Representations of Diponegoro after Arbitrary Interpretations
Martinus Dwi Marianto
1
, Nur Sahid
1
and Purwanto
2
1
Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta (Indonesia Art Institute of Yogyakarta), Jln Parangtritis KM 6,5, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2
Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Diponegoro, yogyakarta, vernacular, war of java
Abstract: This research is to investigate how Prince Diponegoro - one of the National Heroes in the Republic of
Indonesia - is presented in visual works either in two or three-dimensional media. Of the various vernacular
expressions scattered in many places in Yogyakarta, it can be said that Diponegoro - the eldest son of Sultan
Hamengkubuwono III of the Yogyakarta Sultanate - was presented in various expressions, which seemed to
be based on arbitrary interpretations and arbitrary conception. . This research was conducted by first observing
Diponegoro's drawings from a number of works - paintings, sculptures, and reliefs - then observing again
using visual data and historical texts from official sources that can be accessed by the public. Each selected
artwork is considered a sign; its signifier is analyzed, interpreted, and assessed to answer research questions.
In general, there are many interpretations of Diponegoro, causing many perceptions, about Diponegoro. Based
on the findings obtained, it can be said that the representation of Diponegoro in various visual works have
developed in such an arbitrage, even from what is symptomatic can be said to have shown the symptoms of
anarchism.
1 INTRODUCTION
Prince Diponegoro, the first son of Sultan
Hamengkubuwono (HB) III of the Yogyakarta
Sultanate, is one of the Indonesia’s national heroes.
He lead the Java War a fierce and bloody battle -
against Dutch Colonialism in 1825, until 1830.
Diponegoro is very popular in various communities
in Yogyakarta and its surroundings, but the opposite
happens in the Palace of Yogyakarta Kasunanan
itself. The history of Diponegoro related to the War
of Java, and what causes the war is still a 'mystery'
until now. Diponegoro actually had culturally
defected from the Sultanate in the 1810s, when the
Sultanate was legally and militarily under control of
the British government in Java, represented by
Lieutenant-Governor Stamford Raffles od the Dutch
East Indies (1911-1816) (Wikipedia: Stamford
Raffles); the court was internally governed by an
Advisory Board consisting of 4 people. (Roni
Sodewo, 2016). The ruler at the time was Sultan HB
IV, who was too young to rule the Sultanate. He was
crowned as Sulatan Hamengkubuwono IV when he
was 9 years old in 2010 when he was 9 years old,
replacing the deceased Sultan HB III (Diponegoro
and the new sultan’s father). (Roni Sodewo, 2016: 22-
23).
Diponegoro then lead the Java War as a protest
against the interference from the Dutch towards the
sultanate’s internal affairs, such as influencing the
appointment of the next sultan, HB V, who was 2
years old when he was crowned sultan in 1820.
(Sodewo, 2016). The valiant prince, known as the
leader of the Java people against Dutch colonialism,
has been the subject of many art forms, especially
after his capture in Magelang on March 30, 1830, that
marked the end of the War of Java. Diponegoro was
then brought by the Dutch Colonial Government to be
exiled to Manado, North Sulawesi, through Batavia
(now Jakarta); and then moved to Makassar, South
Sulawesi. Di masa 3 tahun pengasingannya di
Manado Diponegoro menulis sebuah babad
(chronicle), consisting of 30 chapters, which is now
called Babad Diponegoro (Chronicle of Diponegoro).
(Peter Carey, 2008, via Sodewo, 2016)
The second incongruity is the fact that although
Diponegoro is welkonown for his his heroism against
imperialism, yet even in a museum that was built in
1968 as a tribute for the great prince, namely
Museum Pangeran Diponegoro Sasana Wiratama”,
there is no single statue of this legendary figure.
Marianto, M., Sahid, N. and Purwanto, .
Representations of Diponegoro after Arbitrary Interpretations.
DOI: 10.5220/0008544700370043
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Arts and Humanities (ICONARTIES 2019), pages 37-43
ISBN: 978-989-758-450-3
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
37
There are only statues of two great generals instead
who fought for the Independence of the Republic of
Indonesia, they are the Great General Sudirman on
the western side and Lieutenant General Oerip
Soemohardjo located in the eastern side of the main
gate of the complex.
