Evaluation of Asana, Odoo, and ProjectLibre Project Management Tools using the OSSpal Methodology

Joana Ferreira Marques, Jorge Bernardino

2019

Abstract

In order to successfully complete projects it is essential for companies to acquire a project management tool that assists in their planning, cost and resource management. Currently, there are several open source project management tools on the market that have much of the functionality required. Thus, it is important to choose the most appropriate one according to the needs of the user. To help with this choice, open source software evaluation methodologies can be used. In this paper, we use the OSSpal methodology to evaluate three popular open source project management tools: Asana, Odoo, and ProjectLibre.

Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Marques J. and Bernardino J. (2019). Evaluation of Asana, Odoo, and ProjectLibre Project Management Tools using the OSSpal Methodology. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2019) - Volume 2: KEOD; ISBN 978-989-758-382-7, SciTePress, pages 397-403. DOI: 10.5220/0008351903970403


in Bibtex Style

@conference{keod19,
author={Joana Ferreira Marques and Jorge Bernardino},
title={Evaluation of Asana, Odoo, and ProjectLibre Project Management Tools using the OSSpal Methodology},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2019) - Volume 2: KEOD},
year={2019},
pages={397-403},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0008351903970403},
isbn={978-989-758-382-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2019) - Volume 2: KEOD
TI - Evaluation of Asana, Odoo, and ProjectLibre Project Management Tools using the OSSpal Methodology
SN - 978-989-758-382-7
AU - Marques J.
AU - Bernardino J.
PY - 2019
SP - 397
EP - 403
DO - 10.5220/0008351903970403
PB - SciTePress