The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on
Sulawesi Island
Nandang Najmulmunir
1
1
Faculty of Agriculture, “45” Islamic University (UNISMA)
Jl Cut Mutiah No. 83 Bekasi 17117, Bekasi, West Java
Keywords: Regional economic corridor, acceleration of regional growth, economic driver sectors
Abstract: Abundant of Natural resources, geographical position, number of population and infrastructure are the
important factors in comparative advantage, especially for supporting the acceleration of economic growth
policies that are focused in six regional economic corridors. Economics corridors approach is expected to
spill over impacts to encourage more rapid growth in surrounding areas and ensure the realization of
continuing development. The sectors that act as an economic driver need to be clearly identified for each
province in order to accelerate the development of Sulawesi. Model used to analyzed the regional data is
the analysis of Location Quotient (LQ), LQ Trend and Regional Concentration Coefficient. Each province
in Sulawesi Island has a regional economic driving sector according to its potential.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The Policy of Indonesian economic development
acceleration is called Master Plan of Acceleration
and Expansion of Indonesian Economic
Development (MPAIED) 2011-2025. It was
launched by President of Republic Indonesia On
May 27
th
2011. (Situmorang, 2011).
The Master plan includes 22 major Indonesian
economic activities and is an adaptation and
integration of National Long Term Development
Plan (LTDP) 2002-2025. It serves as the blue print
or framework to accelerate and expand the
economies, and reduce the rate of poverty in the
respective region. In this paper, the region that will
be analyzed further is the fourth economic
corridors,it was Sulawesi island.
(http://www.kemendag.go.id/files/pdf/2012/12/06/m
aster-plan-2011-2025-id0-1354731495.pdf.)
The master plan divide Indonesia into six
economic corridors namely 1) eastern of Sumatra
corridor , 2) Northern of West Java, the north coast
of Java, 3) Kalimantan, 4) Sulawesi, 5) Papua and 6)
Eastern of Java-Bali-Nusa Tenggara. Each corridor
will be connected by the transportation system,
logistics and economic development of region-based
(Situmorang, 2011)
Further Situmorang, (2011) stated that the
National Area Spatial Plan (NASP) has indicated
that six economic corridors were a region which has
advantages in terms of availability of infrastructure
is relatively good even very good, and the existence
of the economic process of commodities production/
superior sectors which high competitiveness.
Minister of Planning / Head of Bappenas has
described the preparation of the master plan strategy
which includes three main elements, namely: (a)
developing six Indonesia economic corridors
byconstruct growth centers in each corridor with
developing industrial clusters and special economic
zones superior resource-based (commodities), (b)
strengthen national connectivity, including intra
connectivity and inter growth center in economic
corridor, inter economic corridor (inter island), and
international (trade doors and tourists), (c) accelerate
the ability of national science and technology to
support the development of the main program.
(https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/rpjmn/RPJMN
202010-2014.pdf)
Kamarzuki, (2011) stated that the developing
economic corridor approach was expected to make
an impact spill over to drive the surrounding area
growth faster and ensure the existing of the
continuation development. One of the six corridors
is Sulawesi Island, which is expected to be the
forefront of the national economy of the East Asian
Najmulmunir, N.
The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on Sulawesi Island.
DOI: 10.5220/0009935417991808
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pages 1799-1808
ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
1799
market, Australia, Oceania and North and South
America.
1.2 The Purposes of Research
The Policy of Economic Development Corridor aims
to accelerate and expand economic development.
But the national economic face the problem
difference of area economic growth. Then the
problems in this study, is "what are the sectors that
acts as a prime mover of the economy in order to
accelerate the development of Sulawesi "?.
This study aims to 1) Identify the prime mover
sectors that act as the main mover to accelerate
regional economic development of Sulawesi Island
corridors, 2) To determine the development and
sustainability of the sector based 3) To be able to
determine the coefficient sectors concentration and
the excellence of areas and the base region.
2 THEORY
According to Hecksher and Ohlin there is a
difference in the opportunity cost of a country
depending on the difference in the number of
production factors it has (Nopirin, 1999).
