Effect of Herbicide Application on Asystasia Gangetica and
Ottochloa Nodosa in Young Oil-palm Plantation
Asmanizar, Aldy Waridha, Edy Sumantri and Rizky Budiarto
Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Jl. S.M.Raja, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: herbicide application, Asystasiagangetica, Ottochloanodosa, young oil-palm plantation
Abstract: A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of herbicide application on Asystasiagangetica and
Ottochloanodosa in young oil-palm plantation. Experimental plots with the size of 3 x 3 m
2
each were laid
in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The summed dominance ratio of A. gangetica
and Ottochloanodosa were 32 and 37%, respectively. The treatments were Glyphosate-isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha; paraquat dichloride 2 l/ha and 2,4-D Dimethyl amine
2.5 l/ha and untreated control (water). The percentage of weed yellowing, weed killed, weed re-growth and
wet weight and dry weight of weed was found to be significantly affected by herbicide application
compared to untreated control. The result showed that Paraquat dichloride (2 l/ha) caused high weed
yellowing on A. gangetica and O. nodosa (88.66 and 85%) at 4 Days After Treatment (DAT). Glyphosate-
isopropyl ammonium 1.5 l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha caused low effect on A. gangetica and O.
nodosa killed at initial (7 DAT) observation (21.66 and 13.33 %, respectively), but the percentage of weed
killed increased consistently until 28 DAT (100 and 68.33%, respectively). Application of 2,4-D Dimethyl
amine 2.5 l/ha caused weed re-growth to be low on A. gangetica (2.66%) whilst, Glyphosate-isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha and Paraquat Dichloride 2 l/ha was 17.66 and 38.33%,
respectively. Paraquat dichloride 2 l/ha showed good effect at 7 DAT on O. nodosa, but there was high
weed re-growth at 58 DAT (95%).
1 INTRODUCTION
Weeds competed with cultivated crops for nutrients,
such as water, light and space can result in
significant crop losses. Weed infestation is severe
especially during young stage of oil palm. Among
different noxious weed species, Asystasiagangetica
is frequently found in oil palm plantation (Samedani
et al., 2013). Asystasiaganetica begins to be
considered harmful because it can reduce yields on
pineapple and palm oil. The weed spreads very
quickly in most plantation (Wibawa et al., 2009)
Asystasiagangetica is classified as noxious weed
because of its ability to produce many seeds, and it
is very difficult to be controlled. It suppresses oil
palm yield by 13% (Rajanratmam et al., 1979).
Ottochloanodosa is a tanned leafy annual grass that
forms a "sheet". The flower is purple, shaped like a
panicle with branches similar to the shape of barbed
wire, growing in all directions. These weeds can
produce many small seeds and are easily carried
away by processing equipments and the population
is easily dispersed. It is one of the dominant weeds
in Bangun Bandar Palm Oil Plantation (Tantra and
Santoso, 2016). Ottochloanodosa despite grows
from the seeds, can also be reproduced by stems,
especially at the bottom of soil, forming new roots
and shoots (Nasution, 1986
b
). Therefore, it is
difficult to eradicate mechanically.
Weed control by using herbicides is recognized
to be an economical practice in oil palm plantations.
It can reduce reliance on manpower for hand
weeding which can delay operations in time of
scarcity. Glyphosate and paraquat is a
broadspectrum herbicide that is often used to control
weeds in oil palm plantation (Tjitrosoedirdjo et al.,
1984; Wibawa et al., 2009). Glyphosate is a
systemic herbicide and acts as cell division and
photosynthetic inhibitor.
The purpose of this study is to determine the
effectiveness of some herbicides for weed control of
A. gangeticaand O. nodosa.
Asmanizar, ., Waridha, A., Sumantri, E. and Budiarto, R.
Effect of Herbicide Application on Asystasia Gangetica and Ottochloa Nodosa in Young Oil-palm Plantation.
DOI: 10.5220/0008882501030106
In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research (ICMR 2018) - , pages 103-106
ISBN: 978-989-758-437-4
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
103
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
A field trial was set up in the Immature Plants Palm
Oil Plantation, PT. FajarAgung Lestari North
Sumatera, PerbaunganSerdangBedagai. The study
was conducted on 6 April to 10 June 2017.
Experimental plots with each size of 3 x 3 m
2
were
laid in a randomized complete block design with 3
replications. The summed dominance ratio ofA.
gangetica and Ottochloanodosa were 32 and 37%,
respectively. The other weeds were
Puerariajavanica(15%) and mixed of Cynodonsp,
Colocasiasp, Centrocemasp (14%).
The treatments were Glyphosate-isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha;
Paraquat dichloride 2 l/ha; 2,4-D Dimethyl amine
2.5l/ha and untreated control (water). Spray volume
was 450 l/ha using conventional Solo Knapsack
Sprayer with red flat-fan nozzle of 5/64 inch orifice
diameter, 1-1.5 bars pressure. Assessments were
done on percent yellowing of treated weeds at 3 days
after treatment (DAT) and percentage of weeds
killed was carried out at 7, 14, 21, 28 DAT. Re-
growth of weed was evaluated at 30, 44 and 58
DAT. Wet and dry weight of weed were also
evaluated at 58 DAT (from square quadrate of 0.5
x0.5m).
