The Effect of Self-regulation on Narrative Writing Skill
Erdhita Oktrifianty, Zulela MS, Endry Boeriswati
Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Pemuda Street, East Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Self-regulation, narrative writing skills, narrative text, elementary students
Abstract: The object of the research is on the effect of self-regulation with narrative writing skills. Writing is a learning
product that needs to be done continuously since in elementary school. The fact that not all students are able
to pour out thoughts, feelings, ideas into text, students were not able to determine the theme and develop a
framework for a narrative text. Therefore, the researchers made a survey that which took on the level of a
class V (five) in the state elementary schools in Target Area III, Sub-district Kebon Jeruk, West Jakarta.
Research methods used a quantitative approach with survey method and path analysis techniques. The total
of respondents are 109 students from 3 elementary school namely SDN kebon jeruk 01, SDN kebon jeruk 08
and SDN kebon jeruk 10 using multistagecluster sampling techniques. Research instrument is to write a
narrative text for narrative writing skills variable and questionnaire for self regulation variable. The purpose
of this research is to know how influential the self-regulation with narrative writing skills. Results of the study
showed that there were the influence between self regulation on narrative writing skills is 0,340.
1 INTRODUCTION
As one of the language skills, writing is a learning
product that needs to be carried out continuously
since in elementary school. This is based on the idea
that writing ability in elementary school is a basic
ability as a provision for learning to write at the next
level (Somadayo, 2015). Children's writing skills
developed. This ability comes from randomly
scattered streaks on all pages of paper that show word
limitations and the inability to think of placing letters
in a row. Then it develops along with the
development of language, connects sounds with letter
symbols, spelling discoveries and words, and
arranges them in a line of writing (Slavin, 2008).
Rofi'uddin and Zuhdi stated that until now, the
literacy skills of elementary school graduates was still
far from expectations. Complaints about the ability of
elementary school graduates in terms of literacy
continue to be disseminated. Various research results
support these complaints. The Efforts have been
designed, developed and implemented to improve the
effectiveness of teaching reading and writing.
Another fact was stated by the Ministry of National
Education (Giayana, 2004) which revealed that a
number of data from the (International Association
for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
(IEA)) survey of the Indonesian children's writing
ability showed that around 50% of sixth grade
elementary school students in the six provinces in the
Primary Education Quality Improvement Project
(PEQIP) could not write the text. One of the causes of
the low reading ability of elementary school students
in Indonesia is that so far the students have more
lessons in memorizing than practice, including
composing (Kharizmi, 2015).
Furthermore Braine & Yorozu (Javed, 2007)
argue that writing skills are more complicated than
other language skills. The research conducted by
Somadayo on elementary school teachers that in the
Indonesian language lesson the most common
problem is the difficulty of writing text, which is
difficult for students to express their ideas in written
form. In detail the problems that are often found are:
(1) the writing ability of children is still relatively low
because they are lazy to write (2) children are lazy to
read so the ability to compose is low, (3) the child's
ability to compose is influenced by reading skills. (4)
students are less skilled in writing essays (Somadayo,
2015). The high level students of elementary school
have not been able to express ideas coherently in good
sentences. Students still find it difficult to express
ideas that are in their mind verbally and have not been
able to use good vocabulary. In addition, they have
not been able to develop the story thoroughly (Zulela,
2013).
144
Oktrifianty, E., MS, Z. and Boeriswati, E.
The Effect of Self-regulation on Narrative Writing Skill.
DOI: 10.5220/0008995301440150
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Language and Society (ICELS 2019), pages 144-150
ISBN: 978-989-758-405-3
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
Based on observations made by researchers that
60% of students are unable to express ideas are able
to express ideas, thoughts, feelings in the form of
symbols, students are unable and develop a
framework of narrative essays. Students are not fond
of Indonesian writing lessons which results in low
student understanding in developing narrative essays
and not able to use good and correct punctuation and
capital letters in writing narrative essays. Other
difficulties faced by students are about spelling, the
use of punctuation, choosing vocabulary, composing
sentences up to the difficulty of developing story
ideas into written language. In general, the sentences
made by students also contain repeated words so that
they become ineffective sentences. As a result, the
narrative essay produced does not provide a clear
picture of the series of events or cases.
