Big Data and International Accreditations in Higher Education:
A Dutch – Russian Case Study
Florentin Popescu
1a
, Roman Iskandaryan
2b
and Tijmen Weber
1c
1
HAN University of Applied Sciences, Ruitenberglaan 31, 6826 CC, Arnhem, The Netherlands
2
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Stremyannyy Pereulok, 36, Moscow, Russia
Keywords: Big Data, International Accreditation, Quality of Higher Education, University Global Competitiveness.
Abstract: This comparative study paper seeks to document how with the help of Big Data different aspects of
International Accreditations are perceived by both Plekhanov Russian University of Economics and HAN
University of Applied Sciences (Arnhem Business School), the Netherlands faculty and higher management.
This paper is looking at bringing advice and helping the chosen universities with their international
accreditations processes by demonstrating the importance of Big Data. The importance of Big Data and
International Accreditations to both universities will be accounted for in this paper. In comparison to current
research on Big Data in higher education, this work focuses on the goal of preparing the universities for future
academic international accreditations. It is a comparative study where is meant to learn from best practices
rather than to generalize and extrapolate results. On a conceptual way, this paper contributes to knowledge by
attempting to develop a strategic planning of the international accreditations process by determining the best
practices using Big Data while creating a process for internationalization to increase the universities’ global
competitiveness.
1 INTRODUCTION
Big data refers to amounts of data that are being
collected which are so enormous that they cannot be
analysed using conventional statistical techniques
(Dunham, 2014). This development has occurred
because technology is increasingly adapted so it can
effectively collect data, even if it is not directly used.
As an untapped resource, big data is becoming
increasingly valuable because it provides a very cost-
effective means of gathering data and drawing
conclusions (Dunham, 2014). Educators have also
started to take note to this development which has
opened new areas of didactic techniques and research
possibilities (West, 2012). Why not use Big Data in
helping with the International Accreditations?
According to the fourth Global Survey of
International Association of Universities 89% of
universities worldwide claim to have an institutional
policy or to have implemented internationalization
within their overall strategy, and 22% are preparing
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-5567
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-423X
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-5892
an internationalization strategy (Egron-Polak and
Hudson, 2014). With the increase of globalization in
education, which manifests in a growing number of
foreign students and teachers, double degree
programs and joint research projects the importance
of international accreditations significantly, rises
(Iskandaryan, 2018).
The analysis of policies, institutional structure and
operation help administrators make improvements at
the management level (Daniel and Butson, 2013)
while higher education institutions are able to
determine variables affecting student retention and
program completion ( Wagner and Ice, 2012).
E-learning is already promoted as being important
because provides a myriad of benefits to students
such as flexibility and cost ease of access (Arkorful
and Abaidoo, 2015), but with data collected on the
answers students give on assignments it becomes
increasingly possible to develop algorithms that can
develop more personalized feedback (Belcadhi,
2016). A second advantage is that improving
Popescu, F., Iskandaryan, R. and Weber, T.
Big Data and International Accreditations in Higher Education: A Dutch - Russian Case Study.
DOI: 10.5220/0007572102070214
In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security (IoTBDS 2019), pages 207-214
ISBN: 978-989-758-369-8
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
207
curricula becomes more effective. Traditional course
evaluation relies on the feedback of students, but with
new data analytics is becomes possible to uncover
how students interact with course contents (Reyes,
2015).
Big data can also be used to predict students’
performance early on which can allow teachers to
intervene and direct to attention to struggling students
(Picciano, 2014; Reyes, 2015). Finally, big data opens
up new forms of learning. Especially the area of
blended learning has a lot to gain from this. Blended
learning refers to combining online with traditional
forms of learning and this is gaining because of its
proven effectiveness (Porter et al., 2014). If blended
learning platforms are offered on a widespread basis
then the data that is gathered from this can be of major
importance when it comes to developing new classes
and understanding the behaviour of students.
Big Data analytics has also proven to be
beneficial in the area of higher education especially
in the decision-making process of institutions
(Wagner and Ice, 2012; Daniel and Butson, 2013;
Kellen, 2013).
According to Deepa and Chandra Blessie (2017),
Big Data analytics will create a number of
opportunities for the educational institution,
administrators, policy makers, educationalists and
also for the learners. These opportunities include:
1. Collaboration and comparisons among the
institutions would become more comfortable.
