Effect of CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending)
Learning Models on Student’s Mathematical Connections Ability
Devya Permata Sari and Kadir
Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Learning Model CORE, Student Mathematical Connection Ability
Abstract: This research is based on the ability of high school students' math connection. The purpose of this research is
to analyze the influence of CORE learning model on students' mathematical connection ability. This research
was conducted at senior high school 87 Jakarta school year 2013/2014. The method used in this research is
quasi experimental method with research design Randomized Subjects Post-test Only Control Group Design,
which involves 79 students as sample by using cluster random sampling technique. Data collection after
treatment was done by using the students' mathematical connection ability test. The results revealed that the
mathematical connection ability of students taught by CORE learning model is higher than the students taught
by conventional learning model, with the indicator of mathematical connection ability used are: a) linking
mathematics between one topic with another mathematical topic; b) linking mathematical concepts with other
disciplines; c) associate mathematical concepts with real life. The conclusion of this research is that
mathematics learning on trigonometric subject by using CORE learning model has significant effect on
students' mathematical connection ability compared to using conventional learning model.
1 INTRODUCTION
Mathematics is a science that deals with ideas,
structured structures that are arranged according to
logical rules (Ekana, 2011). Mathematics is taught
from students entering elementary to university,
because mathematics is one of the most important
branches of science. According to Van de Walle, the
mathematical competencies students need to have
include problem solving ability, argumentation
ability, communication ability, connections ability,
and representation ability (Van de Walle, 2010). The
general lesson of mathematics, formulated by the
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics or
NCTM, requires students to study mathematics
through understanding and actively building new
knowledge from prior experience and knowledge
(Ekana, 2011). For the student to experience the
benefits of mathematics, he must attain a deep and
meaningful understanding of mathematics by
connecting several mathematical ideas. Research Tout
indicates that students learn best when they make
connections with ideas and transfer these ideas into
long term memory (Corovic, 2017). The ability of
mathematical connections is the ability of students to
demonstrate internal and external relationships of
mathematics, which include connections between
mathematical topics, connections with other
disciplines, and connections with daily life so that
students can connect between mathematical concepts,
students can be more successful in learning
mathematics because with students can link between
mathematical concepts the ability of any
understanding can increase. According to NCTM, in
grades 9-12, students, (Baki et al., 2009)
should be able to use their knowledge of data
analysis and mathematical modeling to understand
societal issues and workplace problems in
reasonable depth;
should be confidently using mathematics to
explain complex applications in the outside world;
not only learn to expect connections but they learn
to take advantage of them, using insights gained in
one context to solve problems in another.
According to Hirdjan, "mathematics is not taught
separately between topics. Each topic can be involved
or involved with other topics ", so students'
understanding of a topic will help to understand other
topics, but this can happen if students are able to
connect the topics (Puspitasari, 2011).
Mathematics learning activities in schools, which
occur so far is to use conventional learning model.
Sari, D. and Kadir, .
Effect of CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) Learning Models on Student’s Mathematical Connections Ability.
DOI: 10.5220/0008524104870490
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Islam (ICMIs 2018), pages 487-490
ISBN: 978-989-758-407-7
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
487
One-way learning, the teacher as the center of learning
with the delivery of materials using lecture methods.
This condition causes learners resulting from school
education lack the ability of understanding caused by
the lack of achievement of mathematical connection
ability. An educator who teaches mathematics can
stimulate or cultivate students' mathematical
connection skills using an effective learning model
and emphasize the process of linking between old
concepts and new concepts.
Based on data from the 2011 Trends in
Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 study
for grade VIII students, putting Indonesian students in
38th out of 42 countries with an average score for
general mathematics ability is 386. Indonesia scored
11 points from the assessment of 2007. The value is
still far from the minimum standard score of average
mathematics ability set by TIMSS that is 500. In the
TIMSS mathematics class VIII, the first rank achieved
by Korean students (613), followed by Singapore.
This shows that the low mathematics learning
achievement (Lince, 2012).
Ruspiani also revealed that the average value of
high school students' mathematical connection ability
is still low, the average score is less than 600 at a score
of 100, which is about 22.2% for mathematical
connections with other subjects, 44.9% for
mathematical connections with other fields of study,
and 67.3% for math connection with daily life
(Lestari, 2011).