Furthermore, it was stated that there were
differences in the proportion and intensity of factors
due to differences in gifts, in the form of differences
in the abundance of natural resources (endowment
factors). That difference encourages the exchange of
goods and services between countries.
In general, international trade arises mainly due
to relative price differences between countries. The
difference comes from production costs. While the
difference in production costs is caused by
differences in God's gift of production factors.
Besides that there are other differences, namely the
level of technology that determines the intensity of
production factors, differences in efficiency in using
factors of production, and foreign exchange rates
(Nopirin, 1999).
Abundant natural resources play an important
role in economic development, but to combine into
competitive goods and services and to transform the
economic structure is very dependent on human
capacity, in line with that Yameogo et al. (2014)
said that natural resource, especially oil endowment
may affect negatively the process of more complex
of countries productive structures. A huge
endowment of oil may negatively impact the
productive structure of a nation through its industry
and manufacturing.
Transformation of the economic structure is an
indicator of regional development and growth.
Economic transformation adopts Fisher and Clark's
theory which links with changes in three main
sectors, namely primary, secondary and tertiary. The
development is characterized by the use of resources
and its benefits, namely the decline in the proportion
of the primary sector, the increase in the proportion
in the secondary sector and the proportion of the
tertiary sector (Nugroho and Dahuri, 2004).
The development of human resources capacity is
part of the responsibility of the regional government,
including having an important role in economic
development, through four important roles of local
government, namely 1) as an entrepreneur, the
regional government can develop its own business
through the utilization of its assets to economically
benefit, 2) as coordinator the regional government
can play a role in the establishment of policies and
strategic planning for regional development, 3) as
facilitators, the regional government can play a role
in accelerating regional development through
improving the attitudinal environment (behavior and
culture) in the region and 4) as a stimulator, it plays
a role to stimulate business creation and
development through specific actions that affect
companies entering to the area concerned (Arsyad,
1999).
According to Hoover and Giarratani (1985) the
development of a region can be seen in the following
parameters: 1) Growth in population, 2) Increased
income per capita and 3) Changes in economic
structure. While according to Nasution (1990)
measures the development of a region can be seen
from the following benchmarks: 1) economic
growth, 2) income distribution, 3) poverty, 4)
unemployment, 5) environmental quality and natural
resource productivity. Trade in the form of exports
will have an impact on regional development. Base
economic theory states that the main determinants of
economic growth in a region are directly related to
the demand for goods and services from outside the
region (Arsyad, 1999). The policy related to this
theory is the reduction of barriers to export-oriented
companies. The income is in line with Hoover and
Giarratani (1985) the development of a region will
be influenced by external factors, namely 1) the
demand for regional output from outside the region,
and 2) Decision making related to the location of the
supply of inputs for production activities in the
region, and 3) trade between regions.
Economic development of the region is divided
directly related to locational factors and not directly
related to non locational factors. The location factor
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1800
has a direct effect on the aspect of inertia and is
related to the minimization of transport costs
(Nugroho, and Dahuri, 2004).
Companies tend to minimize costs by choosing a
location that maximizes their opportunities to
approach the market. The model of ancient industrial
development states that a good location is the
cheapest cost between raw materials and markets
(Arsyad, 1999).
The choice of location selection was carried out
by the company as an effort to minimize costs
carried out through agglomeration, carried out
through internal agglomeration, inter-industry
linkages, localization economies, urbanization
economies (Nugroho and Dahuri, 2004). Even
though agglomeration economies can be classified in
several ways, typically three major categories are
distinguished: (1) benefits of localization economies
(Marshall - Arrow - Romer externalities) are derived
from the agglomeration of specialized firms.
The choice of location selection was carried out
by the company as an effort to minimize costs
carried out through agglomeration, carried out
through internal agglomeration, inter-industry
linkages, localization economies, urbanization
economies (Nugroho and Dahuri, 2004). Even
though agglomeration economies can be classified in
several ways, typically the three major categories are
distinguished: (1) benefits of localization economies
(Marshall - Arrow - Romer externalities) are derived
from the agglomeration of specialized firms across
the same industrial sector, (2) urbanization
economies (Jacobs' externalities) across different
industries, and (3) internal economies of scale
results in significant returns because of the size of
the firms (Parr 2002; McCann 2013 ).