2. Improved knowledge flow and learning
success across the organization would be
achieved.
3. Learning effectiveness would be improved
through the self-measurement of learners and
educators
4. Cost reduction through managing financial
performance could be possible
5. The learning and academic risk and
complexity could be reduced.
These developments are especially interesting
because, if higher education institutions uses big data
effectively, they can improve their quality of
education but also experiment more leading to
research opportunities in helping with International
Accreditations.
For example, using a dashboard that integrates
class materials, teacher instructions, online exercises,
and peer feedback has much potential for not only
enhancing learning experiences, it also allows staff
and research to investigate indicators of education
quality such as student engagement with the
materials. Moreover, it also provides researchers the
opportunity to experiment with various kinds of
education techniques in a semi-controlled
environment.
Through doing so, it becomes much easier and
more effective to improve course contents which
would boost the overall quality of the education
institutions and help with International
Accreditations.
2 PROBLEM DEFINITION AND
RESEARCH DESIGN
The researchers encompass a consideration and
evaluation of the specific universities policies and
practices in relation to the theme and as well as an
evaluation of institutional responses to a range
of issues, policies and strategies concerning
international accreditations and the use of Big Data.
It positions the responses to internationalization
process of chosen universities within the policy
context that they set. It seeks to document how
universities’ management and faculty perceive
different aspects and dimensions of international
accreditations with the help of Big Data. In addition,
this paper highlights some of the major issues
in connection with institutional responses to the
impact of internationalization with respect to
responsibilities that range from being local to
international in nature.
In line with these recommendations, the
researchers chose a combination of interviews,
archives, and observations, with main emphasis on
the first two. In line with the explorative nature of the
study, the goal of the interviews was to see the
research topic from the perspective of the
interviewee, and to understand why he or she came to
have this particular perspective.
Policy and other documentation for the university
was collected on site, to supplement the primary and
secondary data gathered, when made and recorded.
For the international policy context, sources of
documentary information were used to scale the
international, national and local position on higher
education in selected universities. Several
governments and other websites were used to glean
policy and positional information. Sources referenced
in research papers were also utilized as resources
from online searches through various electronic
databases and search engines. The documentation
from institution was collected to gain insight into the
institution and the strategies and policies in place.
IoTBDS 2019 - 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security
208
Sources of this information included: strategic plans;
management and academic structure charts; annual
reports; internationalization policy documents;
websites etc. These documents were the first types of
units of observation.
There are many options available for analysing
big data, but one that is clearly emerging in the field
of higher education is known as Education Data
Mining (EDM) (Romero and Ventura, 2010). In
short, this method refers to using statistics, machine-
learning, and data-mining algorithms in order to
analyse the breadth of educational data that is being
produced. Often the concept of EDM is used
interchangeably with Learning Analytics, which is
said to have the objective of understanding and
optimizing learning and the environments in which
learning occurs (Steiner et al., 2014). Because new
education techniques such as e-learning and massive
open online courses (MOOCs) are emerging (Hughes
and Dobbins, 2015), there is an increasing demand for
finding applications for this data. Although many
applications are possible, here we will only discuss
three in more detail and discuss some examples on
how these have been applied.
One of the key applications is predicting student
performance. Especially with international students it
is difficult assess whether they will be successful
because of the diversity in grading systems and the
fact that their educational and cultural background is
often unfamiliar to faculty and staff (Nghe et al.,
2005). Therefore, it is important to find other ways of
predicting the success and failure of students. Some
of the most commonly used methods are neural-
network models, Bayesian networks, and
classification algorithms (Romero and Ventura,
2010). For example, Nghe et al (2015) used decision
tree and Bayesian network algorithms to predict
student GPA with as much as 94% accuracy.
Similarly, Shahari et al. (2015) found a 98%
accuracy when using neural network analysis.
However, their naïve Bayesian analysis only yielded
a 76% accuracy. Many other examples are available
as well, but the important implication of this
technology is that it allows educators to intervene
earlier making drop-out less likely.
