. 27-69.
Frishammar, J., & Anderson, S. (2009). The overestimated
role of strategic orientations for international
performance of SMEs, Journal of Entrepreneurship,
Vol. 7. pp. 57-77.
Fros ́en Johanna, Luoma Jukka, Jaakkola Matti, Tikkanen
Henrikki, & Aspara Jaakko (2016) What Counts Versus
What Can Be Counted: The Complex Interplay of
Market Orientation and MarketingPerformance
Measurement, American Marketing AssociationJournal
of Marketing ISSN: 0022-2429 (print) Ahead of Print
1547-7185 (electronic) DOI: 10.1509/jm.15.015
Gatignon, Hubert., and Jean-Marc Xuereb (1997), "
Strategy Orientation of the Firm and New Product
Performance," Journal of Marketing Research,
Vol.XXXIV, (February), pp.77-90.
Fraiz. (
2007).
Assessing tourist behavioral intentions
through perceived
service quality and customer
satisfaction. Journal of Business Research. 60. pp. 153 -
160
Grant, R. M., (1991) "Porter's ‘Competitive advantage of
nations': An assessment," Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 535-548.
Greenley, G.& Foxall, G. (1998),
``External moderation
of association among
stakeholder orientation and
company performance", International Journal of
Research in Marketing, No. 15, pp. 51-69.
Grinstein, A. (2008). The Effect Of Market Orientation and
Its Components on Innovation Consequences: A Meta-
Analysis, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 36. Pp. 166-73.
Grönroos, C. (1989). .Defining Marketing: A Market-
Oriented Approach., European Journal of Marketing,
Vol.23, No.1, pp.52-60.
Grönroos, C. (1990), Service Management and Marketing.
Managing the Moments
of Truth in Service Competition,
Lexington, MA, Free
Press/Lexington
Books.
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
145
Grönroos, C. (1991).The Marketing Strategy Continuum. A
Marketing Concept for the 1990.s., Management
Decision, Vol. 29, No.1, pp.7-13.
Grönroos, C., “Quo Vadis, Marketing: Toward a
Relationship Marketing Paradigm, The Marketing
Review 2002, Vol. 3.
Grönroos, C. and Gummesson, E. (
1985).
The Nordic
School of Service
Marketing In; Grönroos, C. and
Gummesson, E
.
(Eds), ServiceMarketing.Nordic
School Perspectives, Stockholm University,
Sweden,pp.6-11.
Gummesson, E., (1987) The New Marketing Developing
long Term Interactive Relationship," Long Range
Planning, Vol. 20 No. 4.
......................, 1990. Part-time Marketer,
researchreport90:3, Service Research Center, University
of Karlstad, Sweden.
......................, (1993) Relationship marketing and
imaginary organizations: A synthesis', European Journal
of Marketing, 30 (2): 31-44.
Hair J.F. et al. (1995), "Multivariate Data Analysis With
Reading", Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall. New Jersey
Han et al. (1998). “Market Orientation, Innovativeness,
Product Innovation and Performance in Small Firm”.
Journal of Small Business Management Vol 42 No.2.
Program Magister Manajemen. Universitas
Diponegoro.
Heide, J.B. dan John, G. 1992. “Do Norms Matter in
Marketing Relationships ?“ Journal of Marketing, 56, p
32-44.
Hitt, M.A., Clifford, P.G., Nixon, R.D., & Coyne, K.P.
(1999). Dynamic strategic resources:
development,diffusion & integration. Chichester, UK:
John Wiley & Sons(PDF) Managing Resources:
Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth
Creation in Family Firms.
Hoffman, Nicole P., (2000), An Examination of The
Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Concept: Past,
Present, and Future," Academy of Marketing Science
Review, TheUniversity of Alabama.
Hoq, M. Z., & Chauhan, A. A. (2011). Effects Of
Organizational Resources On Organizational
Performance: An Empirical Study Of SMEs.