Location Quotient (LQ) is a method for
determining to measure the degree of specialization
of an industry owned by an area, while measuring
the export capacity of the regional economy and the
independence of a sector. Based on the LQ analysis,
the economy is divided into two parts, namely
economic basis, namely economic activities to
produce goods and services for markets in the region
and outside the relevant region and non-base
economy is an activity to produce goods and
services for needs within the region (Widodo , 2006;
Nugroho and Dahuri, 2004).
3 METHODOLOGY
This study used the quantitative approach on
regional economic secondary data based, especially
Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) in all
Provinces on Sulawesi Island.
The model used to analyze regional data is the
analysis of Location Quotient (LQ) (Blair 1991), LQ
Trend (Canon and Uton, 2007) and the Regional
Concentration Coefficient (Blair 1991 and Warpani,
1984).
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Economic Based
Sulawesi Island as the fourth corridor has a several
sectors of the economy in the region which
distributed to several Provincial. Potential
development of the sector is reflected by LQ value.
If LQ > 1 then called economic sector based, that is,
a region growing or developing as a result of
specialization in exports, with export incomes will
be obtained, it can increase the wealth and the ability
of a region to carry out the construction and pay the
price of goods imported from outside the region.
This analysis basically uses the theory of
international trade is applied to the boundary of an
area. (Adisasmita, 2008). LQ values are in all
provinces on Sulawesi Island was presented in Table
1.
Sulawesi Island is expected to contribute to
national economic growth. The development is
highly dependent on the performance of the engines
of economic development regions. Economic growth
in the region is strongly influenced by the stability
of regulation in each regions, if the regulation is not
steady will have an impact on the economy and
income distribution(Jaya,2004). Among these are the
elements of security policy which of these factors is
a key element in determining investment
decisions(Ulum, 2006), besides that there are factors
levies, licensing procedures, services, local
economic regulation (Usman, 2002).
Sulawesi Island as seen in Table 1, has potential
natural resource, if managed properly then it will act
as a driver of regional economic sector, because the
sector is a double impact on the sector either directly
or indirectly that may eventually lead to the growth
of the region.
The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on Sulawesi Island
1801
Table 1. Location Quotient Values in the Province of Sulawesi Island in 2006
North Central
South
Southeast West
Sector
Sulawesi Sulawesi Sulawesi Sulawesi
Gorontalo
Sulawesi
Agriculture
0.839
1.74
1.18
1.41 1.20 2.11
Mining
0.701
0.34
1.33
0.67 0.13 0.07
Industry
0.771
0.65
1.41
0.8751 0.83 0.75
Electricity, Gas and
Water Supply
1.075
1.10
1.35
1.00 0.83 0.48
Construction
2.555
1.07
0.75
1.27 1.25 0.50
Trade, Hotel and
Restaurant
1.101
0.95
1.10
1.12 1.03 0.98
Transportationand
Communications
1.661
0.96
1.08
1.08 1.47 0.38
Financial Services
1.292
0.88
1.18
1.08 1.66 0.89
Services
1.366
1.37
1.04
1.20 1.72 1.28
Source: Results of Analysis
These include the potential for widespread
agricultural sector, particularly farming, fishing and
mining, and the results of the processing industry can
be a major driver of development. The potency when
accompanied by the smooth connectivity through the
infrastructure network, it can stream the supply to
meet demand across the province, in Sulawesi island
and inter-island and international. Beside that, labor
costs of this export activity if it is spent in the region
will cause demand goods and services, so it can
encourage economic growth in the next.
According to the theory of the export base, an
area grown or developed as a result of specialization
in export activities, with export income will be
obtained, this can increase the wealth and the ability
of an area to carry out the construction and pay the
price of goods imported from outside the area. This
analysis basically uses the theory of international
trade which is applied to boundary of an area.
(Adisasmita, 2008).
