
 
rules  in  scientific  papers,  namely  logical 
(sequential),  objective,  systematic  (following  the 
rules  of  a  systematic  mindset),  reliable  (tested  and 
valid),  design  (planned  and  have  a  design), 
accumulative  (a  collection  of  various  sources 
recognized  for  its  truth).  In  terms  of  the  language 
used in scientific papers, Gillett (2017) underlines a 
number  of  characteristics  of  English  scientific 
papers, namely: ‘formal, precise, objective, explicit, 
accurate,  hedging,  responsible,  and  complex. 
Underlining the opinions of Halliday (1989), Gillett 
(2017) asserts that  'Formality' means that  scientific 
writing  avoids  the  use  of:  unofficial  or  colloquial 
expressions such as imprecise words namely stuff, a 
lot  of,  thing,  sort  of,  big,  nice,  like;  abbreviated 
words like can, don't, don't, don't, etc; and the form 
of a double verb like put off, bring up. 
Meanwhile,  'precision'  means  using  exact  or 
specific information. For example, not writing "a lot 
of  people"  but  "50  million  people".  'Objectivity' 
means that what is emphasized is the information or 
argument that you want to convey not you. For this 
reason, the use of words ‘I, me, myself, you should 
be  avoided  in  English  scientific  research.  For 
example,  not  "In  my  opinion,  this  is  a  very 
interesting  study",  but  "This  is  a  very  interesting 
study." Another example, not "You can easily forget 
how  different life  was 50 years  ago.",  But  "It was 
easy to forget how difficult life was 50 years ago." 
Furthermore,  'explicitness'  means  there  is  a 
connection between  one idea and another which is 
characterized  by  the  use  of  signpost  words  (signs) 
both  in  sentences  and  paragraphs,  for  example, 
however,  similarly,  in  addition,  because,  for 
example. "Explicitness" is also related to the need to 
write  sources  that  become  references  in  scientific 
papers,  for  example  "McGreil (1977: 363-408) has 
shown  that  ...",  and  not  "Researchers  have  shown 
that ... 
'Accurate' is related to the accuracy of using words 
in  scientific  papers.  For  example  when  using  the 
words  "money",  "cash",  "currency",  "capital"  or 
"funds"  in  accordance  with  the  right  context. 
'Accurate' is also related to the correct spelling of a 
written word. 
"Hedging"  is related  to caution in expressing  ideas 
through  the  use  of  cautious  language  or  vague 
language.  For  example,  the  use  of  words  "seem, 
believe, may, often, definite, and definitely". 
Finally,  'responsibility'  relates  to  claims  made  in 
scientific  papers.  That  is,  if  an  author  claims  a 
statement  then  the  person  concerned  must  provide 
evidence and justification. 
From these two opinions, there is a link between 
scientific rules proposed by LIPI (2012) and Gillett 
(2017). For example, the logical term (LIPI, 2012) is 
in  line  with  the  meaning  contained  in  the  term 
'explicitness' (Gillett, 2017; objective (LIPI, 2012) in 
line  with  'precision'  (Gillett,  2017);  reliable  (LIPI, 
2012) in line with 'responsibility' (Gillett, 2017) and 
accumulative is also in line with the meaning of the 
term 'explicitness'. 
'Complexity'  is  related  to  the  fact  that  written 
language  is  more  complex  than  spoken  language. 
'Complexity' in written language in English includes, 
among  others,  in  sentence  arrangement,  more 
commonly  used noun  phrases,  subordinate  clauses, 
complement  clauses  with  that  /  to,  long  series  of 
prepositional  phrases,  nominalization,  attributive 
adjectives, and adjective groups as complements. 
The noun  phrase  as the subject consists  of  various 
compositions as outlined in the following examples 
of sentences: 
a). Problems related to the concept of a delinquent 
subculture. 
b.) If a student of British politics demanded to guide 
his research, the compiler would have little difficulty 
about  the  first  and  most  significant  maxim  in  the 
creed. 
c).  Nicolson's  account  is  far  too  discreet,  and 
obscures some of the most important features of the 
crisis. 
d). The three main works are all rather slight when 
they come to the complexities of the Liberal attitude 
during the crisis. 
e). The first step towards understanding the crisis of 
1931  is  to  distinguish  between  different  types  of 
coalition government. 
Noun  phrase  in  sentence  a).  certain  problems 
associated with a delinquent subculture consist of a 
combination of adjectives, nouns, adjectives derived 
from  passive  verbs,  prepositions,  articles,  nouns, 
prepositions, articles, adjectives and nouns with the 
core  nouns  'problems'.  This  includes  a  relatively 
long form of the subject noun phrase. 
The noun phrase of the subject in sentence b). a 
student  of  British  politics,  derived  from  a 
combination  of  articles,  noun  words,  prepositions, 
adjectives,  and  nouns  with  the  core  nominal  word 
'student'.  Meanwhile,  sentence  noun  phrases  c). 
Nicolson's account is a form of a personal noun that 
functions as an adjective and noun word 'account'. In 
section d). The three main works, this noun phrase is 
a form of the word article, adjectives for numbers, 
adjectives, and nouns with the core noun ina works'. 
Finally, the noun phrase in the sentence e). The first 
step  towards  understanding  the  crisis  of  1931  is  a 
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
162