Another application that is used is for the
construction of more effective learning content. For
example, McCusker et al. (2013) proposed a new
adaptive educational environment where the learning
style of students is determined based on their online
behaviour which can then be used to create more
personalized learning environments. Balogh et al
(2013) on the other hand developed a method of
assessing which study materials students were most
likely to engage with. This has important applications
as it can help teachers to more effectively determine
which materials are most suitable or interesting to
students.
Finally, social network analysis is emerging
because of the fact that activity on social networks
can quickly produce a large amount of information.
Wen et al (2014), for example, were able to predict
student dropout in MOOCs by looking at social
media. Specifically, they were able to detect a
significant correlation between drop-rates and the
mood and sentiment about the course in discussion.
Another important source of information is twitter
feeds because it is very accessible to many people.
Koutropoulos et al (2014) investigated the Twitter
behaviours of students in online classes and were able
to do sentiment analyses. Twitter was also used by
participants for sharing information and
troubleshooting problems between classes. Social
networks can thus be utilized to both enhance the
learning experience and allow educators to get better
understanding of what people think of the course.
In the remaining sections we will describe and
discuss how some of the aspects regarding EDM will
be used, or already have been used, with the aim of
facilitating the process of receiving an accreditation.
Two education institutions are compared and we
show how EDM and big data analysis finds various
applications in both. Some of the problems in
gathering relevant information can be overcome
through EDM, but EDM is also used to satisfy criteria
better.
3 RESULTS AND OUTCOMES
Society is more and more characterised by global and
intercultural relationships, but also international
challenges. Due to this, higher education should have
a significant role in the society. Students should
understand, be able to work and make their
contribution to sustainable development at national
and global levels and education should provide the
prerequisites for this.
Intercultural and international dimensions are
integrated into both the formal and informal
curriculum into domestic e-learning environments by
higher education institutions. Internationalisation at
home is promoted by tools such as digital technology
and virtual mobility. Those students who cannot
benefit from physical international mobility
opportunities may use these tools to create their own
international contacts.
Big Data and International Accreditations in Higher Education: A Dutch - Russian Case Study
209
Since not all students will have the possibility to
gain international experience through mobility,
achieving intercultural understanding and
international experience at home is necessary for
students.
According to the needs of the institutions,
government agencies have provided assistance for
higher education institutions towards internationali-
sation. Internationalisation of higher education
institutions brings benefits to almost all areas of
society. Numerous organisations at various levels and
within different areas have responsibility for the
prerequisites for internationalisation and these
prerequisites are also influenced by several policy
areas. The internationalisation of higher education is
particularly influenced by certain domains of society
and related government agencies. These agencies
should support each other and move in the same
direction in order to put their efforts together. In order
to manage effectively the challenges and barriers, the
prerequisites of internationalisation must be
consolidated through inter-sectorial cooperation. The
key role in removing barriers through coordinated
efforts belongs to the Ministry of Education and
Research. The prerequisites for global cooperation
are highly influenced by the national level in relation
to international contacts. To consolidate bilateral
relationships with certain countries and to promote
Dutch research and higher education beyond the
national borders, assuming a more operational role
and coordinating the joint resources should be major
roles of the Government. Considering the
international competition, a more goal-oriented and
stronger cooperation among Dutch higher education
institutions may bring significant benefits.
A continued development by higher education
institutions may be ensured by NVAO by bringing
internationalisation to the forefront of the reviews
executed by NVAO. The international activities
of the institutions must be certified independently
and prove that their efforts are in the positive
direction.
Large data and relevant statistics must be
accessed to obtain a relevant evaluation. Tracking of
internationalisation and evaluation may be performed
using the opportunities offered by NVAO, which
includes review and statistical mandates. The
continuous efforts towards increasing
internationalisation may be supported on the basis
provided by NVAO.
According to Ahmed (2016) who explored the
factors necessary for Big Data implementation and
provided understanding how enhance these factors in
higher education accreditation using qualitative case
study; there are six key factors essential for big data
implementation in higher education accreditation:
Security issues,
Preserving privacy,
Analytical skills,
IT infrastructure,
Top management support
Collaborative information-sharing projects.
Now, HAN University of Applied Science is in
the process of getting accredited by the European
Foundation for Management Development for the
EPAS accreditation program. The aim of EPAS is to
evaluate the quality of business and/or management
degree programs that have an international
perspective (EFMD, 2018a). Interestingly, the
achievement of several of the criteria can be aided by
making good use of data technologies. Indeed, the
HAN is already experimenting with such
technologies, which have the potential of greatly
increasing the quality of its education.