Table 1 shows a sector basis in some provinces
on Sulawesi Island. If all of these facilitated, it will
have an impact in growth acceleration. Each
province has a different driving sector growth,
which is as follows:.
a. Agriculture emerged as a driver of the economy
in all regions except North Sulawesi province,
but has a tendency to increase.
b. Mining and industry sector only in the province
of South Sulawesi which became sector basis
c. Electricity, gas and water supply in the entire
province became a sector basis except in the
province of Gorontalo.
d. The building sector became basis sector in all
regions except in the province of West and
South Sulawesi
d. Trade, Hotel and Restaurantbecame a basis
sector in all regions except in the province of
Central and West Sulawesi
e. Transport and Communications sector and also
financial services sector became basis sector in
all provinces, except the Western and Central
Sulawesi
f. While the service sector into a sector basis
throughout the province.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1802
Table 2: Based Sector Development in Sulawesi Provinces between Year 2000 to the Year 2006
North Middle
South
Southeast West
Sector/ Province
Sulawesi Sulawesi Sulawesi Sulawesi
Gorontalo
Sulawesi
Agriculture
Up Up
Down Up
up
Up
Mining an
d
Quarrying
Down Up Up
Up
up
Up
Industry
Down Down Up
down
down Up
Electricity, Gas an
d
Water Supply
Up Up Up
Up
down Up
Building
Up Down Up
Down
down Up
Trade. Hotel& Rest.
Up Down Up
Down
down
Down
Transport
&
Communications
Down Down Up
Up
down
Down
Financial Services
Down Down Up
Up
down Up
Services
Up Down Up
Down
up
Up
Source: Results of Analysis
The economic potential of the region most
associated with national policies among other
policies Integrated Economic Development Zone or
KAPET (Kuncoro, 2004) and policy of
Development Economic Corridor (Situmorang,
2011). Economic Corridor development is realized
through 8 main programs, namely agriculture,
mining, energy, industrial, marine, tourism,
telecommunications and the development of
strategic areas, and 22 main economic activity.
Selection of the main economic activity for each of
the corridors is based on the consideration of the
strategic view of economic activity and conditions
or interests of current economic activity as well as
the potential winning in each economic corridor. All
22 main economic activity is food and beverage
industry, agro-food, copper, nickel, coal, rubber,
palm oil, fisheries, animal husbandry, tourism, oil
and gas, textiles, shipbuilding, steel, transport
equipment, defense equipment, timber, cocoa and
bauxite, also national strategic area (KSN) of Sunda
Strait and Jabodetabek. (Bappenas go id). According
to Hoover and Giarratani (1985) stated that the
development of an area will be affected by internal
and external factors. These factors are 1) the demand
for the output region from outside the region, 2)
inputs supply for production activities in the region,
and 3) inter-regional trade.
4.2 Economic Based Developments
Regional economic development do not merely
pursue the growth, but must be accompanied by an
increase in the quality of human resources and
institutional capacity of the economy and leaving the
old paradigm where the economy is exploitative,
contrary to the new paradigm in the autonomous
region towards economic development in order to
improve the welfare and distributive justice (Haris ,
2001). This is consistent with the results of the study
by Mopangga (2011) stated that Gorontalo Province
Development has shown inequalities caused by
economic growth that required quality growth and
lead to equitable development and social welfare,
which can be done through increase per capita
income followed by increasing the quality of human
resources and ease of access the infrastructure.
Development and reliability of sector base is
proved by it’s development from time to time in the
province. This development can be approached from
LQshift-share, which the results are presented in
Table 2. LQ shift-share describes the development
status of the sector, in a certain period, if the
development above the provincial average in the
whole island in a certain period means showing up
development. If development below the provincial
average, its mean decline development. Ups and
down of the developments is indicating the
dynamics power. Subsequently Table 2 shows the
development of economic base status.The
developments are part of the region economic
dynamics; most sectors moved up and partially
decreased.
Primary sectors namely agriculture experienced
positive development in the period 2000-2006 but
suffered a setback in South Sulawesi. While the
mining sector increased all regions except in the
province of North Sulawesi. Industrial sector
increased only in the province of South Sulawesi
and West Sulawesi.
Electricity, gas and water supply in almost all
provinces has positive developments, except in the
The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on Sulawesi Island
1803
province of Gorontalo. Meanwhile, electricity, gas
and water increased except in Gorontalo. The
building sector is largely increased, except in
Central Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi and
Gorontalo. Trade, Hotel and Restaurant sector only
increased in North and South Sulawesi.
