E-Government and Budget Transparency
of Indragiri Hulu Government
Muslim Afandi
1
and Syed Agung Afandi
2
1
Department of Guidance and Counseling, State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
2
Department of Science Government, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Budget Transparency, E-Government
Abstract: Information and Communications Technology (ICT) become an essential requirement in developing
information society and a knowledge society. Indragiri Hulu Regency is the only regency in Indonesia to be
piloting an Open Government Indonesia (OGI) project with the targets to maximize the use of the website
for the needs of alternative information media. Based on the assessment of the Indonesian Forum for Budget
Transparency (FITRA) in 2013 Indragiri Hulu Regency scored 23 below the maximum score of 100. This
study aims to determine the budget transparency of Indragiri Hulu Regency government through its official
website. This study uses a qualitative method. The findings of this study indicate that the Indragiri Hulu
Regency government has an official website and accessible, but the website does not encounter any special
content of budget transparency. As for the publication of budget documents to be done but in different
content. Furthermore, Indragiri Hulu Regency also government budget documents does not update regularly
on its official website. This is due to the absence of awareness of local government and the absence of strict
sanctions so that people has not be Able to access information on the implementation process of local
budget policy.
1 INTRODUCTION
Internet is a media which is currently the most easily
accessible by the public and most cost effective for
the government to disseminate information. The use
of Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) in public life become a main needs in
developing the information society and a knowledge
society.
The World Summit on the Information Society
(WSIS) made the decision that by 2015 every state
to seek government agencies, education, hospitals
connected to communication and information
networks and 50% of the world’s population are able
to access information through the information and
communication technology (Tasmil, 2013).
Following up the WSIS then set instruction the
Presidential Directive No.3 of 2003 on National
Policy and Strategy Development of E-Government,
which requiers ministries/state agencies, provinces,
district and cities in Indonesia to implement e-
government.
Based on the Minister of Home Affairs
Instruction No. 188.52/1797/SJ of 2012 on
Transparency of Local Budget Management, local
governments are required to have an official
website, has a budget transparency content, publish
budget documents, and update data. Related to the
publication of budget documents, the documents that
must be published are: summary of RKA SKPD,
summary of RKA PPKD, draft of Regional
Rugulation on APBD, draft of Regional Rugulation
on Revised APBD, Regional Rugulation of APBD,
Regional Rugulation of Revised APBD, summary of
DPA SKPD, summary of DPA PPKD, LRA SKPD,
LRA PPKD, LKPD audited and BPK opinion on
LKPD.
Nationally based on the Ministry of
Communication and Information assessment of 224
government websites in 2004 there were 10% that
can not be opened. Furthermore, based on the results
of a national survey by the Ministry of
Communications and Information in the form of e-
Government Ranking in Indonesia (PeGI) in 2012
there are only 6 local government of the total 497
Afandi, M. and Afandi, S.
E-Government and Budget Transparency of Indragiri Hulu Government.
DOI: 10.5220/0008816900750079
In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Social and Political Affairs (ICoCSPA 2018), pages 75-79
ISBN: 978-989-758-393-3
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
75
districts/cities that are considered successfully
implement e-government.
When compared with other countries in terms of
e-government adoption based on an international
survey of Waseda e-government ranking in 2012,
Indonesia was ranked 33rd out of 55. Even in 2013
Indonesia fell to 40th out of 55 countries surveyed.
In line with that results, e-government ranking by
the United Nations in 2012 shows Indonesia was
ranked 7th out of a total of 11 ASEAN countries, far
below Malaysia and Vietnam (Napitupulu, 2015).
Based on the findings of the Indonesian Forum
for Riau Budget Transparency (FITRA RIAU) in
2013, the index of periodic budget information
disclosure on the Government website of Indragiri
Hulu Regency is also considered minimal budget
information. Indragiri Hulu only got a score 23 out
of a total score 100. Indragiri Hulu Regency is the
only regency in Indonesia that was made piloting
project Open Government Indonesia (OGI) under
the supervision of Presidential Work Unit for
Development Monitoring and Control (UKP4).
UKP4 target is to maximize the use of the website
for the needs of the information media alternatives.
2 FORMULATION OF THE
PROBLEM
How is the transparency of budget management
Indragiri Hulu Regency through its official website?
2.1 Research Methods
This study uses a qualitative method. Qualitative
methods used in this context to describe, analyze and
interpret the condition of e-government especially
the transparency of local financial management on
the official website of Indragiri Hulu Regency using
indicators: the availability of information about the
implementation procesof budget policy; access to
information that is easily accessible and freely
acquired; comformity between the implementation
and standard procedures; as well as the application
of sanctions for negligence in implementation.
2.2 Theoritical Framework
2.2.1 Transparency
According to Lalolo (2003) transparency is a
principle that ensures access or freedom for
everyone to obtain information about the
implementation of government, namely information
about policies, manufacturing processes and results
achieved. Kristianten (2006) mentioned transparency
is the openness of the government in providing
information related to the management activities of
public resources to the needy i.e. the community.