Interdisciplinary, Journal of Contemporary Research in
Business, Vol. 2. pp. 373-385.
Hunt, S. D., Muncy, J. A., & Ray, N. M., (1981) "Alderson's
general theory of marketing: A formalization." In B. M.
Enis & K. L. Roering (Eds.), The Review of Marketing,
American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp.267-
272.
Hurley, R. F and Hult, G, T. M, 1998, "Innovation, Market
Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An
Integration and Empirical Examination," Journal of
Marketing.
Isogawa, D. and K. Nishikawa, and H. Ohashi (2012),
"New-to-Market Product Innovation and Firm
Performance: Evidence from a Firm-level Innovation
Survey in Japan," 12-E-077, RIETI
Jackson, B.B.,1985.
"Build Customer Relationships The
Last,
" Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 63, November-
December 1985, pp. 120-8.
Jaworski, B.J. & Kohli, A.K. (1993). "Market Orientation:
Antecedents and Consequences," Journal of Marketing,
57 (3): 53-70.
Kaya, N. and Patton, J. (2011), "The effects of knowledge-
based resources, market orientation and learning
orientation on innovation performance: an empirical
study of Turkish firms," Journal of International
Development, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 204 - 219.
Kandampully, J, and D Suhartanto. 2000. Customer loyalty
in the hotel industry:
the role of customer satisfaction
and image.
International Journal of
Contemporary
Hospitality Management 12 (6): 346-51.
Kennedy, Marry S. Farrel, L.K, dan Clair, Debbie T. L.
(2001) Consumers trust of Salesperson &
Manufacturer: An Empirical Study." Journal of Bussines
Research, Vol 51, p 73-86.
Kensinger, Steve, 1997, “Re-Engineering Engineering:
Managing To BeInnovative!”, – Aided Engineering,
Dec
Khamimah, Sri Suyati (2015 ), Membangun Keunggulan
Bersaing Berkelanjutan melalui Kapabilitas Modal Sosial
dan Kinerja Pemasaran Pada Pengrajin Wingko Babat di
Kota Semarang, Serat Acitya- Untag Semarang.
Kinicki and Delorey. (2010).
Sustainable energy for a
Yunque National Forest.
Interactive Qualifying
Project completed in partial fulfillment of the
Bachelor
of Science degree at Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
Worcester, MA.
Kirca, A, H., Jayachandran, S. and Bearden, W. O. (2005).
Market Orientation: A Meta-Analityc Review and
Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on
Performance, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69. Pp. 24-4.
Kitchen, Philip J., & Jillian F. Dawes (1995), Marketing
Information Systems In Smaller Building Societies“
International Journal Of Bank Marketing, Vol.13, No.
8,p. 3-9.
Kotler Philip, (
1998) Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisis,
Perencanaan,
Implementasi, dan Pengemdalian, di
Indonesiakan oleh Ancella Anitawati Hermawan,
Salamba Empat Prentice - Hall, Jakarta.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. (2006) . Marketing Management.
12 ed. ed. UpperSaddle River: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. (2010). Marketing Management Analysis,
Planning, Implementation, and Control, 12 Ed.
Englewood Cliff, NJ. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kotler, Philip, and Kevin Lane Keller. 2012. Marketing
Management 13. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall,
Inc.
Knotts, T. L., Jones, S. C., & Brown, K. L. (2008). The
Effect of Strategic Orientation And Gender on Survival:
A Study of Potential Mass Merchandising Suppliers,
Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 13. p.
99-113.
Kropp, F., Lindsay, N. J., & Shoham, A. (2008).
Entrepreneurial Orientation And International
Entrepreneurial Business Venture Start-Up,
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
146
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and
research, Vol. 14. p. 102- 117.
Kumar.V, Eli Jones, Rajkumar Venkatesan, & Robert P.
Leone. 2011. Is Market Orientation a Source of
Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost
of Competing? Journal of MarketingVol. 75.