Transportation sector also increased in South and
Southeast Sulawesi. Financial sector has increased
only in South, Southeast and West Sulawesi. The
service sector has increased except Central and
Southeast Sulawesi.
4.3 Sector Concentration and Superior
Region
Each province has agglomeration of economic
activity; if these sectors are collected and
accumulated it will be advantage for the area
because it can contribute the economic growth in the
region accumulatively which called Regional
Concentration Coefficient (RCC)
Developing the region's economy can be
classified based on the region itself, namely: (1) core
region which grow rapidly as result of economies
agglomeration (core region), 2) the transition region
that grow rapidly because closeness to the central
economies agglomeration (upward transition areas),
transition region whose economy is declining or
stagnant (down ward transitional areas), 4)
undeveloped area but have a primary agricultural
resources or primary activities (resource frontier
regions) and 5) areas that facing special problems
because ofoutlying or isolated condition or its
potential resources inadequate (special problem
region)(Kadin, 2009)
Seppo Laakso and Eeva Kostiainen, (2010) states
that the concentration of activity in a place indicates
that, first, the activity that creative and intensive in
science tends to concentrate in one location.Second,
creative business activities tend to congregate in the
center of the old city. This trend was also found in
several other countries.This is caused by the primary
key is the ease of communication between business
workerand they partners. Besides, with the
concentration can lead positive externalities from
science to creative business community.
Concentration in a few sectors of the region is an
advantage for the province to other provinces. The
Regional Concentration Coefficient (RCC) was
derived from sector concentration index; a positive
concentration index showed concentrations above
the
sector’s average, if negative means was below
the sector’s average.
Positive summation index is a number RCC
(Blair, 1991). A region if it has RCC highest score
mean most superior region, because it has role in the
accumulation of sector excellences. Based on the
GRDP in 2000 until 2006 in 2000 constant prices, it
was found that the value of RCC all provinces in
Sulawesi Island are presented in Figure 1, which
illustrates that South Sulawesi Province has the
smallest RCC value for Sulawesi Island compared to
other provinces. North Sulawesi province in 2000
had the highest value of the RCC that is 0.29, after 6
years this province is still relatively high sectorial
performance, despite a slight decline.
Likewise with Gorontalo province of the result
of expansion from North Sulawesi has a similarity
RCC index with his parent province, but after 6
years experienced a little decline superiority. Figure
1 illustrates the excellence of all provinces on
Sulawesi Island. In a period of 6 years then there are
several regions which the excellence was increase,
that is North, Central and West Sulawesi. North
Sulawesi has an advantage relative to other
provinces caused by a number of sectors and
sectorial activity levels high above the provincial
average on the island of Sulawesi. Besides, the
province that formed relatively recently in the early
period shows positive developments, because the
policy is progressive as Gorontalo and West
Sulawesi, but the next period Gorontalo decrease
with policy dynamics.
Excellence remains the South and Southeast
Sulawesi, and Gorontalo Province was decrease.
0.3500
0.285
7
0.3000
0.2719
0.2892
0.2415
0.2500
0.2262
0.2208
0.213
0
0.2033
0.211
7
0.2000
0.1529
0.1693
0.1500
0.1297
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
T-2000
T-2006
Source: Results of analysis
Figure 1. RCC value of Provinces on 2000 and 2006 on
Sulawesi Island, based on constant prices on 2000.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1804
Regional economic dynamics are characterized
by the dynamics of LQ and RCC changes from time
to time, then the excellence regions and sectors can
be changed according to the dynamics of regional
economic development.
This dynamics is strongly influenced by the
policies of both policies at the district level and
provincial-level policies (Jaya, 2004). Sector is a
major driver for the primary sectors, namely
agriculture, growth centers can be seen in Table 3.
This table explains that the sectors driving growth
of the agricultural sector and food crops expected to
grow much from West Sulawesi. Southast Sulawesi,
Central Sulawesi and West Sulawesi.
