Dynamic Response of Circular, Hexagonal and Rectangular Shaped
Floating Fish Cage in Waves
Yuni A. Wibowo
1
, and M. Romdhonul Hakim
1
1
Department of Marine Technology, Pangandaran Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic, 46396, Pangandaran, Indonesia
Keywords: Fish Cage, Circular, Hexagonal, Rectangular, RAO, Response Spectra
Abstract: A three dimension (3D) model of floating fish cage in both regular and irregular waves is investigated by
numerical simulations. The model vary in the geometry of circular, hexagonal and rectangular/square shaped.
Main purpose of this research is to develop a comparison of floating fish cage responses between the models.
Frequency domain analysis is performed to investigate the responses in both regular and irregular waves. The
fish cage model comprises floating collar with two concentric HDPE tubes and held together by the horizontal
and vertical braces. The benchmark model of circular fish cage is adopted from Shen [1], OD fish cage =
60m, then it is modified into hexagonal and rectangular shaped with nearly dimension from circular shaped.
The model was assumed in rigid state and excluding flexible nets in order to simplify the computation.
Dynamic analysis was performed in free-floating condition by calculating the hydrodynamic properties i.e.
added mass, damping and wave oscillation forces in three-dimensional diffraction theory. The corresponding
analysis reveal that the response of circular fish cage has the largest amplitude in heave and pitch motion than
hexagonal and rectangular model. The following condition is emerged in accordance of viscous damping of
each geometry.
1 INTRODUCTION
In recent years the development of marine
aquaculture located in offshore progressively
increases due to limited nearshore. The fish farms are
being moved by industry from nearshore to more
exposed sea region where waves and current are
stronger. Indonesia, which is 75% of it’s territory,
comprises of the seas, it contributes the huge
opportunity in marine culture/mariculture
development such as marine aquaculture as known
locally as Keramba Jaring Apung (KJA). The model
of KJA is in the form of floating cage in circular
shaped comprised of two concentric HDPE tube
commonly used nowadays.
A numerous research has been done to investigate
the dynamic responses of floating cage by model tests
and simulations. Endersen (2011) evaluate the loads
and responses of floating fish farm in circular collar.
The hydrodynamic behaviors of multiple net cages in
waves and current were investigated numerically by
Xu et al. (2012, 2013b). Shen et al. (2018) provide
numerical and experiment investigations on mooring
loads of a marine fish farm in waves and current.
This research is focused to investigate the motion
characterstics of floating collar fish cage in various
shapes : circular, hexagonal and rectangular/square.
The floating collar comprises with two concentric
tubes and were held together with both horizontal and
vertical braces. In order to simplify the calculation,
the model was simulated in rigid state and exclude the
modeling of flexible nets cage and mooring system.
Thus, in this paper we neglect the effect of
nonlinierity. Dynamic analysis was performed in
free-floating condition by calculating the
hydrodynamic properties i.e. added mass, damping
and wave oscillation forces in three-dimensional
diffraction theory.
The models were investigated in both regular and
irregular seas to obtain the comparison of the motion
characteristic of each model. JONSWAP wave
spectra is conducted to develop the dynamic analysis
in irregular seas, vary from wave height, H, 1.00 to
10.00 meters.
In summary, the present paper organized as
follows. First, a general description of methodology
used in this research, next a brief description model
simulation in three shapes : circular, hexagonal and
rectangular. Second chapter is elaboration of waves
configuration and analysis basic concept in regular
20
Wibowo, Y. and Hakim, M.
Dynamic Response of Circular, Hexagonal and Rectangular Shaped Floating Fish Cage in Waves.
DOI: 10.5220/0008544900200026
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Marine Technology (SENTA 2018), pages 20-26
ISBN: 978-989-758-436-7
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reser ved
and irregular waves. Next, generating the governing
equation of motion behaviour. And finally,
performing result and discussion, consist of motion
characteristic on regular wave, responses on irregular
waves and comparing statistical response of each
model.
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 General
This research began with determining the fixed
variable of fish cage principal dimension. Based on
model generated by Shen (Shen & Faltinsen, 2018),
we kept the dimension of Outer Diameter = 60 m for
circular model, then adopted the OD into the diagonal
length with the exact dimension to the other model.