Lam, A. (2011). Innovative Organizations: Structure,
Learning, and Adaptation commit to user Paper
presented at DIME final conference, 6-8 April 2011.
Lache, Cătălina and Alexa, Elena Lidia. 2011.
Particular Aspects of Tourist
Product Consumers'
Loyalty. Licrari Stiintifice. Vol. 54. Nr. 1.
Le Phi Hoa Khanh, Nguyen Chau Ngoc, Adhikari a
Rajendra, Milesc Morgan P, Bonneya Laurie, (2017)
Exploring market orientation, innovation, and nancial
performance in agricultural value chains in emerging
economies, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, JIK
49, No of pages. 12.
Liang Qiao, Huang Zuhui, Lu Haiyang, wang Xinxin.
(2015). Social Capital, Member Participation, and
Cooperative Performance: Evidence from China's
Zhejiang, International Food and Agribusiness
Management Review, Volume 18 Issue 1, 2015.
Li, Tiger dan Calantone, Roger, J. 1998. The Impact of
Market Knowledge Competence on New Product
Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical
Examination, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, October.
Lovelock Christopher. 1994. Product Plus: How Product +
Service = Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill. New
York.
Lovelock, C, and Wirtz, J. 2004. "Services Marketing," Fifth
Edition, Prentice Hall,
New Jersey.
Lumkin, G.T. & Ferrel. (1996). Clarifying The
Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It
Performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol.
21. p. 135-172.
Lundberg, Donald E., M. Krishnamoorthy dan Mink H.
Stavenga, 1995. Tourism Economics. John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
Lupiyoadi, R. Dan Hamdani, A. 2006. “Manajemen
Pemasaran Jasa”. Edisi 2
Salemba Empat Jakarta.
Malhotra Naresh K. 2004. Marketing Research: An Applied
Orientation,International Edition, Fourth Edition,
Pearson Education International.
Mahoney, Joseph T; Pandian, J. Rajendran. (1992). The
Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of
Strategic Management. Strategic Management
Journal.Vol.13. No.5. Page.363 –380
Mavondo, Felix, T. Chimhanzi, Jacqueline, Stewart &
Jillian. (2003). LearningOrientation and Market
Orientation: Relationship With Invitation, Human
Resource Practices, and Performance, European
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, p. 1235-1263.
Menon, Ajay., Bernard J. Jaworski, and, Ajay K. Kohli,
(1997), " Product Quality: Impact of Interdepartmental
Interactions," Journal of The Academy of Marketing
Science, Vol.25, No.3,p.187-200
Michael J. Enright, James Newton, (
2004). Tourist
Destination Competitiveness: A Quantitative Approach,
School of Business, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam
Road, Hong Kong, 2004.
Micheels, Eric T. & Gow, H.R. (2009). Do Market-
Oriented Firms Demonstrate Clarity on Their Value
Discipline? Evidence from Illinois Beef Producers
Article provided by the International Food and
Agribusiness Management Association (IAMA),
Journal International Food and Agribusiness
Management Review, Vol. 12. p. 34-45.
Mirzaei Omid, Micheels Eric T. & Boeckerc Andreas,
(2016), Product and Marketing Innovation in Farm-
Based Businesses: The Role of Entrepreneurial
Orientation and Market Orientation, International
Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Volume
19 Issue 2.
Moorhead dan Griffin. 2013. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat
Morris, M.H. Coombes, S. & Schindehutte, M. (2007).
Antecedent And Outcomes of Entrepreneurial and
Market Orientation In Anon- Profit Context:
Theoretical And Empirical Insights, Journal of
Leadership and Organization Studies, Vol.13. Pp. 12-
39.
Muhmin, Abdul. (2002).
Effects of Suppliers
Marketing Program Variables on
Industrial Buyers Relationship Satisfaction on
Commitment" Journal of Bussines & Industrial
Marketing, Vol. 7, pp. 637-651.