According to Didjaja (2003) transparency is
openness of the government in making policies that
can be known by the public. Transparency will
ultimately create accountability between the
government and the people. Mardiasmo (2002)
mentions the objective of transparency in
governance: one of the forms of government
accountable to the public; efforts to improve the
management of government; as well as efforts to
improve the management and good governance and
reduce opportunities for corruption practice.
Some of the measuring instrument of
transparency by Mardiasmo (2002) are publication
of public policy through communication tools such
as annual reports, brochures, leaflets, information
centers, toll-free phone, media coverage, public
service announcements, websites, bulletin boards,
local newspapers; information presented such as
service reference, maintenance data, public activity
reports, complaint procedures; and complaint
handling such as city news in mass and local media,
notice of response, response time limit, opinion
pools and surveys on public policy issues, comments
and notes for draft policy and regulation, service
users surveys.
2.2.2 Budget Transparency
Budget transparency refers to the extent to which the
public can obtain information on the government
financial activities and their implications in
comprohensive, accurate, and timely (Andrianto,
2007). According to Mardiasmo (2002) budget
compiled by the executive is said to be transparent if
it meets some criteria, i.e.: there is the
announcement of budget policy; available budget
documents and easily accessible; available timely
accountability reports; accommodation of the
voice/suggestions of the people; and there is a
system to provide information to the public.
Kristianten (2006: 52) mentions that budget
transparency is information related to budgeting
planning is the rights of every society. Citizen rights
related to budgeting, i.e.: the right to know, the right
to observe and attend public meetings, the right to
expression opinions, the right to obtain public
documents and the right to be informed. According
Andrianto (2007) transparency of financial
ICoCSPA 2018 - International Conference on Contemporary Social and Political Affairs
76
management in the implementation is measured bu
indicators:
Availability of information on the
implementation process of budget policy
Access to information that is easily accessible
and free to obtain
Comformity between implementation and
standard procedure
Application of sanctions for negligence in the
implementation.
3 ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH
FINDING
3.1 Availability of Information on
Budget Policy Implementation
Process
The obligation to provide information on
implementation process of the local government
budget policy is determined through the Minister of
Home Affairs Instruction No. 188.52/1797/SJ of
2012 on Transparency of Local Budget
Management, where all local governments shall to
publish 12 documents of budget management
through its official website that consists of:
Summary of RKA SKPD, summary of RKA PPKD,
Proposed Regional Regulation of APBD, Proposed
Regional Regulation of Revised APBD, Regional
Regulation of APBD, Regional Regulation of
Revised APBD, Summary of DPA SKPD, Summary
of PPKD DPA, LRA SKPD, LRA PPKD, audited
LKPD and BPK’s opinion on LKPD.
Of the 12 budgeet documents that must be
published, the Government of Indragiri Hulu
regency through its official website only publish
some of budget documents. Beginning in 2011
means that before the Minister of Home Affairs
Instruction No. 188.52/1797/SJ of 2012 on
Transparency of Local Budget Management,
Government of Indragiri Hulu has published a
summary document of RKA SKPD, summary of
PPKD RKA, summary of DPA SKPD and summary
of DPA PPKD on its official website. In 2012, the
Government of Indragiri Hulu only publishes budget
documents in the form a summary of RKA SKPD,
summary of RKA PPKD, summary of DPA SKPD
and summary of DPA PPKD.
In 2013 the Government of Indragiri Hulu
website publishing only 5 budget documents
consisting of RKA SKPD, RKA PPKD, DPA
SKPD, DPA PPKD and LRA SKPD. In 2014, the
document management budgets published through
the Government of Indragiri Hulu official website is
RKA SKPD, RKA PPKD, Proposed Regional
Regulation of APBD, Proposed Regional Regulation
of Revised APBD, Regional Regulation of APBD,
Regional Regulation of Revised APBD, LRA
SKPD and LRA PPKD, while in 2015, 2016, 2017
and 2018 the Government of Indragiri Hulu does not
at all publish budget documents on its official
website so that the availability of information on the
implementation of budget policies process by
Government of Indragiri Hulu has not been done yet.
3.2 Access to information that is easily
accessible and obtainable free
Access to local financial information is the citizen
rights and part of the government's responsibility to
publish it in line with the transition to the good
governance principle. Implementation of good
governance that in line with the rapid development
of Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) then demanded the government to be able to
utilize the Internet as a medium to improve the
quality of service so that later developed the concept
of e-government.
In an effort to implement e-governmnet, the
Government of Indragiri Hulu has utilized the
internet by making the official website at the address
www.inhukab.go.id. The official website of the
Indragiri Hulu Government has been well managed
through the Office of Communications and
Information Technology as the party who were
given the task and responsibility in managing.
Until now, the official website of Indragiri Hulu
Government has made it easily the public to obtain
access information especially related to local budget
management because these websites can be accessed
from anywhere and by anyone and without time
limit so that information is always available to the
community at any time for 24 hours. Good
management of the website by the Indragiri Hulu
Government is an effort of local government in act
transparently to manage local budgets so it can be
judged that the Government of Indragiri Hulu has
succeeded in adopting the earlystage of e-
government.