With this fixed dimension, we generate the model of
fish cage into circular, hexagonal and rectangular
shaped (Figure 2). The model generated in 3D surface
model, based on 3D diffraction concept. Next, finding
the equilibrium position of each model and
computing the dynamic analysis in regular wave to
obtain the motion characteristic of each model and
presented into Response Amplitude Operator (RAO)
graph, then investigating the motion in irregular
waves by tabulating the squared RAO and multiply
by wave spectra to obtain the response spectra.
Finally, stochastic analysis is performed to generate
the statistical responses and compared the response to
each model. (Show Figure 1)
Figure 1: Research methodology used in this paper.
Figure 1: Research methodology used in this paper. (next)
2.2 Model Simulation
The floating collar composed of two concentric
HDPE tubes with outer cross sectional diameter,
odtube = 0.44 m, and wall thickness, wttube = 0.04
m. The diameter of the center line of the outer tube,
ODouter = 60 m. The inner tube was positioned with
the distance, l = 2.22 m inside the outermost, leading
to the center line diameter, Odinner = 55.56 m. The
tubes were held together by both horizontal and
vertical braces with the length of lhorbrace = 2.22 m
and lverbrace = 2.78 m. Those braces has cross
sectional diameter, odbrace = 0.25 m and wall
thickness, wtbrace = 0.02 m. Material properties of
HDPE tube used in this present paper is given in
Table 1.
The model of circular fish cage is adopted from
Shen (Shen & Faltinsen, 2018), Figure 2 (top-left),
then it is modified into hexagonal and
rectangular/square shaped with the near-dimension
from circular model, see Figure 2. The model was
simplified in rigid state and excluding flexible nets in
order to simplify the computation. Dynamic analysis
was performed in free-floating condition by
calculating the hydrodynamic properties i.e. added
mass, damping and wave oscillation forces in three-
dimensional diffraction theory.
A
A
Dynamic Response of Circular, Hexagonal and Rectangular Shaped Floating Fish Cage in Waves
21
Table 1: Material properties of HDPE.
Figure 2: Floating fish cage geometry : isometric view (top-
left); top view : circular, hexagonal and rectange shaped.
2.3 Waves Configuration and Analysis
The responses of floating fish cage in both regular and
irregular waves are to be evaluated. Linear theory is
adopted to compute the regular wave. According to
Djatmiko (Djatmiko, 2012), the floating structure
exposed to the external force, such as wave excitation
force, then the structure moves with the steady
amplitude and frequency, as known as steady state
oscillation. This state can be performed in the
equation 1.
z
z
= z
z0
sin (wt - e
z
)
(1)
Where z
z0
denotes oscillating motion amplitude
and e
z
is the phase degree between motion and the
propagating wave force. The function of Equation 1
gives the oscilating sinusoidal graph with x-axis of
time (s), and y-axis of wave elevation (z
z
).
The wave excitation forces are the diffraction
force due to added mass and water particle
acceleration and the Froude-Kriloff pressure force
due to the undisturbed dynamic pressure over the
wetted surface of the structure. The diffraction force
will be calculated according to linear theory.
Besides, an irregular waves simulation is
evaluated by computing JONSWAP wave spectra,
suggested by DNV (DNV, 2010), as follows :
!
"
#
$
%
&'(
)
'!
*+
#
$
%
,
-
./0
1
2345'
6
787
9
:'7
9
;<
=
>
(2)
where,
!
*+
= Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum
=
5
?@
'A
B
C
'4$
0
D
4$
25
4EFG
1
H
5
D
6
I
I
9
;
2D
<
(3)
H
s
= significant wave height
v
p
= 2p/Tp (angular spectral peak frequency)
g
= non-dimensional peakedness parameter
s
= spectral width parameter
s =0.07
for v < v
p
s =0.09 for v > v
p
A
g
= 1- 0.287 ln(
g
) as the normalizing factor
Spectral response analysis is conducted by
computation on the basis of H
s
intensities for the
long-term occurence varying from 1.00 to 10.00 m.
The responses of floating fish cage are obtained by
multiplying the square of RAO and wave spectrum
considered in this analysis. The stokhastic parameter
can be generated using the varians of the statistical
method, as follows:
''''''''''''''''''''''''J
K
&
L
$
K
!
M
#
$
%
N$
O
3
(4)
where
J
K
denotes varian n
th
and
!
M
#
$
%
is the
wave spectra.