One-way ANOVA was done to determine the
effect of treatments on the weed. If ANOVA results
were significant, LSD Test (P = 0.05) were used to
separate the means. Data of weed yellowing, weed
control and re-growth was normalized
5.0x
(Gomez & Gomez, 1984) before analysis. All
statistical analyses were run on the MINITAB
Statistical Package (Minitab vol.16, 2010).
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Herbicides affected weed yellowing. Both A.
gangetica and O. nodosa showed high weed
yellowing (up to ±80%) caused by Paraquat
dichloride 2 l/ha, whilst 2,4-D Dimethyl amine
2.5l/ha caused of 57.33 and 76.66%, respectively.
Application of Glyphosate-isopropyl ammonium 1.5
l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha caused lowest
A. gangetica and O. nodosa yellowing (23.33 and
43.33%) (Table 1).
The high effect of Paraquat dichloride 2 l / ha on
A. gangetica and O. nodosa showed yellowing of
leaves, and some of them were brown, even black ,
especially leaves at weed canopy. However, the
leaves, stems and branches on the bottom position
were still alive. Paraquat dichloride is a contact
herbicide acting by inhibition of respiration and
photosynthesis, destroying the plants foliar system
(Sebayang, 2005).
Application of 2,4-D Dimethyl amine 2.5 l / ha
caused 100% of A. gangeticakilled at 21 DAT. It
might causea selective herbicides, poisonous
especially to broadleaf weeds, mainly absorbed by
leaf and also through the soil. Whilst, Glyphosate-
isopropyl ammonium 1.5 l/ha + metsulfuron-methyl
150 g/ha caused lowest A. gangeticakilled at 7 DAT,
and it increased consistently up to 100% at 28 DAT.
Glyphosate is a systemic herbicide and it is much
more effective against weed with translocated
readily through the plant. Paraquat dichloride
generally seems to be similar effective with 2,4-D
Dimethyl amine 2.5 l/ha in controlling A. gangetica.
Paraquat dichloride 2l/ha caused high effect onO.
nodosakilled (up to 80%) at 7 DAT, whilst
Glyphosate-isopropyl ammonium 1.5 l/ha +
metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha and 2,4-D Dimethyl
amine 2.5 l/ha only caused weed killed 13.33 and
33.33%, respectively. Application of 2,4-D
Dimethyl amine showed weed killed ranging 30 to
40% until 28 DAT, but Glyphosate-isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha + metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha
showed weed killed until 28 DAT and it caused
68.33% of weed killed. Generally, herbicides of 2,4-
D Dimethyl amine 2 l/ha showed less effective in
controlling O. nodosa (Table 1). According to
Nasution (1986
a
) 2.4-D compounds included in
selective herbicides, are toxic especially to broadleaf
plants. The selectivity properties of 2,4-D herbicides
occur on the basis of recovery in broad-leaved plants
greater than that in tanning plants due to interception
and higher spray solution retention.
Paraquatdichloride 2 l/ha showed high effect at
early evaluation, but it decreased the effect at 14, 21,
and 28 DAT. Control of O. nodosa with a paraquat
herbicide did not show effective results because the
stolen part of weeds was not exposed to herbicides.
Consequently, new leaves continued to grow in the
next period. According to Wibawa et al. (2009),
some annual grasses may only be temporarily
suppressed by paraquaat, because the low and
enclosed growing points are not contacted by the
spray.
A 38.33% A. gangetica re-growth was observed
in the Paraquat dichloride 2 l/ha application.
Observation at 58 DAT also indicated the faster re-
growth duration than other application due to their
relatively higher dry weights at 58 DAT (Table 2).
Application 2,4-D Dimethyl amine on A.
gangetica(Table 2) showed the lowest weed re-
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
104
growth (2.66%). The herbicide was a
selectiveherbicides, poisonous especially to
broadleaf weeds, mainly absorbed by leaf and also
through the soil.
The higher O. nodosa re-growth showed when it
was applied with 2,4-D Dimethyl amine 2.5 l/ha
(95%). According to Nasution's (1986), the 2,4-D
herbicide belongs to a selective herbicide, poisonous
especially to broadleaf plants. Therefore, O. nodosa
could dominate the area which was A. gangetica
controlled. Wet and dry weight of O. nodosa were
associated with the re-growth of O. nodosa at 58
DAT (Table 2). The heaviest wet weight of all
herbicides treatments was found in treatment 2,4-D
Dimethyl amine 2.5 l / ha (392 g), and it caused the
observation of 58 DAT thatO. nodosa re-growth
reached 95%.
The lowest O. nodosa re-growth was shown at
application of Glyphosate-isopropyl ammonium 1.5
l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha (50%), but the
lowest wet and drry weight result was Paraquat
dichloride 2 l/ha; this is caused at the time of re-
growth observation, O. nodosa coverage was less,
but the composition of leaves and stems in the lower
layer was higher than that of paraquat dichloride 2 l /
ha. Thus the wet and dry weight of O. nodosacaused
by Glyphosate-isopropyl ammonium 1.5 l/ha +
Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ application is more
severe.