Therefore, improvement in writing skills must be
constantly accustomed to learning to internalize the
writing ability of each student, especially the fifth
grade in this study. This is stated in the basic
Indonesian language competence about writing listed
in theme 7, namely the history of Indonesian
civilization with basic competencies which reads
"Processing and presenting story texts of historical
narratives about the values of the development of the
Islamic kingdom in Indonesia independently in
Indonesian oral and written by choosing and sorting
out the standard vocabulary” (Kemdikbud, 2013).
In developing the writing skills of elementary
school students, it seems that it will be more effective
if it starts with revealing the things they already know
in the form of narrative stories. (Zulela, 2017).
Therefore, researchers focused on the ability to write
narratives in the form of experiential stories as a basis
for developing students writing skills.
The factors that are thought to influence the ability
to write narratives are self regulation. Wolters and
Pintrich stated that self-regulation is an active and
constructive process carried out by students in setting
goals to learn to try, monitor, regulate, control
cognition, motivation, and behavior which are then
directed and driven by goals and adapted to the
context of the environment (Boeriswati, 2012).
Similar things have also been stated in the results
of research from Spitzer and Latifah who found that
self-regulation in learning carried out by someone is
closely related to their academic performance.
academicperformance improvement can be generated
if implementing a planned strategy and then
monitoring performance in learning and evaluating
academic progress(Zumbrunn, Tadlock, Robert;
2011). Pintrich and his colleagues in Kosnin further
said that there are two important aspects of self-
regulation namely motivation and learning strategies.
Motivation is a drive from within that is used by
students to deal with stress and emotions that
sometimes emerge when they try to overcome failure
and to be a good studentwhen they have their own
learning strategies to improve understanding their
understanding, integration, and store new information
in the process learning (Kosnin, 2007).
High self-regulation plays an important role in
writing skills because writing is an intentional and
self-planned activity. In fact, oftentimes students see
writing as a difficult task because it requires extensive
self-regulation and control of attention in managing
writing and experiencing obstacles to the topic of
writing and the processes involved in writing
(Kellogg, 1987; Ransdell & Levy, 1996; Scardamalia
& Bereiter, 1986; Zimmerman & Riesemberg, 1997).
Self-regulation is considered to improve writing
performance in two ways. First, own regulatory
mechanisms, such as planning, monitoring,
evaluation, and revision (Scardamalia & Bereiter,
1985). Second, the use of self-regulation can act as a
trigger agent for change that leads to strategic
adjustment in writing (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1985;
Zimmerman &Riesemberg, 1997).
Therefore, with the existence of self-regulation is
thought to affect the success of student learning in
writing narratives. Based on the exposure to the
mentioned problems, the author was interested in
conducting a study entitled "The Effect of Self
Regulation on Narrative Writing Ability in Class V
Students".
2 THEORETICAL STUDY
2.1 Narrative Writing Skill
According to John et al. (Wijaya & Suhaji, 2012).
Ability is a person's talent to perform mental or
physical tasks. Ability is a skill possessed by someone
to do a work assignment in order to achieve the
desired goal.
Furthermore, Braine and Yorozu state that writing
is one of the four basic abilities. The students begin
to learn to communicate through written forms
because they begin to interact with others at the
school level (Javed, 2013). With that basis, then the
child can learn to write gradually. Anderson
suggested that the first thing is to free the child to add
words to the notes in whatever way they want, such
as pictures, definitions in the target language,
equivalent terms in their first language, their own
sentences using new words, and so on. Second, they
The Effect of Self-regulation on Narrative Writing Skill
145
have the opportunity to use the language learned in
reading in real context (Herrero, 2007), so that
children can get used to write.
In particular writing is a communication activity
in the form of delivering messages (information) in
writing to other parties using written language as a
tool or medium. Writing is a creative process of
pouring ideas into written language in purpose
(Dalman, 2014). Writing is a creative process because
it is an achievement process to excite one's thoughts,
write like a process of making meaning (Huy, 2015).
Based on the explanation, it can be concluded that
writing is a creative process that occurs in pouring
ideas into a writing as a means of conveying
messages.