Muljadi A.J. (2009) . Kepariwisataan dan Perjalanan. PT.
Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta
Mulyaningrum, (2005). Eksternalitas Ekonomi Dalam
Pembangunan Wisata Alam Berkelanjutan, Studi Kasus
pada Kawasan Wisata Alam Baturaden, Purwakerto,
Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah.
Muin, Sri Adrianti. 2013. Kajian Kemampuan Usaha Dan
Modal Sosial Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja
Usaha Kecil Sektor Industri Di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal
ASSETS, Vol. 3 No.1.
Murphy, R., et al., (2011). Global developments in the
competition for land from biofuels. Food Policy
Murphy, Peter E, and Murphy, Ann E. (2004).
Aspects
of Tourism: Strategic
Management for Tourism
Communities Bridging the Gaps Channel View
Publications. Clevedon Buffalo-Toronto.
Nadrol, W, M. Breen, J.& Josiassen, A. (2010).
Relationship Between Strategic Orientation And SME
Firm Performance: Developing A
ConceptualFramework, Contact: Breen, J.Victoria
University Melbourne, Australia, commit to user Vol.
8. p. 713-723.
Newman WA, Buckeridge JS, Pitombo F (2016) The
Anatomy of a Proposed Name Change Involving
Chthamalus southwardorum (Cirripedia,
Balanomorpha, Chthamalidae), a Critique. J Marine Sci
Res Dev 6: 207. doi:10.4172/2155-9910.1000207 Page
2 of 2 J Marine Sci Res Dev, an open access journal
ISSN:2155-9910 Volume 6 • Issue 5 • 1000207 (PDF)
Newman et al. 2016.
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
147
Narver, J.C. & Slater, S.F. (2004). The Effect of A Market
Orientation on Business Profitability, Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol. 54. p. 20-35.
Nazir, Mohamad, 1988, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia,
Jakarta.
Neilson Jeffrey a& McKenzie Fiona (2016) Business-
Oriented Outreach Programmes for Sustainable Cocoa
Production in Indonesia: An Institutional Innovation.
Innovative Markets For Sustainable Agriculture How
Innovations in Market Institutions Encourage
Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries, Food
and Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations
(FAO) and Institut National De La Recherche
Agronomique (INRA) Rome.
Nurhayati, W. 1995. Perencanaan Pembangunan Regional
dan Kawasan untuk
Kepariwisataan Alam. Di dalam :
Chafid Fandeli, editor. Dasar-Dasar
Manajemen
Kepariwisataan Alam. Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Oliver, C. (1997), "Sustainable Competitive Advantage:
Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views",
Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), pp. 697 - 713.
Ollorunniwo et al., (2006). Service quality: Practical
Guidelines. Technical Bahvioral Intentions in the service
factory. Journal Service Marketing. 20/1
Palma-dos-Reis e Teotónio-Miranda, 2002. A reconstrução
dos mercados, o aumento do poder do cliente e outras
tendências do e-marketing.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L., 1994.
Servqual: Alternative scales
for measuring servicec
quality? A comparative assessment based on
psychometric and diagnostic criteria, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 70, No. 1,pp. 193-199.
Pastoriza, D. Arino, M.A. and Ricart, J.E. 2009. Creating
an Ethical Work Context: A Pathway to Generate
SocialCapital in Firm. Journal of Business Ethics. No.
88.pp. 477- 489.
Pearce, J. dan Robinson, R. 1997. “Manajemen Stratejik”.
Jilid I Binarupa Aksara Jakarta.
Pendit S. Nyoman, 2006. Ilmu Pariwisata : Sebuah Pengantar
Perdana, Cetakan Kedelapan, (Edisi Revisi), Penerbit PT.
Malta Printindo Jakarta.
Pelhan, Alfred M., 1997."Mediating influence on the
relationship, Between Market Orientation and
Profitability in Small Industry Firm ". Journal of
Marketing Theory and Practice, Sumer, 55-76.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.
