Working Performance Management Organisation in 
order  to  find  the  role  model  for  good  eselon  III 
career  staff  that  will  receive  promotion  in  open 
selection.  
Next, from the previous study conducted in 2014 
which  is  promotion  time  of  eselon  I,  it  selects  best 
three  candidates  from  11  candidates.  The  result  of 
governor  choosing  was  already  predicted  by 
commoners that the chosen people will be those who 
has  same  perspective  within  the  governor  itself.  In 
2015,  the  4  positions  are  competed  over  58 
candidates of the eselon II, ther is disoriented event 
that  creates  apprehension  among  people  of  eselon 
III, they were disappointed as none of their member 
were  chosen  during  the  selection.  Thus,  it  creates 
trust  issue  over  Human  Resource  Working 
Performance Management organisation.  
In 2016, the two positions for eselon II level, the 
winners were professionals  that  come from  internal 
institution,  the  trust  grow  among public  as they  are 
starting to place hope in open selection program. In 
2017,  the  selection  result  in  3  best  people  from  38 
candidates  who  are  professionals  and  come  from 
internal  institutions,  the  trust  were  growing  among 
public  as  they  trust  the  open  selection  program 
commenced  by  Human  Resource  Working 
Performance  Management  organisation. 
Furthermore,  In  2017,  from  7  opened  position  for 
eselon  II  level,  there  are  only  five  chosen 
professionals, the two places were empty as none of 
them are qualified enough to reach the passing grade 
provided  by  the  committee.  That  is  why,  the  re-
selection  event  was  held  in  that  time.  the  event 
shows  the  lack  of  professionals  among  the 
candidates,  it  was  strengthen  by  the  fact  that  the 
other five position were earned from externals. From 
the explanations above, the research questions of the 
study  will  be,  as  follow:  (1)  the  public  opinion 
toward  civil  apparatus;  (2)  The  obstacles  faced  by 
individuals  after  receiving  the  open  selection 
announcement;  (3)  the  bureaucracy  reformation 
challenge  that  must  be  faced  by  Human  Resource 
Working  Performance  Management  organisation 
toward  the  new  model  of  career  counselling  post 
open selection program. 
The study  aims  to  reveal the negative impact  of 
the apprehensive situation among eselon III staff, as 
a result of open selection program, by providing the 
preventive  action  and  solutions,  and  to  reveal  the 
positive  impact  performed  by  the  staff  during  the 
open  selection  program,  in  order  to  give 
development,  and  advance  consolidation.  This 
evaluation  study  type  had  another  objective  to 
describe  the  implementation  of  open  selection 
program from High  Leader  Position  toward  Banten 
civil apparatus career. 
2  THEORICAL FRAMEWORK 
Staff always become an object for Human Resource 
Management, Armstrong (2009), stated that “Human 
resource  management  is  a  strategic,  integrated  and 
coherent approach to the employment, development 
and  well-being  of  the  people  working  in 
organization”.  Lutfim  Cania  (2014)  stated  that  the 
organisation  working  performances  is  more 
important,  especially  in  larger  and  more  dynamic 
market;  human  resource  is  the  key  to  hold  the 
organisation in a very competitive market.  
Evaluation  is part of  management  system which 
are  planning,  organisation,  implementation, 
monitoring,  and  evaluation.  Without  evaluation  the 
condition of the object will remain unknown within 
the plans, implementation, and the result as well. 
Scriven  (1981)  defines  evaluation  as  a  “The 
process of determining the merit or worth or value of 
something, or product of that process”, based on the 
definition  conducted  by  Scriven,  Fitzpatrick, 
Sanders  and  Worthen  (2012)  support  the  definition 
of  evaluation  that  it  determines  the  use  or 
advantages of an object of evaluation. more general, 
evaluation  could  be  defined  as  process  of 
identification,  clarification,  and  implementation  the 
evaluated object. it is also supported by Stufflebeam 
and  Coryn  (2014)  who  defines  evaluation  as  a 
evaluating  as  the  act  or  process  of  determining  the 
merit,  worth,  or  significance  of  something  or  the 
product  of  that  process.  Meanwhile,  Evert  Vedung 
(2013)  defines  evaluation  as  a  careful  retrospective 
assessment of the merit, worth and value of 
administration,  output  and  outcome  of  government 
interventions,  which  is  intended  to  play  a  role  in 
future,  practical  action  situations.  From  all  expert's 
opinions above, it can  be concluded that evaluation 
is  a  systematic  assessment  process  through  planned 
and  coordinated  actions  toward  the  out  pit  of 
government  implementation  in  order  to  find  the 
effectiveness  of  a  program  that  can  be  applied 
during and after the program. 
Mohammad Zohrabi (2011), in his article entitled 
“An  Introduction  to  course  and/or  Program 
Evaluation”, he explained that in the early time, the 
evaluation  of  a  program  is  quantitative  and/or 
experimental  action  toward  the  nature.  Within 
several  times,  it  is  found  that  the  qualitative 
approach  toward  the  nature  become  more  effective 
than  artificial  experiment  in  laboratory.  The  most 
important  issue  during  evaluations  process  is  to 
reveal the on going transformation. 
The  definition  of  evaluation  impact,  based  on 
Elliot Stern (2015),  are  : (1)  Stresses the search  for 
any  effects,  not  only  those  that  are  intended,  (2) 
Recognises  that  effects  may  be  positive  and