On the other hand, images that are assumed to be,
stated, and accepted as Prince Diponegoro emerge in
many visual works that are spread throughout
Yogyakarta and its surroundings. These works,
which were made to bring specific purposes, are in
the form of statues, paintings, reliefs, drawings, and
wayang (shadow puppets); made by professional
sculptors, vernacular artists, even by ordinary people
living in kampongs.
Figure 1. Relief of Diponegoro, at Sleman, Yogyakarta.
Monumental statues of Diponegoro outside the
cities around Yogyakarta, for government
institutions, were made by professional sculptors,
including: Saptoto, Eddie Sunarso, Dunadi, Purjito,
Sukasman, Yusman, Soewardi; Made Karta, the
sculptor who made the Diponegoro statue at
University of Diponegoro Campus, Semarang. The
above mentioned sculptors received art education at
the academy / school of art, which is now part of the
ISI Yogyakarta.
In fact, those monuments that are scattered all
over the place differ from one among the other. Each
work is made from the free interpretation of its maker.
Some of them are objectively below the objective
standard for a monumental statue. Some others looks
funny, or were poorly made. (Figure 1)
Presumably, the visual data and the history from
many sources that can be legally accessed and are
from the time of the Dutch Colonial era are not
considered important as well as relevant. What is
more important is always the ideological aspect,
where Diponegoro’s character carries or has either an
explicit or implicit signifier of his heroism or his
religiosity or both.
The research problems are: 1) What kind of
characteristics can be found in the representation of
Diponegoro in the works that are being researched?;
and 2) To what extent are the differences among the
characteristics of the works that can be found in many
places in Yogyakarta and the works with Diponegoro
as their subject material from the Dutch Colonial era?
This research is conducted using Art Criticism
and Semiotic methods. Every art object observed is
treated as signs. The signs here are realized as three
interrelated aspects, namely ‘sign’, ‘signifier’, and
signified. (Arthur Asa Berger, 1984) The signifier is
described and analyzed objectively beforehand; then
it is interpreted and evaluated by comparing it with
the signifiers from drawings and paintings with the
subject matter of Prince Diponegoro from the Dutch
Colonial era.
2 PRINCE DIPONEGORO IN ART
FORM
2.1 Diponegoro in Dutch Paintings
The first art work with Diponegoro as its subject
matter, considered as the initiator for other works, is
a drawing made by A.J. Bik. There, Diponegoro is
illustrated wearing white turban, fully clothed with
eight buttons on his chest right under his neck. His
sarong is slung over his left shoulder towards the
right waist. The Prince’s shiny keris (traditional
dagger) is tucked in between his belt and his clothes,
with the tip its handle facing to the right. His eyes
glare at the audience; he looks serious. His ears ere
hidden underneath his turban. He has no moustache
or beard. From this illustration a lithograph was made
by C.C.A. Lost in 1835. Consequently, the use of
dark-light contrast on Diponegoro’s figure seemed
sharper, his keris looked shiny, and the image of the
Prince became more volumetric.
The illustration by A.J. Bik and the lithograph
made five years later means that Diponegoro’s
existence is valued; he is considered as an important
figure. Even after his capture and is locked up in Fort
Rotterdam, Makassar, he was visited by high-profile
guests, including the 16-year-old Dutch Prince Henry
in 1837 (Wikipedia: Diponegoro). In correlation with
this, the history recording of Diponegoro’s capture
was very important, even made Lieutenant General
De Kock—the commander of the assault—got
ICONARTIES 2019 - 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Arts and Humanities
38
recognition in the record as shown In the following
painting.
The Submission of Prince Diponegoro to General
de Kock, by Nicholaas Pieneman, made around 1830
1835, shows Diponegoro submitting to the Dutch
authority. Diponegoro’s face was painted in detail,
although it is not clear whether it was made based on
realistic occurrence or fictional, because he was not
shown as an ordinary Javanese from Yogyakarta with
long and thick eyelashes. Fully dressed wearing a
greed turban, Diponegoro’s hands are stretch out in a
way showing as if he was in a submissive state. It is
shown that Diponegoro does not bring his keris. His
chin is raised a little, indexically telling that he is
looking towards his followers, the indigenous people,
in front of him (Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam).