Furthermore, Braine and Yorozu argue that
writing skills are more complicated than other
language skills. Basically the ability to write requires
a well-structured way and how to present the
experience in an organized and planned manner.
Kellogg, Olive, & Pilot added that productive writing
skills are considered a cognitive challenge, because
they help to assess language competence,
remembering talents and thinking abilities. This
requires remembering information from long-term
memory. In fact, Nickerson, Perkins, & Smith stated
that productive writing skills require sound ability to
think about things that are understood (Javed, 2013).
Hereinafter, narrative is to retell an event through
words of something that has happened to become a
story. Narratives tell events and leave behind several
events because they come from several significant
perspectives, and may emphasize others. The
conclusion is narratives can form a history (scene of
events, stories about what happened) (Huy, 2015).
Then according to Zulela, narration is the result of
writing that contains stories about events, figures,
settings drawn from student’s experiences, both new
real events (factual) and related to one another
(Zulela, 2017).
So, it can be concluded that the narrative is writing
that tells the event through a description of
information from the character, background,
experience so that it is understood by the reader.
Narrative essays are divided into two, namely
expository narratives and suggestive narratives. The
definition of expository narrative is an essay that
intends to inform a reader of factual and rational
information. Then the essay of suggestive narrative is
an essay based on the imagination of the author in the
form of imagination (Jauhari, 2013). In this case, the
essay that will be tested is about experiences that
include expository type narratives.
Furthermore, according to Hutchinson the aspect
of the narrative consists of plot, character, dialogue,
setting, conflict and climax (Hutchinson, 2005). As
for the characteristics of narrative essays, namely: (1)
Highlighting the elements of action or action, (2)
Strung together in a time sequence, (3) Trying to
answer the question, what happened? And (4) There
is conflict. Narration is built by a storyline.
Understanding the narrative, one of which is
retelling (experience) is the simplest type of text.
Formally, retelling is sequential text that does a little
more than the sequence of events that require
orientation. Telling a story usually has characters
formed at a certain time and place. There are various
ways to teach the narrative writing stage, for example:
(a) character, time, place, (b) who, what, where, when
and so on, and (c) sequence of events (Keraf, 2000).
There are various ways to teach the narrative writing
stage, for example: (a) character, time, place, (b) who,
what, where, when and so on, and (c) sequence of
events (Knapp, Watkins; 2005).
The conclusion is that narratives writing skill is a
skill through a series of complex activities in
expressing the idea of a factual event or a typical
event experienced by the writer that aims to convey
information to the reader with 3 aspects assessed,
namely: (1) Narrative: themes, characters, plot ( 2)
Language: paragraphs, sentences, word choices, EBI
and punctuation, and (3) Text Structure: orientation,
climax, solution.
2.2 Self-Regulation
According to Zimmerman and Bandura stated that
self-regulation is a concept that refers to students
"self-generated ideas, actions and feelings that are
systematically oriented towards achieving
educational goals (Kosnin, 2007). Furthermore, self-
regulation is an important personality process where
people try to exercise control over their minds, their
feelings, their impulses and desires, and show their
achievements (Baumeister, Gailliot, DeWall, Oaten;
2006).
Bandura added, the process of self regulation
occurs when students' directed actions and processes
are directed towards acquiring information or skills.
Independent students can plan, set their learning
goals, organize, self-monitor and evaluate themselves
during knowledge acquisition. This process makes
them become self-aware and knowledgeable in their
approach to learning. Learning and achievement are
best understood when we recognize the interaction
between affective and cognitive processes. Self-
regulation also includes meta-cognitive skills, namely
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
146
understanding one's cognitive skills, including
memory, attention and problem solving (Boekaerts
and Corno, 2005).
Furthermore, Boeriswati said that the self-
regulation model in the form of a cycle with three
stages, namely planning, implementation, and
evaluation. The three stages of the process are the
same as self regulating learning. The planning phase
will affect performance or the implementation stage,
which in turn will affect the self-reaction phase. The
self-regulation cycle stops when the process of self-
reflection is able to influence the planning process as
long as someone tries to gain the next knowledge
(Boeriswati, 2012). Zimmerman & Pons explicitly
emphasizes that from some researchers it appears "the
use of self regulatory processes and quality and
quantity has shown a high correlation with academic
achievement and with standardized test scores (Zarei,
2012).