Plantation sector is expected to grow from
Southeast Sulawesi, West Sulawesi and Central
Sulawesi. The forestry sector is expected to grow
from almost all provinces, except the province of
South and North Sulawesi. The livestock sector is
expected to grow into a center of excellence in the
Southeast and Central Sulawesi.
The fisheries sector is expected to grow rapidly
and become a center of excellence in the South and
Southeast Sulawesi Province. However, the growth
of agricultural sector cannot be accelerated as the
industrial sector, because of constraints related to
natural factors such as climate factors, biological
potency, also natural conditions from the factors
that cannot be fully controlled Industry excellence
concentrated in the following Provinces:industrial
sector concentrated in South Sulawesi Province
which has a diversity of industries, with this it can
be seen that South Sulawesi has shown a variety of
industrial centers. Gorontalo province seen as the
concentration of the forestry industry and the food
industry. West Sulawesi province only has a
concentration in the food industry. North province
region has a concentration in the food industry and
wood processing and forest products. While other
provinces have the power in each timber and forest
products also the industry of cement and minerals
the industry, respectively for the province of Central
Sulawesi and Southeast Sulawesi. More results are
presented in Table 4.
Other economic prime movers are classified as
tertiary sector is strongly linked with the main
sectors, namely agriculture and industry, yet still
provide a real sense of the region's economic
growth. That economic development as well as
actual and potential, are also strongly associated
with the policies of the provinces and regencies /
cities in each region.
Dynamics of regional economic development that
has been widely driven by domestic consumption
should also be driven by investment and exports. It
is necessary for a conducive investment climate
(Kuncoro, 2004). According to Tambunan (2006)
conducive investment climate is a climate that
encourages a person to invest with the lowest
possible cost and risk, and generate long-term
highbenefits. There are a number of factors that
affect the investment climate, the political and
social stability, the condition of basic infrastructure,
financial sector, labor market, regulation, taxation,
bureaucracy, corruption, consistency and certainty
of policy.
Based on the success of some countries in
implementing Economic Corridor system, it was
concluded that the successful implementation of the
Economic Corridor Development approach in
supporting the rapid economic development of a
country is determined by the following factors:
1. The existence of political and good will of the
Government and all stakeholders in the
consistency of its implementation, starting at
central, provincial to local government
2. Supported by the availability of adequate
infrastructure hardware.
3. Ease of information to support business
competitiveness
4. Ease licensing procedures and guarantees in
business development.
5. Access or ease the movement of goods and
people.
6. Good and strong governance. (Kamarzuki ,
2011)
The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on Sulawesi Island
1805
Table 3. Concentration Coefficient Agricultural Sector in Sulawesi Island
Agricultural Sector
Province
Gorontalo
West
South
Southeas
t
North
Central
Sulawesi
1
Sulawesi
2
Sulawesi
2
Sulawesi
1
Sulawesi
1
Province
3
Crop *
0.019
9
Plantation
0.160
6
0.0272
0.0712
Forestry *
0.003
0
0.001
5
0.0046
0.0328
Pasture *
0.0078
0.0046
Fisheries *
0.0096 0.0355
Source: Results of analysis
* Associated with the main policy MPAIED
Informatio
n
1) the tendency is up;2) the tendency is constant;3)
the tendency is down
Table 4. Concentration Coefficients of Non Agricultural Sector on Sulawesi Island
Sectors
Province
Goronta
lo
West
South Southeast
North
Central
3
Sulawesi
1
Sulawesi
2
Sulawesi
2
Sulawesi
1
Sulawesi
1
Non-oil and gas industry
0.0437
* Food and Beverage
0.0054
0.0011
0.0036
Industry
0.0113
Wood and Forest Products
*
0.0013
0.0042
0.0007
12:03
Fertilizer Industry,
Rubbe
r
0.0001
and Chemicals
Cement, metals and
materials
0.0302 0.0451
Quarrying Products *
Machinery and Equipment
*
0.0015
Other industries
0.0010
0.0011
Source: Results of analysis
* Associated with the main policy MPAIED
Informatio
n
1) the tendency is up; 2) the tendency is constant; 3) the
tendency is down
The factors above are the domain of local
government and should be commitments in the
implementation of MPAIED policy, so that become
the power of local government to be considered by
investors through the power investment climate that
created, not just rely on the power of government
facilities. Samosir study results and Wibowo (2004)
reveals that, existence of KAPET Pare-Pare has not
significantly able to drive the region's economy as
well as fiscal facilities have not effectively utilized
by investors.