2.4 Motion Behaviour of Floating Fish
Cage
In the first stage, the analysis of floating fish cage
motions is conducted in the numerical model based
on frequency domain. The formulation of the
dynamic for the equation of floating structure motion,
in vertical axis may be written as follows (Endersen,
2011):
J
P
=
Q#RST%
UT
=
V'W
XX
Y
#
ZS[
%
V\]
P
^
Q#RST%
UR
^
&_
X
`
#
ZS[
%
V
_
X
ab
#
ZS[
%
V_
X
cdd.d' ecRR
V_
X
dce0fKg
(5)
SENTA 2018 - The 3rd International Conference on Marine Technology
22
The vertical velocity and acceleration is
PQ#RST%
PT
and
U
=
Q#RST%
UT
=
. The unit for each term in the equation is N/m.
J
is the mass of the floater per unit length.
J
is not
varying in space and is therefore a constant.
W
XX
is the
general hydrodynamic restoring coefficient. EI is the
bending stiffness.
_
X
`
#
ZS[
%
and
_
X
ab
#
ZS[
%
are the
diffraction and Froude-Kriloff force.
_
X
cdd.d' ecRR
is
the added mass force because of vertical acceleration
of the floater section.
_
X
dce0fKg
is the damping force,
and contains contributions from potential damping,
skin friction, vortex shedding and structural damping.
Output of the analysis is presented in the form of
RAO curves which exhibit fluctuation of the ratio of
the motion amplitude and the wave amplitude as a
function of wave frequency increment from 0.1 up to
4.0 rad/s. In this analysis a comparison is performed
between the motion behaviors of circular, hexagonal
and rectangular shaped inheave and pitch motion.
Analysis of the motion behaviors in random waves is
obtained from the computation of the squared RAO
multiplied by the wave spectra, which yields the
stochastic data of significant motion responses as the
output.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Motion Characteristic on Regular
Wave
In the following section, we present results from the
numerical simulation in the form of RAO curve in
heave and pitch motion (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The
floating fish cage is exposed with the regular wave in
head seas direction (180 deg).
Figure 3: Comparison of heave motion RAO between
models.
Figure 4: Comparison of pitch motion RAO between
models.
According to Figure 4 the resonance of heave
motion for circular model occurs several times at 0.9,
1.3, 1.9 and 2.7 rad/s with the highest magnification
of heave amplitude through wave amplitude is 2.7
times. The resonance of hexagonal model can be
found at 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 rad/s. While the rectangular
model gave the resonance at 1.7, 2.3 and 3.3 rad/s.
Observing the graph, we find the first resonance of
circular model occurs at 0.9 rad/s with the wave
(JONSWAP) occurence probability is 14% at the
same frequency. This condition will generate the high
response of heave at irregular wave.
Meanwhile the pitch motion of each model shown
at Figure 5 yields the highest RAO at wave frequency
2.0 rad/s, 2.7 rad/s and 2.3 rad/s for circular,
hexagonal and rectangular respectively.
3.2 Fish Cage Response on Regular Wave
Having accomplished analysis of the motions in
regular waves, the next stage is directed towards the
examination of floating fish cage motions in irregular
waves. In this regards the fish cage motions is
estimated by performing the spectral analysis using
the JONSWAP spectrum as shown in Figure 5. The
peak curve occurs at wave frequency, w = 0.95 rad/s.
The spectrum is derived for the wave height, H from
1.00 to 10.10 m. Results of the spectral analysis of
each model presented in Figure 6 to Figure 11, then
the stochastic analysis yields significant response and
compared to each other as given in Figure 12 and
Figure 13 for heave and pitch motion respectively.
Dynamic Response of Circular, Hexagonal and Rectangular Shaped Floating Fish Cage in Waves
23
Figure 5: JONSWAP wave spectrum from H = 1.00 to
10.00 m.
3.2.1 Circular Shaped
Based on Figure 6 and Figure 7, the density of circular
floating cage responses of heave and pitch has several
peaks, first at w = 0.90 rad/s that is caused by the
superposition of first resonance of motion and by
wave excitation. Then at w = 1.30 rad/s and w = 1.90
rad/s are caused by the superposition with second and
third resonance of motion.
3.2.2 Hexagonal Shaped
According to the Figure 8 and Figure 9, the peak
spectra response of heave motion found at w = 0.95
and 1.50 rad/s, while in pitch motion found at w =
0.90 and 1.50 rad/s, The first peak is generated from
wave excitation for heave, and superposition of both
motion and wave excitation for pitch.