The details presented by Schunk & Zimmerman
the differences in characteristics of students who have
high and low regulations, as follows:
Table 1: Differences in characteristics of low-regulated and
highly regulated students
Self-
Regulation
Aspect
Group
Low self-
regulation
High self-regulation
Onward
thinking
Goals not
specific
orientation
Performance
goals
Low self-
efficacy
Not
interested
Specific goals
Mastery goals
orientation
Self-efficacy
High intrinsic
interest
Performanc
e of
volitional
control
Un-focus
planning
Self-
handicappin
g strategy
Self-
monitoring
to result
Performance focus
Self
instruction/imager
y
Monitoring to
process
Self
reflection
No self-
evaluate
Attribution
ability
Negative
self-reaction
Un-adaptive
Self-evaluate
Attribution
strategy
Positive self-
reaction
Adaptive
(Susetyo,Kumara;
2012).
Based on the above explanation that self
regulation is an action in acquiring ability through a
process of thinking, positive behavior and directing
emotions / feelings by intervening on their own
weaknesses and strengths in learning to achieve the
desired target with 3 stages, namely: (1) forward
thinking stage, (2) stage of performance and (3) stage
of reflection.
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study uses a quantitative approach, survey
methods and path analysis techniques to determine
the effect of self regulation (X) on the ability to write
narratives (Y). The target population in this study
were fourth grade students in the State Elementary
School III, Kebon Jeruk sub-district, West Jakarta.
There were 533 students. The study sample was taken
by multistage cluster sampling technique with
sampling from the population of class V (five)
Elementary Schools in Fostered Region III,
KebonJeruk sub-district, West Jakarta which
consisted of 10 schools. After that, 3 schools were
taken for randomly selected samples consisting of
Kebon Jeruk 01 Elementary School with 35 students,
Kebon Jeruk 08 Elementary School with 38 students
and Kebon Jeruk 10 Elementary School with 36
students. So the total sample that had been studied is
109 students.
The data collection techniques used in this study
were tests and questionnaires, namely: questionnaires
and narrative writing tests. Questionnaires are used to
obtain self-regulation data and narrative writing tests
are used to obtain data on the ability to write narrative
texts. Self-regulation questionnaires were compiled
in 22 statements and tests the ability to write
narratives in the form of narrative text writing tests.
4 DISCUSSION AND RESULT
To find out the effect of independent variables on the
dependent variable, correlation analysis is first
performed to determine the magnitude of the
relationship between variables. After that, path
The Effect of Self-regulation on Narrative Writing Skill
147
analysis was carried out to determine the effect of the
Self Regulation variable (X) on writing skill (Y)
regression analysis.
These steps are explained as follows:
1. Correlation Analysis
Before conducting path analysis to find out the
causality relationship between variables,
correlation analysis is used as information to find
out the magnitude of the relationship between the
variables formed. Correlation analysis is to use
Pearson product moment correlation analysis.
Table 2: Correlation Analysis between Research Variable
Self
Regulation
Narrative
Writing
Skills
Self
Regulation
Pearson
Correlation
1
,541
**
Sig. (2-
tailed)
,000
N
109
109
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
(2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
(2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
(2-tailed).
From the calculations that have been done, the
correlation coefficient of 0.541 with a significant
value (0,000) which is smaller than the level of error
(0.05). This means that there is a significant
relationship between self regulation and the narrative
writing skills.
2. Regression Analysis
The regression model on relationships is built
through the composition of the causal variables
namely self regulation, while the consequent variable
is the ability to write narratives. The following are the
results of the regression analysis.
Table 3 :Regression Analysis Result
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standa
rdized
Coeffi
cients
t
Sig.
B
Std.
Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
4,282
10,51
9
,407
,685
Regulasi
Diri
,558
,106
,340
5,242
,000
Based on the hypothesis proposed, there is a
positive direct effect of self regulation (x1) on the
ability to write narratives (Y). That is, the higher the
self-regulation of students, the better their ability to
write narratives. Based on the results of path analysis
on the variable self-regulation (x1) on the ability to
write narratives (Y) produces a regression direction
coefficient of 0,000 with a influence of 0.340.