Principal strategies that can contribute to the
economic development of the region, namely 1)
increased productivity of human resources, labor
quality, and the ability to mastering the technology:
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1806
2) development and management of utilization
natural resource (marine biodiversity, minerals and
energy) and land development; 3) economic
institutional development which support increased
production, the economic empowerment of the
people, and the competitiveness of the regional
economy; 4) increased interregional infrastructure
(road networks, marine transportation, air and
railroad) and regional infrastructure (roads, water
supply, dams, irrigation, sanitation, drainage, waste
management, electricity, and communications), 5)
the increase of economic integration in interregional
through strengthening the interregional economic
network (Kamarzuki, 2011) and 6) increasing the
climate of conducive investment (Tambunan, 2006:
Kuncoro, 2004)
Economic potential on Sulawesi Island, as
described above provide very important information
for the investment to be a commitment between the
Government, State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), local
government and the business world. The investment
opportunity consists of regional development
investment or business activities and infrastructure
investment. Besides, it is also necessary the
connectivity infrastructure development, human
resource and institutional also the progress of
science and technology (Science and Technology
).
Planning and National Development Agency is
responsible for the synergy Acceleration Master plan
and Expansion of Indonesian Economic
Development (MPAIED) with other government
programs. This was stated by Minister for Planning
and National Development / Chief of National
Planning Board (Kompas.com.). This synergy is
very important to combine the function of economic
growth and the distribution at the local community
level. Besides, not all sectors are the main target of
the MPAIED policy but there are other sectors that
can drive the region's economy and become the
vocation for the local community.
5 CONCLUSION
Acceleration Master Plan and Expansion of
Indonesian Economic Development (MPAIED)
based on the Framework of Regional Economic
Corridors. Furthermore Corridor Economic Region
is strongly associated with the sectors of the
economy, reliability in the development and
commitment of the local government.
Based on the results above, it can be concluded
that Sulawesi Island can accelerate its development,
through the sectors with the performance as driver of
regional economic, has dimensions of sustainability
and focus on specific areas as the central
agglomeration. The third dimension is expected to
act as a growth locomotive which sustainable in
order to accelerate Sulawesi Regional Economic
Growth Corridor, and also distribute benefits for the
Sulawesi people which more equitable.
Sectors that have been identified as a driver of
economic regions or prime mover sector on
Sulawesi Island will give the meaning in economic
regional development if supported and responded by
the local government in the form of 1)lack of
political will and good will from the central
government and local governments and the whole
stakeholders in the implementation consistency, 2)
support the availability of adequate infrastructure, 3)
ease of information to support business
competitiveness, 4) ease of licensing procedures and
guarantees in business development, 5) access or
ease the movement of goods and people, 6) Good
and strong governance 7) comfort guarantee and
safety on the sustainability of business activities.
The potential benefits of the region do not give
real meaning if there is no consistency of policy at
both the provincial government and policy at district
and city level and does not provide space on the
participation of local communities to improve their
welfare.
REFERENCES
Adisasmita, R. , 2008. Area Development, Concepts
and Theories. Housekeeping Science, Yogyakarta.
Arsyad, Lincolin. 1999. Pengantar Perencanaan dan
Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Blair, J. P., 1991. Urban and Regional Economics. Irwin.
Boston. Bank Indonesia. 2007. Indonesian Economic
Report of 2007. Bank Indonesia.
Canon, RustanUtonSyarwani and Aaron. 2007. Derivation
of Share Lq, Lq and Lq Trend shift. The First
International Institute Bandung.
Hoover, E. M and F. Giarratani. , 1985. An Introduction to
Regional Economics. Third Edition. Alfred A Knopf.
New York.
Haris, Shamsuddin. , 2001. New Paradigm Relations-
Regional Center for Direction Format. Autonomous
Regions of the Future. News Science and Technology.
