As mentioned at the beginning of the paragraph, 
the optimal requirement configuration seems 
differentiated in the chosen location, UIR Rabat has 
9kW of Photovoltaic Array and 1 kW of Wind 
turbine, but FST Tangier has 3kW of Photovoltaic 
Array and 3 kW of Wind turbine which justify the 
price of each hybrid system. Moreover, the 
integration cost consists of all service providers and 
equipment relating to structural Photovoltaic-Wind 
supporting and installation/wiring.  After analyzing 
these results, it is deductible that each chosen 
location has a specific system requirement as the 
optimal solution of the sizing problem. 
5 CONCLUSION  
In this paper, the authors are focusing on sizing and 
integrating an HPWS to supply an electric load 
demand profile, The target of this size is providing 
an optimized configuration (Photovoltaic and Wind 
size), which can power supply the laboratory 
prototype with the lowest cost of required equipment 
and the higher power reliability. The dynamic 
simulation allowed visualizing the long-term 
electrical production of different HPWS 
configuration, then selecting the optimized solution 
of each chosen location. As result, for the same 
electric load demand and for two coastal cities (IUR 
Rabat & FST Tangier) which distance of 250 km, 
two different configurations are found to meet the 
energy requirement, 9kWp of Photovoltaic array and 
1kW of wind turbine as an optimized solution for 
IUR Rabat with a total cost of integration system 
around 17 215 €, besides, 3kWp of Photovoltaic 
array and 3kW of wind turbine as an optimized 
solution for FST Tangier that have a total cost of 
integration equals to 14 695 €, hybridization of two 
renewable power sources allowed to reduce the total 
cost of integration in Tangier (2520  €) compared to 
the installation cost in Rabat. 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
The authors would like to express their appreciation 
to “IRESEN” by providing financial support to carry 
out this research under the project “MCS Bitume”. 
We would like to emphasize that, we have not been 
able to complete this research without the joint 
support of all head director and engineers of UIR.   
REFERENCES 
Amine, A. (n.d.). Voltrom Energy. Retrieved from 
http://www.voltra.ma/installation/index.php 
Anoune, K., Bouya, M., Astito, A., & Abdellah, A. Ben. 
(2018). Sizing methods and optimization techniques 
for PV-wind based hybrid renewable energy system: A 
review . Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 
93, 652–673. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.032 
Anoune, K., Laknizi, A., Bouya, M., Astito, A., & Ben 
Abdellah, A. (2018). Sizing a PV-Wind based hybrid 
system using deterministic approach. Energy 
Conversion and Management,  169, 137–148. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.03 
El Azzaoui, M., Mahmoudi, H., Boudaraia, K. (2016). 
Backstepping control of wind and photovoltaic hybrid 
renewable energy system. International Journal of 
Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 7(3), 677–686. 
Panayiotou, G., Kalogirou, S., & Tassou, S. (2012). 
Design and simulation of a PV and a PV-Wind 
standalone energy system to power a household 
application.  Renewable Energy,  37(1), 355–363. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.038 
Quesada, B., Sánchez, C., Cañada, J., Royo, R., & Payá, J. 
(2011). Experimental results and simulation with 
TRNSYS of a 7.2kWp grid-connected photovoltaic 
system.  Applied Energy,  88(5), 1772–1783. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.011 
Sanajaoba, S., & Fernandez, E. (2016). Maiden 
application of Cuckoo Search algorithm for optimal 
sizing of a remote hybrid renewable energy System. 
Renewable Energy,  96, 1–10. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.069 
TRNSYS. (n.d.). Http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys/. 
Yang, H. X., Lu, L., & Burnett, J. (2003). Weather data 
and probability analysis of hybrid photovoltaic-wind 
power generation systems in Hong Kong. Renewable 
Energy,  28(11), 1813–1824. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00015-6