The study of entrepreneurship in the field of 
economics (especially in the western) is relatively 
small, particularly in Sukoharjo regency. 
Meanwhile, the creative industry of MSME is 
expected to compete in the global era, but it 
indicates a weakness in synergizing the stakeholders. 
Therefore, it is necessary to make serious efforts by 
starting the mapping of creative industry of MSME 
in Sukoharjo regency and analyzing the related 
strategy and regulatory plan.  
In general, the creative industry of MSME in 
Sukoharjo is divided into three main stages: (1) 
mapping of Sukoharjo creative industry on MSME 
entrepreneurs, (2) analysis of creative industry on 
MSME entrepreneurs’ competitiveness, and (3) 
analysis of policy and alternative strategy on 
competitiveness increase or its application. 
Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine the 
mapping of potential creative industry in Sukoharjo 
regency. 
2 LITERATURE REVIEW  
There are only a few studies in the country that 
explain the entrepreneurs' position in the national 
economy, in the relationship between finance and 
growth, in the contribution, and in the potential to 
the economy. However, we can see some research 
conducted in other countries as the initial reference. 
Research conducted by Global Entrepreneurship 
Monitor (GEM) to 42 world countries (including 
Indonesia) illustrates the interesting facts that 
researcher can follow-up. The results showed that 
the rate of entrepreneurship was inversely 
proportional to GDP per capita, but the curve form 
resembled the letter "U". Countries with a low rate 
of GDP per capita (such as Indonesia, Philippines, 
Peru, and Colombia) showed a high rate of 
entrepreneurship. This condition was the opposite of 
middle to high-income countries (such as Japan and 
the EU) that showed the low rate of 
entrepreneurship. However, the rate of 
entrepreneurship countries with high GDP per capita  
(such as the United States and Norway) increased 
again. 
There are several different results from 
previously conducted research about 
entrepreneurship. Audretsch and Thurik findings 
prove that increasing the number of entrepreneurs 
can reduce the number of unemployment. They call 
this condition as 'Schumpeter effect' by referring to 
Schumpeter's theory which states that 
entrepreneurship provides a positive effect on 
employment. Barringer's findings state that most 
start-up companies face many obstacles to survive, 
thus most of them experience failure less than 2 
years after its establishment. Therefore, a study 
related to the differences between those two research 
results is necessary to conduct. For the domestic 
researchers and policymakers, these differences are a 
challenge as the actuality and locality for a domestic 
case that needs to be confirmed. 
Among the economists, there are two 
mainstream views of entrepreneurship in its position, 
namely the managed and the entrepreneurial 
economy. The managed economy groups believe 
that competitive advantage is achieved if the mass 
production scale derived from the use of capital and 
labor are fulfilled. Solow's theory is also often called 
the old paradigm that is very popular during the 
industrialization period. Indeed, the major 
requirements of large capital and labor are only 
found in large-scale and powerful industries, such as 
Multinational Corporation (MNC). These groups 
believe that the start-up companies and small and 
medium-sized enterprises cannot improve the 
economy as characterized by Charles Brown: (1) 
The inefficiency of production compared to large-
scale companies; (2) Low wages for workers; (3) 
Lack of innovation, research and development 
(RandD) support in production; The insignificant 
role in the economy. 
In contrast to the first view, the entrepreneurial 
economy groups consider that entrepreneurship 
plays an important role in increasing the state 
economic output today. Audretsch and Thurik 
emphasize the rapid knowledge spillover process of 
new and small-to-medium scale business caused by 
the power of innovation and creativity. These are 
several strong arguments for the second group: (1) 
Technology has developed rapidly, thus it is 
expected that the production scale required to 
achieve economies in the lower scale than before; 
(2) Specific market target (niche market) evaluated 
stronger can be conducted by new companies or low 
scale of companies. 
Nevertheless, two arguments above are not 
necessarily appropriate to be confronted in a local 
context or in a developing country, including 
Indonesia. This is due to the differences in the field 
and economic structure.