Year 42. No.. 3. Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
(Accessed on 12 September 2011)
Jaya KiranaWihana. , 2004. New Institutional Economics
of the State: An Alternative Approach to Regional
Autonomy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of
Economics and Business. Vol 19 # 4 things: 327-339.
UniversitasGadjahMada.
The Policy of Regional Economic Development Acceleration on Sulawesi Island
1807
Kamarzuki , 2011. Economic Corridors Development in
Regional Development. http:On-line bulletin. Spatial
ISSN: 1978-1571. March-April edition 2011.
(Accessed on June 28, 2011).
Chamber of Commerce. 2009. Roadmap Development
Economy Indonesia 2009-2014. www//Kadin
Indonesia. (Accessed on June 28, 2011).
Kuncoro, M., 2004. Autonomy and Regional Development,
Reform, Planning and Opportunities. Publisher
Erlangga, Jakarta.
Kuncoro, M. , 2005. Waiting for business investment
climate reform in Indonesia. Http / /
www.mudrajad.com (Accessed on June 28, 2011).
Situmorang, Budi. , 2011. Indonesian Economic
Development in Perspective An arrangement of space.
Http:On-line bulletin. Spatial ISSN: 1978-1571.
March-April edition 2011. (Accessed on June 28,
2011).
Mopangga, Herwin. , 2011. Inequality Analysis of
Development and Economic Growth in Gorontalo
province. Trikonomika, Volume 10 # 1 thing 40-51
ISSN 1411-514X.
SeppoLaakso & EevaKostiainen. 2010. Design in the local
economy: Location factors and Eketernalities of
design. On-line journal: www / / Springer Science and
Business Media BV. (Accessed on 12 September
2011).
Nopirin. 1999. Ekonomi Internasional. Edisi 3.BPFE.
Yogyakarta..
Nugroho, I dan Dahuri, R. 2004. Pembangunan Wilayah
Perspektif Ekonomi, Sosial da Lingkungan. Penerbit
Pustaka LP3ES, Jakarta.
Naidoo, P Collateral and Tri Wibowo. , 2004.
Effectiveness Analysis of Fiscal Incentives in Eastern
Indonesia (KTI), Case Study Kapet Pare-Pare. Studies
Economics and Finance. Vol.1 March 2004. Fiscal
Analysis Agency. Ministry of Finance.
Spinola, N D, Spinola, C. A and Pereira, A,.S.
2015.Business location: strategic factor for the
development of regions? An approach on industrial
location policy of Bahia. 55th Congress of the
European Regional Science Association: "World
Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places",
25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. European
Regional Science Association (ERSA)
Tambunan, Sincere. 2006. I nvestment climate in
Indonesia: issues, challenges and potential. Kadin
Indonesia. Www / / kadin indonesia.or.id. (Accessed
on 12 September 2011).
Ulum, Ihya.2006. Analysis of Investment Attractiveness
Rating Relationships with Revenue District / town in
Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Public Sector
Finance (JAKSP) Volume 7 # 1. ISSN 1411-5921.
Usman, Syaikhu et al. , 2002. Regional Autonomy and the
Business Climate: The Case of the Three Districts in
West Java. Institute Research Institute..
Warpani, S., 1984. Analysis of Cities and Regions.
Publisher ITB, Bandung.
Widodo, Tri. 2006. Perencanaan Pembangunan: Aplikasi
Komputer Era Otonomi Daerah. UP STIM YKPN
Yogyakarta.
Yameogo, N.D., Tiguene Nabassaga, Abebe Shimeles and
Mthuli Ncu. 2014. Diversification and Sophistication
as drivers of structural transformation for Africa: The
Economic Complexity Index of African Countries.
Journal of African Development Fall 2014 | Volume
16 #2.
World Development Indicators (2017). Indonesia
Database for Policy and Economic Research,
Washington, US: World Bank,
https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/rpjmn/RPJMN%202
010-2014.pdf downloaded 1-10-2018.
http://www.kemendag.go.id/files/pdf/2012/12/06/mast
er-plan-2011-2025-id0-1354731495.pdf.. downloaded
1-10-2018
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
1808