Figure 11: Cross section STA 0 + 100 in HyPack 
Software. 
From the calculation of volume using Hypack 
sofware, the smallest volume value of 127.23 m³ is 
located in section between STA 17 + 550 + STA 17 
+ 626.77. The small value is due to the depth of the 
section approaching -13 meters, the existing surface 
above the dredge design is small. Conversely the 
largest volume value is 32.002,69 m³ which located 
in section between STA 12 + 100 and STA 12 + 
150. This is because the shallow depth in the section, 
the existing surface above the dredge design is quite 
a lot to be cut. 
Table 1: Volume of SWAC using Hypack. 
Design Volume (m
3
) 
VL (Volume Left)  839,934.84 
V1 (Channel)  4,525,591.71 
VR (Volume Right)  46,184.21 
Total 5,952,881.83 
 
In calculating the volume of cross section with 
Hypack software the results of the calculation 
information displayed are divided into three parts, 
namely the volume value in VL, V1, and VR. The 
total volume of SWAC with the cross section 
method using Hypack is 5,952,881.83 m
3
. 
The volume difference between the Hypack cross 
section method and the composite method is 
71,062.66 m
3
 (1.2%), whereas the volume difference 
between the Hypack cross section method and the 
manual cross section method is 582,187.174m
3
 
(9.77%). 
 
 
4. CONCLUSION 
Conclusions that can be drawn from this study are as 
follows : 
1.  The volume difference between the 
composite method and the manual cross 
section method used as a reference to 
the comparison calculation is very 
significant at 8.7% (511,124.514 m
3
) 
2.  Difference between volume calculation 
using Autodesk Civil 3D and Hypack 
software is equal to 31,136.83 (0.52%) 
The volume of Autodesk Civil 3D and Hypack 
results have almost the same value as the composite 
method with the difference 0.67% and 1.2% 
consecutively and compared with manual cross 
section are 10.26% for Autodesk Civil 3D and 
9.77% for Hypack software.
REFERENCES 
Autodesk, K., 2014. Sectional Volume Methods. 
s.l.:Autodesk. 
Buana, P. A., 2014. Studi Penentuan Draft dan Lebar 
Ideal Kapal Terhadap Alur Pelayaran. Tugas Akhir, 
Jurusan Teknik Geomatika ITS, Surabaya. 
Disnav, 2016. Peta Laut Indonesia Alur Pelayaran Barat 
Surabaya.  Kementerian Perhubungan Direktorat 
Jenderal Perhubungan Laut Distrik Navigasi Kelas I 
Surabaya, Surabaya. 
Ghilani, C. D. & Wolf, P. R., 2012. Elementary Surveying. 
An introduction to Geomatics. 13th edition. 
s.l.:Prentice Hall. 
Hypack, S., 2016. Volumes Calculation Method 
Comparison in Cross Sections and Volumes. s.l.:s.n. 
Labant, S., Stankova, H. & Weiss, R., 2013. Geodetic 
Determining of Stockpile Volume of Mineral 
Excavated in Open Pit Mine. GeoScience Engineering, 
Volume LIX, pp. No.1 p. 30-40. 
Nation, U., 2017. Identification of Islands and 
Standardization of Their Names. 11th United Nations 
Conference on the Standardization of Geographical 
Names. s.n., New York. 
Parwata, G., 2011. Peran Distrik Navigasi Dalam 
Keselamatan Pelayaran. Kementrian Perhubungan, 
Bali. 
Wahyudi, N., Armono, H. D. & Sujantoko, 2013. Analisa 
Laju Volume Sedimentasi di Alur Pelayaran Barat 
Surabaya (APBS). Jurusan Teknik Kelautan ITS, 
Surabaya. 
Windari, R., 2009. Hukum Laut, Zona-Zona Maritim 
Sesuai UNCLOS 1982 dan Konvensi – Konvensi 
Bidang Maritim. Bakorkamla, Jakarta.