For example, in its curriculum several forms of
blended learning are offered through the help of
digital platforms such as those made available by
Pearson and Khan Academy. When properly utilized
these programs offer a distinct set of advantages,
which fall in line with the criteria, set out by the EPAS
program.
First, there is the advantage that it helps to satisfy
the pedagogy criteria of EPAS (EFMD, 2018b, p.16)
through offering blended learning and the use of
modern technology. More significantly, however, is
the potential these technologies have for helping
students in a broader sense. Two important criteria of
the EPAS are the personal development of students
(EFMD, 2018b, p.17), and have more detailed ideas
of the quality of student work (EFMD, 2018b, p. 20).
Because with online platforms learning is done
online, much data regarding the students’ activities is
gathered. This can then potentially be used to
algorithmically generate individualized feedback,
which is important for their learning process
(Belcadhi, 2016).
Moreover, detailed statistics about the students’
performance can easily be tracked which allows
instructors to gain an overview of the progress that
students are making. This can for example allow
instructors to identify students who are struggling
early on (West, 2012), but this data also hold potential
for researchers because it opens up the possibility of
finding patterns in learning behaviour and see how
this correlates with specific characteristics of
students.
IoTBDS 2019 - 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security
210
A second important advantage that new
technology brings is that it allows program review to
go more effectively. Currently, students’ reviews of
staff and courses are done using standardized
questionnaires, which are only administered a few
times a year. However, as this article is being written,
at HAN programs such as Evalytics are being piloted
which allow instructors to very quickly ask students
to answer a few simple questions in a matter of
minutes. Such technologies make it possible to assess
specific classes instead of whole courses, and it helps
to improve the performance of instructors by giving
more detailed feedback (Nunn et al., 2016). Because
the timing of such reviews is also more spread out,
there is also the advantage that it can potentially
circumvent certain biases such as selection bias which
has been found to influence course evaluation results
(Wolbring and Treischl, 2016).
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
(PRUE) is a public higher educational institution
founded in 1907. Its main campus is located in
Moscow, and 17 other campuses are located in
Russian provinces and 5 campuses are located
abroad. Total number of students is over 53,5
thousand, including 22 thousand in Moscow. Being
one of the largest economic institutions in Russia,
PRUE considers accreditation as one of the most
valuable tools in its efforts to improve quality and
competitiveness of education. There are three types of
accreditation according to Russian Law on
Education: state, public, and professional. Providers
of the two last types can be foreign or international
organizations (companies, agencies, associations,
etc.).
Two important external factors have been forcing
leading Russian universities (about 50 out of total
650+ higher educational institutions) to obtain
different international accreditations: academic
excellence project "5-100" since 2012 and national
project "Export of education" since 2017. Both
initiatives require significant improvement of quality
of education and research, which is expected to
increase share of Russia at the international market of
education. Government of Russia decided that quality
of the education should meet international standards,
even if they are somewhat different from traditional
Russian requirements. Main reason for such
difference is historical separation of research and
teaching functions since Russian Academy of Science
was founded in 1725. Since then the Academy and its
institutions have conducted most of the research
while educational institutions has been concentrated
on teaching as their primary activity. It inevitably
affected quality of education and decreased the scope
and the number of research (and publications)
originated from Russian universities.
In 2013, PRUE adopted internationalization
concept as a part of its strategic development
statement. This concept considered international
accreditations as a primary tool for quality
development for each faculty (institution) and the
whole university. Based on negative experience of
EFMD (EPAS) accreditation attempt in 2011,
concept suggested that at the first stage (2013-2018),
most of the faculties should obtain at least one
international accreditation for its BSc or MSc
programs, and the university at the same time should
strengthen its internationalization efforts by attracting
more Russian-speaking foreign students and English-
speaking teachers and researchers. Second stage
(2018-2021) should include moderate growth in
international rankings (with higher pace of growth in
international faculty share and international students
share criteria) and new application for EFMD (EPAS)
accreditation.
It was considered that PRUE should extend the
number of BSc and MSc programs accredited by
international organization so that accreditation
process experience for different subject fields
(economics, management, marketing, finance, equity,
commerce, innovation, etc.) can be obtained.