New York: John Wiley
Pong. LT., Johnny, Yee. T.P. and Ester. 2001.
An
integrated model of service
loyalty.Academy of
Business and Administrative Sciences. International
conferences. Brussels. Belgium.
Porter, Michael. E. (1991). “Towards a Dynamic Theory of
strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, 95-1
7
Porter, Michael E, (1996), Strategi Bersaing: Teknik
Menganalisis Industri dan Pesaing, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Porter, Michael E . (1998). Competitive Advantage:
Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New
York: The Free Press.
Prakosa, B, 2005, “Pengaruh Orientasi Pasar, Inovasi Dan
Orientasi Pembelajaran Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan
Untuk Mencapai Keunggulan Bersaing (Studi Empiris
PadaIndustri Manufaktur Di Semarang)”, Journal Studi
Manajemen & Organisasi, Vol. 2 No.1
Pranoto at all, 2016), The Social Capital and Firm
Performance: Evident from Indonesia Small
businesses, Special Issue for "International Soft
Science Conference (ISSC), 11-13 April 2016,
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia”
Pretty, J. N. (2002). Agri-culture : reconnecting people,
land and nature. Earthscan, London.
Priem, Richard L, Rasheed, Abdul. (1997) M.A. Alderson's
transvection and Porter's value system: a comparison
of two independently – developed theories. Journal of
Management History, Vol.3 No2. MBC University
Press.
Pretty Jules And Ward Hugh, (2001) Social Capital And
The Environment, World Development, Elsevier
SciencVol. 29, No. 2, pp. 209.
Puspitasari, Ratih Hesty Utami.2015, Orientasi Pasar dan
Inovasi produk Sebagai Strategi Untuk Meningkatkan
Kinerja Pemasaran Perusahaan Mebel Jepara. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Kebangkitan Teknologi, h : 135-148.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton
University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and
revival of American community. Simon & Schuster,
New York.
Rafiq, Mohammed, and Ahmed, K. Pervaiz. (1995).
Using the 7Ps as a generic
marketing mix: an
exploratory survey of UK and European marketing
academic. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(9), pp.
4-15.
Rapih, Subroto, Analisis Pengaruh Kompetensi Sumberdaya
Manusia, Modal Sosial dan Modal Finansial, terhadap
KInerja UMKM Bidang Garmen di Kabupaten Klaten,
Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2015.
Ratih Hurriyati, (2005). Bauran Pemasaran dan Loyalitas
Konsumen. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Ratno Purnomo, (2013), Resource-Based View dan
Keunggulan Bersaing Berkelanjutan: Sebuah Telaah
Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran Jay Barney (1991),
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Raya Alia Bihrajihant, (2014). Farmer Group Performance
of Collective Chili Marketing on Sandy Land Area of
Yogyakarta Province Indonesia. Asian Social Science;
Vol. 10, No; 2014, ISSN 1911.
Retnowati, Nova. (2008). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan,
Orientasi Layanan dan
Strategi Harga terhadap
Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan. Disertasi,
Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Richarson, John Ivor, and Fluker, Martin, 2007.
Understanding and Managing
Tourism. Pearson
Education Australia
Rock, A, & Agca V. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation
and Performance of Turkish Manufacturing FDI
Firms: A Empirical Study, Journal Economics Business
and Finance, Vol. 24. Pp. 115-133.
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
148
Rodríguez, Antonio L. Leal., Gema Albert-Morant. 2016.
Linking Market, Orientation, Innovation, and
Performance: An Empirical Study On Small Industrial
Enterprise In Spain. Journal of Small, Business
Strategy. Vol. 26.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition.
New York: Free Press pp. 424-438
Sahadev, S. and K. Purani, 2008.
Modeling the
consequences of e-service
quality. Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, 26(6): 605-620.
Selnes, Fred. 1993. “
An Examination of The effect of
Product performance on Brand Reputation,
Satisfaction and Loyalty"
European Journal of
Marketing Vol 27, No. 9, pp 19-35.