Thus, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis
which states that there is a positive direct influence
between self-regulation (X1) and students narrative
writing ability (Y) is accepted and tested
significantly.
5 CONCLUSION
Based on the theoretical framework and research
findings discussed, there is a positive relationship
between self-regulation and the ability to write
narratives. The statement is also supported by
(Zimmerman & Riesemberg, 1997) that high self-
regulation plays an important role in writing ability
because writing is an intentional activity that is quite
often self-planned and independent. In fact, often
students see writing as a difficult task because it
requires extensive self-regulation and control of
attention in managing writing and experiencing
obstacles to the topic of writing and the processes
involved in writing (Kellogg, 1987; Ransdell & Levy,
1996; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1986; Zimmerman &
Riesemberg, 1997).
6 RECOMMENDATION
Efforts that can be made in improving self-regulation
are the first to build motivation in children. This is
stated by Bandura's theory in Dinsmore et al's
research that the dimensions of motivation include
evaluative dimensions of performance, personal
standards, assessment of activities, and attribution
(Dinsmor, Alexander, Sandra; 2008). Often students
have difficulty completing homework assignments
because there are other things that are more
interesting that they prefer to watch TV, daydream, or
talk to friends (Zimmerman, 2010). Here the teacher
can play a role in motivating students to make
children aware of being superior, which will affect
their goals and add students confidence in their
commitment to the goals they will achieve, so it will
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
148
take effect to the implementation of the learning
strategies they have been taken.
Second, the positive role of environment. Both
Pintrich and Zimmerman stated that active students
build their own meanings and goals from various
influences in the surrounding environment (Winters,
Greene, Costich; 2008). In this case social assistance
(peers, teachers, or other adults can help the
consistency of the self-regulation process itself
(Zimmerman, 2010). The similarity of opinion is also
stated by Cragg and Nation that environmental
variables affect behavior and self, which in turn affect
to environment. The role of the teacher by observing
problems in the appearance of students who can
provide corrections because students do not fully
understand how to do the skills or strategies and the
performance of students (Craig, Nation; 2006).
Generally in elementary schools the learning process
of reading and writing begins to change. Initially
writers were invited to create their own spelling,
compose their own stories, and read their own texts.
Teachers provide opportunities for children to write
any audiences and goals, negotiate with them as their
writing is underway, arrange for peers to meet
together to respond to each other's work, and
encourage children to go through various concepts of
their work (Hillocks, 1986).
Examples that can be done by teachers in learning
according to Zimmerman and Kitsantas (1999) in
improving revision skills are writing independent
middle school students. Students observe a
demonstration model of writing revision strategy.
First the teacher teaches students how to combine
several sentences into one sentence by eliminating
redundancies and adding transitions. Then students
are assigned to and practice with their respective
strategies. Then students are advised to concentrate
on implementing key steps in the revision strategy.
Then after it was finished the students were told to
rewrite the sentence that had been done in front. In
the process the students doing modelling, training and
feedback (Craig, Nation; 2006).
The other things that can be used by teachers in
the classroom are using collaborative methods in
learning. This was revealed by Jong et al. That
students who work collaboratively to support one
another can improve self-regulation. Azevedo added
that the success of collaboration depends in part on
the ability and level of knowledge of previous
students who collaborate (Winters, Greene, Costich;
2008).
Furthermore, the third is to improve the ability to
monitor and control cognitively which involves
planning or thinking, where individuals define tasks,
set goals, describe strategies. Next, individuals
determine their plans and strategies. During this
phase individuals regulate themselves by engaging in
metacognitive monitoring, which can lead to efforts
to control the learning process through change. For
example, someone might notice that certain learning
strategies don't seem to work and move on to other
strategies.
The example of self-regulation in improving the
ability to write narratives is to implement strategies
and strategies to monitor themselves and strategies to
use feedback. Teachers provide direction or input in
developing student strategies. The teacher can also
help analyze the shortcomings students have in
writing. Furthermore, the third one encourages
students positive perceptions.