3.3 Correspondence between the
implementation and the standard
procedure
Utilization of the internet as a media to support the
government's performance especially in the field of
E-Government and Budget Transparency of Indragiri Hulu Government
77
local budget management has been arranged through
the Minister of Home Affairs Instruction No.
188.52/1797/SJ of 2012 on Transparency of Local
Budget Management. In the policy, local
governments are required to have an official
website, has a budget transparency content, publish
budget documents and update data.
In the implementation, the Government of
Indragiri Hulu already has an official website that to
public, but the website does not have a budget
transparency content accordingly. This websites
publishes budget management documents on the
content of "information-services" along with other
documents so that the public need spend of time to
find budget management document on this website.
Of the 12 budget documents that must be
published, the Government of Indragiri Hulu does
not publish the overall budget management
document. In 2011 the Government of Indragiri
Hulu has begun to publish the budget document in
the form summary of RKA SKPD, summary of
PPKD RKA, summary of DPA SKPD and summary
of DPA PPKD on his website.
Post-enactment the Minister of Home Affairs
No. 188.52/1797/SJ of 2012 on Transparency of
Budget Management Area, Government of Indragiri
Hulu in 2012 instead only publish four budget
documents, 5 budget document in 2013, 8 budget
documents in 2014 while in 2015, 2016, 2017 and
2018 there was no budget document on the website.
Thus it is known that the Government of Indragiri
Hulu does not update the data related to the budget
management on his official website.
3.4 Application of Sanctions for
Negligence In Execution
The application of sanctions is an action on the
bansis to ensure all the rules and policies can be
implemented properly in accordance with
established procedures so that the goal can be
achieved. Minister of Home Affairs Instruction No.
188.52 / 1797 / SJ of 2012 on Transparency of Local
Budget Management, set without the existence of
clear sanction by the central government. In
addition, the website belongs to the Directorate
General of Regional Finance Development Ministry
of Home Affairs with the address
http://keuda.kemendagri.go.id which should contain
the data assessement transparency of local
government websites were empty. This is a form
lack of seiousness of the central government in the
implementation of e-government for media of local
budgets transparance.
Lack of seriousness the central level this is also
happens at the regional level, especially the
Government of Indragiri Hulu caused by the lack of
awareness of the government as policy implementers
to act according the rules, whereas Indragiri Hulu is
the only Regency in Indonesia, which is used as a
piloting project Open Government Indonesia (OGI)
which receive guidance directly by the Presidential
Work Unit of Development Monitoring and Control
(UKP4) with a target to maximizing the use of
websites for the needs of information media
alterantive.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Budget transparency is an openness to all policies
related to financial management. Based on the
Minister of Home Affairs Instruction No.
188.52/1797/SJ of 2012 on Transparency of Local
Budget Management, local governments are
required to have an official website, has a budget
transparency content, publishing budget documents
and update the data. In the implementation, the
Government of Indragiri Hulu already has an official
website which can be accessed public, but the
website has no content of budget management
transparency.
Related to the publication of budget management
documents, local governments are required to
publish 12 budget documents. In the
implementation, the Government of Indragiri Hulu
does not publish all local budget management
documents on its official website. In 2011 and 2012
the website is only publishes 4 budget documents, 5
documents in 2013, 8 documents in 2014, while in
2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 the Government of
Indragiri Hulu is not at all publish budget documents
on its official website so that the update data is not
done.
Related to the application of sanctions for non-
conformity in policy implementation, Minister of
Home Affairs Instruction No. 188.52/1797/SJ of
2012 on Transparency of Local Budget
Management, set out without any sanctions. Other
than that, the website belongs to the Directorate
General of Regional Finance Development Ministry
of Home Affairs which should contain the assessing
transparency data of local government websites were
empty. Lack of seriousness at the central level is
what also happens at the regional level, especially
the Government of Indragiri Hulu Regency caused
by the lack of awareness of the government as the
implementer of the to act on the rules.
ICoCSPA 2018 - International Conference on Contemporary Social and Political Affairs
78
REFERENCES
Andrianto, Nico. 2007. Transparasi dan Akuntabilitas
Publik Melalui e-Government. Malang: Bayumedia
Publishing.
Didjaja, Mustopa. 2003. Transparansi Pemerintah.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Kristianten. 2006. Transparansi Anggaran Pemerintah.
Jakarta :Rineka Cipta
Mardiasmo. 2002. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi.
Yogyakarta.
Napitupulu, Darmawan. Kajian Faktor Sukses
Implementasi E-Government Studi Kasus: Pemerintah
Kota Bogor. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Volume 5,
Nomor 3, Maret 2015.
P. Loina Lalolo. K. 2003. Indikator dan Alat Ukur Prinsip
Akuntabiitas, Transparansi dan Partisipasi. Jakarta.
Tasmil. E-Goverment Rangking In Makassar. Jurnal
Pekommas Vol. 16, No. 3, Desember 2013.
E-Government and Budget Transparency of Indragiri Hulu Government
79