Schroeder R.G., Bates K.A., Juntila M.A. (2002). A
Resource-Based View of Manufacturing Performance,
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23. p. 105-117.
Sheth, J.N., Gardner, D.M. & Garrett, D.E., 1988. Marketing
Theory: Evolution and Evaluation, Wiley, New York.
Sekaran Uma, 2006.
Research Methods For Business
(Metodologi Penelitian
untuk Bisnis), Penerbit Salemba
Empat, Jakarta.
Sekaran, U., Roger, B. (2010). Research Methods For
Business ASkill Building Approach, A John Wiley and
Sons Ltd publication Fith Edition.
Sembiring, Guru, S (2011). Permasalahan Pertanian Karo
(Secara Sosiologis), Masyarakat Karo.
Waspadaonline.com Medan.
Sembiring, 2017, Wortel Brastagi, Produk Lokal yang
Populer di Negara Tetangga, RilisID. Jakarta.
Sigit, Hananto, (1994). Dampak Pariwisata Terhadap
Perekonomian: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota.
ITB, Bandung. RilisID, Jakarta.
Singarimbun, Masrie, Sofyam Efendi. (2006), Metode
Penelitian Survey, LP3ES, Yogyakarta.
Singarimbun, Masri. 1975. Kindship, descent and Alliance
among the Karo Batak. Berkeley, California University
Press.
Soekardijo, R.G, (1997). Anatomi Pariwisata: Memahami
Pariwisata Sebagai Systematic Linkage . PT. Gramedia
Pustaka Utama. Jakarta
Spilane, James J., 1987. Ekonomi Pariwisata, Sejarah, dan
Prospeknya. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Sholihin, Mahfud dan Ratmono, Dwi. (2013). Analisis SEM-
PLS dengan Wrap- PLS 3.0 Untuk Hubungan Nonlinear
dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
ANDI.
Stanton, J. and Pires, G. (2005).
'Ethnic Marketing,
Accepting the Challenge of
Cultural Diversity',:
Thomson Learning Australia.
Sugiyarti Gita, (2015) Membangun Keunggulan Bersaing
Produk Melalui Orientasi Pembelajaran, Orientasi Pasar
Dan Inovasi Produk (Studi empiris pada industry pakaian
jadi skala kecil dan menengah di kota Semarang), Serat
Acitya Jurnal Ilmiah UNTAG Semarang.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu
Pendekatan Praktek,Penerbit Rineka Cipta, Yogyakarta.
Sumantoro, 1997. Upaya Pemerintah Daerah dalam
PengembanganPariwisata Budaya. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Suriatna, Danny dan Ardianti, Retno, RR, (2013), Analisa
Modal Sosial dan Inovasi Produk pada Pengusaha Mikro
dan Kecil di Jawa Timur, Universitas Kristen Petra,
Agora, Vol. 1. No. 3. Surabaya.
Sutiksno, Prana, Rezzy, Ansari, (2018) Brief Overviewof
STATCAL Statistical Application Program. Journal of
Physics : Conf Series.
Taleghani, K.H. andTayebi, A. (2013) Relationship
between Customer Relationship Management and
Marketing Performance. Journal of Business
Management Perspective, 34, 109-123.
Tang, J., Z. Tang, L.D. Marino, Y. Zhang and Q. Li, 2008.
Exploring an inverted u-shape relationship between
entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese
ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 32: 219-
239.
Tang, J., Z. Tang, Y. Zhang and Q. Li, 2007. The impact of
entrepreneurial orientation and ownership type on firm
performance in the emerging region of China. J. Dev.
Entrepreneurship, 12: 383-397.
Tse David K., Francesco M. Nicosia, and Peter C.
Wilton. (1989
). Consumer
Satisfaction as a Process:
Its Rediscovery and Conceptualisation, working paper,
Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, B. C.