Diponegoro is presented with submissive
gestures, contrast to how Lieutenant General De
Kock that looks more relaxed, and is shown to point
towards a carriage to his right. De Kock he orders a
soldier carrying a sword to take Diponegoro to
Batavia. The guards do not appear to be on standby,
while Diponegoro’s followers looked sad because
they have lost their role model, and are in the state of
shock.
2.2 Diponegoro in the Eyes of Raden
Saleh
Raden Saleh, a painter from Terboyo, Central Java
(1811-1880) who had been living in Europe for more
than two decades, saw Prince Diponegoro differently
to Pieneman. Saleh painted Diponegoro distinctively.
In The Arrest of Diponegoro, Saleh depicts
Diponegoro with his chin slightly raised and his eyes
staring directly to his front left into the eyes of De
Kock who doesn’t dare look back at Diponegoro.
Diponegor’s left hand is in a tight fist stretched
upwards a little; his right hand open, stretchs
downward, in a gesture that can be seen as if he are
trying to calm down a kneeling woman who is in awe
of the situation. The woman seems to know
Diponegoro quite well, because it can be seen that she
is touching the Prince’s thigh. No swords are drawn,
no guards were on standby. Figuratively speaking,
this was not an armed confrontation, but a war of
strategy which, according to Raden Saleh, harms
Diponegoro.
Werner Kruss in his article “Raden Saleh’s
Interpretation of the Arrest of Diponegoro: An
Example of Indonesian Proto-nationalist
Modernism”, states that Raden Saleh through his
paintings contests the Dutch’s “Visual version”
hegemony about the key event in the capture of
Diponegoro and painted it using the Javanese idiom
which he lived up to (Kraus, 2005).
2.3 The Images of Diponegoro after the
Independence of Indonesia
In the realm of national heroism for a nation that just
declared its independence (August 17, 1945), Prince
Diponegoro has been included as a national hero. His
name was used by the Third Division of the People’s
Army of Indonesia in Central Java (Division
III/Diponegoro) on June 3, 1947; then it has been
used to name The Military Territorial Command
IV/Diponegoro on July 20, 1950 that covers the
provinces of Central Java and Special Province of
Yogyakarta (wikivisually.com). This means that
Diponegoro has been popular throughout the country
ever since the Republic of Indoneasia received its full
sovereignity; Diponegoro continues to be one of the
subjects of heroism presented in various art media.
Basuki Abdullah (born in Surakarta, 1915-1993),
one of Indonesia’s elite painters, was an active painter
and once took the role as an art teacher during the
period of Japanese occupation (before the Republic of
Indonesia was proclaimed), saw Prince Diponegoro
as an important figure. Abdullah, who took art
education and lived in the Netherlands and other parts
of Europe for several years, expressed his nationalism
through his painting entitled Diponegoro Leading the
Battle, made around 1940 1960 and has the
dimension of 150cm x 120cm. This painter who once
became the official painter for the Kingdom of
Thailand and afterwards as the official painter for the
Presidential Palace of the Republic of Indonesia,
presented Prince Diponegoro as a leader in a battle.
Diponegoro is depicted as having his right arm
stretched forward with his forefinger pointing to a
distant place, and he wears white clothes with white
turban (Printed in Lukisan dan Patung Koleksi
Sukarno, Jilid I). The prince carried his keris that was
tucked in between his clothes and his belly cloth. His
left hand firmly hold his horse’s rein. His horse is a
special one, with black fur except for the tips of its
legs that are colored white. Diponegoro’s horse has
become a legend until this day, its name is Kyai
Gentayu. "Kyai" is a term for honorable people,
usually used for religious leaders. The use of the word
‘kyai’ in front of the names of sacred objects, horse
drawn carriages for kings, and also for horses is also
a tradition common for the Yogyakarta and Surakarta
Sultanates.