Learning model used by educator or teacher in
improving or growing the ability of connection of
mathematics that is by using cooperative learning
model. According to Slavin, cooperative learning
encourages students to interact actively and positively
in groups (Rusman, 2012). A cooperative learning
model that can improve the ability of mathematical
connections is the CORE learning model (Connecting,
Organizing, Reflecting, Extending). CORE learning
model is a discussion model that includes four
processes, namely: (1) connecting, connect language
means come or bring together, meaning students
connect between old concepts with new concepts, (2)
organizing, organize language means arrange in a
system (3) reflecting, reflect language means think
deeply about something and express, meaning
students think deeply about the concepts they are
learning, (4) extending, extending language means
make longer and larger, meaning that through
discussion can help students expand their knowledge
(Yuniarti, 2013). In mathematics learning connecting
old concepts with new concepts is one of the most
important elements, therefore a good connection is
needed in connecting that knowledge.
This research is done with problem formulation:
(1) how mathematical connection ability between
students who follow mathematical learning by using
CORE conventional learning model, (2) is there any
influence of CORE model on students' mathematical
connection ability.
2 RESEARCH METHODS
This research was conducted at senior high school 87
Jakarta, located in Jalan Awareness Ulujami Raya
Pesanggrahan South Jakarta. The sample in this
research is 39 students of the third eleventh grade
science and 40 students of the second eleventh grade
science. The research method used is quasi
experimental method. The sample groups were
divided into two groups, namely the experimental
group and the control group. The research design used
was two groups of randomized subject posttest only.
The test instrument used in this research is the test
instrument of mathematical connection of students in
the form of a description test of 9 questions. The tests
were administered in post-test to experimental groups
and control groups on trigonometric subjects.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Differences in the value of students' mathematical
connection ability between the experimental group
and the control group can be seen in the following
table.
Table 1: Comparison of Test Results of Student
Mathematics Connection.
Statistics
Class
Experiments
Control
N
39
40
Xmax
81
71
Xmin
38
24
62.00
48.90
S
2
177.95
168.66
S
13.34
12.99
In Table 1 the value of the mathematical
connection ability of the experimental group is better
than the control group. The ability of the connections
studied is to connect the concept of trigonometry with
other mathematical topics, connecting the concept of
trigonometry with other disciplines (physics),
connecting the concept of trigonometry with everyday
life.
ICMIs 2018 - International Conference on Mathematics and Islam
488
Judging from the connection capability indicator,
the connection ability score in the experimental group
and the control group based on each indicator is
presented in the following table.
Table 2: Percentage of Mathematical Connection Ability of
Students of Experiment Group and Control Group Based on
Mathematical Connection Indicators.
No
Indicators
Scor
es
Max
Experiment
%
%
1
Connects
the
concept
of
trigonome
try with
other
mathemat
ical topics
28
15.6
9
56.0
4
13.00
46.43
2
Connects
the
concept
of
trigonome
try with
other
discipline
s
8
6.26
78.2
5
3.03
37.81
3
Connects
the
concept
of
trigonome
try with
everyday
life
6
3.64
60.6
7
4.13
68.75
50
25.5
9
51.1
8
21.91
43.82
Table 2 shows that in the experimental group,
students who can connect trigonometry with other
mathematical topics are 56.04%, connecting
trigonometric concepts with other disciplines
(physics) as much as 78.25%, connecting
trigonometric concepts with daily life of 60.67%.
While in the control group, students who can connect
the concept of trigonometry with other mathematical
topics as much as 46.43%, connecting the concept of
trigonometry with other disciplines (physics) as much
as 37.81%, connecting the concept of trigonometry
with daily life as much as 68.75 %. Overall the
mathematical connection ability of the experimental
group was higher than the control group, with the
difference of 9.61%, 40.44%, 8.08% respectively.
Based on the hypothesis testing done shows that
the student’s ability of mathematical connection by
using conventional learning strategies. To test it the
hypothesis as follows.
and

.
Meanwhile the result of the calculations shows
that t
obs
>t
table
(4.32 > 1.66). Thus, H
0
reject, in other
words the average of mathematical connections ability
in the experimental group is higher than the control
group. In summary, the result of the t-test can be seen
in the following table.
Table 3: Hypothesis Test Results with T-Test.
Groups
N
S
t
obs
t
table
Conclusion
Experimental
39
62.00
13.34
4.32
1.66
Reject H
0
Control
40
48.90
12.99
In Table 3 the CORE learning model affects the
student’s mathematical connection ability. This is in
line with the research conducted Santi Yuniarti
(Yuniarti, 2013) which states that contextual-based
learning model CORE can improve student’s
mathematical understanding ability. Ellisia’s research
also states that the learning model CORE can improve
student’s mathematical problem-solving abilities
(Kumalasari, 2011).