Professional short-term programs of the university
also should undergo accreditation procedure by
professional foreign associations.
Big Data analysis has emerged as one of the
features that add value to academic programs in social
and humanitarian sciences both from content and
organizational dimensions. Partnership with the
following institutions has been established: Central
Economic and Mathematical Institute of the Russian
Academy of Science, Institute of System
Programming of the Russian Academy of Science,
and Joint Institute for Nuclear Research.
It permitted to develop new courses to BSc and
MSc programs, such as Analytics of Big Data,
Modern Programming and Methods of Statistical
Analysis, Semantic Research, Forecasting the
Dynamics of Macroeconomic and Financial Markets,
etc. Also new courses were added to the curriculum
of professional (non-degree) programs, such as Legal
Aspects of Cryptocurrency and Block-chain Projects,
Bitcoin Mining, E-Government, etc.
This new direction allows overcoming some
weaknesses mentioned in EFMD (EPAS) peer review
report of 2011 on program quality, such as "low level
of transfer of current research ideas into the teaching
of the program", "limited connections between the
corporate world and research activities", "unclear
Big Data and International Accreditations in Higher Education: A Dutch - Russian Case Study
211
research policy and relatively low quality of research
publications".
Internationalization strategy linked with Big Data
and other digital directions allowed PRUE in 5 years
to increase number of accredited programs at
European Council for Business Education from 2 to
13, as well as obtain accreditations from Chartered
Institute of Marketing (CIM), Chartered Institute of
Management Accountants (CIMA), The Association
of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). In
addition, accreditation from Association of MBA's
(AMBA) was extended from MBA programs to MSc
programs. Consequently, internationalization,
inspired by international accreditation, allowed
PRUE to increase percentage of international students
from 3% in 2013 to 7,4% in 2018 and percentage of
international students from 0,5% in 2013 to 5,2% in
2018.
In 2017 as a way to improve quality of education
and a tool of quality assurance for potential
EFMD (EPAS) accreditation PRUE stated to use
individual exam score analysis of almost 50% of the
students for more than 70 disciplines with 4-6
intended learning outcomes and consisting of 12-18
topics each.
To make sure that current and prospective
curricula are up-to-date with labour market
requirements, PRUE administration requested to
develop a system for automated analysis of open data
from web-based sources, in particular, data placed on
various Internet portals (for example, integrator portal
of employment agencies) and in social networks (for
example, popular Russian social network
VKontakte).
After two years a system has been created for
monitoring and analysing the staffing requirements of
the labour market for university graduates (according
to the nomenclature of specialties of Russian higher
education). The collection and processing of data in
the system is carried out on the basis of modern
methods and technologies for obtaining information
from web-oriented sources. At the next stage,
machine-learning algorithms are used to translate
words into a vector representation. Then, offer
vectors are calculated, which makes it possible to
identify the semantic similarity of the labour market
requirements and professional competencies of
higher education, which are nothing but short text
fragments. The results are used to identify
relationships at different levels of models that
describe labour markets and higher education.
The data collection algorithm is implemented in the
form of periodically launched tasks, each of which
performs its part of working with data:
search for new ads by keywords (job title,
employer, region, salary, list of duties, list of
requirements), which are specified as
parameters and allow to limit the subject area;
the collection and loading of ads in the
database;
selection of significant areas from the text of
job announcements (name of vacancy, region,
salary, requirements, duties);
preparation of texts of labour market
requirements for further binding.
This system allows PRUE to eliminate such
accreditation weaknesses stated by 2011 EFMD
(EPAS) peer review report as "not enough
institutional corporate connections for research,
pedagogy, job placement" and "limited alumni
participation in university curriculum development".
At Plekhanov University administration, plans to
extend data analysis to its graduates in terms of their
career path, competences required and level of
competencies obtained at each stage of their career.
Such automated complex is intended to be used for
collecting, analysing and visualizing data on current
unique job vacancies of the labour market and related
data (employer location, professional requirements,
wage level, etc.). in different regions of the Russian
Federation posted on three major Russian job sites
("Work in Russia", HeadHunter, SuperJob) with the
ability to display data in the context of current
versions of different national and international
directories and classifiers. The system makes it
possible to obtain data on the number of vacancies in
the dynamics in all specialties and allows university
to use this system to assess the real needs of
employers in specialists in specific areas and
specialties, as required by international accreditations
as a proof of quality of education.