Representations of Diponegoro after Arbitrary Interpretations
39
3 IMAGES OF DIPONEGORO IN
THE URBAN COMMUNITY OF
YOGYAKARTA
In the city of Yogyakarta there is a strategic yet
metrically short street which stretches from the
Magelang Street crossroad to the east and ends at the
Tugu Pal Putih monument; the name of this street is
Diponegoro Street. The same street name also exists
in the Sleman and Bantul districts.
Not far from Diponegoro Street, around 2 km to
the west, there is a museum named Museum
Monumen Pangeran Diponegoro Sasana Wiratama;
located at Tegalrejo area where the Prince was raised
by his grandfather’s family. However, the exhibits
there are peculiar. Despite its name, there is no actual
statue of the great prince. Instead there are two
realistic statues—the head and torso—of the Great
General Sudirman and Lietenant General Oerip
Soemohardjo of the Indonesian National Army (TNI).
The relief about Diponegoro’s heroism looks so naive
and sober, that seems to be made carelessly even in
the place where Diponegoro, the nation’s great
national hero, once lived.
Nevertheless Diponegoro still proved to be seen
as an important hero in Yogyakarta and its
surrounding area, as well as in other cities whether
they are in Central Java or in East Java. For example,
in Semarang the name ‘Diponegoro’ is used to name
a famous state university in Semarang - the capital of
Central Java - namely Diponegoro University. For
example, in Semarang the name ‘Diponegoro’ is used
to name a public university in Semarang - the capital
of Central Java - namely Diponegoro University
There are more than 20 monuments of Prince
Diponegoro spread throughout the City of
Yogyakarta and its 4 Districts, and other cities around
Yogyakarta. These monuments are in the form of
statues and reliefs; made as commissioned works, or
by the local communities as an expression of
admiration towards the great prince who fought for
justice and religion. Therefore, in Yogyakarta, there
are a lot of statues and reliefs of Diponegoro that are
made near or on the entrance gate of kampongs, or
become landmarks/site marks of many strategic
places.
A professional photographer named Arif
Sukardono documented these monuments, either in
the form of statues or reliefs, of Price Diponegoro in
almost everywhere within the City of Yogyakarta and
its Districts. All those monuments depict Diponegoro
who is wearing a turban just like A.J. Bik’s depiction,
as a symbolic attribute for Diponegoro’s religion and
heroism.
3.1 Diponegoro in Shadow Puppets
Prince Diponegoro also appears in shadow puppet
performance arts in Yogyakarta. In 2016 a new genre
of shadow puppet arisen and is called Wayang
Diponegoro. This puppet was innovated by Roni
Sodewo. Sodewo himself is the seventh decendant of
Prince Diponegoro. The ideas used to write the script
was based upon “Babad Diponegoro” (The
Chronicles of Diponegoro). Wayang Diponegoro
holds a number of historic stories rooted from the
“traces of English colonialism in Java.”
From August 2016 to the end of August 2017,
Wayang Diponegoro had been performed six times.
This wayang told historical stories of Java in the 19
th
century from Prince Diponegoro’s point of view that
are different from mainstream stories of the Sultanate
of Yogyakarta. In the performance, Prince
Diponegoro’s character is displayed in full, and not
just showing his greatness and heroism, but also his
human weakness. Through this performance, the
everlasting heroic spirit of Prince Diponegoro is
presented, and has continued to inspire many people
to create as well as to interpret today’s life (Kompas,
Thursday, August 31, 2017; Sodewo, 2016).
A set of Wayang Diponegoro characters from
Roni Sodewo's collection was exhibited in “Pameran
Sastra Rupa: Gambar Babad Diponegoro (Visual
Litarary Exhibition: Visuality of Babad Diponegoro),
in Jogja Gallery, Yogyakarta, 1-24 February 2019.
(Figure 2)
Figure 2. Wayang Diponegore, collectios of Roni Sodewo.
Exhibited at Jogja Gallery, 2019.
In connection with the Diponegoro Puppet, it
should be noted that there was once a thick
paperboard (puppet) maker, named Lejar Subroto
ICONARTIES 2019 - 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Arts and Humanities
40
(1937 – 2017). One of his works documented by Arif
Sukardono is the puppet figure of Prince Diponegoro,
who is turbaned and robed in white, wears a slippers,
has an orange belly, and a keris is tucked between his
belly and his robe in the abdomen.