Finally, each learning model includes a self-
reflective phase where performance, measured in
intrinsic or extrinsic terms that makes benchmarks, is
evaluated, often leading to adaptation to individual
confidence, beliefs about tactics and learning
strategies, and learning contexts. This adaptation can
then influence learning activities in the future
(Winters, Greene, Costich; 2008). A simpler thing is
expressed by Schraw et al. That cognitive strategies
are in simple form, problem solving and critical
thinking strategies. Metacognitive processing refers
to knowledge and control of cognitive skills, and
usually involves planning, monitoring, and
evaluating learning (Schraw, Crippen, Hartley;
2006).
REFERENCES
Azlina Mohd Kosnin, 2007. Self-regulated learning
and academic achievement. Malaysia, Shannon
Research Press.
Barry J. Zimmerman, 2010. Self-Regulated Learning
and Academic Achievement. New York,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Daniel L. Dinsmore & Patricia A. Alexander &
Sandra M, 2008. Focusing the Conceptual Lens
on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-
regulated Learning. US, Springer Science.
Dalman, 2014. Keterampilan Menulis. Jakarta, Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Emily Hutchinson, 2005. Narrative Writing. USA,
Saddleback Educational Publishing.
Endry Boeriswati, 2012. The Model of Speaking in
Teaching Indonesian to Foreign Speakers Based
on Self-Regulated Learning and Anxiety
Reduction Approaches. US, David Publishing.
The Effect of Self-regulation on Narrative Writing Skill
149
Gregory Schraw, Kent J. Crippen and Kendall
Hartley, 2006.8 Promoting Self-Regulation in
Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a
Broader Perspective on Learning. Nevada,
Springer.
HeriJauhari, 2013. Terampil Mengarang. Bandung,
Nuansa Cendekia.
Kementerian Pendidikandan Kebudayaan, Tematik
Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 Untuk SD/MI Kelas V
(Jakarta: Kemdikbud, 2014), h. 48.
Lucy Cragg& Kate Nation, 2007.Exploring Written
Narrative in Children with Poor Reading
Comprehension. UK, International Journal of
Experimental Educational Psychology.
Marilyn Cochran, 1991. Word Processing and
Writing in Elementary Classrooms. Pennsylvania,
Educational Research Spring.
Muhammad Kharizmi, 2015. Kesulitan Siswa
Sekolah Dasar Dalam Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Literasi. Aceh, Jupendas.
Monique Boekaertsdan Lyn Corno, 2005.A
Perspective on Assessment and Intervention.
Netherlands, University of Leiden.
Nguyen Thanh Huy, 2015.Problems Affecting
Learning Writing Skill Of grade 11. Vietnam,
Dong Thap University.
Peter Knapp dan Megan Watkins, 2005. Genre, Text,
grammar. Australia: UNSW Press.
Robert Slavin, 2008.PsikologiPendidikan. Jakarta,
Indeks.
Roy F. Baumeister, Matthew Gailliot, C. Nathan De
Wall and Megan Oaten, 2006. Self-Regulation
and Personality. Florida, Blackwell publishing.
Samsu Somadayo, 2015. Peningkatan Kemampuan
Menulis Deskripsi Dengan Strategi Modeling
Pada Siswa Kelas V SD. Ternate, Universitas
Khairun Ternate.
Sharon Zumbrunn, Joseph Tadlock, Elizabeth
Danielle Roberts, 2011. Encouraging Self-
Regulated Learning in the Classroom. Virginia,
MERC.
Steve Graham & Karen R. Harris, 2010.The Role of
Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in
Writing and Writing Development. Columbia,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Yuli Fajar Susetyo dan Amitya Kumara, 2012. Jurnal
Psikologi Volume 39, NO. 1. Orientasi Tujuan,
Atribusi Penyebab, dan Belajar Berdasar
Regulasi Diri. Jogjakarta, Universitas Gajah
Mada.
Winters & Jeffrey A. Greene & Claudine M. Costich,
2008. Self-Regulation of Learning within
Computer-based Learning Environments: A
Critical Analysis Fielding. UK,Springer Science.
Zulela, 2013. Terampil Menulis di Sekolah Dasar.
Tangerang, Pustaka Mandiri.
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
150