As a complimentary service, the system also able
to detect all possible connections between companies,
including foreign, which turns it into a product with
high potential for external commercial use. This
resource perhaps, has no analogues on the market and
allows potential user to solve the following tasks:
creation a base of non-resident companies
operating in the Russian Federation,
use of all available open sources of information
(company registries, data of tax services,
customs, courts, data on leaks of information
from offshore companies),
identification and analysis of links between
non-resident companies on the basis of various
information (managers, co-owners,
IoTBDS 2019 - 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security
212
subsidiaries, address, telephone, historical
links, similarity of names and company
profiles, etc.),
identification of final beneficiaries of non-
resident companies.
Apart from the fact that the information base on
non-resident companies, collected together from
various sources, is valuable in itself, it also provides
a unique opportunity to automate the acquisition of
new knowledge, such as connections between
companies registered in various jurisdictions of the
world.
Both Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
and HAN University of Applied Sciences (Arnhem
Business School), the Netherlands, aim at getting
international accredited. For larger institutions, the
accreditation process involves the collection and
processing of terabytes of data. The data is
heterogeneous, in content and in the way it is
captured and stored. There is unstructured data like
emails and teacher notes; structured data like forms,
surveys, and policies, and multimedia like e-Learning
modules and recorded class sessions. Presently, the
tasks for collecting evidence to verify if a
program complies with the requirement of an
accreditation body are done manually. Moreover,
some data is in digital format while the rest are
not. Data is also gathered from different sources like
staff, faculty, students and industry through emails,
surveys and interviews. The institution then analyses
the collected data and publishes a self-study report,
which is reviewed by the accreditation body.
Looking at the amount of documents that
accreditation institutions are asking, it could be
overwhelming for administrators to get them in place
and on time. It is clear that providing many of the
required documents of the various accreditation
institutions can be made much easier and
comprehensive when big data technologies are
properly used. For example, the criteria of quality
assurance is more attainable because of such
technologies. This is exemplified by the use of
Evalytics at HAN and the automated analysis system
developed at PRUE. Since trends in Big Data are not
coming to a halt, such technologies will no doubt only
become increasingly relevant in the future.
4 CONCLUSIONS AND
FURTHER RESEARCH
Data generated at higher educational institutions
satisfy the characteristics of Big Data. A university
operates various IT systems, such as course
management, human resource, student registration,
finance and institutional research. These systems
generate massive data every semester. Apart from the
structured data from the IT systems, students, staff
and faculty generate unstructured and semi-structured
data, such as Internet traffic, online and offline
activities and data emitted from sensors (Gubbi et al.,
2013).
Therefore, analysing data from higher-education
institutions, based on Big Data methods, is more
appropriate than traditional methods. Big Data and
data analytics allow researchers and industry to
analyse huge datasets and extract valuable patterns
(Reed and Dongarra, 2015).
While big data technologies have much potential
to them, it remains important to keep researching
what the effects are of utilizing these technologies on
the performance of students, instructors, and the
effectiveness of curriculum development. It would be
especially interesting to see how this increases the
likelihood of acquiring accreditation. Considering
that, the adoption of such technologies is not likely to
slow down anytime soon; this might transform the
way that education is offered and developed, and how
education research is performed.
Currently, the accreditation process works by
verifying the self-study report of universities and
compare it to evidence found by on-site visits. There
could be large discrepancies between the report and
the findings. By using different analytic tools to
analyse data and provide evidence to check if a
specific program matches the expectation of a
particular accreditation body prior to the onsite visit
REFERENCES
Ahmed, A.I., 2016. Big Data for Accreditation: A Case
Study of Saudi Universities, Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Information Technology, 91(1)
Arkorful, V. and Abaidoo, N., 2015. The role of e-learning,
advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher
education. International Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), p29-42.
Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G. and Kanai, T.,
2016. Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and
Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic
Literature Review. Online Learning, 20(2), p13-29.
Balogh, Z., Munk, M. and Turcani, M., 2013, October.
Assessment tools and techniques for e-learning
evaluation: Usage analysis and survey sampling. In
Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013,
(pp. 38-44). IEEE.