The learning model CORE can make students
actively building new ideas based on the knowledge
they have in the past or present. In line with the above
statement Calfee, et al suggests that the learning
model CORE is a learning model that expects students
to be able to build their own knowledge by connecting
and organizing new knowledge with old knowledge
then thinking about the concept being studied and
expected students can expand their knowledge during
the learning process takes place (Kumalasari, 2011).
Here is an answer to the number 5 with indicators
Connects the concept of trigonometry with everyday
life on the experimental and control learner with the
following question: "An object glides on a flat surface
with v = 4 m/s and then the object rises on an incline
with a 30
o
slope. If there is no friction between the
object and the glide, then the length of the object's path
on the incline is ..."
(A) (B)
Figure 1: Answer post-test from experiment and control
group.
Effect of CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) Learning Models on Student’s Mathematical Connections Ability
489
Problem in Figure 1 is used to quantify indicator
to connect trigonometric concepts with other
disciplines (physics). Figure 1 (A) is the student's
answer to the control group. The student's answer is
not correct. Students less able to connect the concept
of trigonometry with other disciplinary science and
less mastering the material of mechanical energy.
Figure 1 (B) is the student's answer to the
experimental group. In the student's answer, students
can see the concept of trigonometry with other
discipline science in mechanical energy material
properly and correctly. Indicator connects
trigonometric concepts with other discipline
disciplines has a total score of 8, the students in the
experimental group have an average of 6.26, while the
average value in the control group is smaller at 3.03.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The achievement of the mean value of mathematical
connection indicator of students whose learning
process using CORE learning model from the highest
is 1) Connecting the concept of trigonometry with
other mathematical topics, 2) Connecting the concept
of trigonometry with other disciplines, 3) Connecting
the concept of trigonometry with life daily. The
achievement of the average value of mathematical
connection indicator of the students whose learning
process using conventional learning model from the
highest is 1) Connecting the concept of trigonometry
with other mathematical topics, 2) Connecting the
concept of trigonometry with daily life, 3) Connecting
the concept of trigonometry with the field other
disciplines. Mathematical connection ability of
students using CORE learning is higher than students'
mathematical connection ability taught using
conventional learning with expository method. This
can be seen from the average ability of students'
mathematical connections taught using CORE
learning for 62.00 while the average mathematical
connection ability of students taught using
conventional learning of 48.90. Thus, the CORE
learning model has more effective effect on
mathematical connection ability compared with
conventional learning model.
REFERENCES
Baki, A., Çatlıoğlu, H., Coştu, S. and Birgin, O. 2009.
Conceptions of high school students about mathematical
connections to the real-life. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), pp.1402-1407.
Corovic, E. 2017. Big Ideas in Mathematics. The Common
Denominator, Term 3. Victoria: The Mathematical
Association of Victoria.
Ekana, H. 2011. Profil Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika
Mahasiswa pada Materi Identitas Trigonometri.
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan
Pendidikan Matematika UNS. Palembang: Universitas
Negeri Sriwijaya.
Kumalasari, E. 2011. Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan
Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran
Model CORE. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan
Matematika, 1, pp.221-228.
Lestari, P. 2011. Peningkatan Kemampuan Koneksi
Matematis Siswa SMK Melalui Pendekatan
Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
Pendidikan Matematika, 1. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi.
Napitupulu, L. E. 2012. Prestasi Sains dan Matematika
Indonesia Menurun - Kompas.com. [online]
KOMPAS.com. Available at: https://edukasi.kompas.
com/read/2012/12/14/09005434/Prestasi.Sains.dan.Mat
ematika.Indonesia.Menurun.%2014%20Desember%20
2012 [Accessed 14 Des. 2012].
Puspitasari, N. 2011. Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah
dengan Srategi Koopertif Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Sekolah
Menengah Pertama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
Pendidikan Matematika, 1, pp.107-114. Bandung:
STKIP Siliwangi.
Rusman. 2012. Model-model Pembelajaran. Edisi 2.
Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Van de Walle, J. 2010. Elementary and Middle School
Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally Seven Edition.
Boston: Pearson.
Yuniarti, S. 2013. Pengaruh Model CORE Berbasis
Konstektual terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman
Matematika Siswa. Jurnal. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi.
ICMIs 2018 - International Conference on Mathematics and Islam
490