Uncles, M. 2000. "Market Orientation." Australian Journal
Management. Vol.25, No.2
Usvita, Mega.2014. Pengaruh orientasi kewirausahaan
terhadap kinerja pemasaran IKM.Kota Padang dengan
differentiation strategy sebagai variabel Intervening,
Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonomi Volume 2, Nomor 1, ISSN
2337 - 39
Verbeek, Frans J. H. M. dan Matthew T. G. Meulenberg
(2004), "Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product
Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms," Journal
of Small Business Management, Vol. 42 (2)
Voss, G.B., & Voss Z.G. (2000). Strategic Orientation and
Firm Performance In an Artistic Environment, Journal
of Marketing, Vol. 64. p. 67-83.
Wahyuni, Pradhanawati A dan Hidayat W. 2014. Pengaruh
Tingkat Pengalaman Berwirausaha Produktivitas dan
Inovasi Terhadap Pengembangan Usaha Kulit Lumpia.
Wales, R. (2009). Digestion During Continuous Culture
Fermentation When Replacing Perennial Ryegrass
With Barley and Steam-Flaked Corn, Journal of Dairy
Science, Vol. 92. Pp. 189-197.
Wambugu, at all (2009), Effect of Social Capital on
Performance of Smallholder Producer Organizations,
Contributed Paper prepared for presentation at the
International Association of Agricultural Economists
Conference, Beijing, China, August 1622.
Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T.T. & Frese, M. (2009).
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business
Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and
Suggestions For the Future, Entrepreneurship Theory
and Practice, Vol. 33. p. 761-787.
Wilkinson Paul F. and Wiwik Pratiwi. 1995.Gender and
tourism in an Indonesian village. Annals of Tourism
Research. Volume 22, Issue 2.
Linking Social Capital, Business Environment, Product Innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from
Farmers in Karo Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia
149
Winsted Kathryn Frazer,
2000.
"Service behaviors
that lead to satisfied
customers," European Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 34 Iss: 3/4,
Wirtz, Jochen and John E. G. Bateson. 1999.
“Consumer Satisfaction with
Services: Integrating
the Environmental Perspective in Services Marketing
into the Traditional Disconfirmation
Paradigm,"
Journal of Business
Research, 44 (1): 55-
66.
Wind, J., & Mahajan, V. (1997). Issues and opportunities in
new product development: An introduction to the
special issue. Journal of Marketing
Research,34(February), 1–12
Winger Ray & Gavin Wall. (2006), Food Product
Innovation A background paper, Food, and Agriculture
Organization of The United Nations, Rome, 2006.
Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic
development. Theory and Society 27: 151-208.
Woolcock, M. 2001. The place of social capital in
understanding social and economic outcomes.
Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2: 11 – 17.
Yahya Ansari Al -, Altalib Marwan, Sardo Muna (2011),
Technology Orientation, Innovation, and Business
Performance: A Study of Dubai SMEs, The
International Technology Management Review, Vol. 3,
No. 1, 1-11.
Yen. C.H. dan Lu. H.P. 2008. Effects of E-Service Quality
on loyalty intention: An empirical study in an online
auction. Managing Service Quality, Vol.18.No.2.
Yoo, Boonghee, Naveen Donthu, and Sungho Lee. (2000),
“An. Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements
and Brand Equity,” Journal of the Academy of
Marketing.
Zahra, S. A., and Covin, J. G. (1993) 'Business strategy,
technology policy and firm performance,' Strategic
Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 451-478.
Zhou, K.Z. Yim, C.K. & Tse, D.K. (2005). The Effects of
Strategic Orientations on Technology and Market
Based Breakthrough Innovations, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 69. p. 40.
Zimmerer, Thomas W dan Scarborough, Norman M. 2005,
Pengantar. Kewirausahaan dan Manajemen Bisnis
Kecil. Jakarta: PT. Penebar Swadaya.
EBIC 2019 - Economics and Business International Conference 2019
150