3.2 Diponegoro in Fine Arts Today
3.2.1 Paintings by Heri Dono
Prince Diponegoro’s figure as a national hero and as
subject in art is continuously reinterpreted. In 2017
(more than 150 years after Diponegoro’s death) Heri
Dono, one of the leading artists in Indonesia, who
since the end of 1980s have participated in a number
of prestigious art exhibitions worldwide, has made a
painting with the dimension of 200cm x 150cm,
entitled Pangeran Diponegoro Is In Front of the
Colonial Hotel. The layouts and some other
components of this painting are taken out from Raden
Saleh’s The Arrest of Prince Diponegoro, 1858. The
building, the two mountains on the left hand side of
the painting, and the type of trees presented in there
are more or less the same. The only difference are the
figures. Liutenant-General de Kock is replaced by a
big and tall man that interpretably resembles the 6
th
president of Indonesia: Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.
Other characters presented in that painting were King
Salman from Saudi Arabia, Habib Rizieq Shihab—a
controversial man, Basuki Thahaja Purnama (Ahok),
Megawati Soekarnoputri—the 5
th
president of
Indonesia, Wiranto—a former general of the
Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI), several
other former state officials, and other politicians or
celebrities that often appeared on the silver screen.
There is also the image of Prince Diponegoro as
painted by Raden Saleh, and is even a character that
ichnographically be seen as Raden Saleh himself.
Heri Dono modified Saleh's paintings by
replacing previously existing figures with famous
figures, as well as ordinary people for his paintings.
Short said he made a parody through his painting. The
most significant is the fact that Heri Dono painted
himself in his work. At the far left on the roof of the
building is painted the image of Heri Dono, he
seemed to be running away, or is away from the
commotion caused by many political figures whose
social-political views crossed each other. Dono uses
Raden Saleh's painting as a ‘text’ which is freely
reinterpreted, then placed in the present context, to
offer new perceptions and meanings. (Figure 3)
Figure 3. Heri Dono, Diponegoro is in Front of Colonial
Hotel, 2017, Oil Painting on Canvas, 200 cm x 150 cm.
3.2.2 Paintings by F. Sigit Santoso
The similar free interpretation as a creative concept
was conducted by an artist famous for his realistic
paintings, his name is F. Sigit Santoso. Santoso’s
work entitled Abdulrohim Jokowibowo Namaku was
exhibited in “Pameran Sastra Rupa: Gambar Babad
Diponegoro”, at Jogja Gallery, Yogyakarta. (Figure
4)
Figure 4. F. Sigit Santoso, Abdulrohim Jokowibowo
Namaku, 185 x 115 cm, Oil Painting on Canvas
Representations of Diponegoro after Arbitrary Interpretations
41
During the exhibition (that was held from
February 1, 2019 to February 24, 2019) showed
paintings, a set of Wayang Diponegoro, and an
installation of objects associated with Prince
Diponegoro. This exhibition was held based upon the
history of life journey written by Prince Diponegoro
himself during his exile in Manado, North Sulawesi
and Makassar, South Sulawesi.
In his painting, Santoso depicts a young man
wearing a headband based upon the description from
Babad Diponegoro (The Chronicles of Diponegoro),
in order to represent Diponegoro in his twenties. His
right hand is stretched pointing upwards. His left hand
is holding his keris that is tucked in his rolled up
sarong wrapped around his belly. The figure that is
intended to be Prince Diponegoro wears a turban, just
like A.J. Bik’s depiction. He is wearing a faded moss
green surjan (a traditional clothe from Yogyakarta).
He also wears a faded maroon sarong.
What is significant in this painting is the facial
expression of the young figure that is the subject of
the painting. That face of the figure looks like the face
of President Joko Widodo. The similarity between the
face of 'Prince Diponegoro' on and the face of
President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) is very easy to
recognize, because Jokowi's face has been exposed in
newspapers, television, and social media in particular
in relation to the 2019 Indonesian General Election,
which will take place on 17 April 2019. Moreover,
Santoso also creatively played the names of the two
candidates who were contesting the 2019 national
elections, namely Joko Widodo (No 1) and Prabowo
(No. 2), which he picked as he pleased, and combined
them into a new name, 'Jokowibowo'.