3.2.3 Rectangular Shaped
Observing to the Figure 10 11, the density of
rectangular floating cage responses of heave motion,
has several peaks at w = 0.90, 1.30, 1.70 and 2.30
rad/s. The first peak is affected by wave excitation
while the second, third and forth peak are generatef
from resonance of heave motion. The peak of pitch
responce located at w = 0.90, 1.70 and 2.30 rad/s, the
first peak is generated from superposition of wave
excitation and motion, while the other two is
influenced by its motion.
3.2.4 Significant Responses Comparison
The stochastic number i.e. significant responses can
be derived from the computation of spectral response
accomplished before by identifying the variant of data
analysis. Significant responses of each motion are
shown at Figure 12 and Figure 13. According to the
graphs, the responses of floating cylinder on irregular
wave with the circular shaped has the largest
amplitude than the hexagonal and rectangular shaped
in vertical motion. The following condition is
emerged in accordance of viscous damping of each
geometry. The circular model has a smallest viscous
damping than hexagonal and rectangular model. Thus
the response of circular shaped yields larger than
other model.
The difference of heave responses of circular
shaped yields 1.26 times larger than hexagonal, and
1.71 times larger than rectangular shaped. While in
pitch, the circular responce significantly escalated 2.1
times larger than hexagonal and 2.34 times larger than
rectangular. The pitch response between hexagonal
and rectangular shaped remain the same.
Figure 6: Spectra response of heave : circular shaped fish
cage.
Figure 7: Spectra response of pitch : circular shaped fish
cage.
SENTA 2018 - The 3rd International Conference on Marine Technology
24
Figure 8: Spectra response of heave : hexagonal shaped fish
cage.
Figure 9: Spectra response of pitch : hexagonal shaped fish
cage.
Figure 10: Spectra response of heave : rectangular shaped
fish cage.
Figure 11: Spectra response of pitch : rectangular shaped
fish cage.
Figure 12: Significant response of heave on irregular
waves, Hs = 1.0 to 10 m.
Figure 13: Significant amplitude of pitch on irregular
waves, Hs = 1.0 to 10 m.
Dynamic Response of Circular, Hexagonal and Rectangular Shaped Floating Fish Cage in Waves
25
4 CONCLUSIONS
A numerical simulation has been performed to
investigate the responses of floating fish cage in
circular, hexagonal and rectangular/square shaped.
The simulation conducted in both regular and
irregular waves. This analysis yields some
conclusions as follows:
The motion characteristic on regular wave of
circular shaped has the peak RAO curve in the
wave frequency appear in accordance to the peak
of irregular wave frequency. The following
condition will generate a resonance.
The responses of circular model on irregular wave
has the largest amplitude than the hexagonal and
rectangular shaped in vertical motion. The
following condition is emerged in accordance of
viscous damping of each geometry. The circular
model has a smallest viscous damping than
hexagonal and rectangular model. Thus the
response of circular shaped yields larger than
other model.
The difference of heave responses of circular
shaped yields 1.26 times larger than hexagonal, and
1.71 times larger than rectangular shaped. While in
pitch, the circular responce significantly escalated 2.1
times larger than hexagonal and 2.34 times larger than
rectangular. The pitch response between hexagonal
and rectangular shaped remain the same.
REFERENCES
Djatmiko, E. B., 2012. Perilaku dan Operabilitas
Bangunan Laut di Atas Gelombang Acak. ITS Press,
Surabaya.
DNV, 2010. Global Performance Analysis of Deepwater
Floating Structures. DNV-RP-F205 ed. Norway: s.n.
Endersen, P. C., 2011. Vertical Wave Loads and Response
of a Floating Fish Farm. Master Thesis ed. NTNU,
Norway.
Shen, Y. & Faltinsen, O. M., 2018. Numerical and
Experiment investigations on mooring loads of a
marine fish farm in waves and current. Journal of Fluid
and Structures, Volume 79, pp. 115-136.
Xu, T. -J. et al., 2012. Analysis of hydrodynamic
behaviours of gravity net cage in regular waves. Ocean
Engineering, Volume 38, pp. 1545-1554.
SENTA 2018 - The 3rd International Conference on Marine Technology
26