Tabel 1: Herbicides application effect on A. gangetica andO. nodosa (% yellowing and killed).
Herbicides
Weed
Yellowing (%)
Weed Killed (%)
A.g.
O.n.
A.g. O.n.
7
DAT
14
DAT
21
DAT
28
DAT
7
DAT
14
DAT
21
DAT
28
DAT
Control
0 c
0 c 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
0 b 0 c
Glyphosate-isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha +
Metsulfuron-methyl
150 g/ha
23.33
b
43.33
b
21.66
b
75 a 91 ab 100 a 13.33
bc
53.33
a
61.66 a
68.33 a
Paraquat dichloride 2
l/ha
81.66
a
85.00
a
78.33
a
80.33
a
83.33
b
93.33
a
80.66
a
68.33
a
55 a 25 b
2,4-D dimethyl amine
2.5l/ha
57.33
a
76.66
a
76.66
a
85 a 100 a 100 a 33.33
ab
38.33
a
40 a 30 b
Means in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) by LSD Test.
A.g. (Asystasiagangetica); O.n. (Ottochloanodosa)
Tabel 2: Herbicides application effect on A. gangetica andO. nodosa (% regrowth and wet, dry weight).
Herbicides
Re-growth (%) Weight (58 DAT)
A.g. O.n. A.g. O.n.
30
DAT
44
DAT
58
DAT
30
DAT
44
DAT
58
DAT
Wet (g) Dry (g) Wet
(g)
Dry (g)
Control
0 0
b
0 b 0 c 0 c 0 c 110.66 a 15.13 a 131.33
b
32.84 b
Glyphosate-
isopropyl
ammonium 1.5 l/ha
+ Metsulfuron-
methyl 150 g/ha
0 8.33ab 17.66ab 31.66 b 38.33 b 50 b 29.33ab 2.49 b 280.33
a
76.67ab
Paraquat dichloride
2 l/ha
18.33 28.33
a
38.33 a 55ab 61.66ab 70ab 58ab 6.99ab 276.33
a
76.63ab
2,4-D dimethyl
amine 2.5l/ha
0 1.66 b 2.66 b
71.66
a
86.66
a
95 a 0 b 0 b 392 a 111.28 a
Means in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) by LSD Test.
A.g. (Asystasiagangetica); O.n. (Ottochloanodosa)
Effect of Herbicide Application on Asystasia Gangetica and Ottochloa Nodosa in Young Oil-palm Plantation
105
4 CONCLUSIONS
All of the treatedherbicides showed similar control
of A. gangetica with a 90-100% weed killed, but
2,4-D dimethyl amine showed better results because
it showed that the re-growth was less (2.66%).
Herbicide ofGlyphosate-isopropyl ammonium 1.5
l/ha + Metsulfuron-methyl 150 g/ha showed good
control on A. gangetica and O. nodosa, but this
weed showed a high land dominate after A.
gangetica was controlled.Paraquat dichloride 2 l/ha
showed immediate effect both on A. gangetica and
O. nodosa, but it also caused high O. nodosa re-
growth.
REFERENCES
Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures
for agricultural research.John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Canada.678 pp.
Nasution, U. 1986. Dasar-dasarHerbisida.Universitas
Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan. 146 hal.
Nasution, U. 1986. GulmadanPengendaliannya di
Perkebunan Karet Sumatera Utara dan Aceh.
PusatPenelitiandanPengembangan Perkebunan
TanjungMorawa, Medan.269 hal.
Rajaratnam, J.A., Chan, K.W., Ong, H.T. 1979. Asystasia
in oil palm plantation . In Earp, D.A. and Newall, W.
(eds.) International Developments in Oil Palms. The
Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala
Lumpur.pp.191-212.
Samedani, B., Juraimi, A.S., Anwar, M.P., Rafii, M.Y.,
Sheikh Awadz and A.R.Anuar. 2013. Competitive
interaction of Axonopusscompressus and
Asystasiagangetica under contrasting sunlight
intensity. Scientific World Journal.
Sebayang, H.T. 2005.Gulma,
PengendaliannyapadaTanamanPadi.
UniversitasBrawijaya Press, Malang. 196 hal.
Tantra, A.W., Santoso, E. 2016.Manajemengulma di
kebunKelapaSawitBangun
Bandar.Analisisvegetasidanseed bankgulma. Program
StudiAgronomidanHortikultura, FakultasPertanian,
InstitutPertanianBogor.
Tjitrosoedirjo, S., H, Utomodan J. Wiroatmodjo.1984.
PengelolaanGulma di Perkebunan. PT Gramedia,
Jakarta. 210 hal.
Wibawa, W., Mohammad, R., Juraimi, A.S., Omar, D.,
Dzolkhifli, O., Gazali, M.M., Begum, M. 2009. Weed
control efficacy and short term dynamic impact of
three non-selective herbicides in immature oil palm
plantation. International Journal of Agriculture and
Biology. 11(2):145-150.
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
106