Image ‘Prince Diponegoro’, in his 20s, with
Jokowi's face when he was young, in Santoso's work,
shows that the interpretation and reinterpretation of
the character and 'mystery' of Diponegoro's history of
the War of Java have continued, and appeared in
various artistic and non-artistic expressions.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Since his death in 1855 until today Prince
Diponegoro’s character is still circulating and
inspiring many people in Yogyakarta. There are
many artists from several branches of art who have
created art works based on the media involved,
including fine arts, dance, opera, theater, radio drama,
and monuments; meaning that Diponegoro has
become one of the significant subjects presented in
various art media.
Monuments that were made by either professional
or vernacular artists are spread everywhere; their
visual display can vary, meaning that these art objects
were made based upon the artists’ free interpretation.
Looks like the image reference from the Dutch
colonial era is no longer considered relevant. What is
more important is that within the work, there are hints
that are signifying the ‘heroism’ as well as the
religiosity of Prince Diponegoro.
The fact that the role and image of Prince
Diponegoro did not appear in the Kraton of
Yogyakarta, and that no statue of Diponegoro in a
museum built to commemorate Diponegoro's heroism
can be interpreted that the internal problem within the
Yogyakarta Sultanate in accordance to the history of
the Java War, led by Prince Diponegoro, is not yet
finished and is still considered as controversial.
Whereas various statues, reliefs, paintings, and
other art expressions that were created and continue
to be created in many places in Yogyakarta and in the
surrounding areas signify that the character and
heroism of Diponegoro have continued to revive
amongst many communities. The mystery that
surrounds the history of Pangeran Diponegoro's
journey actually more stimulates and inspires creative
people to explore art through various media.
Diponegoro’s character used in the new genre of
shadow puppet performance telling the stories from
Babad Diponegoro (the Chronicles of Diponegoro),
has its own agenda and interest, and can never be
separated from the socio-cultural dynamics in
Yogyakarta.
In Fine Arts, it seems that the free interpretations
and the re-interpretations of Prince Diponegoro in
correlation to the history of the War of Java (1825
1830), has developed openly and freely.
Of what was phenomenal about the
representations of Diponegoro, it can be said that the
various interpretations are so free and far from the
visual data and official historical records of the
Prince, even somewhat anarchic. It is as if everyone
can interpret and represent Diponegoro in any
possible way, as long as it displays the signs of
heroism and religiosity that are accepted by the
power-holding communities.
It can be said that the interpretation and re-
interpretations, especially which are related to art
creativity, can be carried out in many ways, whether
it is retrospective, productive, prospective, or even
deconstructive. Each choice can create different kinds
of significance based on the paradigm used.
ICONARTIES 2019 - 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Arts and Humanities
42
REFERENCES
Berger, Arthur Asa, 1984, Signs in Contemporary Culture¸
Longman, New York.
Carey, Peter, 2008, The Power ofprophecy, KITLV Pres,
Leiden.
Kraus, Werner, 2005, Raden Saleh’s Interpretation of the
Arrest of Diponegoro: an Example of Indonesian Proto-
nationaist Modernism”, Archipel 69, Paris, 2005, pp.
259-294.
https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Kodam_IV/Diponegoro
Lukisan-Lukisan dan Patung-Patung Koleksi Presiden
Sukarno dari Republik Indonesia, Volume I.
“Wayang Diponegoro Buka Persepsi Baru”, Kompas,
Kamis, 31 August 2017.
Sodewo, Ki Roni, 2016, Perjuangan Pangeran
Diponegoro, Patra Padi,Yogyakarta.
Sahid, Nur, 2016, Semiotika untuk Teater, Tari, Wayang
Purwa dan Film, Gigih Pustaka Mandiri, Yogyakarta.
Wikipedia: ‘Stamford Raffles’
Representations of Diponegoro after Arbitrary Interpretations
43