Belcadhi, L. C., 2016. Personalized feedback for self-
assessment in lifelong learning environments based on
Big Data and International Accreditations in Higher Education: A Dutch - Russian Case Study
213
semantic web. Computers in Human Behavior, 55,
p562–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.042
Daniel, B.K. and Butson, R., 2013. Technology enhanced
analytics (TEA) in higher education. In Proceedings of
the International Conference on Educational
Technologies, 29, p89-96.
Deepa, A. and Chandra Blessie, E., 2017. Big Data
Analytics for Accreditation in the Higher Education
Sector. International Journal of Computer Science and
Information Technologies, 8(3), p357-360.
Dunham, I. M., 2014. Big Data: A Revolution That Will
Transform How We Live, Work, and Think.
International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 181–183.
https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-1-181-183
EheFMD., 2018a. Process Manual. Available at:
https://efmdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/EFMD_Gl
obal-Accrediation_EPAS-Process_Manual.pdf
EFMD., 2018b. Standards and Criteria. Available at:
https://efmdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/EFMD_Gl
obal-Accrediation_EPAS-Standards_and_Criteria.pdf.
Egron-Polak, E. and Hudson, R. 2014. Internationalization
of higher education: Growing expectations, essential
values. IAU 4rd Global Survey Report ed., Paris:
International Association of Universities.
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S. and Palaniswami, M.,
2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural
elements, and future directions. Future Generation
Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.
Hughes, G. and Dobbins, C., 2015. The utilization of data
analysis techniques in predicting student performance
in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Research
and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1),
p1-18.
Koutropoulos, A., Abajian, S. C., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N.
O. and Rodriguez, C. O., 2014. What tweets tell us
about MOOC participation. International Journal of
Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(1), p8-
21.
Iskandaryan, R., 2018. International accreditations as a tool
of university competitiveness improvement. XXXI
International Plekhanov Readings. Theses of PhD
students in foreign languages, p 52-56.
Kellen, V., 2013. Applying Big Data in higher education: A
case study. Cutter Consortium white paper, 13(8).
McCusker, K. A., Harkin, J., Wilson, S. and Callaghan, M.,
2013. Intelligent assessment and content
personalisation in adaptive educational systems. In
Information Technology Based Higher Education and
Training (ITHET), 2013 International Conference on
(pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Nghe, N. T., Janecek, P. and Haddawy, P., 2007, October.
A comparative analysis of techniques for
predicting academic performance. In Frontiers in
Education Conference-Global Engineering:
Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without
Passports, 2007. FIE'07. 37th Annual (pp. T2G-7).
IEEE.
Picciano, A., 2014. Big Data and Learning Analytics in
Blended Learning Environments: Benefits and
Concerns. International Journal of Interactive
Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2(7), p35-43.
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2014.275
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A. and Welch, K.
R., 2014. Blended learning in higher education:
Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers
and Education, 75, p185–195. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
Reed, D.A. and Dongarra, J., 2015. Exascale computing
and big data. Communications of the ACM, 58(7), p56-
68.
Reyes, J. A., 2015. The skinny on big data in education:
Learning analytics simplified. TechTrends, 59(2), p75–
80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0842-1
Romero, C. and Ventura, S., 2010. Educational data
mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part
C (Applications and Reviews), 40(6), p601-618.
Shahiri, A. M. and Husain, W., 2015. A review on
predicting student's performance using data mining
techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, p414-422.
Steiner, C. M., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D. and Albert, D., 2014.
Learning analytics and educational data mining: An
overview of recent techniques. Learning analytics for
and in serious games, 6, p61-75.
Wagner, E. and Ice, P., 2012. Data changes everything.
Delivering on the promise of learning analytics. In
higher education. Educause Review, 47(4), p33-42.
Wen, M., Yang, D., and Rose, C., 2014, July. Sentiment
Analysis in MOOC Discussion Forums: What
does it tell us? In Educational data mining.
West, D. M., 2012. Big data for education: Data mining,
data analytics, and web dashboards. Governance
studies at Brookings, 4(1).
Wolbring, T. and Treischl, E., 2016. Selection bias in
students’ evaluation of teaching. Research in higher
education, 57(1), p51-71.
IoTBDS 2019 - 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security
214